bjs.com website information.
bjs.com domain name is registered by .COM top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .COM domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for bjs.com domain:
- chartis.naii.net
- onoma.naii.net
- diorizo.naii.net
- metafrazo.naii.net
and probably website bjs.com is hosted by CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website bjs.com position was 12728 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 18691. Now website bjs.com ranked in Alexa database as number 17450 (in the world).
Website bjs.com Desktop speed measurement score (49/100) is better than the results of 22.8% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
bjs.com Mobile usability score (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of bjs.com (53/100) is better than the results of 39.51% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Nov-16-2024 | 17,450 | -15 |
| Nov-15-2024 | 17,435 | -6 |
| Nov-14-2024 | 17,429 | 58 |
| Nov-13-2024 | 17,487 | 0 |
| Nov-12-2024 | 17,487 | 0 |
| Nov-11-2024 | 17,487 | 0 |
| Nov-10-2024 | 17,487 | -268 |
Advertisement
bjs.com Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
bjs.com whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
Domain Name: BJS.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1101521_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.brandsight.com
Registrar URL: http://gcd.com
Updated Date: 2023-09-18T15:11:24Z
Creation Date: 1997-04-12T04:00:00Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2026-02-21T04:59:59Z
Registrar: GoDaddy Corporate Domains, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 3786
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@gcd.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.5189669187
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: A1-71.AKAM.NET
Name Server: A12-65.AKAM.NET
Name Server: A13-67.AKAM.NET
Name Server: A14-67.AKAM.NET
Name Server: A16-67.AKAM.NET
Name Server: A7-64.AKAM.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2024-09-10T20:20:02Z
bjs.com server information
bjs.com desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-12-01
Desktop Speed
Bad
49/100
bjs.com Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 96 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 935KiB (59% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img36108_580x290.jpg could save 145.8KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33898_580x290.jpg could save 81.7KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img36103_2280x800.jpg could save 70.2KiB (60% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img36107_580x290.jpg could save 65.3KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing http://dnisjsqid2b9p.cloudfront.net/ClientPaths/bjs/bjs_img_set.png could save 53.4KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…978&recipeName=400x400 could save 51.9KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33726_580x290.jpg could save 38KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…611&recipeName=400x400 could save 37.5KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…891&recipeName=400x400 could save 35.5KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…069&recipeName=400x400 could save 35KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…663&recipeName=400x400 could save 32.3KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…757&recipeName=400x400 could save 30.5KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…918&recipeName=400x400 could save 27KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33727_580x290.jpg could save 19.7KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…167&recipeName=400x400 could save 19.2KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…004&recipeName=400x400 could save 19.1KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33728_580x290.jpg could save 18.8KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…516&recipeName=400x400 could save 17.5KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…898&recipeName=400x400 could save 16.8KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…196&recipeName=400x400 could save 16.7KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…120&recipeName=400x400 could save 16.3KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…095&recipeName=400x400 could save 14.5KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…628&recipeName=400x400 could save 9.2KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…875&recipeName=160x160 could save 3.5KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…865&recipeName=160x160 could save 3.3KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…494&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.9KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…191&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.9KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…668&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.8KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…908&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.7KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…931&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.3KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…734&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.2KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…842&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.9KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…865&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.8KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…386&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…777&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…907&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…367&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…508&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…990&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…965&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.5KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…071&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.5KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…574&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.5KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…695&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…387&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…974&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…955&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…145&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…294&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.3KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…016&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…553&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.1KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…720&recipeName=160x160 could save 1KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…413&recipeName=160x160 could save 1KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…420&recipeName=160x160 could save 1KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…354&recipeName=160x160 could save 1KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…299&recipeName=160x160 could save 969B (31% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…230&recipeName=160x160 could save 968B (20% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…671&recipeName=160x160 could save 944B (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…532&recipeName=160x160 could save 894B (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…816&recipeName=160x160 could save 876B (14% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…988&recipeName=160x160 could save 844B (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…343&recipeName=160x160 could save 823B (14% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…968&recipeName=160x160 could save 805B (34% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…250&recipeName=160x160 could save 800B (24% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33898_580x290.jpg could save 81.7KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img36103_2280x800.jpg could save 70.2KiB (60% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img36107_580x290.jpg could save 65.3KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing http://dnisjsqid2b9p.cloudfront.net/ClientPaths/bjs/bjs_img_set.png could save 53.4KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…978&recipeName=400x400 could save 51.9KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33726_580x290.jpg could save 38KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…611&recipeName=400x400 could save 37.5KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…891&recipeName=400x400 could save 35.5KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…069&recipeName=400x400 could save 35KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…663&recipeName=400x400 could save 32.3KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…757&recipeName=400x400 could save 30.5KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…918&recipeName=400x400 could save 27KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33727_580x290.jpg could save 19.7KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…167&recipeName=400x400 could save 19.2KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…004&recipeName=400x400 could save 19.1KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33728_580x290.jpg could save 18.8KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…516&recipeName=400x400 could save 17.5KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…898&recipeName=400x400 could save 16.8KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…196&recipeName=400x400 could save 16.7KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…120&recipeName=400x400 could save 16.3KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…095&recipeName=400x400 could save 14.5KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…628&recipeName=400x400 could save 9.2KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…875&recipeName=160x160 could save 3.5KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…865&recipeName=160x160 could save 3.3KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…494&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.9KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…191&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.9KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…668&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.8KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…908&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.7KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…931&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.3KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…734&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.2KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…842&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.9KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…865&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.8KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…386&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…777&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…907&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…367&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…508&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…990&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…965&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.5KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…071&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.5KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…574&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.5KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…695&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…387&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…974&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…955&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…145&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…294&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.3KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…016&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…553&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.1KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…720&recipeName=160x160 could save 1KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…413&recipeName=160x160 could save 1KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…420&recipeName=160x160 could save 1KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…354&recipeName=160x160 could save 1KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…299&recipeName=160x160 could save 969B (31% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…230&recipeName=160x160 could save 968B (20% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…671&recipeName=160x160 could save 944B (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…532&recipeName=160x160 could save 894B (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…816&recipeName=160x160 could save 876B (14% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…988&recipeName=160x160 could save 844B (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…343&recipeName=160x160 could save 823B (14% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…968&recipeName=160x160 could save 805B (34% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…250&recipeName=160x160 could save 800B (24% reduction).
priority - 10 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 9 blocking script resources and 2 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/tm/prod.js
http://www.hlserve.com/Delivery/ClientPaths/Library/hook.js?cid=507
http://mathid.mathtag.com/d/i.js
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/site.es6.js
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/analytic-events.js
http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/handlebars.j…dlebars.runtime.min.js
http://edge1.certona.net/cd/da8dbc7c/bjs.com/scripts/resonance.js
http://libs.coremetrics.com/eluminate.js
http://www.bjs.com/wcsstore/BJs/javascript/coremetrics/cmcustom.js
http://www.hlserve.com/Delivery/ClientPaths/Library/hook.js?cid=507
http://mathid.mathtag.com/d/i.js
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/site.es6.js
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/analytic-events.js
http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/handlebars.j…dlebars.runtime.min.js
http://edge1.certona.net/cd/da8dbc7c/bjs.com/scripts/resonance.js
http://libs.coremetrics.com/eluminate.js
http://www.bjs.com/wcsstore/BJs/javascript/coremetrics/cmcustom.js
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto:400,400i,500,700
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/www.bjs.com.css
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/www.bjs.com.css
priority - 7 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://dnisjsqid2b9p.cloudfront.net/ClientPaths/bjs/bjs_img_set.png (expiration not specified)
http://edge1.certona.net/cd/da8dbc7c/bjs.com/scripts/resonance.js (expiration not specified)
http://libs.coremetrics.com/configs/90393428.js (expiration not specified)
http://libs.coremetrics.com/eluminate.js (expiration not specified)
http://tmscdn.coremetrics.com/tms/dispatcher-v3.js (expiration not specified)
https://libs.coremetrics.com/ddxlibs/json-min.js (expiration not specified)
https://libs.coremetrics.com/ddxlibs/yahoo-min.js (expiration not specified)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/cms/4.json (5 minutes)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/tm/prod.js (10 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/1125318400890312?v=2.8.1 (20 minutes)
http://mathid.mathtag.com/d/i.js (60 minutes)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/scripts/BrandCMS/v3.x/bbbcms.min.js (60 minutes)
http://cdn.inspectlet.com/inspectlet.js?wid=1980915118&r=420051 (4 hours)
http://d2oh4tlt9mrke9.cloudfront.net/Record/js/sessioncam.recorder.js (4 hours)
http://edge1.certona.net/cd/da8dbc7c/bjs.com/scripts/resonance.js (expiration not specified)
http://libs.coremetrics.com/configs/90393428.js (expiration not specified)
http://libs.coremetrics.com/eluminate.js (expiration not specified)
http://tmscdn.coremetrics.com/tms/dispatcher-v3.js (expiration not specified)
https://libs.coremetrics.com/ddxlibs/json-min.js (expiration not specified)
https://libs.coremetrics.com/ddxlibs/yahoo-min.js (expiration not specified)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/cms/4.json (5 minutes)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/tm/prod.js (10 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/1125318400890312?v=2.8.1 (20 minutes)
http://mathid.mathtag.com/d/i.js (60 minutes)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/scripts/BrandCMS/v3.x/bbbcms.min.js (60 minutes)
http://cdn.inspectlet.com/inspectlet.js?wid=1980915118&r=420051 (4 hours)
http://d2oh4tlt9mrke9.cloudfront.net/Record/js/sessioncam.recorder.js (4 hours)
priority - 2 Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.
