ANGLICAN.INK Home - Anglican Ink © 2019


anglican.ink website information.

anglican.ink domain name is registered by .INK top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .INK domain zone.

Following name servers are specified for anglican.ink domain:

  • ns1032.ui-dns.org
  • ns1077.ui-dns.biz
  • ns1026.ui-dns.com
  • ns1061.ui-dns.de

and probably website anglican.ink is hosted by FASTLY - Fastly, US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by FASTLY - Fastly, US hosting company.

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website anglican.ink position was 89301 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 998549. Now website anglican.ink ranked in Alexa database as number 198218 (in the world).

Website anglican.ink Desktop speed measurement score (68/100) is better than the results of 47.59% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

anglican.ink Mobile usability score (96/100) is better than the results of 46.59% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed measurement score of anglican.ink (52/100) is better than the results of 37.6% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
Nov-19-2024 198,218-3,011
Nov-18-2024 195,207-1,435
Nov-17-2024 193,7722,955
Nov-16-2024 196,7271,476
Nov-15-2024 198,203-1,135
Nov-14-2024 197,068-8,451
Nov-13-2024 188,6170

Advertisement

anglican.ink Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.



anglican.ink whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.


The queried object does not exist: previous registration D7098190-CNIC was purged on 2021-05-02T01:12:34.0Z (DOMAIN NOT FOUND)

>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2022-04-28T21:04:14.0Z > IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE DEPLOYMENT OF RDAP: please visit
https://www.centralnic.com/support/rdap

anglican.ink server information

Servers Location

IP Address
47.21.227.66
Region
New York
City
Hicksville

anglican.ink desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2019-02-01


Desktop Speed Medium
68/100

anglican.ink Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 30 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 296KiB (71% reduction).

Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/themes/Newspaper/js…theme.min.js?ver=9.2.1 could save 163.2KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4 could save 61.9KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/user-submit…ey.min.js?ver=20181117 could save 29.9KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/td-cloud-li…b3d9be0b6e25d187d8bc1a could save 7.6KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-includes/js/wp-emoji-release.min.js?ver=5.0.3 could save 7.5KiB (63% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1 could save 5.9KiB (60% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/td-newsletter/style.css?ver=9.2.1 could save 4.7KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/uk-cookie-c…ss/style.css?ver=5.0.3 could save 3.5KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/user-submit…p.core.js?ver=20181117 could save 3.2KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/user-submit…s/usp.css?ver=20181117 could save 1.9KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/user-submit…cookie.js?ver=20181117 could save 1.7KiB (56% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/themes/Newspaper/in…mo_style.css?ver=9.2.1 could save 1.6KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/bj-lazy-loa…lazy-load.min.js?ver=2 could save 953B (58% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/uk-cookie-c…onsent-js.js?ver=2.3.0 could save 917B (58% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=5.0.3 could save 650B (47% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-includes/js/comment-reply.min.js?ver=5.0.3 could save 489B (46% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/disqus-comm…nt_count.js?ver=3.0.16 could save 449B (50% reduction).

priority - 10 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 1 blocking script resources and 9 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://anglican.ink/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://anglican.ink/wp-includes/css/dist/block-lib…tyle.min.css?ver=5.0.3
http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/uk-cookie-c…ss/style.css?ver=5.0.3
http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/user-submit…s/usp.css?ver=20181117
http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/td-newsletter/style.css?ver=9.2.1
http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/td-composer…de3d1bd90677504fc739fc
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Montserrat%…%2C700%2C900&ver=9.2.1
http://anglican.ink/wp-content/themes/Newspaper/style.css?ver=9.2.1
http://anglican.ink/wp-content/themes/Newspaper/in…mo_style.css?ver=9.2.1
http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/td-cloud-li…b3d9be0b6e25d187d8bc1a

priority - 2 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 20.1KiB (16% reduction).

Minifying http://anglican.ink/wp-content/themes/Newspaper/style.css?ver=9.2.1 could save 18.4KiB (16% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://anglican.ink/wp-content/themes/Newspaper/in…mo_style.css?ver=9.2.1 could save 688B (30% reduction).
Minifying http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/uk-cookie-c…ss/style.css?ver=5.0.3 could save 616B (14% reduction).
Minifying http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/user-submit…s/usp.css?ver=20181117 could save 412B (16% reduction).

priority - 2 Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 20% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.
Click to see the screenshot with only the HTML response:

priority - 1 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/?s=80&d=mm&r=g (5 minutes)
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?ver=20181117 (5 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 0 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 3.5KiB (14% reduction).

