xtar.cc website information.
xtar.cc domain name is registered by .CC top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .CC domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for xtar.cc domain:
- ns40.domaincontrol.com
- ns39.domaincontrol.com
and probably website xtar.cc is hosted by AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website xtar.cc position was 39592 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 999513. Now website xtar.cc ranked in Alexa database as number 881215 (in the world).
Website xtar.cc Desktop speed measurement score (29/100) is better than the results of 7.9% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
xtar.cc Mobile usability score (69/100) is better than the results of 20.4% of other sites and shows that the page mobile usability is poor and can be improved.
Mobile speed measurement score of xtar.cc (99/100) is better than the results of 96.95% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is excellent.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Sep-23-2024 | 881,215 | -7,927 |
| Sep-22-2024 | 873,288 | 11,779 |
| Sep-21-2024 | 885,067 | -5,722 |
| Sep-20-2024 | 879,345 | -6,360 |
| Sep-19-2024 | 872,985 | 3,299 |
| Sep-18-2024 | 876,284 | -8,590 |
| Sep-17-2024 | 867,694 | 22,353 |
Advertisement
xtar.cc Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
xtar.cc whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
Domain Name: XTAR.CC
Registry Domain ID: 114064759_DOMAIN_CC-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Updated Date: 2022-07-05T08:25:55Z
Creation Date: 2015-08-05T06:16:46Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2023-08-05T06:16:46Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@godaddy.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS09.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS10.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2022-10-17T13:56:28Z
xtar.cc server information
xtar.cc desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-05-20
xtar.cc Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 238 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 2.3MiB (58% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/imageRepository/8fbafc4c-581c-4040-b625-bcabe5fcb384.jpg could save 173.1KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/imageRepository/0e228805-78ed-49c9-893c-639024ac86cf.jpg could save 166.1KiB (46% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/imageRepository/11560972-8e98-450c-a69d-47a8d879679d.jpg could save 159.6KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/n_06.jpg could save 114.6KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/n_04.jpg could save 86.3KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/nd_6.jpg could save 86.2KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/n_11.jpg could save 85.7KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/n_07.jpg could save 80.2KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/imageRepository/20217f12-c051-4ce3-90c7-be540ec51336.jpg could save 79.7KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/imageRepository/a7b7c06e-0b35-4d70-a672-bdb378ecd8b4.jpg could save 78.3KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/imageRepository/462519df-dce4-40fb-b684-5c313b024e44.jpg could save 74KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/n_03.jpg could save 62.8KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/n_05.jpg could save 59.7KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/n_01.jpg could save 58.9KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/n_02.jpg could save 58.6KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/nd_7.jpg could save 54.9KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/imageRepository/aee9ad0b-1b2e-4079-b10d-1ca80f876a96.jpg could save 54KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/n_09.jpg could save 51.5KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/n_08.jpg could save 50.7KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/n_13.jpg could save 50.7KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/n_15.jpg could save 50KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/nd_5.jpg could save 46.4KiB (87% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/nd_3.jpg could save 44.7KiB (86% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/imageRepository/4970e120-641f-4e30-b720-ff1f9a980497.jpg could save 40.4KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/n_14.jpg could save 40.1KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/imageRepository/b7a6cfab-5992-482d-a1a7-5114e29d1bf4.jpg could save 39.5KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/imageRepository/19530a10-d9c4-4b4a-b50e-5a6a18215bed.jpg could save 35.7KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/n_10.jpg could save 27.8KiB (57% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/imageRepository/1da5d6ee-e829-419e-bffd-11cb97e3541d.jpg could save 24.8KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/imageRepository/5b4a564c-8d0c-4709-90be-1e6195cc6f36.jpg could save 23KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/logo.png could save 21.8KiB (95% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/imageRepository/e66c5a85-c7e9-42ec-8b81-42d7a0bbc964.jpg could save 9KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/imageRepository/68b1b5b6-55ea-4a24-81dd-a09d2722ca87.jpg could save 7.9KiB (53% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/imageRepository/f60bd229-3e36-4c2c-a5ed-db8e75e287c5.jpg could save 6.8KiB (51% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/nd_1.jpg could save 6.3KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/imageRepository/ebe24c8b-76d7-4ae2-93f8-81b225eabf97.jpg could save 3.3KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/dq.png could save 2.7KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/ico_search.png could save 2.7KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/ico_mail.png could save 2.7KiB (87% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/ico_down.png could save 2.7KiB (92% reduction).
Compressing http://www.xtar.cc/images/_w/t_ss.png could save 2.6KiB (36% reduction).
priority - 4 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 40.9KiB (80% reduction).
priority - 3 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.27 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 2 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
priority - 2 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://u.heatmap.it/conf/www.xtar.cc.js (5 minutes)
https://u.heatmap.it/log.js (60 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 0 Minify HTML
Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 2KiB (20% reduction).
priority - 0 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 921B (19% reduction).
xtar.cc Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 80 |
| Number of Hosts | 12 |
| Static Resources | 61 |
| JavaScript Resources | 10 |
| CSS Resources | 4 |
xtar.cc Desktop Resource Breakdown
xtar.cc mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-05-20
xtar.cc Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 1 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.34 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
xtar.cc Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 3 |
| Number of Hosts | 3 |
| Static Resources | 1 |
xtar.cc Mobile Resource Breakdown
xtar.cc mobile page usability
Last tested: 2017-05-20
xtar.cc Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 34 Use legible font sizes
The following text on your page renders in a way that may be difficult for some of your visitors to read. Use legible font sizes to provide a better user experience.
The following text fragments have a small font size. Increase the font size to make them more legible.
The requested…t be retrieved renders only 7 pixels tall (18 CSS pixels).The remote hos…request again. and 4 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).http://www.xtar.cc/ and 1 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).连接到 183.60.190.173 失败。 renders only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).(111) Connection refused renders only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).已由 rackspace_j…7 19:03:02 GMT renders only 3 pixels tall (9 CSS pixels).priority - 10 Configure the viewport
Your page does not have a viewport specified. This causes mobile devices to render your page as it would appear on a desktop browser, scaling it down to fit on a mobile screen. Configure a viewport to allow your page to render properly on all devices.
Configure a viewport for this page.
xtar.cc similar domains
www.xtar.net
www.xtar.org
www.xtar.info
www.xtar.biz
www.xtar.us
www.xtar.mobi
www.tar.cc
www.xtar.cc
www.ztar.cc
www.xztar.cc
www.zxtar.cc
www.star.cc
www.xstar.cc
www.sxtar.cc
www.dtar.cc
www.xdtar.cc
www.dxtar.cc
www.ctar.cc
www.xctar.cc
www.cxtar.cc
www.xar.cc
www.xrar.cc
www.xtrar.cc
www.xrtar.cc
www.xfar.cc
www.xtfar.cc
www.xftar.cc
www.xgar.cc
www.xtgar.cc
www.xgtar.cc
www.xyar.cc
www.xtyar.cc
www.xytar.cc
www.xtr.cc
www.xtqr.cc
www.xtaqr.cc
www.xtqar.cc
www.xtwr.cc
www.xtawr.cc
www.xtwar.cc
www.xtsr.cc
www.xtasr.cc
www.xtsar.cc
www.xtzr.cc
www.xtazr.cc
www.xtzar.cc
www.xta.cc
www.xtae.cc
www.xtare.cc
www.xtaer.cc
www.xtad.cc
www.xtard.cc
www.xtadr.cc
www.xtaf.cc
www.xtarf.cc
www.xtafr.cc
www.xtat.cc
www.xtart.cc
www.xtatr.cc
xtar.cc Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
xtar.cc TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.