foodgawker.com website information.
foodgawker.com domain name is registered by .COM top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .COM domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for foodgawker.com domain:
- ns76.domaincontrol.com
- ns75.domaincontrol.com
and probably website foodgawker.com is hosted by WIKIMEDIA - Wikimedia Foundation Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by WIKIMEDIA - Wikimedia Foundation Inc., US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website foodgawker.com position was 46972 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 107486. Now website foodgawker.com ranked in Alexa database as number 52116 (in the world).
Website foodgawker.com Desktop speed measurement score (45/100) is better than the results of 19.01% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
foodgawker.com Mobile usability score (87/100) is better than the results of 28.3% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of foodgawker.com (63/100) is better than the results of 61.76% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Nov-20-2024 | 52,116 | 68 |
| Nov-19-2024 | 52,184 | 713 |
| Nov-18-2024 | 52,897 | -165 |
| Nov-17-2024 | 52,732 | -607 |
| Nov-16-2024 | 52,125 | -69 |
| Nov-15-2024 | 52,056 | -1,077 |
| Nov-14-2024 | 50,979 | -911 |
Advertisement
foodgawker.com Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
foodgawker.com whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
Domain Name: FOODGAWKER.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1492828484_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Updated Date: 2024-08-29T23:31:04Z
Creation Date: 2008-06-13T03:59:02Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2025-06-13T03:59:02Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@godaddy.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS75.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS76.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2024-09-10T20:54:16Z
foodgawker.com server information
foodgawker.com desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2016-07-11
foodgawker.com Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 116 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 1.1MiB (72% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo2.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2713001.jpg could save 66KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2713019.jpg could save 65.6KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo2.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2713209.jpg could save 62.4KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2712997.jpg could save 59KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2712945.jpg could save 54.3KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2713091.jpg could save 53KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo2.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2713037.jpg could save 52.9KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2713221.jpg could save 52.3KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo2.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2713081.jpg could save 47.4KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo2.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2713181.jpg could save 46.3KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2712937.jpg could save 46.2KiB (78% reduction).
Losslessly compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/simgad/6255816879302618772 could save 45.2KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo2.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2713115.jpg could save 42.9KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2713147.jpg could save 42.2KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2713195.jpg could save 41.3KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2713013.jpg could save 41.2KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo2.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2713201.jpg could save 37.9KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2713243.jpg could save 36KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo2.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2712951.jpg could save 34.5KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo2.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2712895.jpg could save 33.9KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2712955.jpg could save 33.6KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://photo2.foodgawker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2713223.jpg could save 30.5KiB (75% reduction).
Losslessly compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/simgad/11437303881467094308 could save 3.7KiB (19% reduction).
Losslessly compressing https://static.foodgawker.com/wp-content/themes/Fo…ogo_6-7-13.png?ver=2.3 could save 1.9KiB (46% reduction).
Losslessly compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/sadbundle/166345…2/images/lentintet.png could save 1.5KiB (44% reduction).
Losslessly compressing https://static.foodgawker.com/wp-content/themes/Fo…/img/addthis-blank.gif could save 1,011B (91% reduction).
Losslessly compressing https://static.foodgawker.com/wp-content/themes/Fo…-bar-texture.jpg?ver=4 could save 908B (73% reduction).
Losslessly compressing https://static.foodgawker.com/wp-content/themes/Fo…oter-texture.jpg?ver=4 could save 908B (65% reduction).
Losslessly compressing https://static.foodgawker.com/wp-content/themes/Fo…epeat_6-7-13.jpg?ver=4 could save 904B (25% reduction).
Losslessly compressing https://static.foodgawker.com/wp-content/themes/Fo…rd-hover-top.png?ver=4 could save 893B (88% reduction).
Losslessly compressing https://static.foodgawker.com/wp-content/themes/Fo…rd-hover-btm.png?ver=4 could save 831B (88% reduction).
priority - 14 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking script resources and 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
priority - 3 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt_mobile.js (15 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/expan…ed.js?source=safeframe (60 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/osd.js (60 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js (60 minutes)
https://ssl.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 3 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 26.7KiB (25% reduction).
foodgawker.com Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 120 |
| Number of Hosts | 21 |
| Static Resources | 77 |
| JavaScript Resources | 32 |
| CSS Resources | 2 |
foodgawker.com Desktop Resource Breakdown
foodgawker.com mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-12-04
foodgawker.com Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 56 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking script resources and 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
priority - 3 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 27.3KiB (25% reduction).
priority - 2 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 22.3KiB (63% reduction).
Compressing https://static.foodgawker.com/wp-content/themes/Fo…epeat_6-7-13.jpg?ver=4 could save 2.5KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing https://static.foodgawker.com/wp-content/themes/Fo…/img/addthis-blank.gif could save 1KiB (93% reduction).
Compressing https://static.foodgawker.com/wp-content/themes/Fo…oter-texture.jpg?ver=4 could save 935B (67% reduction).
Compressing https://static.foodgawker.com/wp-content/themes/Fo…rd-hover-top.png?ver=4 could save 930B (91% reduction).
Compressing https://static.foodgawker.com/wp-content/themes/Fo…-bar-texture.jpg?ver=4 could save 919B (74% reduction).
Compressing https://static.foodgawker.com/wp-content/themes/Fo…rd-hover-btm.png?ver=4 could save 858B (91% reduction).
