PROCESSINGMAGAZINE.COM Processing Magazine | Solutions for the Process Industries


processingmagazine.com website information.

processingmagazine.com domain name is registered by .COM top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .COM domain zone.

No name server records were found.

and probably website processingmagazine.com is hosted by AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US hosting company.

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website processingmagazine.com position was 47474 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 998959. Now website processingmagazine.com ranked in Alexa database as number 292821 (in the world).

Website processingmagazine.com Desktop speed measurement score (32/100) is better than the results of 9.52% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

processingmagazine.com Mobile usability score (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed measurement score of processingmagazine.com (35/100) is better than the results of 13.85% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
Nov-14-2024 292,821-1,808
Nov-13-2024 291,0130
Nov-12-2024 291,0130
Nov-11-2024 291,0130
Nov-10-2024 291,013-8,590
Nov-09-2024 282,4236,355
Nov-08-2024 288,778437

Advertisement

processingmagazine.com Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.



processingmagazine.com whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.


Domain Name: PROCESSINGMAGAZINE.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1188498_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.registrar.amazon.com
Registrar URL: http://registrar.amazon.com
Updated Date: 2024-03-23T22:41:22Z
Creation Date: 1998-04-28T04:00:00Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2025-04-27T04:00:00Z
Registrar: Amazon Registrar, Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 468
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: trustandsafety@support.aws.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.2024422253
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS-1384.AWSDNS-45.ORG
Name Server: NS-1875.AWSDNS-42.CO.UK
Name Server: NS-476.AWSDNS-59.COM
Name Server: NS-568.AWSDNS-07.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2024-10-22T17:53:58Z

processingmagazine.com server information

Servers Location

IP Address
Country
Region
City

processingmagazine.com desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2015-09-12


Desktop Speed Bad
32/100

processingmagazine.com Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 91 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 892.2KiB (61% reduction).

Compressing and resizing http://i2.wp.com/www.processingmagazine.com/wp-con…0.jpg?resize=750%2C420 could save 139.2KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://i0.wp.com/www.processingmagazine.com/wp-con…0.jpg?resize=360%2C360 could save 66.3KiB (96% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://i2.wp.com/www.processingmagazine.com/wp-con…5.jpg?resize=700%2C420 could save 65.2KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://i1.wp.com/www.processingmagazine.com/wp-con…0.jpg?resize=360%2C360 could save 57KiB (96% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://i1.wp.com/www.processingmagazine.com/wp-con…0.jpg?resize=360%2C360 could save 54.4KiB (95% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://i0.wp.com/www.processingmagazine.com/wp-con…0.jpg?resize=750%2C420 could save 53.9KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://i2.wp.com/www.processingmagazine.com/wp-con…0.jpg?resize=360%2C360 could save 47.6KiB (96% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://i2.wp.com/www.processingmagazine.com/wp-con…0.jpg?resize=750%2C420 could save 44.7KiB (89% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://i2.wp.com/www.processingmagazine.com/wp-con…0.jpg?resize=360%2C360 could save 43.2KiB (95% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://imagec18.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Cre…SIA_0515_300x250_4.jpg could save 40.4KiB (44% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://i2.wp.com/www.processingmagazine.com/wp-con…0.jpg?resize=750%2C420 could save 40KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://i0.wp.com/www.processingmagazine.com/wp-con…0.jpg?resize=360%2C360 could save 35.7KiB (93% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://i2.wp.com/www.processingmagazine.com/wp-con…7.jpg?resize=750%2C420 could save 31.7KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://i1.wp.com/www.processingmagazine.com/wp-con…0.jpg?resize=360%2C360 could save 31KiB (92% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://imagec18.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Cre…eric-Web-ad-728x90.png could save 28.5KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://i0.wp.com/www.processingmagazine.com/wp-con…0.jpg?resize=750%2C420 could save 21.4KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://i1.wp.com/www.processingmagazine.com/wp-con…0.jpg?resize=750%2C420 could save 21KiB (88% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://i2.wp.com/www.processingmagazine.com/wp-con…0.jpg?resize=360%2C360 could save 15.8KiB (92% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/uploa…essing_Web_2015-01.png could save 14.9KiB (62% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://imagec18.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Cre…250/300x250_button.jpg could save 12.5KiB (12% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://imagec18.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Cre…ock_040115_3_Art_3.gif could save 7.8KiB (16% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://imagec18.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Cre…cessingINDTOP_8-15.gif could save 5.7KiB (21% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://imagec18.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Cre…3000_300x250banner.jpg could save 4KiB (7% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/uploa…logo_new-tag-white.png could save 2.2KiB (30% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/logo.gif could save 1.3KiB (47% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…rection_nav_custom.png could save 1.3KiB (72% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/bkg.jpg could save 1.2KiB (19% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://imagec18.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Cre…050_Proc_Mag_Right.jpg could save 940B (2% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://imagec18.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Cre…1050_Proc_Mag_Left.jpg could save 898B (2% reduction).
Losslessly compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/4971081421785…0/M1rYvaO8_normal.jpeg could save 740B (37% reduction).
Losslessly compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/606812689852067840/OR52YfUw_normal.jpg could save 739B (43% reduction).
Losslessly compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/5699320179831…0/ZiCUlpQE_normal.jpeg could save 710B (45% reduction).
Losslessly compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/606448264263532544/CEka8wNI_normal.png could save 578B (19% reduction).

