adop.cc website information.
adop.cc domain name is registered by .CC top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .CC domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for adop.cc domain:
- ns2.whoisdomain.kr
- ns1.whoisdomain.kr
- ns3.whoisdomain.kr
- ns4.whoisdomain.kr
and probably website adop.cc is hosted by WIKIMEDIA - Wikimedia Foundation Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by WIKIMEDIA - Wikimedia Foundation Inc., US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website adop.cc position was 116557 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 348907. Now website adop.cc ranked in Alexa database as number 120391 (in the world).
Website adop.cc Desktop speed measurement score (55/100) is better than the results of 29.37% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
adop.cc Mobile usability score (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of adop.cc (43/100) is better than the results of 22.8% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Nov-25-2024 | N/A | N/A |
| Nov-24-2024 | 120,391 | 499 |
| Nov-23-2024 | 120,890 | 325 |
| Nov-22-2024 | 121,215 | 406 |
| Nov-21-2024 | 121,621 | 47 |
| Nov-20-2024 | 121,668 | 1 |
| Nov-19-2024 | 121,669 | -112 |
Advertisement
adop.cc Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
adop.cc whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
Domain Name: ADOP.CC
Registry Domain ID: 110031175_DOMAIN_CC-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.whois.co.kr
Registrar URL: http://www.whois.co.kr
Updated Date: 2024-08-14T02:13:50Z
Creation Date: 2014-09-25T02:46:10Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2025-09-25T02:46:10Z
Registrar: Whois Corp.
Registrar IANA ID: 100
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@whois.co.kr
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +82.15884259
Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok
Name Server: NS1.WHOISDOMAIN.KR
Name Server: NS2.WHOISDOMAIN.KR
Name Server: NS3.WHOISDOMAIN.KR
Name Server: NS4.WHOISDOMAIN.KR
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2024-10-12T18:31:53Z
adop.cc server information
adop.cc desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-05-26
adop.cc Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 77 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 756.5KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins,_revslider,_publ…speed.jc.yIKOnxj8CZ.js could save 67KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public…speed.jm.hKSbRSQ3n8.js could save 65.2KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content,_plugins,_js_composer,_a…speed.jc.AAYLmytXl6.js could save 63.6KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js,qve…speed.jm.zixJPNMRNN.js could save 61.2KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-includes/js/jquery,_ui,_core.min…speed.jc.e_aGfa7ZtG.js could save 56.3KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/contact-form-7,_…speed.jc.sAJ_b8TZIY.js could save 34.4KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-includes/js/wp-emoji-release.min.js?ver=4.4.2 could save 25.7KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/js_composer/asse…speed.jc.PsHEbHWRAJ.js could save 23.7KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public….layeranimation.min.js could save 21KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public…sion.slideanims.min.js could save 20.9KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public…sion.navigation.min.js could save 16.8KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/infinity-seo-sli…lider-min.js?ver=1.0.0 could save 15.1KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/js_composer/asse…front.min.js?ver=4.9.2 could save 12.8KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/contact-form-7/i…speed.jm.RVBOol6lkO.js could save 9KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-includes,_js,_jquery,_jquery-mig…speed.jc.GQhoswhcNi.js could save 6.8KiB (59% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public…ension.parallax.min.js could save 5.8KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public…tension.actions.min.js could save 4.4KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content,_themes,_infinity-seo,_j…speed.jc.qBedF4gYdo.js could save 3.7KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/infinity-seo-sli…ry.fitvid.js?ver=1.0.0 could save 1.1KiB (62% reduction).
priority - 5 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.71 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 2 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
priority - 2 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 18.8KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing http://cdn.ads-optima.com/adop/logo_white180x45.png could save 1.3KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing http://www.adop.cc/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/bg-parallax.jpg?id=55 could save 1.1KiB (12% reduction).
priority - 2 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://adop.cc/wp-content/themes/infinity-seo/css/…c-styles.php?ver=4.4.2 (5 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/plugins/ua/linkid.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 1 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 5KiB (27% reduction).
Minifying http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public…settings.css?ver=5.1.5 could save 2.1KiB (28% reduction) after compression.
