IGDA.JP 国際ゲーム開発者協会日本 – ゲーム開発者個人を対象とした国際NPO

  1. Homepage
  2. igda.jp

igda.jp website information.

igda.jp domain name is registered by .JP top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .JP domain zone.

No name server records were found.

and probably website igda.jp is hosted by AKAMAI-AS - Akamai Technologies, Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by AKAMAI-AS - Akamai Technologies, Inc., US hosting company.

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website igda.jp position was 36289 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 997581. Now website igda.jp ranked in Alexa database as number 596267 (in the world).

Website igda.jp Desktop speed measurement score (63/100) is better than the results of 39.87% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

igda.jp Mobile usability score (98/100) is better than the results of 55.61% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed measurement score of igda.jp (49/100) is better than the results of 31.99% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
Nov-18-2024 596,26711,216
Nov-17-2024 607,4832,240
Nov-16-2024 609,723-24,148
Nov-15-2024 585,5758,977
Nov-14-2024 594,55212,477
Nov-13-2024 607,0290
Nov-12-2024 607,0290

Advertisement

igda.jp Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.


igda.jp whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.

igda.jp server information

Servers Location

IP Address
Country
Region
City

igda.jp desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2018-08-28

Desktop Speed Bad
63/100

igda.jp Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 39 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 4.1 seconds.

There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 8 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 10 blocking script resources and 9 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://www.igda.jp/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
http://www.igda.jp/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
http://webfonts.sakura.ne.jp/js/sakura.js?ver=2.0.0
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-po…4.1.0.min.js?ver=4.1.2
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/_inc…on.min.js?ver=20130122
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/adrotate/lib…rotate.clicktracker.js
https://s0.wp.com/wp-content/js/devicepx-jetpack.js?ver=201835
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/themes/delivery-lite…s/delivery-lite.min.js
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/_inc…eline.min.js?ver=4.0.0
http://www.igda.jp/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.8

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/themes/delivery-lite/wpp.css?ver=4.1.2
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/wp-to-twitte…ter-feed.css?ver=4.9.8
http://www.igda.jp/wp-includes/css/dashicons.min.css?ver=4.9.8
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans%3…bset=latin%2Clatin-ext
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/themes/delivery-lite…gins.min.css?ver=4.9.8
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/themes/delivery-lite/style.min.css?ver=4.9.8
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/modu…icons.css?ver=20170506
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/css/jetpack.css?ver=6.4.2
http://www.igda.jp/?custom-css=257ba6d9bc

priority - 5 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/igdaj-ico-1.bmp (expiration not specified)
https://cdn.syndication.twimg.com/widgets/timeline…&t=1706063&tz=GMT-0700 (5 minutes)
https://syndication.twitter.com/settings (10 minutes)
http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/client.js?onload=clientLibraryLoaded (30 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/googleapis.proxy.js?onload=startup (30 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js (30 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/rpc:shindig_random.js?onload=init (30 minutes)
https://translate.googleapis.com/translate_static/css/translateelement.css (60 minutes)
https://translate.googleapis.com/translate_static/js/element/main.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
https://cdn-ak.b.st-hatena.com/css/entry-button.cs…9790ce853e13cd544bd45e (9.9 hours)

priority - 3 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 33.3KiB (49% reduction).

Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/530395605/f1_normal.jpg could save 5.9KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1063312297/WS000001_normal.JPG could save 5.9KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1142074358/tsukaguchi_normal.png could save 5.2KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/igdajp-logo5.jpg could save 4.4KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/wp-social-bo…c/images/line88x20.png could save 2.4KiB (56% reduction).
Compressing https://d7x5nblzs94me.cloudfront.net/v1/i/pocket_button.png?v=3 could save 1.8KiB (51% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/744921147301470209/y6--a4PC_normal.jpg could save 957B (41% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/935741672276754433/NXN6rinj_normal.jpg could save 954B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/979769306597634055/vEVcTKZ7_normal.jpg could save 950B (47% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/844965848615862273/YIG_p_fX_normal.jpg could save 938B (48% reduction).
Compressing https://calendar.google.com/googlecalendar/images/logo-plus.png could save 875B (90% reduction).
Compressing https://i0.wp.com/www.igda.jp/wp-content/uploads/2…1.jpg?resize=110%2C100 could save 774B (12% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/634078254341582848/O_C_pEmC_normal.jpg could save 745B (50% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/590970599977037824/IIHS-deS_normal.png could save 597B (23% reduction).
Compressing https://i2.wp.com/www.igda.jp/wp-content/uploads/2…0.jpg?resize=110%2C100 could save 421B (11% reduction).
Compressing https://i2.wp.com/igda.sakura.ne.jp/uploads/imgbbf…51.gif?resize=155%2C61 could save 340B (14% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/640393075131482112/FMQJtfIZ_normal.png could save 331B (25% reduction).

