europeanreview.org website information.
europeanreview.org domain name is registered by .ORG top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .ORG domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for europeanreview.org domain:
- ns2.dnshigh.com
- ns1.dnshigh.com
and probably website europeanreview.org is hosted by CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website europeanreview.org position was 21628 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 995641. Now website europeanreview.org ranked in Alexa database as number 45228 (in the world).
Website europeanreview.org Desktop speed measurement score (72/100) is better than the results of 54.39% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
europeanreview.org Mobile usability score (97/100) is better than the results of 49.9% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of europeanreview.org (50/100) is better than the results of 33.92% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Sep-23-2024 | N/A | N/A |
| Sep-22-2024 | 45,228 | 342 |
| Sep-21-2024 | 45,570 | -85 |
| Sep-20-2024 | 45,485 | -540 |
| Sep-19-2024 | 44,945 | 242 |
| Sep-18-2024 | 45,187 | 442 |
| Sep-17-2024 | 45,629 | -430 |
Advertisement
europeanreview.org Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
europeanreview.org whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
Domain Name: EUROPEANREVIEW.ORG
Registry Domain ID: D106418415-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: http://whois.serverplan.com
Registrar URL: http://www.serverplan.com
Updated Date: 2021-05-25T01:31:15Z
Creation Date: 2005-05-24T08:30:26Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2022-05-24T08:30:26Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: Server Plan Srl Unipersonale
Registrar IANA ID: 1460
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@serverplan.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +39.0776392424
Reseller:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registrant Organization: Verduci Editore
Registrant State/Province: RM
Registrant Country: IT
Name Server: NS1.DNSHIGH.COM
Name Server: NS2.DNSHIGH.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form https://www.icann.org/wicf/)
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2022-04-02T17:36:06Z
europeanreview.org server information
europeanreview.org desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2015-10-14
Desktop Speed
Medium
72/100
europeanreview.org Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 20 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 194.9KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…query.min.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 59.7KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…undation.css?ver=4.2.5 could save 49.6KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/ could save 31KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…bit-1.4.0.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 15.3KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-includes/js/wp…lease.min.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 10.1KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ie/style.css?ver=4.2.5 could save 7.5KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…stomforms.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 5.6KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ry.reveal.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 4.6KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes….tooltips.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 4.3KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…oundation.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 3.5KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ie/js/app.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 2.8KiB (66% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…older.min.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 952B (58% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…undation.css?ver=4.2.5 could save 49.6KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/ could save 31KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…bit-1.4.0.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 15.3KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-includes/js/wp…lease.min.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 10.1KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ie/style.css?ver=4.2.5 could save 7.5KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…stomforms.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 5.6KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ry.reveal.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 4.6KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes….tooltips.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 4.3KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…oundation.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 3.5KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ie/js/app.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 2.8KiB (66% reduction).
Compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…older.min.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 952B (58% reduction).
priority - 8 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 2 blocking script resources and 6 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…query.min.js?ver=4.2.5
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…oundation.js?ver=4.2.5
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…oundation.js?ver=4.2.5
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugin…e/widget.css?ver=4.2.5
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…undation.css?ver=4.2.5
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…/css/app.css?ver=4.2.5
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ie/style.css?ver=4.2.5
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans%3…%2C400%2C300&ver=4.2.5
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugin…tyle/wpp.css?ver=3.2.2
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…undation.css?ver=4.2.5
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…/css/app.css?ver=4.2.5
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ie/style.css?ver=4.2.5
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans%3…%2C400%2C300&ver=4.2.5
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugin…tyle/wpp.css?ver=3.2.2
priority - 4 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…rie/images/divider.png (expiration not specified)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/EUR-REV5.gif (expiration not specified)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/upload…2/09/background-v2.png (expiration not specified)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/certificate.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/cover.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/lolo-c4.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/wcrj.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/EUR-REV5.gif (expiration not specified)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/upload…2/09/background-v2.png (expiration not specified)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/certificate.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/cover.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/lolo-c4.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/wcrj.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
priority - 3 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.48 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 2 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 14.6KiB (34% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…bit-1.4.0.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 7.2KiB (37% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ry.reveal.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 2.2KiB (37% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…stomforms.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 1.8KiB (26% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes….tooltips.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 1.8KiB (31% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ie/js/app.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 1.5KiB (37% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ry.reveal.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 2.2KiB (37% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…stomforms.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 1.8KiB (26% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes….tooltips.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 1.8KiB (31% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ie/js/app.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 1.5KiB (37% reduction).
