a-tm.co.jp website information.
a-tm.co.jp domain name is registered by .JP top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .JP domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for a-tm.co.jp domain:
- dns-b.iij.ad.jp
- dns-c.iij.ad.jp
and probably website a-tm.co.jp is hosted by Hetzner Online GmbH web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by Hetzner Online GmbH hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website a-tm.co.jp position was 6222 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 964426. Now website a-tm.co.jp ranked in Alexa database as number 209442 (in the world).
Website a-tm.co.jp Desktop speed measurement score (31/100) is better than the results of 8.96% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
a-tm.co.jp Mobile usability score (100/100) is better than the results of 100% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of a-tm.co.jp (21/100) is better than the results of 4.9% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Apr-19-2024 | 209,442 | 1,344 |
| Apr-18-2024 | 210,786 | -7,370 |
| Apr-17-2024 | 203,416 | 3,899 |
| Apr-16-2024 | 207,315 | -3,467 |
| Apr-15-2024 | 203,848 | 3,350 |
| Apr-14-2024 | 207,198 | -8,244 |
| Apr-13-2024 | 198,954 | -1,425 |
Advertisement
a-tm.co.jp Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
a-tm.co.jp whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
a-tm.co.jp server information
a-tm.co.jp desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-06-15
Desktop Speed
Bad
31/100
a-tm.co.jp Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 207 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 2MiB (64% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/about-img-lower.jpg could save 577.2KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/service-img.jpg could save 433.8KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/banner-img.jpg could save 255KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/mv-01.jpg could save 183.6KiB (44% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/i…out-img-philosophy.jpg could save 182.3KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/mv-02.jpg could save 144.6KiB (44% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/mv-03.jpg could save 107.6KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/i…/about-img-message.jpg could save 102.4KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/i…gallery-banner-img.jpg could save 20.2KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/common/noimage.jpg could save 8.7KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/i…/report-banner-img.jpg could save 3.5KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/i…/banner-part-right.png could save 3.3KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/text-service-01.png could save 651B (31% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/text-service-02.png could save 645B (30% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/text-service-03.png could save 634B (30% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/service-img.jpg could save 433.8KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/banner-img.jpg could save 255KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/mv-01.jpg could save 183.6KiB (44% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/i…out-img-philosophy.jpg could save 182.3KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/mv-02.jpg could save 144.6KiB (44% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/mv-03.jpg could save 107.6KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/i…/about-img-message.jpg could save 102.4KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/i…gallery-banner-img.jpg could save 20.2KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/common/noimage.jpg could save 8.7KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/i…/report-banner-img.jpg could save 3.5KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/i…/banner-part-right.png could save 3.3KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/text-service-01.png could save 651B (31% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/text-service-02.png could save 645B (30% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/images/text-service-03.png could save 634B (30% reduction).
priority - 10 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking script resources and 2 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/scripts/app.js?d=20180816
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_pc/s…s/style.css?d=20180816
https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/bogo/inc…ss/style.css?ver=3.1.1
https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/bogo/inc…ss/style.css?ver=3.1.1
priority - 9 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 84.2KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/ could save 83.4KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…labKey.js?ver=20091209 could save 415B (49% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…ushPlain.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 388B (48% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…labKey.js?ver=20091209 could save 415B (49% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…ushPlain.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 388B (48% reduction).
priority - 5 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.65 seconds.
There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 2 Minify HTML
Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 21.3KiB (22% reduction).
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/ could save 21.3KiB (22% reduction).
priority - 1 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 9.9KiB (28% reduction).
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…hLatex.js?ver=20090613 could save 629B (67% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…rushPerl.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 555B (29% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…werShell.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 550B (29% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…ushPlain.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 500B (60% reduction).
