LOMO.JP ロリポップ!レンタルサーバー | 利用実績165万人突破!


lomo.jp website information.

lomo.jp domain name is registered by .JP top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .JP domain zone.

No name server records were found.

and probably website lomo.jp is hosted by UPCLOUDUSA - UpCloud USA Inc, US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by UPCLOUDUSA - UpCloud USA Inc, US hosting company.

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website lomo.jp position was 12923 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 965928. Now website lomo.jp ranked in Alexa database as number 100633 (in the world).

Website lomo.jp Desktop speed measurement score (61/100) is better than the results of 37.05% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

lomo.jp Mobile usability score (98/100) is better than the results of 55.61% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed measurement score of lomo.jp (50/100) is better than the results of 33.92% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
Sep-21-2024 100,633-2,411
Sep-20-2024 98,2222,083
Sep-19-2024 100,305-16
Sep-18-2024 100,289-230
Sep-17-2024 100,059-2,120
Sep-16-2024 97,9391,353
Sep-15-2024 99,29215,780

Advertisement

lomo.jp Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.



lomo.jp whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.


lomo.jp server information

Servers Location

IP Address
Country
Region
City

lomo.jp desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2017-05-19


Desktop Speed Bad
61/100

lomo.jp Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 26 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 254.7KiB (89% reduction).

Compressing and resizing https://lolipop.jp/img/default/case/customer03.jpg could save 57.7KiB (91% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://lolipop.jp/img/default/case/customer06.jpg could save 54.6KiB (92% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://lolipop.jp/img/default/case/customer04.jpg could save 51.7KiB (91% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://lolipop.jp/img/default/case/customer02.jpg could save 38.4KiB (92% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://lolipop.jp/img/default/case/customer01.jpg could save 20.5KiB (88% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://lolipop.jp/img/default/case/customer05.jpg could save 17KiB (86% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cache.img.gmo.jp/common_header/gmocommonheader_files/logo201601.png could save 8.9KiB (96% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://lolipop.jp/img/default/home/main-image.png could save 5.8KiB (44% reduction).

priority - 20 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 9 blocking script resources and 5 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

https://lolipop.jp/js/components/jquery/jquery.js
https://lolipop.jp/js/common/components.min.js
https://lolipop.jp/js/common/common.min.js
https://lolipop.jp/js/default/home/index.js
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/slick/slick.min.js
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/typed.js/typed.min.js
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/lightbox2/js/lightbox.min.js
https://cd-ladsp-com.s3.amazonaws.com/script/pixel.js
https://px.ladsp.com/pixel?advertiser_id=00002266&referer=

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://lolipop.jp/js/components/slick/slick.css
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/lightbox2/css/lightbox.css
https://lolipop.jp/css/common/style.css
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Material+Icons
https://lolipop.jp/css/common/yakuhanjp/css/yakuhanjp.min.css

priority - 17 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://b92.yahoo.co.jp/js/s_retargeting.js (expiration not specified)
https://cache.img.gmo.jp/common_header/gmocommonheader_files/btn.png (expiration not specified)
https://cache.img.gmo.jp/common_header/gmocommonhe…files/close_footer.png (expiration not specified)
https://cache.img.gmo.jp/common_header/gmocommonhe…es/headerstyle.min.css (expiration not specified)
https://cache.img.gmo.jp/common_header/gmocommonheader_files/logo201601.png (expiration not specified)
https://cache.img.gmo.jp/common_header/gmocommonhe…_files/open_footer.png (expiration not specified)
https://dmpjs.sp.gmossp-sp.jp/js/d.js (expiration not specified)
https://s.adroll.com/j/roundtrip.js (5 minutes)
https://s.adroll.com/pixel/L2O67UXIUBEHDDEOKADQ6J/…G2UAG2ZAKJNSEXUXBMN.js (5 minutes)
https://s.yimg.jp/images/listing/tool/cv/conversion.js (8.5 minutes)
https://s.yjtag.jp/tag.js (15 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/gtm/js?id=GTM-W26…=2009466844.1495215375 (15 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbds.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/1399496843661530?v=2.7.9 (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/909728669085220?v=2.7.9 (20 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/common/common.min.js (30 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/common/components.min.js (30 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/autotrack/autotrack.js (30 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/jquery/jquery.js (30 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/lightbox2/js/lightbox.min.js (30 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/slick/slick.min.js (30 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/typed.js/typed.min.js (30 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/default/home/index.js (30 minutes)
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
https://js.ptengine.jp/32411af1.js (60 minutes)
https://js.ptengine.jp/pta.js (60 minutes)
https://js.ptengine.jp/pts.js (60 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/css/common/style.css (60 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/css/common/yakuhanjp/css/yakuhanjp.min.css (60 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/lightbox2/css/lightbox.css (60 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/slick/slick.css (60 minutes)
https://js-agent.newrelic.com/nr-998.min.js (2 hours)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 3 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.46 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 2 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 15.5KiB (65% reduction).