priority - 1 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 14.2KiB (20% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…undation.css?ver=4.2.5 could save 10.1KiB (17% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ie/style.css?ver=4.2.5 could save 2.9KiB (29% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugin…tyle/wpp.css?ver=3.2.2 could save 608B (68% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…/css/app.css?ver=4.2.5 could save 548B (84% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…ie/style.css?ver=4.2.5 could save 2.9KiB (29% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugin…tyle/wpp.css?ver=3.2.2 could save 608B (68% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…/css/app.css?ver=4.2.5 could save 548B (84% reduction).
priority - 1 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 6.2KiB (14% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/themes…rie/images/divider.png could save 2.8KiB (95% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/EUR-REV5.gif could save 1.2KiB (11% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/cover.jpg could save 911B (7% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/wcrj.jpg could save 844B (12% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/lolo-c4.jpg could save 542B (5% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/EUR-REV5.gif could save 1.2KiB (11% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/cover.jpg could save 911B (7% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/wcrj.jpg could save 844B (12% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/lolo-c4.jpg could save 542B (5% reduction).
priority - 0 Minify HTML
Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 4.7KiB (12% reduction).
Minifying http://www.europeanreview.org/ could save 4.7KiB (12% reduction).
europeanreview.org Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 26 |
| Number of Hosts | 4 |
| Static Resources | 9 |
| JavaScript Resources | 10 |
| CSS Resources | 6 |
europeanreview.org Desktop Resource Breakdown
europeanreview.org mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-08-13
Mobile Speed
Bad
50/100
europeanreview.org Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 40 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 3 blocking script resources and 6 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…uery.min.js?ver=4.9.10
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…undation.js?ver=4.9.10
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…4.2.0.min.js?ver=4.2.2
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…undation.js?ver=4.9.10
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…4.2.0.min.js?ver=4.2.2
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…/widget.css?ver=4.9.10
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…ndation.css?ver=4.9.10
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…css/app.css?ver=4.9.10
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…e/style.css?ver=4.9.10
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans%…2C400%2C300&ver=4.9.10
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…/css/wpp.css?ver=4.2.2
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…ndation.css?ver=4.9.10
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…css/app.css?ver=4.9.10
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…e/style.css?ver=4.9.10
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans%…2C400%2C300&ver=4.9.10
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…/css/wpp.css?ver=4.2.2
priority - 34 Avoid landing page redirects
Your page has 2 redirects. Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded.
Avoid landing page redirects for the following chain of redirected URLs.
http://europeanreview.org/
https://europeanreview.org/
https://www.europeanreview.org/
https://europeanreview.org/
https://www.europeanreview.org/
priority - 21 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 206.2KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…uery.min.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 59.8KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…ndation.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 49.6KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/ could save 42.2KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…it-1.4.0.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 15.3KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…e/style.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 7.6KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-includes/js/w…ease.min.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 7.5KiB (63% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…tomforms.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 5.6KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…y.reveal.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 4.6KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…tooltips.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 4.3KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…undation.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 3.5KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…e/js/app.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 2.8KiB (66% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…lder.min.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 952B (58% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…/css/wpp.css?ver=4.2.2 could save 686B (56% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 650B (47% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…4.2.0.min.js?ver=4.2.2 could save 566B (50% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…css/app.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 446B (69% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…/widget.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 387B (50% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…ndation.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 49.6KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/ could save 42.2KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…it-1.4.0.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 15.3KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…e/style.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 7.6KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-includes/js/w…ease.min.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 7.5KiB (63% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…tomforms.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 5.6KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…y.reveal.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 4.6KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…tooltips.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 4.3KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…undation.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 3.5KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…e/js/app.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 2.8KiB (66% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…lder.min.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 952B (58% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…/css/wpp.css?ver=4.2.2 could save 686B (56% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 650B (47% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…4.2.0.min.js?ver=4.2.2 could save 566B (50% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…css/app.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 446B (69% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…/widget.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 387B (50% reduction).