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…ldFusion.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 430B (13% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…shGroovy.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 388B (29% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…shErlang.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 370B (45% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…shCSharp.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 367B (30% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…BrushCss.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 361B (15% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…ushScala.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 354B (41% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…BrushAS3.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 353B (32% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…BrushPhp.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 353B (17% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…shDelphi.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 348B (31% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…rushBash.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 339B (21% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…rushRuby.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 339B (33% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…BrushCpp.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 338B (15% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…BrushSql.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 338B (23% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…rushJava.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 337B (33% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…shJavaFX.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 332B (31% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…BrushXml.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 331B (35% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…hJScript.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 323B (39% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…shPython.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 313B (27% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…hBrushVb.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 312B (27% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…shObjC.js?ver=20091207 could save 300B (30% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…rushDiff.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 280B (50% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…FSharp.js?ver=20091003 could save 267B (27% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…labKey.js?ver=20091209 could save 200B (24% reduction).
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…lojure.js?ver=20090602 could save 140B (20% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…BrushR.js?ver=20100919 could save 127B (26% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…rushPerl.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 555B (29% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…werShell.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 550B (29% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…ushPlain.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 500B (60% reduction).
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…ldFusion.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 430B (13% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…shGroovy.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 388B (29% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…shErlang.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 370B (45% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…shCSharp.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 367B (30% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…BrushCss.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 361B (15% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…ushScala.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 354B (41% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…BrushAS3.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 353B (32% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…BrushPhp.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 353B (17% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…shDelphi.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 348B (31% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…rushBash.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 339B (21% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…rushRuby.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 339B (33% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…BrushCpp.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 338B (15% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…BrushSql.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 338B (23% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…rushJava.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 337B (33% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…shJavaFX.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 332B (31% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…BrushXml.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 331B (35% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…hJScript.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 323B (39% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…shPython.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 313B (27% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…hBrushVb.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 312B (27% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…shObjC.js?ver=20091207 could save 300B (30% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…rushDiff.js?ver=3.0.9b could save 280B (50% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…FSharp.js?ver=20091003 could save 267B (27% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…labKey.js?ver=20091209 could save 200B (24% reduction).
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…lojure.js?ver=20090602 could save 140B (20% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…BrushR.js?ver=20100919 could save 127B (26% reduction) after compression.
priority - 1 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-NJHH9X (15 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 0 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 459B (23% reduction).
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…/shCore.css?ver=3.0.9b could save 254B (19% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…Default.css?ver=3.0.9b could save 205B (31% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/plugins/syntaxhi…Default.css?ver=3.0.9b could save 205B (31% reduction) after compression.
a-tm.co.jp Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 66 |
| Number of Hosts | 6 |
| Static Resources | 60 |
| JavaScript Resources | 33 |
| CSS Resources | 4 |
a-tm.co.jp Desktop Resource Breakdown
a-tm.co.jp mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2018-11-26
Mobile Speed
Bad
21/100
a-tm.co.jp Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 290 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 2.8MiB (66% reduction).
Compressing https://res.staging.www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/uplo…20181116_sansuma_1.jpg could save 777.3KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing https://res.staging.www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/uplo…20181105_unison_01.jpg could save 380.8KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing https://res.staging.www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/uplo…95621/20181105_S_1.jpg could save 304.8KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/images/mv-03.jpg could save 245.6KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/images/mv-01.jpg could save 211.9KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/images/mv-02.jpg could save 193.4KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing https://res.staging.www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/uplo…181119_Group-Photo.jpg could save 186.5KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/images/service-img.jpg could save 143.4KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/i…out-img-philosophy.jpg could save 129.9KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/images/banner-img.jpg could save 109.6KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/i…/about-img-message.jpg could save 85.9KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/i…/report-banner-img.jpg could save 27.1KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/i…gallery-banner-img.jpg could save 25KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/images/about-img.jpg could save 14KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/images/logo.png could save 553B (12% reduction).
Compressing https://res.staging.www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/uplo…20181105_unison_01.jpg could save 380.8KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing https://res.staging.www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/uplo…95621/20181105_S_1.jpg could save 304.8KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/images/mv-03.jpg could save 245.6KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/images/mv-01.jpg could save 211.9KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/images/mv-02.jpg could save 193.4KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing https://res.staging.www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/uplo…181119_Group-Photo.jpg could save 186.5KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/images/service-img.jpg could save 143.4KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/i…out-img-philosophy.jpg could save 129.9KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/images/banner-img.jpg could save 109.6KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/i…/about-img-message.jpg could save 85.9KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/i…/report-banner-img.jpg could save 27.1KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/i…gallery-banner-img.jpg could save 25KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/images/about-img.jpg could save 14KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/images/logo.png could save 553B (12% reduction).
priority - 24 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking script resources and 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/scripts/app.js?d=20180816
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://www.a-tm.co.jp/wp-content/themes/a-tm_sp/s…s/style.css?d=20180816
priority - 8 Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
77.9KiB of the HTML response was required to render the above-the-fold content. This requires 3 network round-trips. However, if the HTML response were compressed, then the HTML required to render the above-the-fold content could be delivered in just 1 network round-trips. Enable compression for the HTML response in order to prioritize the visible content for this page.