Minifying http://anglican.ink/ could save 3.5KiB (14% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 3.2KiB (38% reduction).

Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/log…ader@2xa-2096x98-1.png could save 2.4KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/?s=80&d=mm&r=g could save 800B (60% reduction).

priority - 0 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 2.7KiB (27% reduction).

Minifying http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/user-submit…cookie.js?ver=20181117 could save 1.3KiB (43% reduction).
Minifying http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/user-submit…p.core.js?ver=20181117 could save 923B (20% reduction).
Minifying http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/uk-cookie-c…onsent-js.js?ver=2.3.0 could save 312B (20% reduction).
Minifying http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/disqus-comm…nt_count.js?ver=3.0.16 could save 184B (21% reduction).

anglican.ink Desktop Resources

Total Resources51
Number of Hosts11
Static Resources35
JavaScript Resources18
CSS Resources9

anglican.ink Desktop Resource Breakdown

anglican.ink mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2019-02-01


Mobile Speed Bad
52/100

anglican.ink Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 40 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 1 blocking script resources and 9 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://anglican.ink/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://anglican.ink/wp-includes/css/dist/block-lib…tyle.min.css?ver=5.0.3
http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/uk-cookie-c…ss/style.css?ver=5.0.3
http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/user-submit…s/usp.css?ver=20181117
http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/td-newsletter/style.css?ver=9.2.1
http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/td-composer…de3d1bd90677504fc739fc
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Montserrat%…%2C700%2C900&ver=9.2.1
http://anglican.ink/wp-content/themes/Newspaper/style.css?ver=9.2.1
http://anglican.ink/wp-content/themes/Newspaper/in…mo_style.css?ver=9.2.1
http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/td-cloud-li…b3d9be0b6e25d187d8bc1a

priority - 30 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 296KiB (71% reduction).

Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/themes/Newspaper/js…theme.min.js?ver=9.2.1 could save 163.2KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4 could save 61.9KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/user-submit…ey.min.js?ver=20181117 could save 29.9KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/td-cloud-li…b3d9be0b6e25d187d8bc1a could save 7.6KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-includes/js/wp-emoji-release.min.js?ver=5.0.3 could save 7.5KiB (63% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1 could save 5.9KiB (60% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/td-newsletter/style.css?ver=9.2.1 could save 4.7KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/uk-cookie-c…ss/style.css?ver=5.0.3 could save 3.5KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/user-submit…p.core.js?ver=20181117 could save 3.2KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/user-submit…s/usp.css?ver=20181117 could save 1.9KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/user-submit…cookie.js?ver=20181117 could save 1.7KiB (56% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/themes/Newspaper/in…mo_style.css?ver=9.2.1 could save 1.6KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/bj-lazy-loa…lazy-load.min.js?ver=2 could save 953B (58% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/uk-cookie-c…onsent-js.js?ver=2.3.0 could save 917B (58% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=5.0.3 could save 650B (47% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-includes/js/comment-reply.min.js?ver=5.0.3 could save 489B (46% reduction).
Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/disqus-comm…nt_count.js?ver=3.0.16 could save 449B (50% reduction).

priority - 18 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 1.4 seconds.

There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 8 Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 37% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.
Click to see the screenshot with only the HTML response:

priority - 2 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/?s=160&d=mm&r=g (5 minutes)
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?ver=20181117 (5 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 2 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 20.1KiB (16% reduction).

Minifying http://anglican.ink/wp-content/themes/Newspaper/style.css?ver=9.2.1 could save 18.4KiB (16% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://anglican.ink/wp-content/themes/Newspaper/in…mo_style.css?ver=9.2.1 could save 688B (30% reduction).
Minifying http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/uk-cookie-c…ss/style.css?ver=5.0.3 could save 616B (14% reduction).
Minifying http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/user-submit…s/usp.css?ver=20181117 could save 412B (16% reduction).

priority - 0 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 3.5KiB (13% reduction).

Minifying http://anglican.ink/ could save 3.5KiB (13% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 3.1KiB (33% reduction).