priority - 69 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 670.8KiB (77% reduction).

Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…s/theme.css?ver=1.13.1 could save 131.8KiB (88% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/ could save 99.5KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…js/asset.js?ver=1.13.1 could save 65.6KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/j…y/jquery.js?ver=1.11.3 could save 61.2KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…/jetpack.css?ver=3.6.1 could save 43.9KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…exslider.js?ver=1.13.1 could save 30.8KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…otstrap.css?ver=1.13.1 could save 30.4KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…ull.min.css?ver=3.11.2 could save 26.8KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…tope.min.js?ver=1.13.1 could save 25.6KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…awesome.css?ver=1.13.1 could save 19.5KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…/entypo.css?ver=1.13.1 could save 12.5KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/themes/presso/jetmenu.css could save 12.3KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/w…release.min.js?ver=4.3 could save 10.8KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/j…tabs.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 8KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/j…fect.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 8KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…ebox.min.js?ver=1.13.1 could save 7.6KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://oascentral.processingmagazine.com/RealMedia…ub=processing-magazine could save 7.3KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…ff-style.css?ver=2.3.7 could save 5.9KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…ile.min.css?ver=3.11.2 could save 5.9KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…/zocial.css?ver=1.13.1 could save 5.7KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/j…dion.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 5.7KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/themes/presso/jetmenu.js could save 5.4KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing http://script.crazyegg.com/pages/scripts/0026/0959.js?400561 could save 4.5KiB (59% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/j…dget.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 4.2KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/j…grate.min.js?ver=1.2.1 could save 4KiB (57% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…/bd-styles.css?ver=4.3 could save 3.4KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…/js/main.js?ver=1.13.1 could save 3.4KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…wipebox.css?ver=1.13.1 could save 3.4KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…-custom.css?ver=1.13.1 could save 2.8KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…f-scripts.js?ver=2.3.7 could save 2.5KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…/symbol.css?ver=1.13.1 could save 2.5KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…t-search.js?ver=1.13.1 could save 2.2KiB (66% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/j…core.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 2.1KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme….fitvids.js?ver=1.13.1 could save 1.9KiB (59% reduction).
Compressing http://a15941.actonservice.com/cdnr/89/acton/bn/tracker/15941 could save 1.5KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…ortcodes.js?ver=1.13.1 could save 1.2KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…photon.js?ver=20130122 could save 711B (51% reduction).

priority - 28 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 25 blocking script resources and 19 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/j…y/jquery.js?ver=1.11.3
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/j…grate.min.js?ver=1.2.1
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…t-search.js?ver=1.13.1
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/themes/presso/jetmenu.js
http://oascentral.processingmagazine.com/RealMedia…ub=processing-magazine
http://bs.serving-sys.com/BurstingPipe/adServer.bs…d=[timestamp]&ucm=true
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…photon.js?ver=20130122
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…f-scripts.js?ver=2.3.7
http://s0.wp.com/wp-content/js/devicepx-jetpack.js?ver=201537
http://s.gravatar.com/js/gprofiles.js?ver=2015Sepaa
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…les/wpgroho.js?ver=4.3
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/j…fect.min.js?ver=1.11.4
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/j…fade.min.js?ver=1.11.4
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/j…core.min.js?ver=1.11.4
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/j…dget.min.js?ver=1.11.4
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/j…dion.min.js?ver=1.11.4
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/j…tabs.min.js?ver=1.11.4
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…ortcodes.js?ver=1.13.1
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme….fitvids.js?ver=1.13.1
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…tope.min.js?ver=1.13.1
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…exslider.js?ver=1.13.1
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…ebox.min.js?ver=1.13.1
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…js/asset.js?ver=1.13.1
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…/js/main.js?ver=1.13.1
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…ia/js/count.js?ver=4.3