Compressing https://pdmp.jp/init.js could save 5.9KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing https://dis.as.criteo.com/dis/dis.aspx?p=37180&cb=…&sc_r=1024x768&sc_d=24 could save 4.3KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing https://js.ptengine.jp/32411af1.js could save 1.5KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing https://px.ladsp.com/pixel?cr=true&advertiser_id=00002266&referer= could save 1.4KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing https://pdmp.jp/sync.js could save 986B (52% reduction).
Compressing https://pdmp.jp/tag.js?v=1&loc=https%3A%2F%2Flolip…1495215375505&a=&p=&r= could save 792B (57% reduction).
Compressing https://js.ptengine.jp/pta.js could save 680B (57% reduction).

priority - 1 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 5.6KiB (22% reduction).

Minifying https://lolipop.jp/ could save 5.6KiB (22% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 3.1KiB (32% reduction).

Minifying https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbds.js could save 694B (33% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/1399496843661530?v=2.7.9 could save 633B (79% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/909728669085220?v=2.7.9 could save 629B (79% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://s.adroll.com/pixel/L2O67UXIUBEHDDEOKADQ6J/…G2UAG2ZAKJNSEXUXBMN.js could save 621B (14% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://lolipop.jp/js/default/home/index.js could save 601B (34% reduction) after compression.

lomo.jp Desktop Resources

Total Resources214
Number of Hosts70
Static Resources79
JavaScript Resources40
CSS Resources6

lomo.jp Desktop Resource Breakdown

lomo.jp mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2017-05-12


Mobile Speed Bad
50/100

lomo.jp Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 80 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 9 blocking script resources and 5 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

https://lolipop.jp/js/components/jquery/jquery.js
https://lolipop.jp/js/common/components.min.js
https://lolipop.jp/js/common/common.min.js
https://lolipop.jp/js/default/home/index.js
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/slick/slick.min.js
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/typed.js/typed.min.js
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/lightbox2/js/lightbox.min.js
https://cd-ladsp-com.s3.amazonaws.com/script/pixel.js
https://px.ladsp.com/pixel?advertiser_id=00002266&referer=

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://lolipop.jp/js/components/slick/slick.css
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/lightbox2/css/lightbox.css
https://lolipop.jp/css/common/style.css
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Material+Icons
https://lolipop.jp/css/common/yakuhanjp/css/yakuhanjp.min.css

