testhub.pl website information.
testhub.pl domain name is registered by .PL top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .PL domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for testhub.pl domain:
- george.ns.cloudflare.com
- lorna.ns.cloudflare.com
and probably website testhub.pl is hosted by CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website testhub.pl position was 33857 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 997248. Now website testhub.pl ranked in Alexa database as number 977318 (in the world).
Website testhub.pl Desktop speed measurement score (76/100) is better than the results of 61.81% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
testhub.pl Mobile usability score (98/100) is better than the results of 55.61% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of testhub.pl (48/100) is better than the results of 30.32% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
Date | Rank | Change |
---|---|---|
Nov-16-2024 | 977,318 | N/A |
Nov-15-2024 | N/A | N/A |
Nov-14-2024 | 966,141 | -6,235 |
Nov-13-2024 | 959,906 | 0 |
Nov-12-2024 | 959,906 | 0 |
Nov-11-2024 | 959,906 | 0 |
Nov-10-2024 | 959,906 | 8,897 |
Advertisement
testhub.pl Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
testhub.pl whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
DOMAIN NAME: testhub.pl
registrant type: individual
nameservers: george.ns.cloudflare.com.
lorna.ns.cloudflare.com.
created: 2011.01.31 15:11:13
last modified: 2022.01.01 16:05:57
renewal date: 2023.01.31 15:11:13
no option
dnssec: Unsigned
REGISTRAR:
OVH SAS
2 Rue Kellermann
59100 Roubaix
Francja/France
+48.717500200
https://www.ovh.pl/abuse/
WHOIS database responses: https://dns.pl/en/whois
WHOIS displays data with a delay not exceeding 15 minutes in relation to the .pl Registry system
testhub.pl server information
testhub.pl desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-01-02
testhub.pl Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 16 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 152.8KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/LYNXMPEE7905P_L.jpg could save 12.8KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/logo-we2018-150x150.jpg could save 6.3KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/KAbk…Bc0DUs0B3g-150x150.jpg could save 6.1KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Honor-8X-2-150x150.jpg could save 5.8KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/cd8e…hnology_04-150x150.jpg could save 5.7KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/maxresdefault-150x150.jpg could save 5.4KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/merc…-class-004-150x150.jpg could save 5.1KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/tele…uszkodzony-150x150.jpg could save 4.3KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/img_…lhouette-4-150x150.jpg could save 4KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/ewAAAgOdoOA-960-150x150.jpg could save 3.8KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/rent-lease-or-buy-150x150.jpg could save 3.7KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/LYNXMPEE7905P_L-150x150.jpg could save 3.5KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/7828…-europe-18-150x150.jpg could save 2.8KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/img_…lhouette-4-585x372.jpg could save 2.4KiB (12% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/daca_images/simg…nlHg5HNzDpbBB0TwVEZSWA could save 160B (13% reduction).
priority - 8 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking script resources and 3 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:…900italic&subset=latin
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/cache/wpfc-minified/l0esgfws/ddhc9.css
priority - 2 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 24.4KiB (33% reduction).
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/slick.min.js?ver=1.5.9 could save 3.7KiB (26% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/lightcase.js?ver=1.0 could save 3.3KiB (33% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/smoothscroll.js?ver=1.4.4 could save 2.6KiB (41% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/jarallax.js?ver=1.5.2 could save 2KiB (35% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/scripts.js?ver=1.0 could save 2KiB (25% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/ZmiBshNJmxrL…MnrtxaJRg.js?ver=2.2.3 could save 1.9KiB (31% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/jq…portChecker.js?ver=1.0 could save 1.2KiB (53% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/jquery.hoverdir.js?ver=1.0 could save 1.1KiB (44% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/plugins/contact-form…s/scripts.js?ver=5.0.5 could save 659B (17% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/jquery.cookie.js?ver=1.4.1 could save 606B (44% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/superfish.js?ver=1.7.5 could save 525B (22% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/jq…size.sensor.js?ver=0.3 could save 168B (16% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/jq…tual.min.js?ver=1.0.16 could save 131B (21% reduction) after compression.
priority - 2 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.40 seconds.
