oc.org website information.
oc.org domain name is registered by .ORG top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .ORG domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for oc.org domain:
- ns4.linode.com
- ns5.linode.com
- ns2.linode.com
- ns3.linode.com
- ns1.linode.com
and probably website oc.org is hosted by CNNIC-ALIBABA-CN-NET-AP Hangzhou Alibaba Advertising Co.,Ltd., CN web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by CNNIC-ALIBABA-CN-NET-AP Hangzhou Alibaba Advertising Co.,Ltd., CN hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website oc.org position was 39304 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 998478. Now website oc.org ranked in Alexa database as number 867193 (in the world).
Website oc.org Desktop speed measurement score (47/100) is better than the results of 20.85% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
oc.org Mobile usability score (100/100) is better than the results of 100% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of oc.org (53/100) is better than the results of 39.51% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
Date | Rank | Change |
---|---|---|
Nov-16-2024 | N/A | N/A |
Nov-15-2024 | 867,193 | -4,731 |
Nov-14-2024 | 862,462 | 60,653 |
Nov-13-2024 | 923,115 | 0 |
Nov-12-2024 | 923,115 | 0 |
Nov-11-2024 | 923,115 | 0 |
Nov-10-2024 | 923,115 | -44,668 |
Advertisement
oc.org Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
oc.org whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
Domain Name: OC.ORG
Registry Domain ID: D1592084-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.networksolutions.com
Registrar URL: http://www.networksolutions.com
Updated Date: 2018-03-05T19:53:24Z
Creation Date: 1997-05-02T04:00:00Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2026-05-03T04:00:00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: Network Solutions, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 2
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: domain.operations@web.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.8777228662
Reseller:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registrant Organization: Overseas Campus Ministries
Registrant State/Province: CA
Registrant Country: US
Name Server: NS1.LINODE.COM
Name Server: NS2.LINODE.COM
Name Server: NS3.LINODE.COM
Name Server: NS4.LINODE.COM
Name Server: NS5.LINODE.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form https://www.icann.org/wicf/)
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2021-11-29T08:25:32Z
oc.org server information
oc.org desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-08-10
oc.org Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 51 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 499.3KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/ocmbanner.jpg could save 94KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/%E6%…%E7%A4%BE%E5%8C%BA.jpg could save 41.6KiB (94% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/%E5%…%E7%BB%B4%E7%A0%81.jpg could save 21.7KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/BHWX.jpg could save 20.5KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing http://tianluke.org/podcast/wp-content/uploads/et_…ont-129520_280x187.jpg could save 15.5KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/OCWX.jpg could save 14.7KiB (57% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/BCL1.jpg could save 14KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/BH.jpg could save 8.6KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/key-2308112_640-160x113.jpg could save 405B (13% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/hands-1926414_640-160x98.jpg could save 388B (11% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-1/p50x…920735befc&oe=5DDEB005 could save 365B (24% reduction).
Compressing https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v3/yG/r/wrCiWd_JmQD.png could save 296B (30% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/google-custo…t_75_ffffff_40x100.png could save 112B (53% reduction).
priority - 36 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 353.9KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/css/jetpack.css?ver=7.4.1 could save 57.6KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/ could save 47.4KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/themes/magazine-basi…-awesome.css?ver=4.7.0 could save 29.3KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/themes/magazine-basi…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742 could save 28.4KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/css/dist/block-libr…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742 could save 24KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/css/dashicons.min.c…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742 could save 18.6KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/draggable.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 13.6KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/resizable.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 12.9KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/google-custo…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742 could save 11.2KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/wp-emoji-release…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742 could save 9KiB (66% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/dialog.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 8.2KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1 could save 5.9KiB (60% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/button.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 5KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/widget.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 4.2KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/position.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 3.9KiB (60% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/google-custo…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742 could save 2.1KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/core.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 2.1KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/mouse.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 2.1KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/captcha/css/…op_style.css?ver=4.4.5 could save 1.3KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/author-recom…s/public.css?ver=1.0.3 could save 1.3KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/captcha/css/…nd_style.css?ver=4.4.5 could save 1.1KiB (60% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/themes/magazine-basi…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742 could save 714B (53% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742 could save 650B (47% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/modu…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742 could save 574B (53% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/fbf-facebook…facebook_page_feed.css could save 448B (51% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/social-share…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742 could save 372B (59% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/google-custo…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742 could save 223B (43% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/_inc…/facebook-embed.min.js could save 214B (35% reduction).