priority - 2 Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 26% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.
Click to see the screenshot with only the HTML response:

priority - 1 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 11.4KiB (49% reduction).

Compressing https://d7x5nblzs94me.cloudfront.net/v1/c/button.css?v=8 could save 2KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/j/btn.js?v=1 could save 1.2KiB (55% reduction).
Compressing https://d7x5nblzs94me.cloudfront.net/v1/j/button.js?v=5 could save 1.1KiB (49% reduction).
Compressing https://d7x5nblzs94me.cloudfront.net/v1/j/shared.js?v=2 could save 676B (53% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.05334356869570911 could save 436B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.8283028185833246 could save 436B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.9098710289690644 could save 435B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.6402643441688269 could save 435B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.7067068491596729 could save 435B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.6411443448159844 could save 435B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.7986031137406826 could save 435B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.1824128630105406 could save 434B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.33450601529330015 could save 434B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.3278128553647548 could save 434B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.06612521503120661 could save 434B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.1596023328602314 could save 434B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.7355505488812923 could save 434B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.8383512159343809 could save 434B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…2F&r=0.341704961610958 could save 434B (43% reduction).

priority - 0 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 3.8KiB (25% reduction).

Minifying http://b.hatena.ne.jp/js/bookmark_button.js could save 1.9KiB (22% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://d7x5nblzs94me.cloudfront.net/v1/j/button.js?v=5 could save 807B (35% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/j/btn.js?v=1 could save 545B (24% reduction).
Minifying http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/adrotate/lib…rotate.clicktracker.js could save 328B (61% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://d7x5nblzs94me.cloudfront.net/v1/j/shared.js?v=2 could save 228B (19% reduction).

priority - 0 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 3.2KiB (22% reduction).

Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.05334356869570911 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.8283028185833246 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.1824128630105406 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.33450601529330015 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.3278128553647548 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.06612521503120661 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.9098710289690644 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.6402643441688269 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.1596023328602314 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.7355505488812923 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.7067068491596729 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.6411443448159844 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.8383512159343809 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.7986031137406826 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…2F&r=0.341704961610958 could save 217B (22% reduction).

priority - 0 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 2.2KiB (35% reduction).

Minifying http://www.igda.jp/?custom-css=257ba6d9bc could save 954B (62% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://cdn-ak.b.st-hatena.com/css/reset.css?c6577…9790ce853e13cd544bd45e could save 431B (46% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://d7x5nblzs94me.cloudfront.net/v1/c/button.css?v=8 could save 407B (14% reduction).
Minifying http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/themes/delivery-lite/wpp.css?ver=4.1.2 could save 304B (58% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/modu…icons.css?ver=20170506 could save 168B (30% reduction) after compression.

igda.jp Desktop Resources

Total Resources211
Number of Hosts35
Static Resources112
JavaScript Resources40
CSS Resources16

igda.jp Desktop Resource Breakdown

igda.jp mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2018-08-28

Mobile Speed Bad
49/100

igda.jp Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 56 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 4 seconds.

There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 32 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 10 blocking script resources and 9 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://www.igda.jp/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
http://www.igda.jp/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
http://webfonts.sakura.ne.jp/js/sakura.js?ver=2.0.0
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-po…4.1.0.min.js?ver=4.1.2
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/_inc…on.min.js?ver=20130122
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/adrotate/lib…rotate.clicktracker.js
https://s0.wp.com/wp-content/js/devicepx-jetpack.js?ver=201835
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/themes/delivery-lite…s/delivery-lite.min.js
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/_inc…eline.min.js?ver=4.0.0
http://www.igda.jp/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.8