priority - 7 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…rie/images/divider.png (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/EUR-REV5.gif (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploa…2/09/background-v2.png (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploa…ver-new-IF-225x300.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/certificate.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploa…-logo-625w-300x300.png (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/lolo-c4.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/wcrj.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://ssl.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/EUR-REV5.gif (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploa…2/09/background-v2.png (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploa…ver-new-IF-225x300.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/certificate.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploa…-logo-625w-300x300.png (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/lolo-c4.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/wcrj.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://ssl.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
priority - 3 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 30.5KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploa…ver-new-IF-225x300.jpg could save 11.9KiB (49% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploa…-logo-625w-300x300.png could save 6.6KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/lolo-c4.jpg could save 6.2KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…rie/images/divider.png could save 2.6KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/wcrj.jpg could save 2.1KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/certificate.jpg could save 1.1KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploa…-logo-625w-300x300.png could save 6.6KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/lolo-c4.jpg could save 6.2KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…rie/images/divider.png could save 2.6KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/wcrj.jpg could save 2.1KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/certificate.jpg could save 1.1KiB (15% reduction).
priority - 3 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.40 seconds.
There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 1 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 14.6KiB (20% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…ndation.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 10.1KiB (17% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…e/style.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 2.9KiB (29% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…/css/wpp.css?ver=4.2.2 could save 853B (70% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…css/app.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 548B (84% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…/widget.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 151B (20% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…e/style.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 2.9KiB (29% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…/css/wpp.css?ver=4.2.2 could save 853B (70% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…css/app.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 548B (84% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/plugi…/widget.css?ver=4.9.10 could save 151B (20% reduction).
priority - 1 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 14.6KiB (34% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…it-1.4.0.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 7.2KiB (37% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…y.reveal.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 2.2KiB (37% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…tomforms.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 1.8KiB (26% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…tooltips.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 1.8KiB (31% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…e/js/app.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 1.5KiB (37% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…y.reveal.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 2.2KiB (37% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…tomforms.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 1.8KiB (26% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…tooltips.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 1.8KiB (31% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/theme…e/js/app.js?ver=4.9.10 could save 1.5KiB (37% reduction).
