lut.fi website information.
lut.fi domain name is registered by .FI top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .FI domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for lut.fi domain:
- nse2.lut.fi
- ns-secondary.funet.fi
- nse1.lut.fi
and probably website lut.fi is hosted by NINTENDO - Nintendo Of America inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by NINTENDO - Nintendo Of America inc., US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website lut.fi position was 20376 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 22009. Now website lut.fi ranked in Alexa database as number 20751 (in the world).
Website lut.fi Desktop speed measurement score (70/100) is better than the results of 50.91% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
lut.fi Mobile usability score (94/100) is better than the results of 36.81% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of lut.fi (53/100) is better than the results of 39.51% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
Date | Rank | Change |
---|---|---|
Nov-15-2024 | 20,751 | 37 |
Nov-14-2024 | 20,788 | -19 |
Nov-13-2024 | 20,769 | 0 |
Nov-12-2024 | 20,769 | 0 |
Nov-11-2024 | 20,769 | 0 |
Nov-10-2024 | 20,769 | 42 |
Nov-09-2024 | 20,811 | -204 |
Advertisement
lut.fi Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
lut.fi whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
domain.............: lut.fi
status.............: Registered
created............: 1.1.1991 00:00:00
expires............: 31.8.2025 00:00:00
available..........: 30.9.2025 00:00:00
modified...........: 24.7.2024 13:33:07
RegistryLock.......: no
Nameservers
nserver............: ns-secondary.funet.fi [128.214.248.132] [2001:708:10:55::53] [OK]
nserver............: nse1.lut.fi [157.24.2.15] [OK]
nserver............: nse2.lut.fi [157.24.188.15] [OK]
DNSSEC
dnssec.............: no
Holder
name...............: Lappeenrannan teknillinen yliopisto
register number....: 0245904-2
address............: PL 20
postal.............: 53851
city...............: Lappeenranta
country............: Finland
phone..............:
holder email.......:
Registrar
registrar..........: Domainkeskus Oy
www................: www.domainkeskus.com
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 22.9.2024 12:15:09 (EET)
lut.fi server information
lut.fi desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-05-15
lut.fi Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 28 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 272.1KiB (55% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/96865/etusivu-gr…cc1bcc?t=1397562948482 could save 59.4KiB (52% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/96865/etusivu-mi…dfd896?t=1397562950069 could save 24.4KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/95630/etusivu-op…c927ae?t=1364473603978 could save 21.2KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/162695/etusivu-k…07613c?t=1440160120395 could save 4.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/450271/promootio-122x89.jpg could save 3.3KiB (47% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/images/lut/gui/arrows.png could save 2.7KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/images/lut/lut_logo.png could save 2.7KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/images/common/search.png could save 2.7KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/images/lut/footer_lines_2.png could save 2.6KiB (94% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/70753/footer-ban…31fce0?t=1415365966491 could save 1.1KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/70753/icon-caree…b57e43?t=1435826943504 could save 963B (86% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/images/lut/carousel-arrows.png could save 889B (80% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/96865/etusivun-v…f72b58?t=1426579787163 could save 838B (11% reduction).
priority - 10 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 4 blocking script resources and 5 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.7.2/jquery.min.js
http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/js/slider.js
http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/js/main.js?browser…b=6101&t=1493813902000
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://www.lut.fi/html/portlet/asset_publisher/css…b=6101&t=1493985259000
http://www.lut.fi/html/portlet/journal_content/css…b=6101&t=1493985259000
http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/css/main.css?brows…b=6101&t=1493813902000
http://www.lut.fi/combo/?browserId=other&minifierT…ns/sam/widget-base.css
priority - 3 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/css/font/parachute…o-regular-webfont.woff (expiration not specified)
http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/css/font/pfdintextpro-medium-webfont.woff (expiration not specified)
http://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-NH5VTX (15 minutes)
https://static.doubleclick.net/instream/ad_status.js (15 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
priority - 2 Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.
priority - 0 Minify HTML
Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 2.7KiB (15% reduction).