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/themes/delivery-lite/wpp.css?ver=4.1.2
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/wp-to-twitte…ter-feed.css?ver=4.9.8
http://www.igda.jp/wp-includes/css/dashicons.min.css?ver=4.9.8
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans%3…bset=latin%2Clatin-ext
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/themes/delivery-lite…gins.min.css?ver=4.9.8
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/themes/delivery-lite/style.min.css?ver=4.9.8
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/modu…icons.css?ver=20170506
http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/css/jetpack.css?ver=6.4.2
http://www.igda.jp/?custom-css=257ba6d9bc

priority - 9 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/igdaj-ico-1.bmp (expiration not specified)
https://ton.twimg.com/tfw/css/syndication_bundle_v…89ef109e9eba493ffa.css (60 seconds)
https://cdn.syndication.twimg.com/widgets/timeline…&t=1706063&tz=GMT-0700 (5 minutes)
https://syndication.twitter.com/settings (10 minutes)
http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/client.js?onload=clientLibraryLoaded (30 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/googleapis.proxy.js?onload=startup (30 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js (30 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/rpc:shindig_random.js?onload=init (30 minutes)
https://translate.googleapis.com/translate_static/css/translateelement.css (60 minutes)
https://translate.googleapis.com/translate_static/js/element/main.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
https://cdn-ak.b.st-hatena.com/css/reset.css?c6577…9790ce853e13cd544bd45e (9.6 hours)
https://cdn-ak.b.st-hatena.com/css/entry-button.cs…9790ce853e13cd544bd45e (9.9 hours)

priority - 8 Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 41% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.
Click to see the screenshot with only the HTML response:

priority - 6 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 57.7KiB (55% reduction).

Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/530395605/f1_bigger.jpg could save 13.9KiB (87% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1063312297/WS000001_bigger.JPG could save 13.8KiB (86% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1142074358/tsukaguchi_bigger.png could save 12.4KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/igdajp-logo5.jpg could save 4.4KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing https://d7x5nblzs94me.cloudfront.net/v1/i/pocket_button-2x.png?v=3 could save 3.2KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing https://i0.wp.com/www.igda.jp/wp-content/uploads/2…=2.625&resize=300%2C97 could save 2.4KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/844965848615862273/YIG_p_fX_bigger.jpg could save 1KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/744921147301470209/y6--a4PC_bigger.jpg could save 980B (26% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/935741672276754433/NXN6rinj_bigger.jpg could save 971B (31% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/979769306597634055/vEVcTKZ7_bigger.jpg could save 956B (33% reduction).
Compressing https://calendar.google.com/googlecalendar/images/logo-plus.png could save 875B (90% reduction).
Compressing http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/wp-social-bo…c/images/line88x20.png could save 784B (18% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/634078254341582848/O_C_pEmC_bigger.jpg could save 696B (39% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/590970599977037824/IIHS-deS_normal.png could save 597B (23% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/640393075131482112/FMQJtfIZ_bigger.png could save 520B (25% reduction).
Compressing https://i2.wp.com/igda.sakura.ne.jp/uploads/imgbbf…51.gif?resize=155%2C61 could save 340B (14% reduction).

priority - 1 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 11.4KiB (48% reduction).

Compressing https://d7x5nblzs94me.cloudfront.net/v1/c/button.css?v=8 could save 2KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/j/btn.js?v=1 could save 1.2KiB (55% reduction).
Compressing https://d7x5nblzs94me.cloudfront.net/v1/j/button.js?v=5 could save 1.1KiB (49% reduction).
Compressing https://d7x5nblzs94me.cloudfront.net/v1/j/shared.js?v=2 could save 676B (53% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…2F&r=0.653810755815357 could save 436B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.24873096914961934 could save 436B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.34399502584710717 could save 435B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.9372386175673455 could save 435B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.2755968610290438 could save 435B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.5907622380182147 could save 435B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.34287911537103355 could save 435B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.24626537505537271 could save 434B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…2F&r=0.415887045674026 could save 434B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.09493710426613688 could save 434B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.4481974656227976 could save 433B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.39266586070880294 could save 433B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.6481027095578611 could save 433B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.6506572149228305 could save 433B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.09570529498159885 could save 432B (43% reduction).

priority - 0 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 3.8KiB (25% reduction).