priority - 1 Minify HTML
Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 8.2KiB (16% reduction).
Minifying https://www.europeanreview.org/ could save 8.2KiB (16% reduction).
europeanreview.org Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 30 |
| Number of Hosts | 4 |
| Static Resources | 10 |
| JavaScript Resources | 12 |
| CSS Resources | 6 |
europeanreview.org Mobile Resource Breakdown
europeanreview.org mobile page usability
Last tested: 2019-08-13
Mobile Usability
Good
97/100
europeanreview.org Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 3 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
The tap target
<a href="https://www.eu…ic/allergology">Allergology</a> and 67 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="http://scienti…pean%20review*">Current Conten…nical Medicine</a> and 4 others are close to other tap targets.europeanreview.org similar domains
Similar domains:
www.europeanreview.com
www.europeanreview.net
www.europeanreview.org
www.europeanreview.info
www.europeanreview.biz
www.europeanreview.us
www.europeanreview.mobi
www.uropeanreview.org
www.europeanreview.org
www.wuropeanreview.org
www.ewuropeanreview.org
www.weuropeanreview.org
www.suropeanreview.org
www.esuropeanreview.org
www.seuropeanreview.org
www.duropeanreview.org
www.eduropeanreview.org
www.deuropeanreview.org
www.ruropeanreview.org
www.eruropeanreview.org
www.reuropeanreview.org
www.eropeanreview.org
www.eyropeanreview.org
www.euyropeanreview.org
www.eyuropeanreview.org
www.ehropeanreview.org
www.euhropeanreview.org
www.ehuropeanreview.org
www.ejropeanreview.org
www.eujropeanreview.org
www.ejuropeanreview.org
www.eiropeanreview.org
www.euiropeanreview.org
www.eiuropeanreview.org
www.euopeanreview.org
www.eueopeanreview.org
www.eureopeanreview.org
www.eueropeanreview.org
www.eudopeanreview.org
www.eurdopeanreview.org
www.eudropeanreview.org
www.eufopeanreview.org
www.eurfopeanreview.org
www.eufropeanreview.org
www.eutopeanreview.org
www.eurtopeanreview.org
www.eutropeanreview.org
www.eurpeanreview.org
www.euripeanreview.org
www.euroipeanreview.org
www.euriopeanreview.org
www.eurkpeanreview.org
www.eurokpeanreview.org
www.eurkopeanreview.org
www.eurlpeanreview.org
www.eurolpeanreview.org
www.eurlopeanreview.org
www.eurppeanreview.org
www.europpeanreview.org
www.eurpopeanreview.org
www.euroeanreview.org
www.eurooeanreview.org
www.europoeanreview.org
www.euroopeanreview.org
www.euroleanreview.org
www.europleanreview.org
www.europanreview.org
www.europwanreview.org
www.europewanreview.org
www.europweanreview.org
www.europsanreview.org
www.europesanreview.org
www.europseanreview.org
www.europdanreview.org
www.europedanreview.org
www.europdeanreview.org
www.europranreview.org
www.europeranreview.org
www.europreanreview.org
www.europenreview.org
www.europeqnreview.org
www.europeaqnreview.org
www.europeqanreview.org
www.europewnreview.org
www.europeawnreview.org
www.europesnreview.org
www.europeasnreview.org
www.europeznreview.org
www.europeaznreview.org
www.europezanreview.org
www.europeareview.org
www.europeabreview.org
www.europeanbreview.org
www.europeabnreview.org
www.europeahreview.org
www.europeanhreview.org
www.europeahnreview.org
www.europeajreview.org
www.europeanjreview.org
www.europeajnreview.org
www.europeamreview.org
www.europeanmreview.org
www.europeamnreview.org
www.europeaneview.org
www.europeaneeview.org
www.europeanreeview.org
www.europeanereview.org
www.europeandeview.org
www.europeanrdeview.org
www.europeandreview.org
www.europeanfeview.org
www.europeanrfeview.org
www.europeanfreview.org
www.europeanteview.org
www.europeanrteview.org
www.europeantreview.org
www.europeanrview.org
www.europeanrwview.org
www.europeanrewview.org
www.europeanrweview.org
www.europeanrsview.org
www.europeanresview.org
www.europeanrseview.org
www.europeanrdview.org
www.europeanredview.org
www.europeanrrview.org
www.europeanrerview.org
www.europeanrreview.org
www.europeanreiew.org
www.europeanreciew.org
www.europeanrevciew.org
www.europeanrecview.org
www.europeanrefiew.org
www.europeanrevfiew.org
www.europeanrefview.org
www.europeanregiew.org
www.europeanrevgiew.org
www.europeanregview.org
www.europeanrebiew.org
www.europeanrevbiew.org
www.europeanrebview.org
www.europeanrevew.org
www.europeanrevuew.org
www.europeanreviuew.org
www.europeanrevuiew.org
www.europeanrevjew.org
www.europeanrevijew.org
www.europeanrevjiew.org
www.europeanrevkew.org
www.europeanrevikew.org
www.europeanrevkiew.org
www.europeanrevoew.org
www.europeanrevioew.org
www.europeanrevoiew.org
www.europeanreviw.org
www.europeanreviww.org
www.europeanrevieww.org
www.europeanreviwew.org
www.europeanrevisw.org
www.europeanreviesw.org
www.europeanrevisew.org