lut.fi Desktop Resources
Total Resources | 54 |
Number of Hosts | 13 |
Static Resources | 26 |
JavaScript Resources | 14 |
CSS Resources | 6 |
lut.fi Desktop Resource Breakdown
lut.fi mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2016-12-18
lut.fi Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 45 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 437.4KiB (51% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/96865/etusivu-gr…cc1bcc?t=1397562948482 could save 59.4KiB (52% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/96865/etusivu-mi…dfd896?t=1397562950069 could save 24.4KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/95630/pikkubanne…4340e5?t=1404284101260 could save 10.2KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/162695/quote-mik…af4b43?t=1480334188632 could save 3.3KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/images/lut/lut_logo.png could save 3.2KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/images/lut/gui/arrows.png could save 2.8KiB (91% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/images/common/search.png could save 2.7KiB (91% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/70753/og-image-v2.gif could save 1.4KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/70753/footer-ban…31fce0?t=1415365966491 could save 1.1KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/70753/lut-logo-f…db277d?t=1358860633144 could save 1,000B (11% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/70753/icon-caree…b57e43?t=1435826943504 could save 963B (86% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/images/lut/carousel-arrows.png could save 889B (80% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/96865/etusivun-v…f72b58?t=1426579787163 could save 838B (11% reduction).
Compressing http://www.lut.fi/documents/10633/70753/footer-ban…0eecc7?t=1415365962802 could save 738B (27% reduction).
priority - 40 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 4 blocking script resources and 5 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.7.2/jquery.min.js
http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/js/slider.js
http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/js/main.js?browser…b=6101&t=1479202716000
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://www.lut.fi/html/portlet/asset_publisher/css…b=6101&t=1479205719000
http://www.lut.fi/html/portlet/journal_content/css…b=6101&t=1479205719000
http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/css/main.css?brows…b=6101&t=1479202716000
http://www.lut.fi/combo/?browserId=other&minifierT…ns/sam/widget-base.css
priority - 8 Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.
priority - 5 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/css/font/parachute…tpro-bold-webfont.woff (expiration not specified)
http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/css/font/parachute…o-regular-webfont.woff (expiration not specified)
http://www.lut.fi/lut-6.1-theme/css/font/pfdintextpro-medium-webfont.woff (expiration not specified)
http://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-NH5VTX (15 minutes)
https://static.doubleclick.net/instream/ad_status.js (15 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
priority - 0 Minify HTML
Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 2.6KiB (15% reduction).
lut.fi Mobile Resources
Total Resources | 55 |
Number of Hosts | 15 |
Static Resources | 26 |
JavaScript Resources | 14 |
CSS Resources | 6 |
lut.fi Mobile Resource Breakdown
lut.fi mobile page usability
Last tested: 2016-12-18
lut.fi Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 5 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<a href="http://uni.lut.fi" class="main_link">Opiskelijoiden Uni-portaali</a>
and 1 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="/web/en/research/platforms/red" class="sub_link">RED - Revealin…discrepancies</a>
and 24 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="mailto:info@lut.fi">info@lut.fi</a>
and 1 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="/tutustu-meihin/yhteystiedot" class="picture_link">Ota yhteyttä</a>
and 3 others are close to other tap targets.lut.fi similar domains
www.lut.net
www.lut.org
www.lut.info
www.lut.biz
www.lut.us
www.lut.mobi
www.ut.fi
www.lut.fi
www.put.fi
www.lput.fi
www.plut.fi
www.out.fi
www.lout.fi
www.olut.fi
www.kut.fi
www.lkut.fi
www.klut.fi
www.lt.fi
www.lyt.fi
www.luyt.fi
www.lyut.fi
www.lht.fi
www.luht.fi
www.lhut.fi
www.ljt.fi
www.lujt.fi
www.ljut.fi
www.lit.fi
www.luit.fi
www.liut.fi
www.lu.fi
www.lur.fi
www.lutr.fi
www.lurt.fi
www.luf.fi
www.lutf.fi
www.luft.fi
www.lug.fi
www.lutg.fi
www.lugt.fi
www.luy.fi
www.luty.fi
lut.fi Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
lut.fi TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.