Compressing http://anglican.ink/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/log…ader@2xa-2096x98-1.png could save 2.4KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/?s=160&d=mm&r=g could save 735B (32% reduction).

priority - 0 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 2.7KiB (27% reduction).

Minifying http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/user-submit…cookie.js?ver=20181117 could save 1.3KiB (43% reduction).
Minifying http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/user-submit…p.core.js?ver=20181117 could save 923B (20% reduction).
Minifying http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/uk-cookie-c…onsent-js.js?ver=2.3.0 could save 312B (20% reduction).
Minifying http://anglican.ink/wp-content/plugins/disqus-comm…nt_count.js?ver=3.0.16 could save 184B (21% reduction).

anglican.ink Mobile Resources

Total Resources48
Number of Hosts11
Static Resources34
JavaScript Resources18
CSS Resources9

anglican.ink Mobile Resource Breakdown

anglican.ink mobile page usability

Last tested: 2019-02-01


Mobile Usability Good
96/100

anglican.ink Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 3 Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <a href="http://anglica…egory/sermons/" class="td-post-category">Messages</a> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="http://anglica…-abortion-law/">Archbishop Bea…Y abortion law</a> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="http://anglica…press-release/">Press Release</a> and 2 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="http://anglica…ar-of-beliefs/">Praise for BBC…ar of Beliefs’</a> and 4 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="http://anglica…uthor/gconger/">George Conger</a> and 4 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="http://anglica…egory/ai-news/" class="td-ct-item">AI News128</a> and 11 others are close to other tap targets.

anglican.ink similar domains

Similar domains:
www.anglican.com
www.anglican.net
www.anglican.org
www.anglican.info
www.anglican.biz
www.anglican.us
www.anglican.mobi
www.nglican.ink
www.anglican.ink
www.qnglican.ink
www.aqnglican.ink
www.qanglican.ink
www.wnglican.ink
www.awnglican.ink
www.wanglican.ink
www.snglican.ink
www.asnglican.ink
www.sanglican.ink
www.znglican.ink
www.aznglican.ink
www.zanglican.ink
www.aglican.ink
www.abglican.ink
www.anbglican.ink
www.abnglican.ink
www.ahglican.ink
www.anhglican.ink
www.ahnglican.ink
www.ajglican.ink
www.anjglican.ink
www.ajnglican.ink
www.amglican.ink
www.anmglican.ink
www.amnglican.ink
www.anlican.ink
www.anflican.ink
www.angflican.ink
www.anfglican.ink
www.anvlican.ink
www.angvlican.ink
www.anvglican.ink
www.antlican.ink
www.angtlican.ink
www.antglican.ink
www.anblican.ink
www.angblican.ink
www.anylican.ink
www.angylican.ink
www.anyglican.ink
www.anhlican.ink
www.anghlican.ink
www.angican.ink
www.angpican.ink
www.anglpican.ink
www.angplican.ink
www.angoican.ink
www.angloican.ink
www.angolican.ink
www.angkican.ink
www.anglkican.ink
www.angklican.ink
www.anglcan.ink
www.anglucan.ink
www.angliucan.ink
www.angluican.ink
www.angljcan.ink
www.anglijcan.ink
www.angljican.ink
www.anglkcan.ink
www.anglikcan.ink
www.anglocan.ink
www.angliocan.ink
www.anglian.ink
www.anglixan.ink
www.anglicxan.ink
www.anglixcan.ink
www.anglidan.ink
www.anglicdan.ink
www.anglidcan.ink
www.anglifan.ink
www.anglicfan.ink
www.anglifcan.ink
www.anglivan.ink
www.anglicvan.ink
www.anglivcan.ink
www.anglicn.ink
www.anglicqn.ink
www.anglicaqn.ink
www.anglicqan.ink
www.anglicwn.ink
www.anglicawn.ink
www.anglicwan.ink
www.anglicsn.ink
www.anglicasn.ink
www.anglicsan.ink
www.angliczn.ink
www.anglicazn.ink
www.angliczan.ink
www.anglica.ink
www.anglicab.ink
www.anglicanb.ink
www.anglicabn.ink
www.anglicah.ink
www.anglicanh.ink
www.anglicahn.ink
www.anglicaj.ink
www.anglicanj.ink
www.anglicajn.ink
www.anglicam.ink
www.anglicanm.ink
www.anglicamn.ink

anglican.ink Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.


anglican.ink TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.