GRAPHIC-DESIGN.COM Graphic Design & Publishing Center


graphic-design.com website information.

graphic-design.com domain name is registered by .COM top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .COM domain zone.

No name server records were found.

and probably website graphic-design.com is hosted by AKAMAI-AS - Akamai Technologies, Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by AKAMAI-AS - Akamai Technologies, Inc., US hosting company.

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website graphic-design.com position was 30990 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 991853. Now website graphic-design.com ranked in Alexa database as number 187806 (in the world).

Website graphic-design.com Desktop speed measurement score (75/100) is better than the results of 59.78% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

graphic-design.com Mobile usability score (63/100) is better than the results of 9.16% of other sites and shows that the page mobile usability is poor and can be improved.

Mobile speed measurement score of graphic-design.com (71/100) is better than the results of 78.26% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
Sep-24-2024 187,806-1,559
Sep-23-2024 186,2471,743
Sep-22-2024 187,990515
Sep-21-2024 188,5051,223
Sep-20-2024 189,7282,611
Sep-19-2024 192,339159
Sep-18-2024 192,498-1,690

Advertisement

graphic-design.com Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.



graphic-design.com whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.


Domain Name: GRAPHIC-DESIGN.COM
Registry Domain ID: 2857797_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.moniker.com
Registrar URL: http://www.moniker.com
Updated Date: 2020-09-26T20:39:08Z
Creation Date: 1995-06-30T04:00:00Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2021-06-29T04:00:00Z
Registrar: Moniker Online Services LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 228
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@moniker.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +49.68949396850
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: NS8255.HOSTGATOR.COM
Name Server: NS8256.HOSTGATOR.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2021-05-12T19:32:17Z

graphic-design.com server information

Servers Location

IP Address
Country
Region
City

graphic-design.com desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2018-12-04


Desktop Speed Medium
75/100

graphic-design.com Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 14 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 132.5KiB (46% reduction).

Compressing and resizing http://graphic-design.com/sites/default/files/cookies.jpg could save 44.7KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.graphic-design.com/NET_NEUTRALITY/net_neutrality_t.jpg could save 12.7KiB (66% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/Photoshop/tutorials/…ming_guitar_sketch.jpg could save 10.6KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/GO/NO_ADS_125.jpg could save 8.3KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/default/files/colo…ncils_2.jpg?1520973782 could save 7.2KiB (56% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/Showker/fred_c_125.jpg could save 7.2KiB (60% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/creative/tidbits_205.jpg could save 5.5KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/creative/2015/creative_update_185.jpg could save 4.5KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/Photoshop/faves/faves.jpg could save 4.4KiB (48% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/graphics/125/photo_folio.jpg could save 4.3KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/adobe/elements_camera_125.jpg could save 4.2KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/graphics/125/thank_you.jpg could save 3.9KiB (44% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/default/files/dpts/logo-home.png could save 3.7KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/Photoshop/tutorials/…g_comet_tutorial_m.jpg could save 2.4KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/Photoshop/photo_mani…ions/photo_color_m.jpg could save 2.1KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/partners/1511_Logobee.png could save 1.6KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/news/2013/modern_photo_editor.jpg could save 1.5KiB (58% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/Photoshop/1101_madne…_Photoshop_Madness.jpg could save 1.5KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/graphics/32_graphics/discuss_this.jpg could save 1.4KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/themes/dtg/images/icon-rss.gif could save 380B (35% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/dtgnews/facebook16.png could save 177B (50% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/themes/dtg/images/menufirst-sel.png could save 127B (51% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/themes/dtg/images/menusel.png could save 117B (60% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/themes/dtg/images/bullet.png could save 114B (60% reduction).

priority - 6 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 6 blocking script resources and 12 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://graphic-design.com/misc/jquery.js?e
http://graphic-design.com/misc/drupal.js?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…fish/js/superfish.js?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…uery.bgiframe.min.js?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…erIntent.minified.js?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_menus/nice_menus.js?e

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://graphic-design.com/modules/node/node.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/defaults.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/system.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/system-menus.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/modules/user/user.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/cck/theme/content-module.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/filefield/filefield.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_menus/nice_menus.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…ce_menus_default.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/tagadelic/tagadelic.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/views/css/views.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/themes/dtg/style.css?e

priority - 5 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 51KiB (60% reduction).

