e-jw.org website information.
e-jw.org domain name is registered by .ORG top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .ORG domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for e-jw.org domain:
- cp3.privatesystems.net
- cp2.privatesystems.net
- cp4.privatesystems.net
- cp1.privatesystems.net
and probably website e-jw.org is hosted by G-Core Labs S.A. web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by G-Core Labs S.A. hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website e-jw.org position was 103460 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 995435. Now website e-jw.org ranked in Alexa database as number 195159 (in the world).
Website e-jw.org Desktop speed measurement score (77/100) is better than the results of 63.93% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
e-jw.org Mobile usability score (96/100) is better than the results of 46.59% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of e-jw.org (68/100) is better than the results of 72.32% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Nov-15-2024 | 195,159 | 2,422 |
| Nov-14-2024 | 197,581 | -1,624 |
| Nov-13-2024 | 195,957 | 0 |
| Nov-12-2024 | 195,957 | 0 |
| Nov-11-2024 | 195,957 | 0 |
| Nov-10-2024 | 195,957 | -3,667 |
| Nov-09-2024 | 192,290 | 1,801 |
Advertisement
e-jw.org Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
e-jw.org whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
Domain Name: E-JW.ORG
Registry Domain ID: D167679521-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.publicdomainregistry.com
Registrar URL: http://www.publicdomainregistry.com
Updated Date: 2021-05-28T07:51:41Z
Creation Date: 2013-01-24T06:16:40Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2028-01-24T06:16:40Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
Registrar IANA ID: 303
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@publicdomainregistry.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.2013775952
Reseller:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registrant Organization: Privacy Protect, LLC (PrivacyProtect.org)
Registrant State/Province: MA
Registrant Country: US
Name Server: NS1.ENVISIONOCITY.COM
Name Server: NS2.ENVISIONOCITY.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form https://www.icann.org/wicf/)
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2022-01-25T14:58:23Z
e-jw.org server information
e-jw.org desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-08-26
e-jw.org Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 10 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 99.5KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.…2a39a892838d66.en.html could save 20.3KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe…=http%3A%2F%2Fe-jw.org could save 9.2KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing https://platform.twitter.com/js/button.509719336ca39171c37a321231ccaf83.js could save 4.5KiB (66% reduction).
priority - 8 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 5 blocking script resources and 6 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://e-jw.org/js/xenforo/xenforo.js?_v=9ef47df6
http://e-jw.org/js/ipbforo/js/jquery.sticky.min.js?_v=9ef47df6
http://e-jw.org/js/ipbforo/js/ipbf_custom.min.js?_v=9ef47df6
http://e-jw.org/js/ipbforo/js/jquery.totop.min.js?_v=9ef47df6
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://e-jw.org/css.php?css=bb_code,ipbf_footerSoc…2&dir=LTR&d=1558272864
http://e-jw.org/css.php?css=ipbf,nerva,ipbf_privat…2&dir=LTR&d=1558272864
http://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/4.4.0/css/font-awesome.min.css
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato:300,40…elvetica,%20sans-serif
http://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/4.4.0/css/font-awesome.min.css
priority - 7 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 73.2KiB (52% reduction).
Compressing http://e-jw.org/data/avatars/s/0/2.jpg?1536036778 could save 377B (26% reduction).
Compressing http://e-jw.org/data/avatars/s/0/357.jpg?1566693992 could save 376B (24% reduction).
Compressing http://e-jw.org/data/avatars/s/0/16.jpg?1450458047 could save 374B (23% reduction).
Compressing https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v3/yM/r/vle-6….png?_nc_x=Ij3Wp8lg5Kz could save 172B (50% reduction).
Compressing http://e-jw.org/styles/nerva/_custom/ipbs_box_pattern.png could save 104B (27% reduction).
priority - 1 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js (20 minutes)
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
priority - 1 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 6.8KiB (22% reduction).