www.europeanrevidw.org
www.europeanreviedw.org
www.europeanrevidew.org
www.europeanrevirw.org
www.europeanrevierw.org
www.europeanrevirew.org
www.europeanrevie.org
www.europeanrevieq.org
www.europeanreviewq.org
www.europeanrevieqw.org
www.europeanreviea.org
www.europeanreviewa.org
www.europeanrevieaw.org
www.europeanrevies.org
www.europeanreviews.org
www.europeanreviee.org
www.europeanreviewe.org
www.europeanrevieew.org
www.europeanreview.net
www.europeanreview.org
www.europeanreview.info
www.europeanreview.biz
www.europeanreview.us
www.europeanreview.mobi
www.uropeanreview.org
www.europeanreview.org
www.wuropeanreview.org
www.ewuropeanreview.org
www.weuropeanreview.org
www.suropeanreview.org
www.esuropeanreview.org
www.seuropeanreview.org
www.duropeanreview.org
www.eduropeanreview.org
www.deuropeanreview.org
www.ruropeanreview.org
www.eruropeanreview.org
www.reuropeanreview.org
www.eropeanreview.org
www.eyropeanreview.org
www.euyropeanreview.org
www.eyuropeanreview.org
www.ehropeanreview.org
www.euhropeanreview.org
www.ehuropeanreview.org
www.ejropeanreview.org
www.eujropeanreview.org
www.ejuropeanreview.org
www.eiropeanreview.org
www.euiropeanreview.org
www.eiuropeanreview.org
www.euopeanreview.org
www.eueopeanreview.org
www.eureopeanreview.org
www.eueropeanreview.org
www.eudopeanreview.org
www.eurdopeanreview.org
www.eudropeanreview.org
www.eufopeanreview.org
www.eurfopeanreview.org
www.eufropeanreview.org
www.eutopeanreview.org
www.eurtopeanreview.org
www.eutropeanreview.org
www.eurpeanreview.org
www.euripeanreview.org
www.euroipeanreview.org
www.euriopeanreview.org
www.eurkpeanreview.org
www.eurokpeanreview.org
www.eurkopeanreview.org
www.eurlpeanreview.org
www.eurolpeanreview.org
www.eurlopeanreview.org
www.eurppeanreview.org
www.europpeanreview.org
www.eurpopeanreview.org
www.euroeanreview.org
www.eurooeanreview.org
www.europoeanreview.org
www.euroopeanreview.org
www.euroleanreview.org
www.europleanreview.org
www.europanreview.org
www.europwanreview.org
www.europewanreview.org
www.europweanreview.org
www.europsanreview.org
www.europesanreview.org
www.europseanreview.org
www.europdanreview.org
www.europedanreview.org
www.europdeanreview.org
www.europranreview.org
www.europeranreview.org
www.europreanreview.org
www.europenreview.org
www.europeqnreview.org
www.europeaqnreview.org
www.europeqanreview.org
www.europewnreview.org
www.europeawnreview.org
www.europesnreview.org
www.europeasnreview.org
www.europeznreview.org
www.europeaznreview.org
www.europezanreview.org
www.europeareview.org
www.europeabreview.org
www.europeanbreview.org
www.europeabnreview.org
www.europeahreview.org
www.europeanhreview.org
www.europeahnreview.org
www.europeajreview.org
www.europeanjreview.org
www.europeajnreview.org
www.europeamreview.org
www.europeanmreview.org
www.europeamnreview.org
www.europeaneview.org
www.europeaneeview.org
www.europeanreeview.org
www.europeanereview.org
www.europeandeview.org
www.europeanrdeview.org
www.europeandreview.org
www.europeanfeview.org
www.europeanrfeview.org
www.europeanfreview.org
www.europeanteview.org
www.europeanrteview.org
www.europeantreview.org
www.europeanrview.org
www.europeanrwview.org
www.europeanrewview.org
www.europeanrweview.org
www.europeanrsview.org
www.europeanresview.org
www.europeanrseview.org
www.europeanrdview.org
www.europeanredview.org
www.europeanrrview.org
www.europeanrerview.org
www.europeanrreview.org
www.europeanreiew.org
www.europeanreciew.org
www.europeanrevciew.org
www.europeanrecview.org
www.europeanrefiew.org
www.europeanrevfiew.org
www.europeanrefview.org
www.europeanregiew.org
www.europeanrevgiew.org
www.europeanregview.org
www.europeanrebiew.org
www.europeanrevbiew.org
www.europeanrebview.org
www.europeanrevew.org
www.europeanrevuew.org
www.europeanreviuew.org
www.europeanrevuiew.org
www.europeanrevjew.org
www.europeanrevijew.org
www.europeanrevjiew.org
www.europeanrevkew.org
www.europeanrevikew.org
www.europeanrevkiew.org
www.europeanrevoew.org
www.europeanrevioew.org
www.europeanrevoiew.org
www.europeanreviw.org
www.europeanreviww.org
www.europeanrevieww.org
www.europeanreviwew.org
www.europeanrevisw.org
www.europeanreviesw.org
www.europeanrevisew.org
www.europeanrevidw.org
www.europeanreviedw.org
www.europeanrevidew.org
www.europeanrevirw.org
www.europeanrevierw.org
www.europeanrevirew.org
www.europeanrevie.org
www.europeanrevieq.org
www.europeanreviewq.org
www.europeanrevieqw.org
www.europeanreviea.org
www.europeanreviewa.org
www.europeanrevieaw.org
www.europeanrevies.org
www.europeanreviews.org
www.europeanreviee.org
www.europeanreviewe.org
www.europeanrevieew.org
europeanreview.org Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
europeanreview.org TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.