Compressing https://static.foodgawker.com/wp-content/themes/Fo…-sm_6-7-13.png?ver=2.3 could save 633B (20% reduction).
priority - 1 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
foodgawker.com Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 47 |
| Number of Hosts | 9 |
| Static Resources | 41 |
| JavaScript Resources | 6 |
| CSS Resources | 1 |
foodgawker.com Mobile Resource Breakdown
foodgawker.com mobile page usability
Last tested: 2019-12-04
foodgawker.com Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 10 Configure the viewport
Your page uses a legacy HandheldFriendly meta tag, which instructs some browsers that your page is optimized for mobile. Other browsers, including those on iOS, will render your page as it would appear on a desktop browser.
While the HandheldFriendly tag instructs some mobile devices to display the page at the device's width, it should be replaced with a meta viewport specifying <meta name=viewport width=device-width> to increase compatibility.
priority - 3 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<a href="/about/">about</a> and 11 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="https://foodga…g/gluten-free/" class="tag-link-29768…ink-position-2">Gluten Free</a> and 18 others are close to other tap targets.foodgawker.com similar domains
www.foodgawker.net
www.foodgawker.org
www.foodgawker.info
www.foodgawker.biz
www.foodgawker.us
www.foodgawker.mobi
www.oodgawker.com
www.foodgawker.com
www.coodgawker.com
www.fcoodgawker.com
www.cfoodgawker.com
www.doodgawker.com
www.fdoodgawker.com
www.dfoodgawker.com
www.roodgawker.com
www.froodgawker.com
www.rfoodgawker.com
www.toodgawker.com
www.ftoodgawker.com
www.tfoodgawker.com
www.goodgawker.com
www.fgoodgawker.com
www.gfoodgawker.com
www.voodgawker.com
www.fvoodgawker.com
www.vfoodgawker.com
www.fodgawker.com
www.fiodgawker.com
www.foiodgawker.com
www.fioodgawker.com
www.fkodgawker.com
www.fokodgawker.com
www.fkoodgawker.com
www.flodgawker.com
www.folodgawker.com
www.floodgawker.com
www.fpodgawker.com
www.fopodgawker.com
www.fpoodgawker.com
www.foidgawker.com
www.fooidgawker.com
www.fokdgawker.com
www.fookdgawker.com
www.foldgawker.com
www.fooldgawker.com
www.fopdgawker.com
www.foopdgawker.com
www.foogawker.com
www.fooxgawker.com
www.foodxgawker.com
www.fooxdgawker.com
www.foosgawker.com
www.foodsgawker.com
www.foosdgawker.com
www.fooegawker.com
www.foodegawker.com
www.fooedgawker.com
www.foorgawker.com
www.foodrgawker.com
www.foordgawker.com
www.foofgawker.com
www.foodfgawker.com
www.foofdgawker.com
www.foocgawker.com
www.foodcgawker.com
www.foocdgawker.com
www.foodawker.com
www.foodfawker.com
www.foodgfawker.com
www.foodvawker.com
www.foodgvawker.com
www.foodvgawker.com
www.foodtawker.com
www.foodgtawker.com
www.foodtgawker.com
www.foodbawker.com
www.foodgbawker.com
www.foodbgawker.com
www.foodyawker.com
www.foodgyawker.com
www.foodygawker.com
www.foodhawker.com
www.foodghawker.com
www.foodhgawker.com
www.foodgwker.com
www.foodgqwker.com
www.foodgaqwker.com
www.foodgqawker.com
www.foodgwwker.com
www.foodgawwker.com
www.foodgwawker.com
www.foodgswker.com
www.foodgaswker.com
www.foodgsawker.com
www.foodgzwker.com
www.foodgazwker.com
www.foodgzawker.com
www.foodgaker.com
www.foodgaqker.com
www.foodgawqker.com
www.foodgaaker.com
www.foodgawaker.com
www.foodgaawker.com
www.foodgasker.com
www.foodgawsker.com
www.foodgaeker.com
www.foodgaweker.com
www.foodgaewker.com
www.foodgawer.com
www.foodgawjer.com
www.foodgawkjer.com
www.foodgawjker.com
www.foodgawier.com
www.foodgawkier.com
www.foodgawiker.com
www.foodgawmer.com
www.foodgawkmer.com
www.foodgawmker.com
www.foodgawler.com
www.foodgawkler.com
www.foodgawlker.com
www.foodgawoer.com
www.foodgawkoer.com
www.foodgawoker.com
www.foodgawkr.com
www.foodgawkwr.com
www.foodgawkewr.com
www.foodgawkwer.com
www.foodgawksr.com
www.foodgawkesr.com
www.foodgawkser.com
www.foodgawkdr.com
www.foodgawkedr.com
www.foodgawkder.com
www.foodgawkrr.com
www.foodgawkerr.com
www.foodgawkrer.com
www.foodgawke.com
www.foodgawkee.com
www.foodgawkere.com
www.foodgawkeer.com
www.foodgawked.com
www.foodgawkerd.com
www.foodgawkef.com
www.foodgawkerf.com
www.foodgawkefr.com
www.foodgawket.com
www.foodgawkert.com
www.foodgawketr.com
www.foodgawker.con
foodgawker.com Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
foodgawker.com TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.