Minifying http://e-jw.org/css.php?css=bb_code,ipbf_footerSoc…2&dir=LTR&d=1558272864 could save 1.1KiB (21% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://e-jw.org/css.php?css=ipbf,nerva,ipbf_privat…2&dir=LTR&d=1558272864 could save 420B (14% reduction) after compression.
priority - 0 Minify HTML
Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.5KiB (14% reduction).
priority - 0 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 671B (39% reduction).
e-jw.org Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 41 |
| Number of Hosts | 10 |
| Static Resources | 29 |
| JavaScript Resources | 12 |
| CSS Resources | 5 |
e-jw.org Desktop Resource Breakdown
e-jw.org mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-04-27
e-jw.org Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 32 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 3 blocking script resources and 4 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://e-jw.org/js/xenforo/xenforo.js,q_v=9ef47df6…speed.jm.YmnWxrEazX.js
http://e-jw.org/js/ipbforo/js/jquery.sticky.min.js…speed.jc.mZwS8tt7-y.js
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/4.4.0/css/font-awesome.min.css
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato:300,40…elvetica,%20sans-serif
http://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/4.4.0/css/font-awesome.min.css
priority - 8 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 71.8KiB (53% reduction).
priority - 7 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://e-jw.org/styles/nerva/_custom/ipbs_box_pattern.png (expiration not specified)
http://e-jw.org/styles/nerva/_custom/magnet.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://e-jw.org/styles/nerva/xenforo/avatars/avatar_s.png (expiration not specified)
http://e-jw.org/styles/nerva/xenforo/xenforo-ui-sprite.png (expiration not specified)
http://e-jw.org/js/jquery/jquery-1.11.0.min.js.pagespeed.jm.VDIv7VBTRR.js (5 minutes)
http://e-jw.org/js/xenforo/xenforo.js,q_v=9ef47df6…speed.jm.YmnWxrEazX.js (5 minutes)
http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js (20 minutes)
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
priority - 1 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 6.9KiB (24% reduction).
priority - 0 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 2.8KiB (65% reduction).
priority - 0 Minify HTML
Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.3KiB (11% reduction).
e-jw.org Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 34 |
| Number of Hosts | 10 |
| Static Resources | 16 |
| JavaScript Resources | 8 |
| CSS Resources | 3 |
e-jw.org Mobile Resource Breakdown
e-jw.org mobile page usability
Last tested: 2017-04-27
e-jw.org Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 3 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<div id="loginBar">Your name or e…Stay logged in</div> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="index.php?foru…ion-center.11/">Newcomer Information Center</a> and 8 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="index.php?posts/4952/">Forum Charter</a> and 9 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="index.php?memb…hovahisgod.16/" class="username">jehovahisgod</a> and 4 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="index.php?profile-posts/20/" class="item muted">Apr 7, 2017</a> and 4 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="index.php?help/terms">Terms and Rules</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="https://xenforo.com" class="concealed">Forum software…5 XenForo Ltd.</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.e-jw.org similar domains
www.e-jw.net
www.e-jw.org
www.e-jw.info
www.e-jw.biz
www.e-jw.us
www.e-jw.mobi
www.-jw.org
www.e-jw.org
www.w-jw.org
www.ew-jw.org
www.we-jw.org
www.s-jw.org
www.es-jw.org
www.se-jw.org
www.d-jw.org
www.ed-jw.org
www.de-jw.org
www.r-jw.org
www.er-jw.org
www.re-jw.org
www.ejw.org
www.e-w.org
www.e-nw.org
www.e-jnw.org
www.e-njw.org
www.e-hw.org
www.e-jhw.org
www.e-hjw.org
www.e-uw.org
www.e-juw.org
www.e-ujw.org
www.e-iw.org
www.e-jiw.org
www.e-ijw.org
www.e-kw.org
www.e-jkw.org
www.e-kjw.org
www.e-mw.org
www.e-jmw.org
www.e-mjw.org
www.e-j.org
www.e-jq.org
www.e-jwq.org
www.e-jqw.org
www.e-ja.org
www.e-jwa.org
www.e-jaw.org
www.e-js.org
www.e-jws.org
www.e-jsw.org
www.e-je.org
www.e-jwe.org
www.e-jew.org
e-jw.org Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
e-jw.org TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.