WRITING.COM Where the Writers Go to Write - Writing.Com

  1. Homepage
  2. writing.com

writing.com website information.

writing.com domain name is registered by .COM top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .COM domain zone.

Following name servers are specified for writing.com domain:

  • dns2.dictionaryof.com
  • dns1.dictionaryof.com

and probably website writing.com is hosted by SAMSUNGSDS-AS-KR SamsungSDS Inc., KR web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by SAMSUNGSDS-AS-KR SamsungSDS Inc., KR hosting company.

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website writing.com position was 31020 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 69773. Now website writing.com ranked in Alexa database as number 32752 (in the world).

Website writing.com Desktop speed measurement score (74/100) is better than the results of 57.94% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

writing.com Mobile usability score (100/100) is better than the results of 100% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed measurement score of writing.com (32/100) is better than the results of 11.35% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
Nov-07-2024 32,75294
Nov-06-2024 32,846-315
Nov-05-2024 32,531-368
Nov-04-2024 32,163217
Nov-03-2024 32,380-199
Nov-02-2024 32,181180
Nov-01-2024 32,361322

Advertisement

writing.com Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.


writing.com whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.

Domain Name: WRITING.COM
Registry Domain ID: 423633_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.uniregistrar.com
Registrar URL: http://www.uniregistry.com
Updated Date: 2023-09-11T06:38:20Z
Creation Date: 1997-05-21T04:00:00Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2033-05-22T04:00:00Z
Registrar: GoDaddy Online Services Cayman Islands Ltd.
Registrar IANA ID: 1659
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@uniregistry.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1 4805058800
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: DNS1.DICTIONARYOF.COM
Name Server: DNS2.DICTIONARYOF.COM
Name Server: DNS3.DICTIONARYOF.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2024-09-12T03:33:28Z

writing.com server information

Servers Location

IP Address
209.235.204.247
209.235.217.188
Country
United States
United States
Region
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
City
Allentown
Allentown

writing.com desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2016-09-03

Desktop Speed Medium
74/100

writing.com Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 12 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 118KiB (78% reduction).

Compressing http://www.writing.com/?i=1 could save 60.8KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing http://www.writing.com/main/css/jquery-ui-1.10.3.min.css could save 20.3KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing http://www.writing.com/main/js/dropzone.min.js?x=1 could save 19KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing http://www.writing.com/main/js/css/dropzone.css could save 8.9KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing http://www.writing.com/main/css/joyride-2.1.css could save 5.5KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://www.writing.com/main/css/colorbox.css could save 2.9KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing http://ads.writing.com/bc_ad.php?ad_type=728x90&v=1&in=1 could save 628B (54% reduction).

priority - 12 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 15 blocking script resources and 6 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://www.writing.com/main/js/jquery-1.10.2.min.js
http://www.writing.com/main/myjs/wdcjsX20150904f.js
http://www.writing.com/main/js/stars/jquery.MetaData.js
http://www.writing.com/main/js/stars/jquery.rating.js?v=092013
http://www.writing.com/main/js/jquery.timeago.js
http://www.writing.com/main/js/jquery.colorbox-min.js
http://www.writing.com/main/js/jquery.topzindex.min.js
http://www.writing.com/main/js/jquery.mousewheel.js
http://www.writing.com/main/js/dropzone.min.js?x=1
http://www.writing.com/main/js/jquery.cookie.js
http://www.writing.com/main/js/jquery.joyride-2.1.js
http://www.writing.com/main/js/jquery-ui-1.10.3.min.js
http://www.writing.com/main/js/jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
http://www.writing.com/main/WdCEditor.js?x=r
http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://www.writing.com/main/css/colorbox.css
http://www.writing.com/main/js/stars/jquery.rating.css
http://www.writing.com/main/js/css/dropzone.css
http://www.writing.com/main/css/joyride-2.1.css
http://www.writing.com/main/css/jquery-ui-1.10.3.min.css
http://www.writing.com/main/style/skin_id/100057/o…styleX-2016-06-29d.css

priority - 5 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://m.addthisedge.com/live/boost?pub=writingcom…_ate.track.config_resp (60 seconds)
http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js (10 minutes)
http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js (20 minutes)
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (60 minutes)
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js (60 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/osd.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
http://www.writing.com/main/images/action/display/…95/item_id/1694115.gif (24 hours)
http://www.writing.com/main/style/skin_id/100057/o…styleX-2016-06-29d.css (2 days)
http://www.writing.com/main/myjs/wdcjsX20150904f.js (3 days)

priority - 2 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 21.4KiB (33% reduction).