Compressing http://graphic-design.com/misc/jquery.js?e could save 15KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/system.css?e could save 7KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/themes/dtg/style.css?e could save 6.7KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/misc/drupal.js?e could save 6.6KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…ce_menus_default.css?e could save 3.4KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_menus/nice_menus.css?e could save 2.7KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…fish/js/superfish.js?e could save 2.1KiB (59% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/cck/theme/content-module.css?e could save 1.5KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/views/css/views.css?e could save 1.1KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…erIntent.minified.js?e could save 895B (55% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/filefield/filefield.css?e could save 792B (64% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…uery.bgiframe.min.js?e could save 711B (47% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/modules/user/user.css?e could save 634B (59% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/system-menus.css?e could save 547B (62% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_menus/nice_menus.js?e could save 373B (43% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/modules/node/node.css?e could save 358B (52% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/tagadelic/tagadelic.css?e could save 353B (65% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/defaults.css?e could save 317B (46% reduction).

priority - 4 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.64 seconds.

There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 1 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 8.6KiB (49% reduction).

Minifying http://graphic-design.com/misc/drupal.js?e could save 6.5KiB (63% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…fish/js/superfish.js?e could save 946B (26% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_menus/nice_menus.js?e could save 558B (63% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…uery.bgiframe.min.js?e could save 330B (22% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…erIntent.minified.js?e could save 322B (21% reduction).

priority - 1 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://s3.buysellads.com/ac/bsa.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)

priority - 1 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 7.7KiB (29% reduction).

Minifying http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/system.css?e could save 2.6KiB (28% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…ce_menus_default.css?e could save 1.7KiB (39% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_menus/nice_menus.css?e could save 1KiB (29% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/cck/theme/content-module.css?e could save 566B (25% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/views/css/views.css?e could save 412B (24% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/filefield/filefield.css?e could save 372B (31% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/defaults.css?e could save 292B (43% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/modules/user/user.css?e could save 272B (26% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/system-menus.css?e could save 197B (23% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/modules/node/node.css?e could save 134B (20% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/tagadelic/tagadelic.css?e could save 129B (24% reduction).

graphic-design.com Desktop Resources

Total Resources62
Number of Hosts4
Static Resources60
JavaScript Resources8
CSS Resources12

graphic-design.com Desktop Resource Breakdown

graphic-design.com mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2018-12-04


Mobile Speed Medium
71/100

graphic-design.com Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 24 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 6 blocking script resources and 12 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://graphic-design.com/misc/jquery.js?e
http://graphic-design.com/misc/drupal.js?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…fish/js/superfish.js?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…uery.bgiframe.min.js?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…erIntent.minified.js?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_menus/nice_menus.js?e

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://graphic-design.com/modules/node/node.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/defaults.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/system.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/system-menus.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/modules/user/user.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/cck/theme/content-module.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/filefield/filefield.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_menus/nice_menus.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…ce_menus_default.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/tagadelic/tagadelic.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/views/css/views.css?e
http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/themes/dtg/style.css?e

priority - 8 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 75.1KiB (36% reduction).

Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/Photoshop/tutorials/…ming_guitar_sketch.jpg could save 10.6KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/GO/NO_ADS_125.jpg could save 8.3KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/default/files/colo…ncils_2.jpg?1520973782 could save 7.2KiB (56% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/Showker/fred_c_125.jpg could save 7.2KiB (60% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/creative/tidbits_205.jpg could save 5.5KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/creative/2015/creative_update_185.jpg could save 4.5KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/Photoshop/faves/faves.jpg could save 4.4KiB (48% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/graphics/125/photo_folio.jpg could save 4.3KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/adobe/elements_camera_125.jpg could save 4.2KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/graphics/125/thank_you.jpg could save 3.9KiB (44% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/default/files/dpts/logo-home.png could save 3.7KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/Photoshop/tutorials/…g_comet_tutorial_m.jpg could save 2.4KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/Photoshop/photo_mani…ions/photo_color_m.jpg could save 2.1KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/partners/1511_Logobee.png could save 1.6KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/news/2013/modern_photo_editor.jpg could save 1.5KiB (58% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/Photoshop/1101_madne…_Photoshop_Madness.jpg could save 1.5KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/graphics/32_graphics/discuss_this.jpg could save 1.4KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/themes/dtg/images/icon-rss.gif could save 380B (35% reduction).
Compressing http://www.graphic-design.com/dtgnews/facebook16.png could save 177B (50% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/themes/dtg/images/menufirst-sel.png could save 127B (51% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/themes/dtg/images/menusel.png could save 117B (60% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/themes/dtg/images/bullet.png could save 114B (60% reduction).

priority - 5 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 51KiB (60% reduction).

