bioblog.com.br website information.
bioblog.com.br domain name is registered by .BR top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .BR domain zone.
No name server records were found.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website bioblog.com.br position was 6854 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 997284. Current position of bioblog.com.br in Alexa rank database is below 1 million.
Website bioblog.com.br Desktop speed measurement score (84/100) is better than the results of 78.07% of other sites and shows that the page is performing great on desktop computers.
bioblog.com.br Mobile usability score (98/100) is better than the results of 55.61% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of bioblog.com.br (70/100) is better than the results of 76.43% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Sep-27-2024 | N/A | N/A |
| Sep-26-2024 | N/A | N/A |
| Sep-25-2024 | N/A | N/A |
| Sep-24-2024 | N/A | N/A |
| Sep-23-2024 | N/A | N/A |
| Sep-22-2024 | N/A | N/A |
| Sep-21-2024 | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
bioblog.com.br Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
bioblog.com.br whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
% Copyright (c) Nic.br
% The use of the data below is only permitted as described in
% full by the Use and Privacy Policy at https://registro.br/upp ,
% being prohibited its distribution, commercialization or
% reproduction, in particular, to use it for advertising or
% any similar purpose.
% 2023-11-07T21:57:23-03:00 - IP: 167.99.102.248
% Permission denied. For more information, contact abuse@registro.br
% Security and mail abuse issues should also be addressed to
% cert.br, http://www.cert.br/ , respectivelly to cert@cert.br
% and mail-abuse@cert.br
%
% whois.registro.br accepts only direct match queries. Types
% of queries are: domain (.br), registrant (tax ID), ticket,
% provider, CIDR block, IP and ASN.
bioblog.com.br server information
Servers Location
| IP Address |
|---|
| Country |
|---|
bioblog.com.br desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-03-20
bioblog.com.br Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 8 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 2 blocking script resources and 2 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
Approximately 27% of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://tag.navdmp.com/tm48008.js
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Poppins%3A…bset=latin%2Clatin-ext
priority - 6 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.75 seconds.
There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 2 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 20.1KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing http://www.bioblog.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/…016-1200px-300x200.jpg could save 4.6KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing http://www.bioblog.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/…354-1200px-300x200.jpg could save 4.5KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing http://www.bioblog.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/…522-1200px-300x200.jpg could save 4KiB (21% reduction).
priority - 1 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://usr.navdmp.com/usr?v=9&acc=48008&new=1 (60 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 1 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 6KiB (16% reduction).
Minifying http://www.bioblog.com.br/wp-content/cache/minify/0fef6.js could save 653B (17% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.bioblog.com.br/wp-content/cache/minify/e624c.js could save 646B (17% reduction) after compression.
bioblog.com.br Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 64 |
| Number of Hosts | 17 |
| Static Resources | 47 |
| JavaScript Resources | 11 |
| CSS Resources | 2 |
bioblog.com.br Desktop Resource Breakdown
bioblog.com.br mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-03-20
bioblog.com.br Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 32 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 2 blocking script resources and 2 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
Approximately 1% of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://tag.navdmp.com/tm48008.js
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Poppins%3A…bset=latin%2Clatin-ext
priority - 7 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.65 seconds.
There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 2 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 20.2KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing http://www.bioblog.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/…016-1200px-300x200.jpg could save 4.6KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing http://www.bioblog.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/…354-1200px-300x200.jpg could save 4.5KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing http://www.bioblog.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/…522-1200px-300x200.jpg could save 4KiB (21% reduction).
priority - 2 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://usr.navdmp.com/usr?v=9&acc=48008&new=1 (60 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 1 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 6KiB (16% reduction).