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…/bd-styles.css?ver=4.3
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…ff-style.css?ver=2.3.7
http://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/4.2.0/…some.min.css?ver=4.2.0
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…ull.min.css?ver=3.11.2
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…awesome.css?ver=1.13.1
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…-custom.css?ver=1.13.1
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…/zocial.css?ver=1.13.1
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…/entypo.css?ver=1.13.1
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…/symbol.css?ver=1.13.1
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…wipebox.css?ver=1.13.1
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…otstrap.css?ver=1.13.1
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…s/theme.css?ver=1.13.1
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…/jetpack.css?ver=3.6.1
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans+C…k-ext,greek,vietnamese
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/themes/presso/jetmenu.css
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/themes/presso/font-awesome.css
http://s.gravatar.com/css/hovercard.css?ver=2015Sepaa
http://s.gravatar.com/css/services.css?ver=2015Sepaa

priority - 15 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://a15941.actonservice.com/cdnr/89/acton/bn/tracker/15941 (expiration not specified)
http://ds.serving-sys.com/BurstingRes///Site-34780…-9c1d-7f8fee287b5e.gif (expiration not specified)
http://imagec18.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Cre…SIA_0515_300x250_4.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://imagec18.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Cre…250/300x250_button.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://imagec18.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Cre…3000_300x250banner.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://imagec18.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Cre…ock_040115_3_Art_3.gif (expiration not specified)
http://imagec18.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Cre…1050_Proc_Mag_Left.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://imagec18.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Cre…050_Proc_Mag_Right.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://imagec18.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Cre…eric-Web-ad-728x90.png (expiration not specified)
http://imagec18.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Cre…cessingINDTOP_8-15.gif (expiration not specified)
http://imagec18.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/Creatives/default/empty.gif (expiration not specified)
http://p.halldata.com/piwik.js (expiration not specified)
http://s.dpmsrv.com/dpm_a2e33d344f272e100d4a8efeabc7ae8a60a8ba7a.min.js (expiration not specified)
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…rection_nav_custom.png (expiration not specified)
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/themes/presso/jetmenu.css (expiration not specified)
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/themes/presso/jetmenu.js (expiration not specified)
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/uploa…logo_new-tag-white.png (expiration not specified)
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/uploa…essing_Web_2015-01.png (expiration not specified)
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/bkg.jpg (expiration not specified)
http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/logo.gif (expiration not specified)
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/606812689852067840/OR52YfUw_normal.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://cdn.syndication.twimg.com/widgets/timeline…e_codes=true&t=1602244 (60 seconds)
http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/365c8bfc4e64bdcbfb1d91d3332ceb94?s=32&d=mm&r=g (5 minutes)
http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/8fff6593400cbd8d78b8ca34f6a1a87e?s=32&d=mm&r=g (5 minutes)
http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/e0b1c245e97330c6d6e64da9f881ee18?s=32&d=mm&r=g (5 minutes)
http://processingmagazine.disqus.com/count-data.js…gazine.com%2F%3Fp%3D99 (10 minutes)
http://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-P27C26 (16.2 minutes)
http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
http://js-agent.newrelic.com/nr-686.min.js (60 minutes)
http://script.crazyegg.com/pages/scripts/0026/0959.js?400561 (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 7 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 67.9KiB (25% reduction).

Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…s/theme.css?ver=1.13.1 could save 38.2KiB (26% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…otstrap.css?ver=1.13.1 could save 6.6KiB (19% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…awesome.css?ver=1.13.1 could save 6.5KiB (28% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…/entypo.css?ver=1.13.1 could save 4.5KiB (29% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/themes/presso/jetmenu.css could save 3.2KiB (22% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…/zocial.css?ver=1.13.1 could save 2.4KiB (32% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…ff-style.css?ver=2.3.7 could save 2.3KiB (30% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…/symbol.css?ver=1.13.1 could save 1.4KiB (39% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…-custom.css?ver=1.13.1 could save 1.3KiB (29% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…/bd-styles.css?ver=4.3 could save 838B (18% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…wipebox.css?ver=1.13.1 could save 745B (17% reduction).

priority - 6 Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 44% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.

priority - 6 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.49 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 4 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 38KiB (24% reduction).

Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…exslider.js?ver=1.13.1 could save 16.7KiB (43% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…js/asset.js?ver=1.13.1 could save 12.6KiB (14% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…/js/main.js?ver=1.13.1 could save 1.9KiB (36% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/themes/presso/jetmenu.js could save 1.6KiB (24% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…f-scripts.js?ver=2.3.7 could save 1.4KiB (37% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme….fitvids.js?ver=1.13.1 could save 1.1KiB (35% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…ortcodes.js?ver=1.13.1 could save 774B (41% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/theme…t-search.js?ver=1.13.1 could save 733B (22% reduction).
Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plugi…photon.js?ver=20130122 could save 724B (52% reduction).
Minifying http://a15941.actonservice.com/cdnr/89/acton/bn/tracker/15941 could save 585B (24% reduction).

priority - 1 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 11.7KiB (10% reduction).

Minifying http://www.processingmagazine.com/ could save 11.7KiB (10% reduction).

processingmagazine.com Desktop Resources

Total Resources152
Number of Hosts35
Static Resources88
JavaScript Resources40
CSS Resources20

processingmagazine.com Desktop Resource Breakdown

processingmagazine.com mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2019-06-24


Mobile Speed Bad
35/100

processingmagazine.com Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 79 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 772.8KiB (86% reduction).

Compressing https://i0.wp.com/www.processingmagazine.com/wp-co…resize=360%2C360&ssl=1 could save 693.4KiB (93% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/uplo…Logo_White_2015-01.png could save 40KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/simgad/8381619446106644271 could save 27.3KiB (57% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/simgad/372974048744661849 could save 5.4KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/uplo…R_Logo_2015_300x89.png could save 2.4KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/877554927932891136/ZBEs235N_bigger.jpg could save 1KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/903661095759470592/VtmCySoU_bigger.jpg could save 940B (32% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/606812689852067840/OR52YfUw_bigger.jpg could save 702B (34% reduction).
Compressing https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/1408803f71108f7…a1d79c30?s=64&d=mm&r=g could save 453B (39% reduction).
Compressing https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/345df03e9eca83d…b8100fe0?s=64&d=mm&r=g could save 453B (39% reduction).
Compressing https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6ab393f05c9e2f5…5e74ccc8?s=64&d=mm&r=g could save 453B (39% reduction).
Compressing https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/8756bd76c240a70…fd577e3e?s=64&d=mm&r=g could save 453B (39% reduction).

priority - 56 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 22 blocking script resources and 19 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/…y/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/…grate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plug…ront.min.js?ver=1.2.44
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them…h.js?ver=1.1%20tacOcat
https://js.adsrvr.org/up_loader.1.1.0.js
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/…41644438be482dca147d37
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plug…photon.js?ver=20130122
https://s0.wp.com/wp-content/js/devicepx-jetpack.js?ver=201925
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/…fect.min.js?ver=1.11.4
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/…fade.min.js?ver=1.11.4
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/…core.min.js?ver=1.11.4
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/…dget.min.js?ver=1.11.4
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/…dion.min.js?ver=1.11.4
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/…tabs.min.js?ver=1.11.4
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plug…s.js?ver=1.1%20tacOcat
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them…s.js?ver=1.1%20tacOcat
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them…n.js?ver=1.1%20tacOcat
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them…r.js?ver=1.1%20tacOcat
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them…n.js?ver=1.1%20tacOcat
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them…t.js?ver=1.1%20tacOcat
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them…n.js?ver=1.1%20tacOcat
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/…41644438be482dca147d37

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plug…41644438be482dca147d37
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Oswald:300…ic,700italic,800italic
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/css…41644438be482dca147d37
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plug…41644438be482dca147d37
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plug…full.min.css?ver=4.5.9
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plug…bile.min.css?ver=4.5.9
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them….css?ver=1.1%20tacOcat
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them….css?ver=1.1%20tacOcat
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them….css?ver=1.1%20tacOcat
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them….css?ver=1.1%20tacOcat
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them….css?ver=1.1%20tacOcat
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them….css?ver=1.1%20tacOcat
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them….css?ver=1.1%20tacOcat
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them….css?ver=1.1%20tacOcat
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them…41644438be482dca147d37
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/themes/presso/style.css
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans%…41644438be482dca147d37
https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plug…/jetpack.css?ver=5.2.1
https://rtp-static.marketo.com/rtp/libs/jquery-ui-…htera-custom-1.9.6.css

priority - 26 Avoid landing page redirects

Your page has 2 redirects. Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded.

