murex.com website information.
murex.com domain name is registered by .COM top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .COM domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for murex.com domain:
- ns1.nan2.fr.uu.net
- ns.murex.com
and probably website murex.com is hosted by EBAY - eBay, Inc, US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by EBAY - eBay, Inc, US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website murex.com position was 6356 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 998046. Now website murex.com ranked in Alexa database as number 487901 (in the world).
Website murex.com Desktop speed measurement score (58/100) is better than the results of 33.06% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
murex.com Mobile usability score (96/100) is better than the results of 46.59% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of murex.com (43/100) is better than the results of 22.8% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Sep-23-2024 | 487,901 | -10,601 |
| Sep-22-2024 | 477,300 | 11,871 |
| Sep-21-2024 | 489,171 | 9,679 |
| Sep-20-2024 | 498,850 | -11,654 |
| Sep-19-2024 | 487,196 | -5,291 |
| Sep-18-2024 | 481,905 | 7,872 |
| Sep-17-2024 | 489,777 | -4,225 |
Advertisement
murex.com Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
murex.com whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
Domain Name: MUREX.COM
Registry Domain ID: 4142421_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.networksolutions.com
Registrar URL: http://networksolutions.com
Updated Date: 2019-11-04T15:05:39Z
Creation Date: 1999-03-07T05:00:00Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2027-01-06T22:25:56Z
Registrar: Network Solutions, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 2
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@web.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.8003337680
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: NS-1357.AWSDNS-41.ORG
Name Server: NS-1913.AWSDNS-47.CO.UK
Name Server: NS-280.AWSDNS-35.COM
Name Server: NS-829.AWSDNS-39.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2021-05-30T17:42:38Z
murex.com server information
murex.com desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2018-10-31
murex.com Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 40 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 391.8KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://www.murex.com/sites/default/files/styles/b…-AWS.png?itok=URij7jwq could save 80.9KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://www.murex.com/sites/default/files/styles/b…nner.png?itok=A28I7XGk could save 24KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://www.murex.com/sites/default/files/styles/b…nner.png?itok=vHPAifBZ could save 18KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing https://www.murex.com/sites/default/files/styles/b…-AWS.png?itok=5x3QNEXB could save 17.1KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing https://www.murex.com/sites/default/files/styles/b…hero.png?itok=udB0wTYN could save 15.4KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing https://www.murex.com/sites/default/files/styles/b…hero.png?itok=A55epysr could save 12.6KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing https://www.murex.com/sites/default/files/styles/b…play.png?itok=nrnZ7YVO could save 8.6KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.murex.com/sites/default/files/styles/b…play.png?itok=j9zKnMkE could save 8.1KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.murex.com/sites/all/themes/murex/images/icon/arrow_white.png could save 872B (78% reduction).
priority - 10 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking script resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
Approximately 2% of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
priority - 9 Avoid landing page redirects
Your page has 2 redirects. Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded.
Avoid landing page redirects for the following chain of redirected URLs.
https://murex.com/
https://www.murex.com/
priority - 8 Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.
priority - 7 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.89 seconds.
There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 3 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api2/webworker.js?hl=en&v=v1540189908068 (5 minutes)
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-TKSX32 (15 minutes)
https://www.googleadservices.com/pagead/conversion_async.js (60 minutes)
https://ssl.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
murex.com Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 68 |
| Number of Hosts | 13 |
| Static Resources | 47 |
| JavaScript Resources | 10 |
| CSS Resources | 1 |
murex.com Desktop Resource Breakdown
murex.com mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2018-10-31
murex.com Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 40 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking script resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
Approximately 42% of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
priority - 34 Avoid landing page redirects
Your page has 2 redirects. Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded.
Avoid landing page redirects for the following chain of redirected URLs.
https://murex.com/
https://www.murex.com/
priority - 32 Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.
priority - 28 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 273.2KiB (56% reduction).
Compressing https://www.murex.com/sites/default/files/styles/b…nner.png?itok=A28I7XGk could save 24KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://www.murex.com/sites/default/files/styles/b…-AWS.png?itok=5x3QNEXB could save 17.1KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing https://www.murex.com/sites/default/files/styles/b…hero.png?itok=udB0wTYN could save 15.4KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing https://www.murex.com/sites/default/files/styles/b…play.png?itok=nrnZ7YVO could save 8.6KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.murex.com/sites/all/themes/murex/images/icon/arrow_white.png could save 872B (78% reduction).
priority - 10 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.89 seconds.
There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 4 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api2/webworker.js?hl=en&v=v1540189908068 (5 minutes)
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-TKSX32 (15 minutes)
https://www.googleadservices.com/pagead/conversion_async.js (60 minutes)
https://ssl.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
murex.com Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 59 |
| Number of Hosts | 11 |
| Static Resources | 41 |
| JavaScript Resources | 10 |
| CSS Resources | 1 |
murex.com Mobile Resource Breakdown
murex.com mobile page usability
Last tested: 2018-10-31
murex.com Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 3 Size content to viewport
The page content is too wide for the viewport, forcing the user to scroll horizontally. Size the page content to the viewport to provide a better user experience.
The page content is 473 CSS pixels wide, but the viewport is only 412 CSS pixels wide. The following elements fall outside the viewport:
<div class="square"> falls outside the viewport.The element
<div class="square"> falls outside the viewport.The element
<div class="square"> falls outside the viewport.The element
<div class="square"> falls outside the viewport.priority - 0 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<ul class="carousel owl-c…usel owl-theme">Report: ERM Sy…prevnext</ul> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<ul class="carousel owl-c…usel owl-theme">Report: ERM Sy…prevnext</ul> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="/news">NEWS</a> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.<div class="back-to-top"> is close to 1 other tap targets.murex.com similar domains
www.murex.net
www.murex.org
www.murex.info
www.murex.biz
www.murex.us
www.murex.mobi
www.urex.com
www.murex.com
www.nurex.com
www.mnurex.com
www.nmurex.com
www.jurex.com
www.mjurex.com
www.jmurex.com
www.kurex.com
www.mkurex.com
www.kmurex.com
www.mrex.com
www.myrex.com
www.muyrex.com
www.myurex.com
www.mhrex.com
www.muhrex.com
www.mhurex.com
www.mjrex.com
www.mujrex.com
www.mirex.com
www.muirex.com
www.miurex.com
www.muex.com
www.mueex.com
www.mureex.com
www.muerex.com
www.mudex.com
www.murdex.com
www.mudrex.com
www.mufex.com
www.murfex.com
www.mufrex.com
www.mutex.com
www.murtex.com
www.mutrex.com
www.murx.com
www.murwx.com
www.murewx.com
www.murwex.com
www.mursx.com
www.muresx.com
www.murdx.com
www.muredx.com
www.murrx.com
www.murerx.com
www.murrex.com
www.mure.com
www.murez.com
www.murexz.com
www.murezx.com
www.mures.com
www.murexs.com
www.mured.com
www.murexd.com
www.murec.com
www.murexc.com
www.murecx.com
www.murex.con
murex.com Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
murex.com TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.