Only about 9% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.
priority - 0 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 680B (16% reduction).
Minifying http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/handlebars.j…dlebars.runtime.min.js could save 680B (16% reduction) after compression.
bjs.com Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 110 |
| Number of Hosts | 22 |
| Static Resources | 81 |
| JavaScript Resources | 25 |
| CSS Resources | 2 |
bjs.com Desktop Resource Breakdown
bjs.com mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-11-30
Mobile Speed
Bad
53/100
bjs.com Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 40 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 9 blocking script resources and 2 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/tm/prod.js
http://www.hlserve.com/Delivery/ClientPaths/Library/hook.js?cid=507
http://mathid.mathtag.com/d/i.js
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/site.es6.js
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/analytic-events.js
http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/handlebars.j…dlebars.runtime.min.js
http://edge1.certona.net/cd/da8dbc7c/bjs.com/scripts/resonance.js
http://libs.coremetrics.com/eluminate.js
http://www.bjs.com/wcsstore/BJs/javascript/coremetrics/cmcustom.js
http://www.hlserve.com/Delivery/ClientPaths/Library/hook.js?cid=507
http://mathid.mathtag.com/d/i.js
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/site.es6.js
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/analytic-events.js
http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/handlebars.j…dlebars.runtime.min.js
http://edge1.certona.net/cd/da8dbc7c/bjs.com/scripts/resonance.js
http://libs.coremetrics.com/eluminate.js
http://www.bjs.com/wcsstore/BJs/javascript/coremetrics/cmcustom.js
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto:400,400i,500,700
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/www.bjs.com.css
http://www.bjs.com/wpassets/1.0.413/www.bjs.com.css
priority - 38 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 367.4KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33898_580x290.jpg could save 66.8KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://dnisjsqid2b9p.cloudfront.net/ClientPaths/bjs/bjs_img_set.png could save 53.4KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img35496_580x290.jpg could save 22.1KiB (47% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img35495_580x290.jpg could save 17.8KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…191&recipeName=400x400 could save 17.7KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…395&recipeName=400x400 could save 17.3KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…891&recipeName=400x400 could save 15.3KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…246&recipeName=400x400 could save 12.7KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…663&recipeName=400x400 could save 10.1KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…506&recipeName=400x400 could save 10KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…866&recipeName=400x400 could save 8.1KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33726_580x290.jpg could save 6.5KiB (13% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…120&recipeName=400x400 could save 6.3KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…004&recipeName=400x400 could save 5.5KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…699&recipeName=400x400 could save 5.5KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…524&recipeName=400x400 could save 5.5KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33727_580x290.jpg could save 5.4KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33728_580x290.jpg could save 4.8KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…937&recipeName=400x400 could save 4.8KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…639&recipeName=400x400 could save 4.7KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…771&recipeName=400x400 could save 3.6KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…628&recipeName=400x400 could save 3KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…494&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.9KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…191&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.9KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…668&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.8KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…908&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.7KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…640&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.7KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…218&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.5KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…734&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.2KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…842&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.9KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…628&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.9KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…672&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.7KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…386&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…777&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…907&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…367&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…508&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…335&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…965&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.5KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…695&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…387&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…974&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…955&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…145&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…925&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.3KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…630&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.3KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…603&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.2KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…016&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…890&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.2KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…553&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.1KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…620&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.1KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…720&recipeName=160x160 could save 1KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…299&recipeName=160x160 could save 969B (31% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…230&recipeName=160x160 could save 968B (20% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…671&recipeName=160x160 could save 944B (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…532&recipeName=160x160 could save 894B (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…816&recipeName=160x160 could save 876B (14% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…508&recipeName=160x160 could save 862B (25% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…833&recipeName=160x160 could save 838B (17% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…343&recipeName=160x160 could save 823B (14% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…250&recipeName=160x160 could save 800B (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…914&recipeName=160x160 could save 782B (19% reduction).