Avoid landing page redirects for the following chain of redirected URLs.

http://processingmagazine.com/
http://www.processingmagazine.com/
https://www.processingmagazine.com/

priority - 18 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://js.adsrvr.org/up_loader.1.1.0.js (expiration not specified)
https://rtp-static.marketo.com/rtp/libs/ga-integration-2.0.2.js (expiration not specified)
https://rtp-static.marketo.com/rtp/libs/jquery-ui-…htera-custom-1.9.6.css (expiration not specified)
https://rtp-static.marketo.com/rtp/libs/jquery/1.8.3/jquery.min.js (expiration not specified)
https://rtp-static.marketo.com/rtp/libs/jqueryui/1…query-custom-ui.min.js (expiration not specified)
https://s.dpmsrv.com/dpm_193b3437a94374579772f3f1a8c8f08381218bf9.min.js (expiration not specified)
https://s.dpmsrv.com/dpm_a2e33d344f272e100d4a8efeabc7ae8a60a8ba7a.min.js (expiration not specified)
https://abrtp1-cdn.marketo.com/rtp-api/v1/rtp.js?aid=processingmagazine (4.9 minutes)
https://cdn.syndication.twimg.com/timeline/profile…700&with_replies=false (5 minutes)
https://script.crazyegg.com/pages/scripts/0026/0959.js?433705 (5 minutes)
https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/1408803f71108f7…a1d79c30?s=64&d=mm&r=g (5 minutes)
https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/345df03e9eca83d…b8100fe0?s=64&d=mm&r=g (5 minutes)
https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6ab393f05c9e2f5…5e74ccc8?s=64&d=mm&r=g (5 minutes)
https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/8756bd76c240a70…fd577e3e?s=64&d=mm&r=g (5 minutes)
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js (5 minutes)
https://cdn.blueconic.net/ebm.js (10 minutes)
https://syndication.twitter.com/settings (10 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/195426…2533?v=2.8.51&r=stable (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/plugins/inferredEvents.js?v=2.8.51 (20 minutes)
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
https://s.adroll.com/j/roundtrip.js (60 minutes)
https://s.adroll.com/pixel/YR4G24JEVVGBDFTE34LFZQ/…7IZUTCNBNHBIBVM2GBD.js (60 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 15 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 148.3KiB (71% reduction).

Compressing https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js could save 65.6KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing https://platform.twitter.com/css/timeline.70d17849…00695473.light.ltr.css could save 41.4KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing https://platform.twitter.com/js/moment~timeline~tw…4b1c047f200045ffa1e.js could save 16.5KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing https://platform.twitter.com/js/timeline.49693ebcd…8708ebca7502c7c343d.js could save 15.6KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe…processingmagazine.com could save 9.2KiB (61% reduction).

priority - 8 Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 6% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.
Click to see the screenshot with only the HTML response:

priority - 1 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 10KiB (25% reduction).

Minifying https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them…t.js?ver=1.1%20tacOcat could save 4.4KiB (18% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them…r.js?ver=1.1%20tacOcat could save 3.1KiB (36% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them…n.js?ver=1.1%20tacOcat could save 820B (26% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://connect.facebook.net/signals/plugins/inferredEvents.js?v=2.8.51 could save 646B (85% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them…s.js?ver=1.1%20tacOcat could save 409B (32% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plug…photon.js?ver=20130122 could save 335B (50% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/plug…s.js?ver=1.1%20tacOcat could save 136B (21% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-includes/js/…fade.min.js?ver=1.11.4 could save 125B (37% reduction) after compression.

priority - 1 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 9.2KiB (24% reduction).