Compressing http://graphic-design.com/misc/jquery.js?e could save 15KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/system.css?e could save 7KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/themes/dtg/style.css?e could save 6.7KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/misc/drupal.js?e could save 6.6KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…ce_menus_default.css?e could save 3.4KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_menus/nice_menus.css?e could save 2.7KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…fish/js/superfish.js?e could save 2.1KiB (59% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/cck/theme/content-module.css?e could save 1.5KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/views/css/views.css?e could save 1.1KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…erIntent.minified.js?e could save 895B (55% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/filefield/filefield.css?e could save 792B (64% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…uery.bgiframe.min.js?e could save 711B (47% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/modules/user/user.css?e could save 634B (59% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/system-menus.css?e could save 547B (62% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_menus/nice_menus.js?e could save 373B (43% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/modules/node/node.css?e could save 358B (52% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/tagadelic/tagadelic.css?e could save 353B (65% reduction).
Compressing http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/defaults.css?e could save 317B (46% reduction).

priority - 1 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://s3.buysellads.com/ac/bsa.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)

priority - 1 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.26 seconds.

There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 1 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 8.6KiB (49% reduction).

Minifying http://graphic-design.com/misc/drupal.js?e could save 6.5KiB (63% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…fish/js/superfish.js?e could save 946B (26% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_menus/nice_menus.js?e could save 558B (63% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…uery.bgiframe.min.js?e could save 330B (22% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…erIntent.minified.js?e could save 322B (21% reduction).

priority - 1 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 7.7KiB (29% reduction).

Minifying http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/system.css?e could save 2.6KiB (28% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_m…ce_menus_default.css?e could save 1.7KiB (39% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/nice_menus/nice_menus.css?e could save 1KiB (29% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/cck/theme/content-module.css?e could save 566B (25% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/views/css/views.css?e could save 412B (24% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/filefield/filefield.css?e could save 372B (31% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/defaults.css?e could save 292B (43% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/modules/user/user.css?e could save 272B (26% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/modules/system/system-menus.css?e could save 197B (23% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/modules/node/node.css?e could save 134B (20% reduction).
Minifying http://graphic-design.com/sites/all/modules/tagadelic/tagadelic.css?e could save 129B (24% reduction).

graphic-design.com Mobile Resources

Total Resources62
Number of Hosts4
Static Resources60
JavaScript Resources8
CSS Resources12

graphic-design.com Mobile Resource Breakdown

graphic-design.com mobile page usability

Last tested: 2018-12-04


Mobile Usability Bad
63/100

graphic-design.com Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 40 Use legible font sizes

The following text on your page renders in a way that may be difficult for some of your visitors to read. Use legible font sizes to provide a better user experience.

The following text fragments have a small font size. Increase the font size to make them more legible.

Home renders only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).

Photography and 7 others render only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).

60 seconds renders only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).

elcome to the Design Center. renders only 6 pixels tall (16 CSS pixels).

... we invite…Graphic-Design and 2 others render only 6 pixels tall (16 CSS pixels).

DT&G FaceBook Group and 2 others render only 6 pixels tall (16 CSS pixels).

PHOTOGRAPHY and 14 others render only 4 pixels tall (10 CSS pixels).

REVIEWS & CRITIQUE and 10 others render only 4 pixels tall (10 CSS pixels).

Creative Tidbi…ation and more and 9 others render only 8 pixels tall (20 CSS pixels).

Yes, Valentine…d more! Enjoy. and 9 others render only 5 pixels tall (14 CSS pixels).

October 24, 2018 and 9 others render only 5 pixels tall (14 CSS pixels).

