APORT.RU Aport.ru® Цены на товары и услуги в Москве. Aport - найдем лучшие цены!


aport.ru website information.

aport.ru domain name is registered by .RU top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .RU domain zone.

Following name servers are specified for aport.ru domain:

  • ns2.price.ua
  • ns3.price.ua
  • ns4.price.ua
  • ns1.price.ua

and probably website aport.ru is hosted by FASTLY - Fastly, US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by FASTLY - Fastly, US hosting company.

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website aport.ru position was 41848 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 44993. Now website aport.ru ranked in Alexa database as number 43856 (in the world).

Website aport.ru Desktop speed measurement score (70/100) is better than the results of 50.91% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

aport.ru Mobile usability score (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed measurement score of aport.ru (64/100) is better than the results of 64.03% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
May-04-2024 43,856285
May-03-2024 44,141-405
May-02-2024 43,736-130
May-01-2024 43,606-220
Apr-30-2024 43,3861,134
Apr-29-2024 44,520-193
Apr-28-2024 44,327-913

Advertisement

aport.ru Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.



aport.ru whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.


% By submitting a query to RIPN's Whois Service
% you agree to abide by the following terms of use:
% http://www.ripn.net/about/servpol.html#3.2 (in Russian)
% http://www.ripn.net/about/en/servpol.html#3.2 (in English).

domain: APORT.RU
nserver: ns1.price.ua.
nserver: ns2.price.ua.
nserver: ns3.price.ua.
state: REGISTERED, DELEGATED, VERIFIED
org: CPRGROUP IP LICENSING LIMITED
registrar: RU-CENTER-RU
admin-contact: https://www.nic.ru/whois
created: 1997-10-01T08:01:31Z
paid-till: 2021-10-31T21:00:00Z
free-date: 2021-12-02
source: TCI

Last updated on 2021-04-25T07:36:31Z

aport.ru server information

Servers Location

IP Address
23.105.240.138
Region
Moskva
City
Moscow

aport.ru desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2018-07-05


Desktop Speed Medium
70/100

aport.ru Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 14 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://css1.aport.ru/assets/a4d10394bad20f6f/build/style.min.css

priority - 9 Avoid landing page redirects

Your page has 2 redirects. Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded.

Avoid landing page redirects for the following chain of redirected URLs.

http://aport.ru/
https://aport.ru/
https://www.aport.ru/

priority - 8 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://syndication.twitter.com/settings (10 minutes)
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-T7GPNP (15 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/ru_RU/sdk.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/186170…3684?v=2.8.18&r=stable (20 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js (30 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/rpc:shindig_random.js?onload=init (30 minutes)
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
https://mc.yandex.ru/metrika/advert.gif (60 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/osd.js (60 minutes)
https://www.googleadservices.com/pagead/conversion_async.js (60 minutes)
https://stats.g.doubleclick.net/dc.js (2 hours)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
https://i2.aport.ru/images/blog/213807/1/main-74.jpg (24 hours)
https://i3.aport.ru/images/blog/213737/1/main-75.jpg (24 hours)
https://i3.aport.ru/images/blog/213821/1/lamp.jpg (24 hours)
https://i4.aport.ru/images/blog/213799/1/main-73.jpg (24 hours)

priority - 6 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 62KiB (29% reduction).

Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/simgad/1234264703533156806 could save 34.7KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/simgad/5356136864512494177 could save 19KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://css1.aport.ru/assets/a4d10394bad20f6f/images/bg/bg-slider.jpg could save 4.1KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/simgad/4484032469624060884 could save 2.1KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing https://css1.aport.ru/assets/a4d10394bad20f6f/imag…rites/hider-sprite.png could save 754B (64% reduction).
Compressing https://i3.aport.ru/images/blog/213821/1/lamp.jpg could save 263B (18% reduction).
Compressing https://i3.aport.ru/images/blog/213737/1/main-75.jpg could save 243B (16% reduction).
Compressing https://i2.aport.ru/images/blog/213807/1/main-74.jpg could save 207B (12% reduction).
Compressing https://i4.aport.ru/images/blog/213799/1/main-73.jpg could save 207B (12% reduction).
Compressing https://i1.aport.ru/images/firm-logo/17352/type1/1430392673.jpg could save 180B (13% reduction).
Compressing https://i3.aport.ru/images/producers/649/type1/649_87.jpg could save 162B (13% reduction).
Compressing https://mc.yandex.ru/informer/16751482/1_0_FFFFFFFF_FFFFFFFF_0_pageviews could save 120B (18% reduction).