Compressing https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v2/yz/r/y_KJ3X1mNCs.png could save 6.7KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://images.writing.com/imgs/writing.com/writers/e15/bullet.png could save 3.8KiB (95% reduction).
Compressing http://images.writing.com/imgs/writing.com/writers/e15/ribbonb.png could save 3.3KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://images.writing.com/imgs/writing.com/writers/e15/badge.png could save 2.8KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing http://images.writing.com/imgs/writing.com/writers…/pl-icon-regular-2.png could save 1.1KiB (92% reduction).
Compressing http://images.writing.com/imgs/writing.com/writers/frontpage-bookshelf.gif could save 1KiB (11% reduction).
Compressing http://images.writing.com/imgs/writing.com/writers…13/ribbon2_grey-25.png could save 996B (14% reduction).
Compressing http://images.writing.com/imgs/writing.com/writers…umicons-lg2/pl-top.png could save 907B (69% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.writing.com/imgs/apps/prompts/Icon.png could save 846B (39% reduction).

priority - 2 Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

57KiB of the HTML response was required to render the above-the-fold content. This requires 3 network round-trips. However, if the HTML response were compressed, then the HTML required to render the above-the-fold content could be delivered in just 2 network round-trips. Enable compression for the HTML response in order to prioritize the visible content for this page.

Only about 69% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the HTML delivered within 2 round-trips.

priority - 1 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 6.7KiB (44% reduction).

Minifying http://www.writing.com/main/js/stars/jquery.rating.js?v=092013 could save 2.5KiB (57% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.writing.com/main/js/jquery.joyride-2.1.js could save 2KiB (32% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.writing.com/main/js/stars/jquery.MetaData.js could save 1KiB (71% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.writing.com/main/js/jquery.timeago.js could save 691B (33% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.writing.com/main/js/jquery.mousewheel.js could save 549B (42% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 3.8KiB (18% reduction).

Minifying http://www.writing.com/main/css/joyride-2.1.css could save 1.6KiB (23% reduction).
Minifying http://www.writing.com/main/js/css/dropzone.css could save 1.1KiB (11% reduction).
Minifying http://www.writing.com/main/css/colorbox.css could save 1.1KiB (25% reduction).

writing.com Desktop Resources

Total Resources112
Number of Hosts24
Static Resources91
JavaScript Resources41
CSS Resources13

writing.com Desktop Resource Breakdown

writing.com mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2019-12-10

Mobile Speed Bad
32/100

writing.com Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 114 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 1.1MiB (49% reduction).

Compressing https://www.writing.com/images/TESTI-1.jpeg could save 223.9KiB (46% reduction).
Compressing https://www.writing.com/images/TESTI-3.jpeg could save 205.1KiB (48% reduction).
Compressing https://www.writing.com/images/TESTI-2.jpeg could save 190.8KiB (47% reduction).
Compressing https://www.writing.com/images/IndexCover.jpeg could save 181.2KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing https://www.writing.com/images/getting-started.jpg could save 156.1KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing https://www.writing.com/images/typewriter.jpg could save 138.9KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.writing.com/images/WDC-Square.jpg could save 13.5KiB (92% reduction).

priority - 51 Avoid landing page redirects

Your page has 3 redirects. Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded.

Avoid landing page redirects for the following chain of redirected URLs.

http://writing.com/
https://writing.com/
http://www.writing.com/?i=1
https://www.writing.com/?i=1

priority - 32 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 1 blocking script resources and 3 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/webfont/1.4.7/webfont.js

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://www.writing.com/main/css/normalize.css
https://www.writing.com/main/css/webflow.css
https://www.writing.com/main/css/writing-com.webflow.css

priority - 17 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 161.6KiB (72% reduction).