Artist Brian Y…e Way He Works and 10 others render only 5 pixels tall (14 CSS pixels).
1 renders only 5 pixels tall (14 CSS pixels).
next › and 5 others render only 5 pixels tall (14 CSS pixels).
renders only 5 pixels tall (14 CSS pixels).
subscribe and 4 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).

logo bee 2018 - 10 and 1 others render only 4 pixels tall (10 CSS pixels).

FRIENDS renders only 4 pixels tall (10 CSS pixels).

Custom logo design and 6 others render only 4 pixels tall (10 CSS pixels).

--------------------- renders only 4 pixels tall (10 CSS pixels).

Publishers' Warehouse and 1 others render only 5 pixels tall (14 CSS pixels).

learn how to a…web sites with and 5 others render only 5 pixels tall (14 CSS pixels).

The Design & P…E web site ... and 2 others render only 5 pixels tall (14 CSS pixels).

malvertising and 2 others render only 5 pixels tall (14 CSS pixels).

Safenetting renders only 5 pixels tall (14 CSS pixels).

Latest Photoshop articles: and 2 others render only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).
1 and 6 others render only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).
Photoshop Vale…shes, Clip Art and 6 others render only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).
ALL RIGHTS RES…994 - 2018 DTG renders only 4 pixels tall (10 CSS pixels).
POLICY & PRIVACY and 2 others render only 4 pixels tall (10 CSS pixels).
web site and w…is located in and 3 others render only 3 pixels tall (9 CSS pixels).
Harrisonburg, Virginia and 2 others render only 3 pixels tall (9 CSS pixels).

priority - 12 Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <a href="/">Home</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="/department/photoshop">Photoshop</a> and 6 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="https://www.fa…s/DTGmagazine/">DT&amp;G FaceBook Group</a> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="/rss.xml"></a> is close to 1 other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="/department/web-design">Web Design</a> and 14 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="/department/we…views-critique">Reviews &amp; Critique</a> and 10 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="https://medium…d-866947f2531b">More cookies than God</a> and 3 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="/search">Search</a> and 4 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="http://www.gra…m/contact.html"></a> and 7 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="http://www.gra…m/friends.html">FRIENDS</a> and 7 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="http://www.gra…use/index.html">Publishers&#39; Warehouse</a> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="http://www.gra…com/tags/fonts">Fonts, fonts, fonts</a> and 8 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="/content/about…lishing-center">Policy &amp; Privacy</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="http://www.harrisonburg.org/">Harrisonburg, Virginia</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.

priority - 10 Configure the viewport

Your page does not have a viewport specified. This causes mobile devices to render your page as it would appear on a desktop browser, scaling it down to fit on a mobile screen. Configure a viewport to allow your page to render properly on all devices.

Configure a viewport for this page.