priority - 4 Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

113.5KiB of the HTML response was required to render the above-the-fold content. This requires 4 network round-trips. Prioritize the above-the-fold content so that it can be rendered with only the first 2 round-trips' worth of HTML.

Only about 58% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the HTML delivered within 2 round-trips.
Click to see the screenshot with 2 round trips:

priority - 1 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 14.4KiB (17% reduction).

Minifying https://vk.com/js/al/lite.js?2244537532 could save 8.1KiB (16% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://vk.com/js/api/openapi.js could save 3.7KiB (17% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://js1.aport.ru/assets/a4d103948650de90/jquery.yiiactiveform.js could save 1.7KiB (47% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://vk.com/js/api/widgets/al_like.js?2029025800 could save 513B (14% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://vk.com/js/api/xdm.js?1449919642 could save 433B (17% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 451B (45% reduction).

Compressing https://ams.creativecdn.com/tags?type=script&id=pr…bzbXiSpznNj0_home&tc=1 could save 451B (45% reduction).

aport.ru Desktop Resources

Total Resources165
Number of Hosts42
Static Resources113
JavaScript Resources50
CSS Resources3

aport.ru Desktop Resource Breakdown

aport.ru mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2017-12-01


Mobile Speed Bad
64/100

aport.ru Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 56 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 2 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://css1.aport.ru/assets/7eeb9de3f06eb848/build…a95b8de77051f175c4.css
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto:300…0,700i&subset=cyrillic

priority - 3 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-T7GPNP (15 minutes)
http://www.googleadservices.com/pagead/conversion_async.js (60 minutes)
http://stats.g.doubleclick.net/dc.js (2 hours)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 0 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.22 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

aport.ru Mobile Resources

Total Resources113
Number of Hosts27
Static Resources81
JavaScript Resources17
CSS Resources2

aport.ru Mobile Resource Breakdown

aport.ru mobile page usability

Last tested: 2017-12-01


Mobile Usability Good
99/100

aport.ru Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 1 Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <label for="compare_1416947_1081">Выбрать для сравнения</label> and 20 others are close to other tap targets.

aport.ru similar domains

Similar domains:
www.aport.com
www.aport.net
www.aport.org
www.aport.info
www.aport.biz
www.aport.us
www.aport.mobi
www.port.ru
www.aport.ru
www.qport.ru
www.aqport.ru
www.qaport.ru
www.wport.ru
www.awport.ru
www.waport.ru
www.sport.ru
www.asport.ru
www.saport.ru
www.zport.ru
www.azport.ru
www.zaport.ru
www.aort.ru
www.aoort.ru
www.apoort.ru
www.aoport.ru
www.alort.ru
www.aplort.ru
www.alport.ru
www.aprt.ru
www.apirt.ru
www.apoirt.ru
www.apiort.ru
www.apkrt.ru
www.apokrt.ru
www.apkort.ru
www.aplrt.ru
www.apolrt.ru
www.apprt.ru
www.apoprt.ru
www.apport.ru
www.apot.ru
www.apoet.ru
www.aporet.ru
www.apoert.ru
www.apodt.ru
www.apordt.ru
www.apodrt.ru
www.apoft.ru
www.aporft.ru
www.apofrt.ru
www.apott.ru
www.aportt.ru
www.apotrt.ru
www.apor.ru
www.aporr.ru
www.aportr.ru
www.aporrt.ru
www.aporf.ru
www.aportf.ru
www.aporg.ru
www.aportg.ru
www.aporgt.ru
www.apory.ru
www.aporty.ru
www.aporyt.ru

aport.ru Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.


aport.ru TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.