Compressing https://www.writing.com/main/js/webflow.js could save 106.9KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing https://www.writing.com/main/css/webflow.css could save 28KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing https://www.writing.com/?i=1 could save 11.5KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing https://www.writing.com/main/css/writing-com.webflow.css could save 8.6KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing https://www.writing.com/main/css/normalize.css could save 5KiB (66% reduction).
Compressing https://www.writing.com/images/social-18.svg could save 412B (40% reduction).
Compressing https://www.writing.com/images/feather2-17-white.svg could save 402B (42% reduction).
Compressing https://www.writing.com/images/feather2-22-white.svg could save 297B (36% reduction).
Compressing https://www.writing.com/images/social-11.svg could save 290B (36% reduction).
Compressing https://www.writing.com/images/social-03.svg could save 246B (34% reduction).

priority - 5 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 53.2KiB (37% reduction).

Minifying https://www.writing.com/main/js/webflow.js could save 53.2KiB (37% reduction).

priority - 3 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://v1.addthisedge.com/live/boost/writingcom/_ate.track.config_resp (55 seconds)
https://s7.addthis.com/js/300/addthis_widget.js (10 minutes)
https://widgets.pinterest.com/v1/urls/count.json?u…dow._ate.cbs.rcb_dw2u0 (14.8 minutes)
https://widgets.pinterest.com/v1/urls/count.json?u…dow._ate.cbs.rcb_5wng0 (14.8 minutes)
https://z.moatads.com/addthismoatframe568911941483/moatframe.js (7.7 hours)

priority - 2 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 14.9KiB (28% reduction).

Minifying https://www.writing.com/main/css/webflow.css could save 7.4KiB (21% reduction).
Minifying https://www.writing.com/main/css/normalize.css could save 5.7KiB (74% reduction).
Minifying https://www.writing.com/main/css/writing-com.webflow.css could save 1.8KiB (18% reduction).

priority - 0 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 2.5KiB (16% reduction).

Minifying https://www.writing.com/?i=1 could save 2.5KiB (16% reduction).

writing.com Mobile Resources

Total Resources36
Number of Hosts10
Static Resources26
JavaScript Resources14
CSS Resources3

writing.com Mobile Resource Breakdown

writing.com mobile page usability

Last tested: 2019-12-10

Mobile Usability Good
100/100

writing.com similar domains

Similar domains:
www.writing.com
www.writing.net
www.writing.org
www.writing.info
www.writing.biz
www.writing.us
www.writing.mobi
www.riting.com
www.writing.com
www.qriting.com
www.wqriting.com
www.qwriting.com
www.ariting.com
www.wariting.com
www.awriting.com
www.sriting.com
www.wsriting.com
www.swriting.com
www.eriting.com
www.weriting.com
www.ewriting.com
www.witing.com
www.weiting.com
www.wreiting.com
www.wditing.com
www.wrditing.com
www.wdriting.com
www.wfiting.com
www.wrfiting.com
www.wfriting.com
www.wtiting.com
www.wrtiting.com
www.wtriting.com
www.wrting.com
www.wruting.com
www.wriuting.com
www.wruiting.com
www.wrjting.com
www.wrijting.com
www.wrjiting.com
www.wrkting.com
www.wrikting.com
www.wrkiting.com
www.wroting.com
www.wrioting.com
www.wroiting.com
www.wriing.com
www.wriring.com
www.writring.com
www.wrirting.com
www.wrifing.com
www.writfing.com
www.wrifting.com
www.wriging.com
www.writging.com
www.wrigting.com
www.wriying.com
www.writying.com
www.wriyting.com
www.writng.com
www.writung.com
www.writiung.com
www.writuing.com
www.writjng.com
www.writijng.com
www.writjing.com
www.writkng.com
www.writikng.com
www.writking.com
www.writong.com
www.writiong.com
www.writoing.com
www.writig.com
www.writibg.com
www.writinbg.com
www.writibng.com
www.writihg.com
www.writinhg.com
www.writihng.com
www.writijg.com
www.writinjg.com
www.writimg.com
www.writinmg.com
www.writimng.com
www.writin.com
www.writinf.com
www.writingf.com
www.writinfg.com
www.writinv.com
www.writingv.com
www.writinvg.com
www.writint.com
www.writingt.com
www.writintg.com
www.writinb.com
www.writingb.com
www.writiny.com
www.writingy.com
www.writinyg.com
www.writinh.com
www.writingh.com
www.writing.con

writing.com Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.

writing.com TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.