adop.cc Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 92 |
| Number of Hosts | 8 |
| Static Resources | 76 |
| JavaScript Resources | 23 |
| CSS Resources | 24 |
adop.cc Desktop Resource Breakdown
adop.cc mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-05-26
adop.cc Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 77 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 753.7KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins,_revslider,_publ…speed.jc.yIKOnxj8CZ.js could save 67KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public…speed.jm.hKSbRSQ3n8.js could save 65.2KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content,_plugins,_js_composer,_a…speed.jc.AAYLmytXl6.js could save 63.6KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js,qve…speed.jm.zixJPNMRNN.js could save 61.2KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-includes/js/jquery,_ui,_core.min…speed.jc.e_aGfa7ZtG.js could save 56.3KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/contact-form-7,_…speed.jc.sAJ_b8TZIY.js could save 34.4KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-includes/js/wp-emoji-release.min.js?ver=4.4.2 could save 25.7KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/js_composer/asse…speed.jc.PsHEbHWRAJ.js could save 23.7KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public….layeranimation.min.js could save 21KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public…sion.slideanims.min.js could save 20.9KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public…sion.navigation.min.js could save 16.8KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/infinity-seo-sli…lider-min.js?ver=1.0.0 could save 15.1KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/js_composer/asse…front.min.js?ver=4.9.2 could save 12.8KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/contact-form-7/i…speed.jm.RVBOol6lkO.js could save 9KiB (62% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public…ension.parallax.min.js could save 5.8KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public…tension.actions.min.js could save 4.4KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrat…speed.jm.mhpNjdU8Wl.js could save 4KiB (57% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content,_themes,_infinity-seo,_j…speed.jc.qBedF4gYdo.js could save 3.7KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/infinity-seo-sli…ry.fitvid.js?ver=1.0.0 could save 1.1KiB (62% reduction).
priority - 56 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 5 blocking script resources and 18 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://adop.cc/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrat…speed.jm.mhpNjdU8Wl.js
http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public…speed.jm.hKSbRSQ3n8.js
http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins,_revslider,_publ…speed.jc.yIKOnxj8CZ.js
http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/webfont/1/webfont.js?ver=4.4.2
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://adop.cc/wp-includes/css/jquery-ui-dialog.min.css?ver=4.4.2
http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/contact-form-7/i…s/styles.css?ver=4.4.1
http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/language-bar-flags/style.css?ver=4.4.2
http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/language-bar-flags/countries.css
http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public…settings.css?ver=5.1.5
http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/infinity-seo-por…ortfolio.css?ver=1.0.0
http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/infinity-seo-sli…a_slider.css?ver=1.0.0
http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/infinity-seo-sli…exslider.css?ver=1.0.0
http://adop.cc/wp-content/themes/infinity-seo/css/plugins.css?ver=4.4.2
http://adop.cc/wp-content/themes/infinity-seo/style.css?ver=4.4.2
http://adop.cc/wp-content/themes/infinity-seo/css/responsive.css?ver=4.4.2
http://adop.cc/wp-content/themes/infinity-seo/css/…c-styles.php?ver=4.4.2
http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/js_composer/asse…oser.min.css?ver=4.4.2
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans%3…%2Clatin-ext&ver=1.0.0
http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/hangul-font-nanu…c/css/font.css?ver=1.1
http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/js_composer/asse…oser.min.css?ver=4.9.2
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Noto%20Sans:700,400
priority - 8 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.72 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 2 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://www.google-analytics.com/plugins/ua/linkid.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 1 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 5KiB (27% reduction).
Minifying http://adop.cc/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public…settings.css?ver=5.1.5 could save 2.1KiB (28% reduction) after compression.
priority - 0 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 2.5KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing http://www.adop.cc/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/bg-parallax.jpg?id=55 could save 1.1KiB (12% reduction).
adop.cc Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 86 |
| Number of Hosts | 8 |
| Static Resources | 69 |
| JavaScript Resources | 23 |
| CSS Resources | 24 |
adop.cc Mobile Resource Breakdown
adop.cc mobile page usability
Last tested: 2017-05-26
adop.cc Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 0 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<div class="tp-bullet selected"></div> is close to 1 other tap targets.<div class="tp-bullet"></div> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="http://adop.cc/sticky-ad" class="vc_gitem-link">[Google New Ad] ‘Sticky Ad’ 소개</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="http://www.ado…urce/adop-news" class="btn btn-orange">애드오피 뉴스</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="http://www.ado…/resource/blog" class="btn default">애드오피 블로그</a> is close to 4 other tap targets.adop.cc similar domains
www.adop.net
www.adop.org
www.adop.info
www.adop.biz
www.adop.us
www.adop.mobi
www.dop.cc
www.adop.cc
www.qdop.cc
www.aqdop.cc
www.qadop.cc
www.wdop.cc
www.awdop.cc
www.wadop.cc
www.sdop.cc
www.asdop.cc
www.sadop.cc
www.zdop.cc
www.azdop.cc
www.zadop.cc
www.aop.cc
www.axop.cc
www.adxop.cc
www.axdop.cc
www.asop.cc
www.adsop.cc
www.aeop.cc
www.adeop.cc
www.aedop.cc
www.arop.cc
www.adrop.cc
www.ardop.cc
www.afop.cc
www.adfop.cc
www.afdop.cc
www.acop.cc
www.adcop.cc
www.acdop.cc
www.adp.cc
www.adip.cc
www.adoip.cc
www.adiop.cc
www.adkp.cc
www.adokp.cc
www.adkop.cc
www.adlp.cc
www.adolp.cc
www.adlop.cc
www.adpp.cc
www.adopp.cc
www.adpop.cc
www.ado.cc
www.adoo.cc
www.adopo.cc
www.adoop.cc
www.adol.cc
www.adopl.cc
adop.cc Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
adop.cc TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.