Only about 5% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the HTML delivered within 2 round-trips.
Click to see the screenshot with 2 round trips:
priority - 7 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 66.2KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing https://www.a-tm.co.jp/ could save 66.2KiB (85% reduction).
priority - 4 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.50 seconds.
There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 2 Minify HTML
Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 17KiB (23% reduction).
Minifying https://www.a-tm.co.jp/ could save 17KiB (23% reduction).
priority - 1 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-NJHH9X (15 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
a-tm.co.jp Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 34 |
| Number of Hosts | 6 |
| Static Resources | 29 |
| JavaScript Resources | 3 |
| CSS Resources | 1 |
a-tm.co.jp Mobile Resource Breakdown
a-tm.co.jp mobile page usability
Last tested: 2018-11-26
Mobile Usability
Good
100/100
a-tm.co.jp similar domains
Similar domains:
www.a-tm.com
www.a-tm.net
www.a-tm.org
www.a-tm.info
www.a-tm.biz
www.a-tm.us
www.a-tm.mobi
www.-tm.co.jp
www.a-tm.co.jp
www.q-tm.co.jp
www.aq-tm.co.jp
www.qa-tm.co.jp
www.w-tm.co.jp
www.aw-tm.co.jp
www.wa-tm.co.jp
www.s-tm.co.jp
www.as-tm.co.jp
www.sa-tm.co.jp
www.z-tm.co.jp
www.az-tm.co.jp
www.za-tm.co.jp
www.atm.co.jp
www.a-m.co.jp
www.a-rm.co.jp
www.a-trm.co.jp
www.a-rtm.co.jp
www.a-fm.co.jp
www.a-tfm.co.jp
www.a-ftm.co.jp
www.a-gm.co.jp
www.a-tgm.co.jp
www.a-gtm.co.jp
www.a-ym.co.jp
www.a-tym.co.jp
www.a-ytm.co.jp
www.a-t.co.jp
www.a-tn.co.jp
www.a-tmn.co.jp
www.a-tnm.co.jp
www.a-tj.co.jp
www.a-tmj.co.jp
www.a-tjm.co.jp
www.a-tk.co.jp
www.a-tmk.co.jp
www.a-tkm.co.jp
www.a-tm.net
www.a-tm.org
www.a-tm.info
www.a-tm.biz
www.a-tm.us
www.a-tm.mobi
www.-tm.co.jp
www.a-tm.co.jp
www.q-tm.co.jp
www.aq-tm.co.jp
www.qa-tm.co.jp
www.w-tm.co.jp
www.aw-tm.co.jp
www.wa-tm.co.jp
www.s-tm.co.jp
www.as-tm.co.jp
www.sa-tm.co.jp
www.z-tm.co.jp
www.az-tm.co.jp
www.za-tm.co.jp
www.atm.co.jp
www.a-m.co.jp
www.a-rm.co.jp
www.a-trm.co.jp
www.a-rtm.co.jp
www.a-fm.co.jp
www.a-tfm.co.jp
www.a-ftm.co.jp
www.a-gm.co.jp
www.a-tgm.co.jp
www.a-gtm.co.jp
www.a-ym.co.jp
www.a-tym.co.jp
www.a-ytm.co.jp
www.a-t.co.jp
www.a-tn.co.jp
www.a-tmn.co.jp
www.a-tnm.co.jp
www.a-tj.co.jp
www.a-tmj.co.jp
www.a-tjm.co.jp
www.a-tk.co.jp
www.a-tmk.co.jp
www.a-tkm.co.jp
a-tm.co.jp Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
a-tm.co.jp TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.