graphic-design.com similar domains

Similar domains:
www.graphic-design.com
www.graphic-design.net
www.graphic-design.org
www.graphic-design.info
www.graphic-design.biz
www.graphic-design.us
www.graphic-design.mobi
www.raphic-design.com
www.graphic-design.com
www.fraphic-design.com
www.gfraphic-design.com
www.fgraphic-design.com
www.vraphic-design.com
www.gvraphic-design.com
www.vgraphic-design.com
www.traphic-design.com
www.gtraphic-design.com
www.tgraphic-design.com
www.braphic-design.com
www.gbraphic-design.com
www.bgraphic-design.com
www.yraphic-design.com
www.gyraphic-design.com
www.ygraphic-design.com
www.hraphic-design.com
www.ghraphic-design.com
www.hgraphic-design.com
www.gaphic-design.com
www.geaphic-design.com
www.greaphic-design.com
www.geraphic-design.com
www.gdaphic-design.com
www.grdaphic-design.com
www.gdraphic-design.com
www.gfaphic-design.com
www.grfaphic-design.com
www.gtaphic-design.com
www.grtaphic-design.com
www.grphic-design.com
www.grqphic-design.com
www.graqphic-design.com
www.grqaphic-design.com
www.grwphic-design.com
www.grawphic-design.com
www.grwaphic-design.com
www.grsphic-design.com
www.grasphic-design.com
www.grsaphic-design.com
www.grzphic-design.com
www.grazphic-design.com
www.grzaphic-design.com
www.grahic-design.com
www.graohic-design.com
www.grapohic-design.com
www.graophic-design.com
www.gralhic-design.com
www.graplhic-design.com
www.gralphic-design.com
www.grapic-design.com
www.grapbic-design.com
www.graphbic-design.com
www.grapbhic-design.com
www.grapgic-design.com
www.graphgic-design.com
www.grapghic-design.com
www.grapyic-design.com
www.graphyic-design.com
www.grapyhic-design.com
www.grapuic-design.com
www.graphuic-design.com
www.grapuhic-design.com
www.grapjic-design.com
www.graphjic-design.com
www.grapjhic-design.com
www.grapnic-design.com
www.graphnic-design.com
www.grapnhic-design.com
www.graphc-design.com
www.graphuc-design.com
www.graphiuc-design.com
www.graphjc-design.com
www.graphijc-design.com
www.graphkc-design.com
www.graphikc-design.com
www.graphkic-design.com
www.graphoc-design.com
www.graphioc-design.com
www.graphoic-design.com
www.graphi-design.com
www.graphix-design.com
www.graphicx-design.com
www.graphixc-design.com
www.graphid-design.com
www.graphicd-design.com
www.graphidc-design.com
www.graphif-design.com
www.graphicf-design.com
www.graphifc-design.com
www.graphiv-design.com
www.graphicv-design.com
www.graphivc-design.com
www.graphicdesign.com
www.graphic-esign.com
www.graphic-xesign.com
www.graphic-dxesign.com
www.graphic-xdesign.com
www.graphic-sesign.com
www.graphic-dsesign.com
www.graphic-sdesign.com
www.graphic-eesign.com
www.graphic-deesign.com
www.graphic-edesign.com
www.graphic-resign.com
www.graphic-dresign.com
www.graphic-rdesign.com
www.graphic-fesign.com
www.graphic-dfesign.com
www.graphic-fdesign.com
www.graphic-cesign.com
www.graphic-dcesign.com
www.graphic-cdesign.com
www.graphic-dsign.com
www.graphic-dwsign.com
www.graphic-dewsign.com
www.graphic-dwesign.com
www.graphic-dssign.com
www.graphic-dessign.com
www.graphic-ddsign.com
www.graphic-dedsign.com
www.graphic-ddesign.com
www.graphic-drsign.com
www.graphic-dersign.com
www.graphic-deign.com
www.graphic-dewign.com
www.graphic-deswign.com
www.graphic-deeign.com
www.graphic-deseign.com
www.graphic-dedign.com
www.graphic-desdign.com
www.graphic-dezign.com
www.graphic-deszign.com
www.graphic-dezsign.com
www.graphic-dexign.com
www.graphic-desxign.com
www.graphic-dexsign.com
www.graphic-deaign.com
www.graphic-desaign.com
www.graphic-deasign.com
www.graphic-desgn.com
www.graphic-desugn.com
www.graphic-desiugn.com
www.graphic-desuign.com
www.graphic-desjgn.com
www.graphic-desijgn.com
www.graphic-desjign.com
www.graphic-deskgn.com
www.graphic-desikgn.com
www.graphic-deskign.com
www.graphic-desogn.com
www.graphic-desiogn.com
www.graphic-desoign.com
www.graphic-desin.com
www.graphic-desifn.com
www.graphic-desigfn.com
www.graphic-desifgn.com
www.graphic-desivn.com
www.graphic-desigvn.com
www.graphic-desivgn.com
www.graphic-desitn.com
www.graphic-desigtn.com
www.graphic-desitgn.com
www.graphic-desibn.com
www.graphic-desigbn.com
www.graphic-desibgn.com
www.graphic-desiyn.com
www.graphic-desigyn.com
www.graphic-desiygn.com
www.graphic-desihn.com
www.graphic-desighn.com
www.graphic-desihgn.com
www.graphic-desig.com
www.graphic-desigb.com
www.graphic-designb.com
www.graphic-desigh.com
www.graphic-designh.com
www.graphic-desigj.com
www.graphic-designj.com
www.graphic-desigjn.com
www.graphic-desigm.com
www.graphic-designm.com
www.graphic-desigmn.com
www.graphic-design.con

graphic-design.com Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.


graphic-design.com TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.