TELEGRAF.DESIGN Телеграф — журнал об украинском и мировом дизайне.


telegraf.design website information.

telegraf.design domain name is registered by .DESIGN top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .DESIGN domain zone.

Following name servers are specified for telegraf.design domain:

  • slave.hostsila.net
  • master.hostsila.com

and probably website telegraf.design is hosted by FASTLY - Fastly, US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by FASTLY - Fastly, US hosting company.

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website telegraf.design position was 33787 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 999931. Now website telegraf.design ranked in Alexa database as number 797604 (in the world).

Website telegraf.design Desktop speed measurement score (42/100) is better than the results of 16.45% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

telegraf.design Mobile usability score (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed measurement score of telegraf.design (70/100) is better than the results of 76.43% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
Sep-24-2024 797,60412,341
Sep-23-2024 809,945-12,163
Sep-22-2024 797,782-8,889
Sep-21-2024 788,893-5,564
Sep-20-2024 783,32922,347
Sep-19-2024 805,676-12,364
Sep-18-2024 793,3123,841

Advertisement

telegraf.design Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.



telegraf.design whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.


telegraf.design domain is not supported

telegraf.design server information

Servers Location

IP Address
91.239.234.10
Country
Ukraine
Region
Kyiv
City
Kiev

telegraf.design desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2018-04-04


Desktop Speed Bad
42/100

telegraf.design Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 138 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 1.3MiB (93% reduction).

Compressing and resizing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2018-03-30_15-16-12.png could save 187.6KiB (94% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2018-03-30_15-38-52.png could save 176.6KiB (94% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2018-03-30_14-15-25.png could save 166.5KiB (96% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2018-03-30_13-46-11.png could save 147.9KiB (96% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2018-03-30_15-59-50.png could save 110.2KiB (94% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2018-03-30_13-59-01.png could save 74.1KiB (92% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2018-03-05_13-57-49.png could save 66.7KiB (95% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2018-03-30_13-50-26.png could save 65.3KiB (91% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2018-03-30_13-55-22.png could save 60.9KiB (92% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2018-03-30_13-43-21.png could save 59.7KiB (91% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2018-03-30_13-35-26.png could save 55.8KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2018-03-30_14-05-41.png could save 47.4KiB (89% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2018-03-02_14-10-19.png could save 40.1KiB (93% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2018-03-30_14-18-55.png could save 34.8KiB (89% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2018-04-03_13-41-30.png could save 28.7KiB (89% reduction).
Compressing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/plugins/simple-s…buttons/somacro/vk.png could save 20.6KiB (92% reduction).

priority - 6 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 2 blocking script resources and 5 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://telegraf.design/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
http://telegraf.design/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquer…grate.min.js?ver=1.4.1

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://telegraf.design/wp-content/plugins/contact-…css/styles.css?ver=4.6
http://telegraf.design/wp-includes/css/dashicons.min.css?ver=4.7.10
http://telegraf.design/wp-content/plugins/post-vie…rontend.css?ver=4.7.10
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Indie+Flower&ver=4.7.10
http://telegraf.design/wp-content/plugins/mistape/…pe-front.css?ver=1.3.3

priority - 5 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23design/img/background.svg (expiration not specified)
http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…g/svg/facebook_red.svg (expiration not specified)
http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…svg/facebook_white.svg (expiration not specified)
http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…mg/svg/twitter_red.svg (expiration not specified)
http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…/svg/twitter_white.svg (expiration not specified)
http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…/svg/vkontakte_red.svg (expiration not specified)
http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…vg/vkontakte_white.svg (expiration not specified)
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-KXJL52 (15 minutes)
http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js (20 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 4 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.65 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 1 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 8.4KiB (32% reduction).

Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/plugins/mistape/…ape-front.js?ver=1.3.3 could save 2.3KiB (37% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…er/dist/js/lightbox.js could save 2KiB (41% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…dist/js/lightslider.js could save 1.7KiB (25% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…y.youtubebackground.js could save 1KiB (38% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23design/js/scripts.js could save 786B (23% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23design/js/lazyYT/lazyYT.js could save 622B (27% reduction) after compression.

priority - 1 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 5.8KiB (24% reduction).

Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23design/css/style.css could save 3.4KiB (21% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/plugins/mistape/…pe-front.css?ver=1.3.3 could save 1.6KiB (44% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…st/css/lightslider.css could save 311B (20% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23design/js/lazyYT/lazyYT.css could save 280B (31% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23design/css/reset.css could save 197B (21% reduction).
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…/dist/css/lightbox.css could save 121B (12% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 3.6KiB (13% reduction).

Minifying http://telegraf.design/ could save 2.8KiB (11% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://t.sharethis.com/1/d/t.dhj?rnd=1522860528031…10&dmn=telegraf.design could save 765B (50% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 2.2KiB (42% reduction).

Compressing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23design/css/reset.css could save 437B (46% reduction).
Compressing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…svg/facebook_white.svg could save 376B (45% reduction).
Compressing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…g/svg/facebook_red.svg could save 369B (45% reduction).
Compressing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…vg/vkontakte_white.svg could save 357B (37% reduction).
Compressing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…/svg/vkontakte_red.svg could save 351B (37% reduction).
Compressing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/plugins/simple-s…ssba.min.js?ver=4.7.10 could save 314B (45% reduction).

telegraf.design Desktop Resources

Total Resources113
Number of Hosts23
Static Resources73
JavaScript Resources26
CSS Resources13

telegraf.design Desktop Resource Breakdown

telegraf.design mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2018-04-05


Mobile Speed Medium
70/100

telegraf.design Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 24 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 2 blocking script resources and 4 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://telegraf.design/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
http://telegraf.design/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquer…grate.min.js?ver=1.4.1

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://telegraf.design/wp-content/plugins/contact-…css/styles.css?ver=4.6
http://telegraf.design/wp-includes/css/dashicons.min.css?ver=4.7.10
http://telegraf.design/wp-content/plugins/post-vie…rontend.css?ver=4.7.10
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Indie+Flower&ver=4.7.10

priority - 7 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23design/img/background.svg (expiration not specified)
http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…g/svg/facebook_red.svg (expiration not specified)
http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…svg/facebook_white.svg (expiration not specified)
http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…mg/svg/twitter_red.svg (expiration not specified)
http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…/svg/twitter_white.svg (expiration not specified)
http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…/svg/vkontakte_red.svg (expiration not specified)
http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…vg/vkontakte_white.svg (expiration not specified)
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-KXJL52 (15 minutes)
http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js (20 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 7 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.64 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 4 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 37.2KiB (34% reduction).

Compressing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/plugins/simple-s…buttons/somacro/vk.png could save 20.6KiB (92% reduction).
Compressing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/invision-1.jpg could save 16.5KiB (19% reduction).

priority - 1 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 6.1KiB (31% reduction).

Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…er/dist/js/lightbox.js could save 2KiB (41% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…dist/js/lightslider.js could save 1.7KiB (25% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…y.youtubebackground.js could save 1KiB (38% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23design/js/scripts.js could save 786B (23% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23design/js/lazyYT/lazyYT.js could save 622B (27% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 4.2KiB (21% reduction).

Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23design/css/style.css could save 3.4KiB (21% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…st/css/lightslider.css could save 311B (20% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23design/js/lazyYT/lazyYT.css could save 280B (31% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23design/css/reset.css could save 197B (21% reduction).
Minifying http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…/dist/css/lightbox.css could save 121B (12% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 2.2KiB (42% reduction).

