wpfr.net website information.
wpfr.net domain name is registered by .NET top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .NET domain zone.
No name server records were found.
and probably website wpfr.net is hosted by FASTLY - Fastly, US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by FASTLY - Fastly, US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website wpfr.net position was 14263 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 14686. Now website wpfr.net ranked in Alexa database as number 14312 (in the world).
Website wpfr.net Desktop speed measurement score (81/100) is better than the results of 71.91% of other sites and shows that the page is performing great on desktop computers.
wpfr.net Mobile usability score (98/100) is better than the results of 55.61% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of wpfr.net (63/100) is better than the results of 61.76% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Nov-06-2024 | 14,312 | 1 |
| Nov-05-2024 | 14,313 | 90 |
| Nov-04-2024 | 14,403 | -50 |
| Nov-03-2024 | 14,353 | 51 |
| Nov-02-2024 | 14,404 | -72 |
| Nov-01-2024 | 14,332 | -69 |
| Oct-31-2024 | 14,263 | 244 |
Advertisement
wpfr.net Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
wpfr.net whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
Domain Name: WPFR.NET
Registry Domain ID: 1582612308_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.ovh.com
Registrar URL: http://www.ovh.com
Updated Date: 2021-01-01T05:37:56Z
Creation Date: 2010-01-21T13:28:49Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2024-01-21T13:28:49Z
Registrar: OVH sas
Registrar IANA ID: 433
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@ovh.net
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +33.972101007
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: NS1.O2SWITCH.NET
Name Server: NS2.O2SWITCH.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2022-11-16T23:29:58Z
wpfr.net server information
Servers Location
| IP Address |
|---|
| Country |
|---|
wpfr.net desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-05-24
wpfr.net Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 11 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 111.4KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing https://wpfr.net/files/2016/09/cop21.jpg could save 19.2KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Flavillette.com?w=263&h=201 could save 12.4KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.panzani.fr?w=263&h=201 could save 10.5KiB (46% reduction).
Compressing https://wpfr.net/files/2017/05/sondage-wordpress-312x150.png could save 10.2KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/http%3A%2F%2Fwww…ker.com%2F?w=263&h=201 could save 9.3KiB (48% reduction).
Compressing https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mnt.fr?w=263&h=201 could save 8.9KiB (46% reduction).
Compressing https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/http%3A%2F%2Fwww…oeb.com%2F?w=263&h=201 could save 7.7KiB (47% reduction).
Compressing https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/http%3A%2F%2Fwww…ploi.fr%2F?w=263&h=201 could save 7.2KiB (48% reduction).
Compressing https://wpfr.net/files/2016/01/seomix-favicon@2x.png could save 1.5KiB (12% reduction).
Compressing https://wpfr.net/wp-content/themes/wpfr/assets/img/location-cluster.png could save 712B (54% reduction).
Compressing https://wpfr.net/wp-content/themes/wpfr/assets/img/location.png could save 595B (55% reduction).
priority - 8 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 2 blocking script resources and 5 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://wpfr.net/wp-content/cache/min/1/68a58416dcee65e5bda7e8c123dc1d19.js
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://wpfr.net/wp-content/cache/min/1/2132a99d52…158b70370831b89983.css
https://wpfr.net/wp-content/cache/min/1/65d41555e5…8b3e213b306bc0c45a.css
https://wpfr.net/wp-content/cache/min/1/60e5eb9d19…e9038f9b480ad616f3.css
https://wpfr.net/wp-content/cache/min/1/c86b85bdd2…686c8141307960ac0f.css
priority - 2 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/http%3A%2F%2Fwww…ploi.fr%2F?w=263&h=201 (10 minutes)
https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/js?v=3.exp&ke…-PZK59qNiownOk&ver=3.0 (30 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
wpfr.net Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 102 |
| Number of Hosts | 14 |
| Static Resources | 76 |
| JavaScript Resources | 27 |
| CSS Resources | 6 |
wpfr.net Desktop Resource Breakdown
wpfr.net mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-05-23
wpfr.net Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 32 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 2 blocking script resources and 5 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://wpfr.net/wp-content/cache/min/1/68a58416dcee65e5bda7e8c123dc1d19.js
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://wpfr.net/wp-content/cache/min/1/2132a99d52…158b70370831b89983.css
https://wpfr.net/wp-content/cache/min/1/65d41555e5…8b3e213b306bc0c45a.css
https://wpfr.net/wp-content/cache/min/1/60e5eb9d19…e9038f9b480ad616f3.css
https://wpfr.net/wp-content/cache/min/1/c86b85bdd2…686c8141307960ac0f.css
priority - 26 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 255.8KiB (44% reduction).