There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 1 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (60 minutes)
https://ssl.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
testhub.pl Desktop Resources
Total Resources | 154 |
Number of Hosts | 21 |
Static Resources | 20 |
JavaScript Resources | 45 |
CSS Resources | 7 |
testhub.pl Desktop Resource Breakdown
testhub.pl mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-01-02
testhub.pl Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 48 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 3 blocking script resources and 25 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://testhub.pl/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion-child…1bde3de47caa94e2c85092
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/plugins/contact-form…s/styles.css?ver=5.0.5
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/plugins/google-captc…/gglcptch.css?ver=1.37
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/plugins/widget-optio…css/widget-options.css
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/plugins/wp-statistic…rontend.css?ver=12.5.2
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/plugins/nextend-face…1bde3de47caa94e2c85092
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:600
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/plugins/js_composer/…wesome.min.css?ver=5.3
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/plugins/simple-light…/css/app.css?ver=2.7.0
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/plugins/js_composer/…mposer.min.css?ver=5.3
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/css/b…trap.min.css?ver=3.3.4
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/css/slick.css?ver=1.5.9
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/css/s…ne-icons.css?ver=1.0.0
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/css/t…fy-icons.css?ver=1.0.0
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/css/lightcase.css?ver=1.0.0
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/css/jssocials.css?ver=1.0.0
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/css/p…7-stroke.css?ver=1.0.0
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/css/p…lbar.min.css?ver=1.0.0
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/css/t…bundle.min.css?ver=4.0
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/css/j…allery.min.css?ver=4.0
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/style.css?ver=1.0
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/css/responsive.css?ver=1.0
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:…900italic&subset=latin
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion-child…1bde3de47caa94e2c85092
https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/ZmiBshNJmxrL…YEoALBxf.css?ver=2.2.3
priority - 44 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 431.2KiB (66% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/merc…-class-004-585x585.jpg could save 69.9KiB (98% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Honor-8X-2-585x585.jpg could save 69.5KiB (97% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/tele…uszkodzony-585x585.jpg could save 52.5KiB (97% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/cd8e…hnology_04-585x585.jpg could save 51.3KiB (96% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/7828…-europe-18-585x585.jpg could save 38.4KiB (97% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/samsung-585x585.jpg could save 35.4KiB (96% reduction).
Compressing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/LYNXMPEE7905P_L.jpg could save 12.8KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/icore_images/6521538708196646012 could save 3.2KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/icore_images/3507816557042290193 could save 2.8KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/icore_images/13569552325363365335 could save 2.5KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/img_…lhouette-4-585x372.jpg could save 2.4KiB (12% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/icore_images/1918128615702933895 could save 2.4KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/icore_images/3896023825919826393 could save 2.2KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/icore_images/3802485895045546119 could save 2KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/icore_images/17931896697125669664 could save 1.5KiB (11% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/icore_images/4463555493377666096 could save 1.4KiB (13% reduction).
priority - 23 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.40 seconds.
There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 3 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (60 minutes)
https://ssl.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 2 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 24.4KiB (33% reduction).
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/slick.min.js?ver=1.5.9 could save 3.7KiB (26% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/lightcase.js?ver=1.0 could save 3.3KiB (33% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/smoothscroll.js?ver=1.4.4 could save 2.6KiB (41% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/jarallax.js?ver=1.5.2 could save 2KiB (35% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/scripts.js?ver=1.0 could save 2KiB (25% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/ZmiBshNJmxrL…MnrtxaJRg.js?ver=2.2.3 could save 1.9KiB (31% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/jq…portChecker.js?ver=1.0 could save 1.2KiB (53% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/jquery.hoverdir.js?ver=1.0 could save 1.1KiB (44% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/plugins/contact-form…s/scripts.js?ver=5.0.5 could save 659B (17% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/jquery.cookie.js?ver=1.4.1 could save 606B (44% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/superfish.js?ver=1.7.5 could save 525B (22% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/jq…size.sensor.js?ver=0.3 could save 168B (16% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/js/jq…tual.min.js?ver=1.0.16 could save 131B (21% reduction) after compression.
priority - 1 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 7.8KiB (19% reduction).