Minifying https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them….css?ver=1.1%20tacOcat could save 3.7KiB (19% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them….css?ver=1.1%20tacOcat could save 1.6KiB (36% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them….css?ver=1.1%20tacOcat could save 1.2KiB (37% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them….css?ver=1.1%20tacOcat could save 755B (39% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them….css?ver=1.1%20tacOcat could save 641B (11% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them….css?ver=1.1%20tacOcat could save 567B (49% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them….css?ver=1.1%20tacOcat could save 505B (32% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.processingmagazine.com/wp-content/them…41644438be482dca147d37 could save 328B (45% reduction) after compression.

processingmagazine.com Mobile Resources

Total Resources247
Number of Hosts53
Static Resources164
JavaScript Resources61
CSS Resources19

processingmagazine.com Mobile Resource Breakdown

processingmagazine.com mobile page usability

Last tested: 2019-06-24


Mobile Usability Good
99/100

processingmagazine.com Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 0 Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <a href="https://www.pr…/franksequino/" class="author-name">Frank Sequino</a> and 2 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="https://twitter.com/gfps_uk" class="PrettyLink pro…misable h-card">@gfps_uk</a> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="http://processflownetwork.com">Process Flow Network</a> and 9 others are close to other tap targets.

processingmagazine.com similar domains

Similar domains:
www.processingmagazine.com
www.processingmagazine.net
www.processingmagazine.org
www.processingmagazine.info
www.processingmagazine.biz
www.processingmagazine.us
www.processingmagazine.mobi
www.rocessingmagazine.com
www.processingmagazine.com
www.orocessingmagazine.com
www.porocessingmagazine.com
www.oprocessingmagazine.com
www.lrocessingmagazine.com
www.plrocessingmagazine.com
www.lprocessingmagazine.com
www.pocessingmagazine.com
www.peocessingmagazine.com
www.preocessingmagazine.com
www.perocessingmagazine.com
www.pdocessingmagazine.com
www.prdocessingmagazine.com
www.pdrocessingmagazine.com
www.pfocessingmagazine.com
www.prfocessingmagazine.com
www.pfrocessingmagazine.com
www.ptocessingmagazine.com
www.prtocessingmagazine.com
www.ptrocessingmagazine.com
www.prcessingmagazine.com
www.pricessingmagazine.com
www.proicessingmagazine.com
www.priocessingmagazine.com
www.prkcessingmagazine.com
www.prokcessingmagazine.com
www.prkocessingmagazine.com
www.prlcessingmagazine.com
www.prolcessingmagazine.com
www.prlocessingmagazine.com
www.prpcessingmagazine.com
www.propcessingmagazine.com
www.prpocessingmagazine.com
www.proessingmagazine.com
www.proxessingmagazine.com
www.procxessingmagazine.com
www.proxcessingmagazine.com
www.prodessingmagazine.com
www.procdessingmagazine.com
www.prodcessingmagazine.com
www.professingmagazine.com
www.procfessingmagazine.com
www.profcessingmagazine.com
www.provessingmagazine.com
www.procvessingmagazine.com
www.provcessingmagazine.com
www.procssingmagazine.com
www.procwssingmagazine.com
www.procewssingmagazine.com
www.procwessingmagazine.com
www.procsssingmagazine.com
www.processsingmagazine.com
www.procsessingmagazine.com
www.procdssingmagazine.com
www.procedssingmagazine.com
www.procrssingmagazine.com
www.procerssingmagazine.com
www.procressingmagazine.com
www.procesingmagazine.com
www.procewsingmagazine.com
www.proceswsingmagazine.com
www.proceesingmagazine.com
www.procesesingmagazine.com
www.proceessingmagazine.com
www.procedsingmagazine.com
www.procesdsingmagazine.com
www.procezsingmagazine.com
www.proceszsingmagazine.com
www.procezssingmagazine.com
www.procexsingmagazine.com
www.procesxsingmagazine.com
www.procexssingmagazine.com
www.proceasingmagazine.com
www.procesasingmagazine.com
www.proceassingmagazine.com
www.proceswingmagazine.com
www.processwingmagazine.com
www.proceseingmagazine.com
www.processeingmagazine.com
www.procesdingmagazine.com
www.processdingmagazine.com
www.proceszingmagazine.com
www.processzingmagazine.com