Compressing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23design/css/reset.css could save 437B (46% reduction).
Compressing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…svg/facebook_white.svg could save 376B (45% reduction).
Compressing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…g/svg/facebook_red.svg could save 369B (45% reduction).
Compressing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…vg/vkontakte_white.svg could save 357B (37% reduction).
Compressing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/themes/the23desi…/svg/vkontakte_red.svg could save 351B (37% reduction).
Compressing http://telegraf.design/wp-content/plugins/simple-s…ssba.min.js?ver=4.7.10 could save 314B (45% reduction).

priority - 0 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 765B (50% reduction).

Minifying http://t.sharethis.com/1/d/t.dhj?rnd=1522929716660…10&dmn=telegraf.design could save 765B (50% reduction) after compression.

telegraf.design Mobile Resources

Total Resources106
Number of Hosts23
Static Resources69
JavaScript Resources24
CSS Resources12

telegraf.design Mobile Resource Breakdown

telegraf.design mobile page usability

Last tested: 2018-04-05


Mobile Usability Good
99/100

telegraf.design Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 0 Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <form class="wpcf7-form">ПОДПИШИСЬ НА Е…ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ</form> is close to 1 other tap targets.

telegraf.design similar domains

Similar domains:
www.telegraf.com
www.telegraf.net
www.telegraf.org
www.telegraf.info
www.telegraf.biz
www.telegraf.us
www.telegraf.mobi
www.elegraf.design
www.telegraf.design
www.relegraf.design
www.trelegraf.design
www.rtelegraf.design
www.felegraf.design
www.tfelegraf.design
www.ftelegraf.design
www.gelegraf.design
www.tgelegraf.design
www.gtelegraf.design
www.yelegraf.design
www.tyelegraf.design
www.ytelegraf.design
www.tlegraf.design
www.twlegraf.design
www.tewlegraf.design
www.twelegraf.design
www.tslegraf.design
www.teslegraf.design
www.tselegraf.design
www.tdlegraf.design
www.tedlegraf.design
www.tdelegraf.design
www.trlegraf.design
www.terlegraf.design
www.teegraf.design
www.tepegraf.design
www.telpegraf.design
www.teplegraf.design
www.teoegraf.design
www.teloegraf.design
www.teolegraf.design
www.tekegraf.design
www.telkegraf.design
www.teklegraf.design
www.telgraf.design
www.telwgraf.design
www.telewgraf.design
www.telwegraf.design
www.telsgraf.design
www.telesgraf.design
www.telsegraf.design
www.teldgraf.design
www.teledgraf.design
www.teldegraf.design
www.telrgraf.design
www.telergraf.design
www.telregraf.design
www.teleraf.design
www.telefraf.design
www.telegfraf.design
www.telefgraf.design
www.televraf.design
www.telegvraf.design
www.televgraf.design
www.teletraf.design
www.telegtraf.design
www.teletgraf.design
www.telebraf.design
www.telegbraf.design
www.telebgraf.design
www.teleyraf.design
www.telegyraf.design
www.teleygraf.design
www.telehraf.design
www.teleghraf.design
www.telehgraf.design
www.telegaf.design
www.telegeaf.design
www.telegreaf.design
www.telegeraf.design
www.telegdaf.design
www.telegrdaf.design
www.telegdraf.design
www.telegfaf.design
www.telegrfaf.design
www.telegtaf.design
www.telegrtaf.design
www.telegrf.design
www.telegrqf.design
www.telegraqf.design
www.telegrqaf.design
www.telegrwf.design
www.telegrawf.design
www.telegrwaf.design
www.telegrsf.design
www.telegrasf.design
www.telegrsaf.design
www.telegrzf.design
www.telegrazf.design
www.telegrzaf.design
www.telegra.design
www.telegrac.design
www.telegrafc.design
www.telegracf.design
www.telegrad.design
www.telegrafd.design
www.telegradf.design
www.telegrar.design
www.telegrafr.design
www.telegrarf.design
www.telegrat.design
www.telegraft.design
www.telegratf.design
www.telegrag.design
www.telegrafg.design
www.telegragf.design
www.telegrav.design
www.telegrafv.design
www.telegravf.design

telegraf.design Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.


telegraf.design TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.