Minifying http://www.bioblog.com.br/wp-content/cache/minify/0fef6.js could save 653B (17% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.bioblog.com.br/wp-content/cache/minify/e624c.js could save 646B (17% reduction) after compression.
bioblog.com.br Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 63 |
| Number of Hosts | 16 |
| Static Resources | 48 |
| JavaScript Resources | 11 |
| CSS Resources | 2 |
bioblog.com.br Mobile Resource Breakdown
bioblog.com.br mobile page usability
Last tested: 2019-03-20
bioblog.com.br Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 1 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<a href="#site-navigation" class="skip-link screen-reader-text">Skip to navigation</a> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.<button type="button" class="slick-prev sli…av slick-arrow"></button> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="http://www.bio…tentabilidade/">Sustentabilidade</a> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="http://www.bio…var-o-planeta/">Onze maneiras…lvar o planeta</a> and 4 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="http://www.bio…var-o-planeta/">15/05/2018 17/05/2018</a> and 4 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<li id="slick-slide10" class="slick-active">1</li> and 7 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<button type="button">1</button> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<button type="button">2</button> and 6 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="http://www.bio…urais/#respond" class="Comentários fechados">0</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="//instagram.com/novozymes/" class="">Novozymes</a> is close to 2 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="//instagram.com/novozymes/" class="">Novozymes</a> is close to 4 other tap targets.bioblog.com.br similar domains
www.bioblog.net
www.bioblog.org
www.bioblog.info
www.bioblog.biz
www.bioblog.us
www.bioblog.mobi
www.ioblog.com.br
www.bioblog.com.br
www.vioblog.com.br
www.bvioblog.com.br
www.vbioblog.com.br
www.gioblog.com.br
www.bgioblog.com.br
www.gbioblog.com.br
www.hioblog.com.br
www.bhioblog.com.br
www.hbioblog.com.br
www.nioblog.com.br
www.bnioblog.com.br
www.nbioblog.com.br
www.boblog.com.br
www.buoblog.com.br
www.biuoblog.com.br
www.buioblog.com.br
www.bjoblog.com.br
www.bijoblog.com.br
www.bjioblog.com.br
www.bkoblog.com.br
www.bikoblog.com.br
www.bkioblog.com.br
www.booblog.com.br
www.biooblog.com.br
www.boioblog.com.br
www.biblog.com.br
www.biiblog.com.br
www.bioiblog.com.br
www.biioblog.com.br
www.bikblog.com.br
www.biokblog.com.br
www.bilblog.com.br
www.biolblog.com.br
www.biloblog.com.br
www.bipblog.com.br
www.biopblog.com.br
www.bipoblog.com.br
www.biolog.com.br
www.biovlog.com.br
www.biobvlog.com.br
www.biovblog.com.br
www.bioglog.com.br
www.biobglog.com.br
www.biogblog.com.br
www.biohlog.com.br
www.biobhlog.com.br
www.biohblog.com.br
www.bionlog.com.br
www.biobnlog.com.br
www.bionblog.com.br
www.biobog.com.br
www.biobpog.com.br
www.bioblpog.com.br
www.biobplog.com.br
www.bioboog.com.br
www.biobloog.com.br
www.biobolog.com.br
www.biobkog.com.br
www.bioblkog.com.br
www.biobklog.com.br
www.bioblg.com.br
www.bioblig.com.br
www.biobloig.com.br
www.biobliog.com.br
www.bioblkg.com.br
www.bioblokg.com.br
www.biobllg.com.br
www.bioblolg.com.br
www.biobllog.com.br
www.bioblpg.com.br
www.bioblopg.com.br
www.bioblo.com.br
www.bioblof.com.br
www.bioblogf.com.br
www.bioblofg.com.br
www.bioblov.com.br
www.bioblogv.com.br
www.bioblovg.com.br
www.bioblot.com.br
www.bioblogt.com.br
www.bioblotg.com.br
www.bioblob.com.br
www.bioblogb.com.br
www.bioblobg.com.br
www.biobloy.com.br
www.bioblogy.com.br
www.biobloyg.com.br
www.biobloh.com.br
www.bioblogh.com.br
www.bioblohg.com.br
bioblog.com.br Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
bioblog.com.br TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.