kemi.fi website information.
kemi.fi domain name is registered by .FI top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .FI domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for kemi.fi domain:
- ns.kemi.fi
- ns2.kemi.fi
and probably website kemi.fi is hosted by GOOGLE - Google LLC, US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by GOOGLE - Google LLC, US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website kemi.fi position was 46344 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 998260. Now website kemi.fi ranked in Alexa database as number 306674 (in the world).
Website kemi.fi Desktop speed measurement score (75/100) is better than the results of 59.78% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
kemi.fi Mobile usability score (96/100) is better than the results of 46.59% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of kemi.fi (71/100) is better than the results of 78.26% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Nov-17-2024 | N/A | N/A |
| Nov-16-2024 | 306,674 | 2,461 |
| Nov-15-2024 | 309,135 | 2,495 |
| Nov-14-2024 | 311,630 | 3,208 |
| Nov-13-2024 | 314,838 | 0 |
| Nov-12-2024 | 314,838 | 0 |
| Nov-11-2024 | 314,838 | 0 |
Advertisement
kemi.fi Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
kemi.fi whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
domain.............: kemi.fi
status.............: Registered
created............: 1.1.1991 00:00:00
expires............: 31.8.2022 00:00:00
available..........: 30.9.2022 00:00:00
modified...........: 14.4.2020 11:21:46
RegistryLock.......: no
Nameservers
nserver............: ns.kemi.fi [185.25.200.5] [OK]
nserver............: ns2.kemi.fi [185.25.201.6] [OK]
DNSSEC
dnssec.............: no
Holder
name...............: Kemin kaupunki
register number....: 0210427-6
address............: Valtakatu 27-29
postal.............: 94100
city...............: Kemi
country............: Finland
phone..............:
holder email.......:
Registrar
registrar..........: Kemin kaupunki
www................: www.kemi.fi
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 10.3.2022 20:30:09 (EET)
kemi.fi server information
kemi.fi desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-07-15
kemi.fi Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 22 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 210.3KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/kemikortti-etusivu.jpg could save 39KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/investinkemi.jpg could save 26.2KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/greenkemibanneri.jpg could save 25.9KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/kaikukorttietu.jpg could save 24.2KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/kemin-150v-liput.jpg could save 20.5KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/avoinnaolobanneri2018.jpg could save 9KiB (11% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/plugins/ml-slider-pr…ssets/arrows/white.png could save 3.5KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Pien…suuri_sydan-300x83.jpg could save 2.2KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/vihreakemi-logo-141x90.png could save 1.4KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing https://www.google.com/cse/static/css/v2/clear.png could save 898B (88% reduction).
priority - 5 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.70 seconds.
There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 2 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
priority - 2 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://www.google.com/cse/static/style/look/v3/default.css (50 minutes)
http://cse.google.com/adsense/search/async-ads.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 1 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 10.3KiB (29% reduction).
Minifying http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/themes/vantage/style.css could save 3.1KiB (22% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/themes/vantage-child2/style.css?ver=2.6 could save 1.7KiB (39% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.google.com/cse/static/style/look/v3/default.css could save 512B (19% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/plugins/ml-slider/as…r/public.css?ver=3.8.1 could save 387B (26% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/plugins/easy-table/t…ault/style.css?ver=1.6 could save 242B (30% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/plugins/wp-forecast/wp-forecast-default.css could save 199B (22% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/plugins/page-list/css/page-list.css?ver=5.1 could save 197B (36% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/modu…icons.css?ver=20170506 could save 168B (30% reduction) after compression.
priority - 0 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 425B (48% reduction).
kemi.fi Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 73 |
| Number of Hosts | 13 |
| Static Resources | 65 |
| JavaScript Resources | 21 |
| CSS Resources | 27 |
kemi.fi Desktop Resource Breakdown
kemi.fi mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-07-15
kemi.fi Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 22 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 210.3KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/kemikortti-etusivu.jpg could save 39KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/investinkemi.jpg could save 26.2KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/greenkemibanneri.jpg could save 25.9KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/kaikukorttietu.jpg could save 24.2KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/kemin-150v-liput.jpg could save 20.5KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/avoinnaolobanneri2018.jpg could save 9KiB (11% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/plugins/ml-slider-pr…ssets/arrows/white.png could save 3.5KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Pien…suuri_sydan-300x83.jpg could save 2.2KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/vihreakemi-logo-141x90.png could save 1.4KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing https://www.google.com/cse/static/css/v2/clear.png could save 898B (88% reduction).
priority - 8 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
priority - 8 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.71 seconds.
There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 3 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://www.google.com/cse/static/style/look/v3/default.css (50 minutes)
http://cse.google.com/adsense/search/async-ads.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 1 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 10.5KiB (29% reduction).
Minifying http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/themes/vantage/style.css could save 3.1KiB (22% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/themes/vantage-child2/style.css?ver=2.6 could save 1.7KiB (39% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.google.com/cse/static/style/look/v3/default.css could save 512B (19% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/plugins/ml-slider/as…r/public.css?ver=3.8.1 could save 387B (26% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/plugins/easy-table/t…ault/style.css?ver=1.6 could save 242B (30% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.google.com/cse/static/element/e1b7867e793369c8/mobile+fi.css could save 215B (20% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/plugins/wp-forecast/wp-forecast-default.css could save 199B (22% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/plugins/page-list/css/page-list.css?ver=5.1 could save 197B (36% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.kemi.fi/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/modu…icons.css?ver=20170506 could save 168B (30% reduction) after compression.
priority - 0 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 425B (48% reduction).
kemi.fi Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 75 |
| Number of Hosts | 13 |
| Static Resources | 66 |
| JavaScript Resources | 21 |
| CSS Resources | 28 |
kemi.fi Mobile Resource Breakdown
kemi.fi mobile page usability
Last tested: 2019-07-15
kemi.fi Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 3 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<a href="http://kartta.kemi.fi/">Karttapalvelu</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="http://www.kem…an-katon-alla/">The Arctic Gem…ian katon alla</a> and 31 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="http://intra.kemi.fi">Intranet</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.<button id="button2" type="button" class="uk-button uk-b…uk-modal-close">Hyväksyn</button> is close to 1 other tap targets.kemi.fi similar domains
www.kemi.net
www.kemi.org
www.kemi.info
www.kemi.biz
www.kemi.us
www.kemi.mobi
www.emi.fi
www.kemi.fi
www.jemi.fi
www.kjemi.fi
www.jkemi.fi
www.iemi.fi
www.kiemi.fi
www.ikemi.fi
www.memi.fi
www.kmemi.fi
www.mkemi.fi
www.lemi.fi
www.klemi.fi
www.lkemi.fi
www.oemi.fi
www.koemi.fi
www.okemi.fi
www.kmi.fi
www.kwmi.fi
www.kewmi.fi
www.kwemi.fi
www.ksmi.fi
www.kesmi.fi
www.ksemi.fi
www.kdmi.fi
www.kedmi.fi
www.kdemi.fi
www.krmi.fi
www.kermi.fi
www.kremi.fi
www.kei.fi
www.keni.fi
www.kemni.fi
www.kenmi.fi
www.keji.fi
www.kemji.fi
www.kejmi.fi
www.keki.fi
www.kemki.fi
www.kekmi.fi
www.kem.fi
www.kemu.fi
www.kemiu.fi
www.kemui.fi
www.kemj.fi
www.kemij.fi
www.kemk.fi
www.kemik.fi
www.kemo.fi
www.kemio.fi
www.kemoi.fi
kemi.fi Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
kemi.fi TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.