Compressing https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lanef.com?w=462&h=355 could save 27.7KiB (46% reduction).
Compressing https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.panzani.fr?w=462&h=355 could save 26.3KiB (47% reduction).
Compressing https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/http%3A%2F%2Fwww…uk%2Fen%2F?w=462&h=355 could save 24.6KiB (46% reduction).
Compressing https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/http%3A%2F%2Fwww…eparis.com?w=462&h=355 could save 24.5KiB (49% reduction).
Compressing https://wpfr.net/files/2016/09/vivendi-1.jpg could save 20.8KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing https://wpfr.net/files/2016/09/cop21.jpg could save 19.2KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing https://wpfr.net/files/2016/09/renault.jpg could save 15.9KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/http%3A%2F%2Fwww…ort.org%2F?w=263&h=201 could save 15.2KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lanef.com?w=263&h=201 could save 11.8KiB (46% reduction).
Compressing https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.panzani.fr?w=263&h=201 could save 10.5KiB (46% reduction).
Compressing https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/http%3A%2F%2Fwww…uk%2Fen%2F?w=263&h=201 could save 10KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/http%3A%2F%2Fwww…eparis.com?w=263&h=201 could save 9.5KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing https://wpfr.net/wp-content/themes/wpfr/assets/img/location-cluster.png could save 712B (54% reduction).
Compressing https://wpfr.net/wp-content/themes/wpfr/assets/img/location.png could save 595B (55% reduction).
priority - 2 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/js?v=3.exp&ke…-PZK59qNiownOk&ver=3.0 (30 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
wpfr.net Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 105 |
| Number of Hosts | 13 |
| Static Resources | 78 |
| JavaScript Resources | 28 |
| CSS Resources | 6 |
wpfr.net Mobile Resource Breakdown
wpfr.net mobile page usability
Last tested: 2017-05-23
wpfr.net Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 1 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<a href="https://wpparis.fr/">Paris</a> and 11 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<div></div> and 3 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<div>12</div> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="https://wpfr.net/">Accueil</a> and 6 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="https://fr.wordpress.org/">Propulsé par WordPress</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="https://www.fa…ssFrancophone/">Facebook</a> and 2 others are close to other tap targets.wpfr.net similar domains
www.wpfr.net
www.wpfr.org
www.wpfr.info
www.wpfr.biz
www.wpfr.us
www.wpfr.mobi
www.pfr.net
www.wpfr.net
www.qpfr.net
www.wqpfr.net
www.qwpfr.net
www.apfr.net
www.wapfr.net
www.awpfr.net
www.spfr.net
www.wspfr.net
www.swpfr.net
www.epfr.net
www.wepfr.net
www.ewpfr.net
www.wfr.net
www.wofr.net
www.wpofr.net
www.wopfr.net
www.wlfr.net
www.wplfr.net
www.wlpfr.net
www.wpr.net
www.wpcr.net
www.wpfcr.net
www.wpcfr.net
www.wpdr.net
www.wpfdr.net
www.wpdfr.net
www.wprr.net
www.wpfrr.net
www.wprfr.net
www.wptr.net
www.wpftr.net
www.wptfr.net
www.wpgr.net
www.wpfgr.net
www.wpgfr.net
www.wpvr.net
www.wpfvr.net
www.wpvfr.net
www.wpf.net
www.wpfe.net
www.wpfre.net
www.wpfer.net
www.wpfd.net
www.wpfrd.net
www.wpff.net
www.wpfrf.net
www.wpffr.net
www.wpft.net
www.wpfrt.net
wpfr.net Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
wpfr.net TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.