FOOD.BLOG WordPress.com: Create a free website or blog


food.blog website information.

food.blog domain name is registered by .BLOG top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .BLOG domain zone.

No name server records were found.

and probably website food.blog is hosted by YANDEX LLC web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by YANDEX LLC hosting company.

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website food.blog position was 14248 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 987836. Now website food.blog ranked in Alexa database as number 52264 (in the world).

Website food.blog Desktop speed measurement score (75/100) is better than the results of 59.78% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

food.blog Mobile usability score (94/100) is better than the results of 36.81% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed measurement score of food.blog (55/100) is better than the results of 43.86% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
Sep-21-2024 52,264-193
Sep-20-2024 52,071120
Sep-19-2024 52,191-43
Sep-18-2024 52,148493
Sep-17-2024 52,641-326
Sep-16-2024 52,315715
Sep-15-2024 53,030-37

Advertisement

food.blog Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.



food.blog whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.


food.blog domain is not supported

food.blog server information

Servers Location

IP Address
Country
Region
City

food.blog desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2017-06-23


Desktop Speed Medium
75/100

food.blog Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 10 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 2 blocking script resources and 4 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

https://s1.wp.com/home.logged-out/page-domain-only…bundle.js?v=1494322199
https://www.googleadservices.com/pagead/conversion_async.js

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Noto+Serif…t,latin-ext,vietnamese
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Noto+Sans:…t,latin-ext,vietnamese
https://s0.wp.com/i/noticons/noticons.css
https://s1.wp.com/home.logged-out/page-domain-only…tyles.css?v=1498118418

priority - 9 Avoid landing page redirects

Your page has 2 redirects. Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded.

Avoid landing page redirects for the following chain of redirected URLs.

http://food.blog/
https://food.blog/
https://wordpress.com/

priority - 5 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://a.quora.com/qevents.js (expiration not specified)
https://d3ir0rz7vxwgq5.cloudfront.net/mwData.min.js (expiration not specified)
https://getrockerbox.com/assets/xyz.js (expiration not specified)
https://snap.licdn.com/li.lms-analytics/insight.min.js (expiration not specified)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/823166884443641?v=2.7.16 (20 minutes)
https://bat.bing.com/bat.js (30 minutes)
https://secure.leadback.advertising.com/adcedge/lb…sprlb_1472760452[8760] (60 minutes)
https://secure.leadback.advertising.com/adcedge/lb…sprlb_1487351090[8760] (60 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 3 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 28.8KiB (69% reduction).

Compressing https://d3ir0rz7vxwgq5.cloudfront.net/mwData.min.js could save 28KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing https://dis.us.criteo.com/dis/dis.aspx?p=31321&cb=…&sc_r=1024x768&sc_d=24 could save 818B (52% reduction).

priority - 3 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 26.9KiB (17% reduction).

Compressing https://s1.wp.com/home.logged-out/page-domain-only/img/website-scene.jpg could save 14.8KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://s1.wp.com/home.logged-out/page-domain-only/img/blog-scene.jpg could save 12.1KiB (16% reduction).

priority - 2 Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 16% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.

food.blog Desktop Resources

Total Resources78
Number of Hosts47
Static Resources26
JavaScript Resources18
CSS Resources4

food.blog Desktop Resource Breakdown

food.blog mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2017-12-01


Mobile Speed Bad
55/100

food.blog Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 40 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 3 blocking script resources and 4 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

https://s1.wp.com/home.logged-out/page-domain-only…bundle.js?v=1510302125
https://www.googleadservices.com/pagead/conversion_async.js
https://refer.wordpress.com/wp-content/themes/refe…rals.min.js?v=20171117

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Noto+Serif…t,latin-ext,vietnamese
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Noto+Sans:…t,latin-ext,vietnamese
https://s1.wp.com/i/noticons/noticons.css?v=20150727
https://s1.wp.com/home.logged-out/page-domain-only…tyles.css?v=1512066170

priority - 34 Avoid landing page redirects

Your page has 2 redirects. Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded.

Avoid landing page redirects for the following chain of redirected URLs.

http://food.blog/
https://food.blog/
https://wordpress.com/

priority - 8 Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 21% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.

priority - 8 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://getrockerbox.com/assets/xyz.js (expiration not specified)
https://amplify.outbrain.com/cp/obtp.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/823166884443641?v=2.8.1 (20 minutes)
https://bat.bing.com/bat.js (30 minutes)
https://mc.yandex.ru/metrika/watch.js (60 minutes)
https://secure.leadback.advertising.com/adcedge/lb…sprlb_1472760452[8760] (60 minutes)
https://secure.leadback.advertising.com/adcedge/lb…sprlb_1487351090[8760] (60 minutes)
https://secure.leadback.advertising.com/adcedge/lb…ssprlb_1501625044[720] (60 minutes)
https://www.googleadservices.com/pagead/conversion_async.js (60 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
https://snap.licdn.com/li.lms-analytics/insight.min.js (12 hours)

priority - 0 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 868B (64% reduction).

Minifying https://refer.wordpress.com/wp-content/themes/refe…rals.min.js?v=20171117 could save 868B (64% reduction) after compression.

food.blog Mobile Resources

Total Resources84
Number of Hosts50
Static Resources29
JavaScript Resources22
CSS Resources4

food.blog Mobile Resource Breakdown

food.blog mobile page usability

Last tested: 2017-12-01


Mobile Usability Good
94/100

food.blog Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 5 Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <a href="https://wordpr….com/features/">Features</a> and 16 others are close to other tap targets.

food.blog similar domains

Similar domains:
www.food.com
www.food.net
www.food.org
www.food.info
www.food.biz
www.food.us
www.food.mobi
www.ood.blog
www.food.blog
www.cood.blog
www.fcood.blog
www.cfood.blog
www.dood.blog
www.fdood.blog
www.dfood.blog
www.rood.blog
www.frood.blog
www.rfood.blog
www.tood.blog
www.ftood.blog
www.tfood.blog
www.good.blog
www.fgood.blog
www.gfood.blog
www.vood.blog
www.fvood.blog
www.vfood.blog
www.fod.blog
www.fiod.blog
www.foiod.blog
www.fiood.blog
www.fkod.blog
www.fokod.blog
www.fkood.blog
www.flod.blog
www.folod.blog
www.flood.blog
www.fpod.blog
www.fopod.blog
www.fpood.blog
www.foid.blog
www.fooid.blog
www.fokd.blog
www.fookd.blog
www.fold.blog
www.foold.blog
www.fopd.blog
www.foopd.blog
www.foo.blog
www.foox.blog
www.foodx.blog
www.fooxd.blog
www.foos.blog
www.foods.blog
www.foosd.blog
www.fooe.blog
www.foode.blog
www.fooed.blog
www.foor.blog
www.foodr.blog
www.foord.blog
www.foof.blog
www.foodf.blog
www.foofd.blog
www.fooc.blog
www.foodc.blog
www.foocd.blog

food.blog Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.


food.blog TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.