Compressing http://dnisjsqid2b9p.cloudfront.net/ClientPaths/bjs/bjs_img_set.png could save 53.4KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img35496_580x290.jpg could save 22.1KiB (47% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img35495_580x290.jpg could save 17.8KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…191&recipeName=400x400 could save 17.7KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…395&recipeName=400x400 could save 17.3KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…891&recipeName=400x400 could save 15.3KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…246&recipeName=400x400 could save 12.7KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…663&recipeName=400x400 could save 10.1KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…506&recipeName=400x400 could save 10KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…866&recipeName=400x400 could save 8.1KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33726_580x290.jpg could save 6.5KiB (13% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…120&recipeName=400x400 could save 6.3KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…004&recipeName=400x400 could save 5.5KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…699&recipeName=400x400 could save 5.5KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…524&recipeName=400x400 could save 5.5KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33727_580x290.jpg could save 5.4KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/img33728_580x290.jpg could save 4.8KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…937&recipeName=400x400 could save 4.8KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…639&recipeName=400x400 could save 4.7KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…771&recipeName=400x400 could save 3.6KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing http://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery/…628&recipeName=400x400 could save 3KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…494&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.9KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…191&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.9KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…668&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.8KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…908&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.7KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…640&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.7KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…218&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.5KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…734&recipeName=160x160 could save 2.2KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…842&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.9KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…628&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.9KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…672&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.7KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…386&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…777&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…907&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…367&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…508&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…335&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.6KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…965&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.5KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…695&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…387&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…974&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…955&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…145&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.4KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…925&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.3KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…630&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.3KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…603&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.2KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…016&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…890&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.2KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…553&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.1KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…620&recipeName=160x160 could save 1.1KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…720&recipeName=160x160 could save 1KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…299&recipeName=160x160 could save 969B (31% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…230&recipeName=160x160 could save 968B (20% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…671&recipeName=160x160 could save 944B (30% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…532&recipeName=160x160 could save 894B (22% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…816&recipeName=160x160 could save 876B (14% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…508&recipeName=160x160 could save 862B (25% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…833&recipeName=160x160 could save 838B (17% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…343&recipeName=160x160 could save 823B (14% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…250&recipeName=160x160 could save 800B (24% reduction).
Compressing https://richmedia.channeladvisor.com/ImageDelivery…914&recipeName=160x160 could save 782B (19% reduction).