priority - 14 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/google-custo…t_75_ffffff_40x100.png (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/google-custo…ons_222222_256x240.png (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/_inc…/facebook-embed.min.js (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/themes/magazine-basi…ry/images/bg-hatch.gif (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/themes/magazine-basic/library/images/line.gif (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/themes/magazine-basi…brary/images/solid.png (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/BCL1.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/BH.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/donate.gif (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/ocmbanner.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/%E5%…%E7%BB%B4%E7%A0%81.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/%E6%…%E7%A4%BE%E5%8C%BA.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/BHWX.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/OC%E…%E5%AD%A6%E7%BD%91.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/OC-FY1-LOGO.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/%E5%…%E7%89%871-260x117.png (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Capture-260x74.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/NL201904-1-HX-1-560x418.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/hands-1926414_640-160x98.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/key-2308112_640-160x113.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/peop…594785_640-160x107.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/OCWX.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/images/rss.png (expiration not specified)
http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js?_=1565420186044 (20 minutes)
https://www.google.com/cse/static/style/look/minim…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742 (50 minutes)
http://cse.google.com/adsense/search/async-ads.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google.com/jsapi?ver=4c1e827e0ba9faaa2580dd43273c8742 (60 minutes)
http://www.google.com/uds/?file=search&v=1&hl=en_US (60 minutes)
priority - 10 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 1.2 seconds.
There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 8 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 4 blocking script resources and 14 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/google-custo…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742
http://www.google.com/jsapi?ver=4c1e827e0ba9faaa2580dd43273c8742
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://www.google.com/cse/style/look/minimalist.cs…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/google-custo…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742
http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/css/dist/block-libr…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/captcha/css/…nd_style.css?ver=4.4.5
http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/css/dashicons.min.c…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/captcha/css/…op_style.css?ver=4.4.5
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/social-share…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Cantata+One|Lato:300,700
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/themes/magazine-basi…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/themes/magazine-basi…-awesome.css?ver=4.7.0
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/author-recom…s/public.css?ver=1.0.3
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/css/jetpack.css?ver=7.4.1
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/fbf-facebook…facebook_page_feed.css
priority - 2 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 20.4KiB (22% reduction).
Minifying http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/themes/magazine-basi…-awesome.css?ver=4.7.0 could save 4.9KiB (14% reduction).
Minifying http://www.google.com/uds/api/search/1.0/c0497eba7…8847206/default+en.css could save 3.9KiB (39% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/google-custo…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742 could save 597B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://www.google.com/cse/static/style/look/minim…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742 could save 589B (24% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/fbf-facebook…facebook_page_feed.css could save 506B (57% reduction).
Minifying http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/captcha/css/…nd_style.css?ver=4.4.5 could save 413B (23% reduction).
Minifying http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/author-recom…s/public.css?ver=1.0.3 could save 323B (18% reduction).
Minifying http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/captcha/css/…op_style.css?ver=4.4.5 could save 274B (16% reduction).
priority - 0 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.4KiB (31% reduction).
Minifying http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/modu…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742 could save 278B (26% reduction).
Minifying http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/themes/magazine-basi…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742 could save 275B (21% reduction).