priority - 23 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://b92.yahoo.co.jp/js/s_retargeting.js (expiration not specified)
https://cache.img.gmo.jp/common_header/gmocommonheader_files/btn.png (expiration not specified)
https://cache.img.gmo.jp/common_header/gmocommonhe…files/close_footer.png (expiration not specified)
https://cache.img.gmo.jp/common_header/gmocommonhe…es/headerstyle.min.css (expiration not specified)
https://cache.img.gmo.jp/common_header/gmocommonheader_files/logo201601.png (expiration not specified)
https://cache.img.gmo.jp/common_header/gmocommonhe…_files/open_footer.png (expiration not specified)
https://dmpjs.sp.gmossp-sp.jp/js/d.js (expiration not specified)
https://s.adroll.com/j/roundtrip.js (5 minutes)
https://s.adroll.com/pixel/L2O67UXIUBEHDDEOKADQ6J/…G2UAG2ZAKJNSEXUXBMN.js (5 minutes)
https://s.yimg.jp/images/listing/tool/cv/conversion.js (9.9 minutes)
https://s.yjtag.jp/tag.js (15 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/gtm/js?id=GTM-W26…=1931639414.1494627435 (15 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbds.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/common/common.min.js (30 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/common/components.min.js (30 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/autotrack/autotrack.js (30 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/jquery/jquery.js (30 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/lightbox2/js/lightbox.min.js (30 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/slick/slick.min.js (30 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/typed.js/typed.min.js (30 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/default/home/index.js (30 minutes)
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
https://js.ptengine.jp/32411af1.js (60 minutes)
https://js.ptengine.jp/pta.js (60 minutes)
https://js.ptengine.jp/pts.js (60 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/css/common/style.css (60 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/css/common/yakuhanjp/css/yakuhanjp.min.css (60 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/lightbox2/css/lightbox.css (60 minutes)
https://lolipop.jp/js/components/slick/slick.css (60 minutes)
https://js-agent.newrelic.com/nr-998.min.js (2 hours)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 2 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.34 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 1 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 11.2KiB (63% reduction).

Compressing https://pdmp.jp/init.js could save 5.9KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing https://js.ptengine.jp/32411af1.js could save 1.5KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing https://px.ladsp.com/pixel?cr=true&advertiser_id=00002266&referer= could save 1.4KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing https://pdmp.jp/sync.js could save 986B (52% reduction).
Compressing https://pdmp.jp/tag.js?v=1&loc=https%3A%2F%2Flolip…1494627435260&a=&p=&r= could save 788B (57% reduction).
Compressing https://js.ptengine.jp/pta.js could save 680B (57% reduction).

priority - 1 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 5.6KiB (22% reduction).

Minifying https://lolipop.jp/ could save 5.6KiB (22% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 2.3KiB (25% reduction).

Compressing https://cache.img.gmo.jp/common_header/gmocommonheader_files/logo201601.png could save 2.3KiB (25% reduction).

priority - 0 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.9KiB (23% reduction).

Minifying https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbds.js could save 693B (33% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://s.adroll.com/pixel/L2O67UXIUBEHDDEOKADQ6J/…G2UAG2ZAKJNSEXUXBMN.js could save 621B (14% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://lolipop.jp/js/default/home/index.js could save 601B (34% reduction) after compression.

lomo.jp Mobile Resources

Total Resources176
Number of Hosts54
Static Resources76
JavaScript Resources37
CSS Resources6

lomo.jp Mobile Resource Breakdown

lomo.jp mobile page usability

Last tested: 2017-05-12


Mobile Usability Good
98/100

lomo.jp Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 1 Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <a href="/terms/tos/" class="lol-legal-footer-nav__link">利用規約</a> and 3 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="https://pepabo.com/"></a> is close to 1 other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="http://jugem.jp/" class="lol-group-footer__link">無料 ブログ</a> and 13 others are close to other tap targets.

lomo.jp similar domains

Similar domains:
www.lomo.com
www.lomo.net
www.lomo.org
www.lomo.info
www.lomo.biz
www.lomo.us
www.lomo.mobi
www.omo.jp
www.lomo.jp
www.pomo.jp
www.lpomo.jp
www.plomo.jp
www.oomo.jp
www.loomo.jp
www.olomo.jp
www.komo.jp
www.lkomo.jp
www.klomo.jp
www.lmo.jp
www.limo.jp
www.loimo.jp
www.liomo.jp
www.lkmo.jp
www.lokmo.jp
www.llmo.jp
www.lolmo.jp
www.llomo.jp
www.lpmo.jp
www.lopmo.jp
www.loo.jp
www.lono.jp
www.lomno.jp
www.lonmo.jp
www.lojo.jp
www.lomjo.jp
www.lojmo.jp
www.loko.jp
www.lomko.jp
www.lom.jp
www.lomi.jp
www.lomoi.jp
www.lomio.jp
www.lomk.jp
www.lomok.jp
www.loml.jp
www.lomol.jp
www.lomlo.jp
www.lomp.jp
www.lomop.jp
www.lompo.jp

lomo.jp Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.


lomo.jp TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.