priority - 11 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://dnisjsqid2b9p.cloudfront.net/ClientPaths/bjs/bjs_img_set.png (expiration not specified)
http://edge1.certona.net/cd/da8dbc7c/bjs.com/scripts/resonance.js (expiration not specified)
http://libs.coremetrics.com/configs/90393428.js (expiration not specified)
http://libs.coremetrics.com/eluminate.js (expiration not specified)
http://tmscdn.coremetrics.com/tms/dispatcher-v3.js (expiration not specified)
https://libs.coremetrics.com/ddxlibs/json-min.js (expiration not specified)
https://libs.coremetrics.com/ddxlibs/yahoo-min.js (expiration not specified)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/cms/4.json (5 minutes)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/tm/prod.js (10 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/1125318400890312?v=2.8.1 (20 minutes)
http://mathid.mathtag.com/d/i.js (60 minutes)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/scripts/BrandCMS/v3.x/bbbcms.min.js (60 minutes)
http://cdn.inspectlet.com/inspectlet.js?wid=1980915118&r=420009 (4 hours)
http://d2oh4tlt9mrke9.cloudfront.net/Record/js/sessioncam.recorder.js (4 hours)
http://edge1.certona.net/cd/da8dbc7c/bjs.com/scripts/resonance.js (expiration not specified)
http://libs.coremetrics.com/configs/90393428.js (expiration not specified)
http://libs.coremetrics.com/eluminate.js (expiration not specified)
http://tmscdn.coremetrics.com/tms/dispatcher-v3.js (expiration not specified)
https://libs.coremetrics.com/ddxlibs/json-min.js (expiration not specified)
https://libs.coremetrics.com/ddxlibs/yahoo-min.js (expiration not specified)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/cms/4.json (5 minutes)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/prod/property421/tm/prod.js (10 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/1125318400890312?v=2.8.1 (20 minutes)
http://mathid.mathtag.com/d/i.js (60 minutes)
https://cdn.brandingbrand.com/scripts/BrandCMS/v3.x/bbbcms.min.js (60 minutes)
http://cdn.inspectlet.com/inspectlet.js?wid=1980915118&r=420009 (4 hours)
http://d2oh4tlt9mrke9.cloudfront.net/Record/js/sessioncam.recorder.js (4 hours)
priority - 8 Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.
Only about 20% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.
priority - 0 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 680B (16% reduction).
Minifying http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/handlebars.j…dlebars.runtime.min.js could save 680B (16% reduction) after compression.
bjs.com Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 108 |
| Number of Hosts | 22 |
| Static Resources | 81 |
| JavaScript Resources | 25 |
| CSS Resources | 2 |
bjs.com Mobile Resource Breakdown
bjs.com mobile page usability
Last tested: 2017-11-30
Mobile Usability
Good
99/100
bjs.com Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 0 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
The tap target
<div class="title-cart">0Cart</div> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="/products/index.html">Product Index</a> and 2 others are close to other tap targets.bjs.com similar domains
Similar domains:
www.bjs.com
www.bjs.net
www.bjs.org
www.bjs.info
www.bjs.biz
www.bjs.us
www.bjs.mobi
www.js.com
www.bjs.com
www.vjs.com
www.bvjs.com
www.vbjs.com
www.gjs.com
www.bgjs.com
www.gbjs.com
www.hjs.com
www.bhjs.com
www.hbjs.com
www.njs.com
www.bnjs.com
www.nbjs.com
www.bs.com
www.bns.com
www.bjns.com
www.bhs.com
www.bjhs.com
www.bus.com
www.bjus.com
www.bujs.com
www.bis.com
www.bjis.com
www.bijs.com
www.bks.com
www.bjks.com
www.bkjs.com
www.bms.com
www.bjms.com
www.bmjs.com
www.bj.com
www.bjw.com
www.bjsw.com
www.bjws.com
www.bje.com
www.bjse.com
www.bjes.com
www.bjd.com
www.bjsd.com
www.bjds.com
www.bjz.com
www.bjsz.com
www.bjzs.com
www.bjx.com
www.bjsx.com
www.bjxs.com
www.bja.com
www.bjsa.com
www.bjas.com
www.bjs.con
www.bjs.net
www.bjs.org
www.bjs.info
www.bjs.biz
www.bjs.us
www.bjs.mobi
www.js.com
www.bjs.com
www.vjs.com
www.bvjs.com
www.vbjs.com
www.gjs.com
www.bgjs.com
www.gbjs.com
www.hjs.com
www.bhjs.com
www.hbjs.com
www.njs.com
www.bnjs.com
www.nbjs.com
www.bs.com
www.bns.com
www.bjns.com
www.bhs.com
www.bjhs.com
www.bus.com
www.bjus.com
www.bujs.com
www.bis.com
www.bjis.com
www.bijs.com
www.bks.com
www.bjks.com
www.bkjs.com
www.bms.com
www.bjms.com
www.bmjs.com
www.bj.com
www.bjw.com
www.bjsw.com
www.bjws.com
www.bje.com
www.bjse.com
www.bjes.com
www.bjd.com
www.bjsd.com
www.bjds.com
www.bjz.com
www.bjsz.com
www.bjzs.com
www.bjx.com
www.bjsx.com
www.bjxs.com
www.bja.com
www.bjsa.com
www.bjas.com
www.bjs.con
bjs.com Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
bjs.com TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.