Minifying http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/google-custo…a9faaa2580dd43273c8742 could save 201B (39% reduction).
oc.org Desktop Resources
Total Resources | 90 |
Number of Hosts | 18 |
Static Resources | 49 |
JavaScript Resources | 29 |
CSS Resources | 18 |
oc.org Desktop Resource Breakdown
oc.org mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-04-27
oc.org Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 32 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 4 blocking script resources and 11 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/google-custo…9507060a509b61646752f6
http://www.google.com/jsapi?ver=45da5792dc9507060a509b61646752f6
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://www.google.com/cse/style/look/minimalist.cs…9507060a509b61646752f6
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/google-custo…9507060a509b61646752f6
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/captcha/css/…nd_style.css?ver=4.3.0
http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/css/dashicons.min.c…9507060a509b61646752f6
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/captcha/css/…le_style.css?ver=4.3.0
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/social-share…9507060a509b61646752f6
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/modu…9507060a509b61646752f6
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/author-recom…s/public.css?ver=1.0.3
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/css/jetpack.css?ver=4.8.2
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/fbf-facebook…facebook_page_feed.css
priority - 28 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 276KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/css/jetpack.css?ver=4.8.2 could save 51.7KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/ could save 28KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/modu…9507060a509b61646752f6 could save 23.2KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/css/dashicons.min.c…9507060a509b61646752f6 could save 17.3KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/draggable.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 13.6KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/resizable.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 12.8KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/google-custo…9507060a509b61646752f6 could save 11.2KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/dialog.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 8.2KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/wp-emoji-release…9507060a509b61646752f6 could save 7KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/gallery-plug…9507060a509b61646752f6 could save 6.9KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1 could save 5.9KiB (60% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/button.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 5KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/widget.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 4.2KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/position.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 3.9KiB (60% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/gallery-plug…9507060a509b61646752f6 could save 3.8KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/google-custo…9507060a509b61646752f6 could save 2.1KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/core.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 2.1KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/mouse.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 2.1KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/author-recom…s/public.css?ver=1.0.3 could save 1.3KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/captcha/css/…nd_style.css?ver=4.3.0 could save 1.1KiB (60% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/captcha/css/…le_style.css?ver=4.3.0 could save 913B (71% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?…9507060a509b61646752f6 could save 647B (47% reduction).
Compressing http://oc.org/ could save 544B (43% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/modu…9507060a509b61646752f6 could save 526B (51% reduction).
priority - 14 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 137KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/building-768815_640.jpg could save 25.1KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/9A6F…-9A09-3AD3910EB0C0.jpg could save 18KiB (18% reduction).
priority - 9 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/_inc/facebook-embed.js (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/themes/magazine-basi…brary/images/solid.png (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/ocmbanner.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/building-768815_640.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/201612-1024x569.png (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/%E5%…E7%89%875-1024x140.png (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/%E6%…%E6%A6%88%E8%8A%82.png (expiration not specified)
http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/9A6F…-9A09-3AD3910EB0C0.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js?_=1493349362121 (20 minutes)
http://www.google.com/jsapi?ver=45da5792dc9507060a509b61646752f6 (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
priority - 8 Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.
priority - 5 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.54 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 1 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 9.8KiB (20% reduction).
Minifying http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/gallery-plug…9507060a509b61646752f6 could save 1.7KiB (20% reduction).
Minifying http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/gallery-plug…9507060a509b61646752f6 could save 741B (15% reduction).
Minifying http://blog.oc.org/wp-content/plugins/google-custo…9507060a509b61646752f6 could save 597B (22% reduction).
Minifying https://cse.google.com/cse/style/look/minimalist.c…9507060a509b61646752f6 could save 588B (24% reduction) after compression.
oc.org Mobile Resources
Total Resources | 54 |
Number of Hosts | 12 |
Static Resources | 18 |
JavaScript Resources | 22 |
CSS Resources | 15 |
oc.org Mobile Resource Breakdown
oc.org mobile page usability
Last tested: 2017-04-27
oc.org similar domains
www.oc.net
www.oc.org
www.oc.info
www.oc.biz
www.oc.us
www.oc.mobi
www.c.org
www.oc.org
www.ic.org
www.oic.org
www.ioc.org
www.kc.org
www.okc.org
www.koc.org
www.lc.org
www.olc.org
www.loc.org
www.pc.org
www.opc.org
www.poc.org
www.o.org
www.ox.org
www.ocx.org
www.oxc.org
www.od.org
www.ocd.org
www.odc.org
www.of.org
www.ocf.org
www.ofc.org
www.ov.org
www.ocv.org
www.ovc.org
oc.org Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
oc.org TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.