Minifying http://b.hatena.ne.jp/js/bookmark_button.js could save 1.9KiB (22% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://d7x5nblzs94me.cloudfront.net/v1/j/button.js?v=5 could save 807B (35% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/j/btn.js?v=1 could save 545B (24% reduction).
Minifying http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/adrotate/lib…rotate.clicktracker.js could save 328B (61% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://d7x5nblzs94me.cloudfront.net/v1/j/shared.js?v=2 could save 228B (19% reduction).

priority - 0 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 3.2KiB (22% reduction).

Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.4481974656227976 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…2F&r=0.653810755815357 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.39266586070880294 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.34399502584710717 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.6481027095578611 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.24873096914961934 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.9372386175673455 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.2755968610290438 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.24626537505537271 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.6506572149228305 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.09570529498159885 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…2F&r=0.415887045674026 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…F&r=0.5907622380182147 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.09493710426613688 could save 217B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://widgets.getpocket.com/v1/button?label=pock…&r=0.34287911537103355 could save 217B (22% reduction).

priority - 0 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 2.2KiB (35% reduction).

Minifying http://www.igda.jp/?custom-css=257ba6d9bc could save 954B (62% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://cdn-ak.b.st-hatena.com/css/reset.css?c6577…9790ce853e13cd544bd45e could save 431B (46% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://d7x5nblzs94me.cloudfront.net/v1/c/button.css?v=8 could save 407B (14% reduction).
Minifying http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/themes/delivery-lite/wpp.css?ver=4.1.2 could save 304B (58% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.igda.jp/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/modu…icons.css?ver=20170506 could save 168B (30% reduction) after compression.

igda.jp Mobile Resources

Total Resources224
Number of Hosts35
Static Resources124
JavaScript Resources40
CSS Resources16

igda.jp Mobile Resource Breakdown

igda.jp mobile page usability

Last tested: 2018-08-28

Mobile Usability Good
98/100

igda.jp Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 1 Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <a href="https://t.co/lbcFo8C18A" class="link customisable">http://www.igda.jp/?p=8901</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.
The tap target <td id="dateMenuArrow1" class="date-picker-off"></td> is close to 2 other tap targets.
The tap target <img src="//calendar.goo…icon_print.gif"> is close to 2 other tap targets.
The tap target <div class="tab-name">Print</div> is close to 1 other tap targets.
The tap target <div id="2-20180828" class="all-day event-summary">All day アジア競技大会[ジャカルタ]</div> and 6 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="http://igdajau…/posts/default" class="rsswidget"></a> and 8 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="http://igdajau…g-audio15.html" class="rsswidget">SIG-Audio#15 アンケート集計結果</a> and 77 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="http://www.theme-junkie.com/">Theme Junkie</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.

igda.jp similar domains

Similar domains:
www.igda.com
www.igda.net
www.igda.org
www.igda.info
www.igda.biz
www.igda.us
www.igda.mobi
www.gda.jp
www.igda.jp
www.ugda.jp
www.iugda.jp
www.uigda.jp
www.jgda.jp
www.ijgda.jp
www.jigda.jp
www.kgda.jp
www.ikgda.jp
www.kigda.jp
www.ogda.jp
www.iogda.jp
www.oigda.jp
www.ida.jp
www.ifda.jp
www.igfda.jp
www.ifgda.jp
www.ivda.jp
www.igvda.jp
www.ivgda.jp
www.itda.jp
www.igtda.jp
www.itgda.jp
www.ibda.jp
www.igbda.jp
www.ibgda.jp
www.iyda.jp
www.igyda.jp
www.iygda.jp
www.ihda.jp
www.ighda.jp
www.ihgda.jp
www.iga.jp
www.igxa.jp
www.igdxa.jp
www.igxda.jp
www.igsa.jp
www.igdsa.jp
www.igsda.jp
www.igea.jp
www.igdea.jp
www.igeda.jp
www.igra.jp
www.igdra.jp
www.igrda.jp
www.igfa.jp
www.igdfa.jp
www.igca.jp
www.igdca.jp
www.igcda.jp
www.igd.jp
www.igdq.jp
www.igdaq.jp
www.igdqa.jp
www.igdw.jp
www.igdaw.jp
www.igdwa.jp
www.igds.jp
www.igdas.jp
www.igdz.jp
www.igdaz.jp
www.igdza.jp

igda.jp Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.

igda.jp TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.