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/css/lightcase.css?ver=1.0.0 could save 1.1KiB (39% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion-child…1bde3de47caa94e2c85092 could save 211B (37% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/css/responsive.css?ver=1.0 could save 188B (18% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/plugins/nextend-face…1bde3de47caa94e2c85092 could save 183B (17% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/uploads/ZmiBshNJmxrL…YEoALBxf.css?ver=2.2.3 could save 140B (14% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://testhub.pl/wp-content/themes/gillion/css/j…allery.min.css?ver=4.0 could save 108B (19% reduction) after compression.
testhub.pl Mobile Resources
Total Resources | 173 |
Number of Hosts | 19 |
Static Resources | 29 |
JavaScript Resources | 47 |
CSS Resources | 27 |
testhub.pl Mobile Resource Breakdown
testhub.pl mobile page usability
Last tested: 2019-01-02
testhub.pl Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 1 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<div class="sh-hamburger-m…h-nav-dropdown"></div>
is close to 2 other tap targets.<a href="https://testhu…b-pamieci-ram/">Samsung galaxy…GB pamięci RAM</a>
and 5 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="https://testhu…b-pamieci-ram/">Samsung galaxy…GB pamięci RAM</a>
and 7 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="https://testhu…ersonalizacja/" class="post-date">8 godzin temu</a>
is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="https://testhu…a/tech/mobile/">Mobile</a>
and 15 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<div id="abgc" class="abgc"></div>
is close to 1 other tap targets.testhub.pl similar domains
www.testhub.net
www.testhub.org
www.testhub.info
www.testhub.biz
www.testhub.us
www.testhub.mobi
www.esthub.pl
www.testhub.pl
www.resthub.pl
www.tresthub.pl
www.rtesthub.pl
www.festhub.pl
www.tfesthub.pl
www.ftesthub.pl
www.gesthub.pl
www.tgesthub.pl
www.gtesthub.pl
www.yesthub.pl
www.tyesthub.pl
www.ytesthub.pl
www.tsthub.pl
www.twsthub.pl
www.tewsthub.pl
www.twesthub.pl
www.tssthub.pl
www.tessthub.pl
www.tsesthub.pl
www.tdsthub.pl
www.tedsthub.pl
www.tdesthub.pl
www.trsthub.pl
www.tersthub.pl
www.tethub.pl
www.tewthub.pl
www.teswthub.pl
www.teethub.pl
www.tesethub.pl
www.teesthub.pl
www.tedthub.pl
www.tesdthub.pl
www.tezthub.pl
www.teszthub.pl
www.tezsthub.pl
www.texthub.pl
www.tesxthub.pl
www.texsthub.pl
www.teathub.pl
www.tesathub.pl
www.teasthub.pl
www.teshub.pl
www.tesrhub.pl
www.testrhub.pl
www.tesrthub.pl
www.tesfhub.pl
www.testfhub.pl
www.tesfthub.pl
www.tesghub.pl
www.testghub.pl
www.tesgthub.pl
www.tesyhub.pl
www.testyhub.pl
www.tesythub.pl
www.testub.pl
www.testbub.pl
www.testhbub.pl
www.testbhub.pl
www.testgub.pl
www.testhgub.pl
www.testyub.pl
www.testhyub.pl
www.testuub.pl
www.testhuub.pl
www.testuhub.pl
www.testjub.pl
www.testhjub.pl
www.testjhub.pl
www.testnub.pl
www.testhnub.pl
www.testnhub.pl
www.testhb.pl
www.testhyb.pl
www.testhuyb.pl
www.testhhb.pl
www.testhuhb.pl
www.testhhub.pl
www.testhjb.pl
www.testhujb.pl
www.testhib.pl
www.testhuib.pl
www.testhiub.pl
www.testhu.pl
www.testhuv.pl
www.testhubv.pl
www.testhuvb.pl
www.testhug.pl
www.testhubg.pl
www.testhugb.pl
www.testhuh.pl
www.testhubh.pl
www.testhun.pl
www.testhubn.pl
www.testhunb.pl
testhub.pl Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
testhub.pl TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.