www.procesxingmagazine.com
www.processxingmagazine.com
www.procesaingmagazine.com
www.processaingmagazine.com
www.processngmagazine.com
www.processungmagazine.com
www.processiungmagazine.com
www.processuingmagazine.com
www.processjngmagazine.com
www.processijngmagazine.com
www.processjingmagazine.com
www.processkngmagazine.com
www.processikngmagazine.com
www.processkingmagazine.com
www.processongmagazine.com
www.processiongmagazine.com
www.processoingmagazine.com
www.processigmagazine.com
www.processibgmagazine.com
www.processinbgmagazine.com
www.processibngmagazine.com
www.processihgmagazine.com
www.processinhgmagazine.com
www.processihngmagazine.com
www.processijgmagazine.com
www.processinjgmagazine.com
www.processimgmagazine.com
www.processinmgmagazine.com
www.processimngmagazine.com
www.processinmagazine.com
www.processinfmagazine.com
www.processingfmagazine.com
www.processinfgmagazine.com
www.processinvmagazine.com
www.processingvmagazine.com
www.processinvgmagazine.com
www.processintmagazine.com
www.processingtmagazine.com
www.processintgmagazine.com
www.processinbmagazine.com
www.processingbmagazine.com
www.processinymagazine.com
www.processingymagazine.com
www.processinygmagazine.com
www.processinhmagazine.com
www.processinghmagazine.com
www.processingagazine.com
www.processingnagazine.com
www.processingmnagazine.com
www.processingnmagazine.com
www.processingjagazine.com
www.processingmjagazine.com
www.processingjmagazine.com
www.processingkagazine.com
www.processingmkagazine.com
www.processingkmagazine.com
www.processingmgazine.com
www.processingmqgazine.com
www.processingmaqgazine.com
www.processingmqagazine.com
www.processingmwgazine.com
www.processingmawgazine.com
www.processingmwagazine.com
www.processingmsgazine.com
www.processingmasgazine.com
www.processingmsagazine.com
www.processingmzgazine.com
www.processingmazgazine.com
www.processingmzagazine.com
www.processingmaazine.com
www.processingmafazine.com
www.processingmagfazine.com
www.processingmafgazine.com
www.processingmavazine.com
www.processingmagvazine.com
www.processingmavgazine.com
www.processingmatazine.com
www.processingmagtazine.com
www.processingmatgazine.com
www.processingmabazine.com
www.processingmagbazine.com
www.processingmabgazine.com
www.processingmayazine.com
www.processingmagyazine.com
www.processingmaygazine.com
www.processingmahazine.com
www.processingmaghazine.com
www.processingmahgazine.com
www.processingmagzine.com
www.processingmagqzine.com
www.processingmagaqzine.com
www.processingmagqazine.com
www.processingmagwzine.com
www.processingmagawzine.com
www.processingmagwazine.com
www.processingmagszine.com
www.processingmagaszine.com
www.processingmagsazine.com
www.processingmagzzine.com
www.processingmagazzine.com
www.processingmagzazine.com
www.processingmagaine.com
www.processingmagaxine.com
www.processingmagazxine.com
www.processingmagaxzine.com
www.processingmagasine.com
www.processingmagazsine.com
www.processingmagaaine.com
www.processingmagazaine.com
www.processingmagaazine.com
www.processingmagazne.com
www.processingmagazune.com
www.processingmagaziune.com
www.processingmagazuine.com
www.processingmagazjne.com
www.processingmagazijne.com
www.processingmagazjine.com
www.processingmagazkne.com
www.processingmagazikne.com
www.processingmagazkine.com
www.processingmagazone.com
www.processingmagazione.com
www.processingmagazoine.com
www.processingmagazie.com
www.processingmagazibe.com
www.processingmagazinbe.com
www.processingmagazibne.com
www.processingmagazihe.com
www.processingmagazinhe.com
www.processingmagazihne.com
www.processingmagazije.com
www.processingmagazinje.com
www.processingmagazime.com
www.processingmagazinme.com
www.processingmagazimne.com
www.processingmagazin.com
www.processingmagazinw.com
www.processingmagazinew.com
www.processingmagazinwe.com
www.processingmagazins.com
www.processingmagazines.com
www.processingmagazinse.com
www.processingmagazind.com
www.processingmagazined.com
www.processingmagazinde.com
www.processingmagazinr.com
www.processingmagaziner.com
www.processingmagazinre.com
www.processingmagazine.con

processingmagazine.com Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.


processingmagazine.com TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.