bgr.in website information.
bgr.in domain name is registered by .IN top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .IN domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for bgr.in domain:
- ns-1493.awsdns-58.org
- ns-1941.awsdns-50.co.uk
- ns-382.awsdns-47.com
- ns-651.awsdns-17.net
and probably website bgr.in is hosted by WIKIMEDIA - Wikimedia Foundation Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by WIKIMEDIA - Wikimedia Foundation Inc., US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website bgr.in position was 18582 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 32673. Now website bgr.in ranked in Alexa database as number 32204 (in the world).
Website bgr.in Desktop speed measurement score (75/100) is better than the results of 59.78% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
bgr.in Mobile usability score (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of bgr.in (62/100) is better than the results of 59.44% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Nov-20-2024 | 32,204 | 178 |
| Nov-19-2024 | 32,382 | 291 |
| Nov-18-2024 | 32,673 | -798 |
| Nov-17-2024 | 31,875 | 486 |
| Nov-16-2024 | 32,361 | -219 |
| Nov-15-2024 | 32,142 | -128 |
| Nov-14-2024 | 32,014 | 155 |
Advertisement
bgr.in Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
bgr.in whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
bgr.in server information
bgr.in desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-12-05
bgr.in Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 18 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 8 blocking script resources and 6 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://cdn.izooto.com/scripts/185ab9ebc070b0b242472a9489383866a9255d5f.js
https://tags.crwdcntrl.net/c/12381/cc.js?ns=_cc12381
https://st1.bgr.in/wp-content/plugins/iwpl-social-….min.js?ver=x-20191101
https://st1.bgr.in/wp-content/themes/bgr2017/js/bgr_custom.js?ver=20191101
https://st1.bgr.in/wp-content/themes/bgr2017/js/vendor.js?ver=20191101
https://st1.bgr.in/wp-content/themes/bgr2017/js/ph…ry-min.js?ver=20191101
https://st1.bgr.in/wp-content/plugins/bj-lazy-load…lazy-load.min.js?ver=2
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://st1.bgr.in/wp-content/themes/bgr2017/css/b…sktop.css?ver=20191101
https://st1.bgr.in/wp-content/themes/bgr2017/css/vendors/bootstrap.min.css
https://st1.bgr.in/wp-content/themes/bgr2017/css/v…s/font-awesome.min.css
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto+Sla…700|Roboto:300,400,700
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Eczar|Roboto
priority - 7 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-MBRX45 (15 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/activeview/js/cu…osd.js?cb=%2Fr20100101 (50 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/activeview/js/cu…ner.js?cache=r20110914 (50 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (60 minutes)
https://tags.expo9.exponential.com/tags/ContentVer…ationBackup_DV/tags.js (60 minutes)
https://tags.expo9.exponential.com/tags/Zee5com/BGR_Tier1/tags.js (60 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/dcm/dcmads.js (60 minutes)
https://p.skimresources.com/?provider_id=725a24e4e…d145&skim_mapping=true (2 hours)
https://stats.g.doubleclick.net/dc.js (2 hours)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
https://c2.taboola.com/nr/zeemedia-bgr/newsroom.js (4 hours)
https://cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/impl.20191202-12-RELEASE.es5.js (4 hours)
https://cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/zeemedia-bgr/loader.js (4 hours)
https://cdn.doubleverify.com/dv-match6.js (9.8 hours)
priority - 3 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 28.4KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing https://cdnx.tribalfusion.com/media/common//adChoice/icon/ad_choices_UR.png could save 876B (54% reduction).
Compressing https://tps715.doubleverify.com/bsevent.gif?impid=…cbust=1575514542643342 could save 739B (91% reduction).
Compressing https://tps715.doubleverify.com/bsevent.gif?impid=…cbust=1575514547587658 could save 739B (91% reduction).
Compressing https://tps715.doubleverify.com/bsevent.gif?impid=…cbust=1575514542644949 could save 739B (91% reduction).
Compressing https://delivery.adrecover.com/block.jpg?ts=1575514542328 could save 346B (54% reduction).
Compressing https://cdnx.tribalfusion.com/media/common//adChoi…on/ad_choices_i_UR.png could save 247B (49% reduction).
priority - 2 Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.
priority - 1 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 11.1KiB (16% reduction).
priority - 1 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 8.2KiB (29% reduction).
Minifying https://tags.expo9.exponential.com/tags/Zee5com/BGR_Tier1/tags.js could save 3.9KiB (29% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://s0.2mdn.net/9428808/1571788599553/jpc%2030…bate/scripts/Banner.js could save 198B (27% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://cdnx.tribalfusion.com/media/common/adChoice/tf_adChoice11.js could save 177B (18% reduction) after compression.
priority - 1 Minify HTML
Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 5KiB (19% reduction).
Minifying https://s0.2mdn.net/9428808/1571788599553/jpc%2030…et%20rebate/index.html could save 266B (17% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://cdn.izooto.com/scripts/sak/iz_setcid.html could save 152B (19% reduction) after compression.
bgr.in Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 242 |
| Number of Hosts | 65 |
| Static Resources | 102 |
| JavaScript Resources | 53 |
| CSS Resources | 8 |
bgr.in Desktop Resource Breakdown
bgr.in mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-04-24
bgr.in Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 40 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 4 blocking script resources and 2 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/google_top_exp.js
http://tags.crwdcntrl.net/c/5620/cc_af.js
http://www.googleadservices.com/pagead/conversion.js
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://www.bgr.in/wp-content/themes/vip/bgr-child/…ts.css?ver=20170412-V1
priority - 10 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://atemda.com/UserMatch.ashx?bidderid=102&bidderuid=Y58fe1da011913 (1 second)
http://q.crowdynews.com/v1/content/BGR?q=bgr-india…=0&sort=time&callback= (103 seconds)
http://widget.crowdynews.com/BGR_bgr-horizontal-widget.js (2.6 minutes)
https://dptr.areyouahuman.com/dptr?dpn=lotame&dpi=…475b-8fec-b194bc3550ee (10 minutes)
https://n-cdn.areyouahuman.com/play/yCd2dryLyB4SiZ…ZSGqiUHnU?AYAH_F1=9559 (10 minutes)
http://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-MBRX45 (15 minutes)
http://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/osd.js (60 minutes)
http://rules.quantcount.com/rules-p-hkYNkh0PX-Jwa.js (60 minutes)
http://stats.g.doubleclick.net/dc.js (2 hours)
https://js-agent.newrelic.com/nr-1026.min.js (2 hours)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 8 Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.
priority - 7 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 69.9KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://video.sekindo.com/uploads/mobileVideoJpg/8…amesSeq/framesSeq1.jpg could save 18.8KiB (14% reduction).
Compressing https://s0.2mdn.net/4351363/1487100711202/320x50/bg1.jpg could save 3.8KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://st1.bgr.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/social-media-image-260x120.jpg could save 1.9KiB (14% reduction).
Compressing https://s0.2mdn.net/4351363/1487100711202/320x50/velo1.jpg could save 1.8KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing https://s0.2mdn.net/4351363/1487100711202/320x50/bg2.jpg could save 1.5KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing https://s0.2mdn.net/4351363/1487100711202/320x50/bg3.jpg could save 1.4KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://video.sekindo.com/uploads/mobileVideoJpg/8…6/framesSeq/poster.jpg could save 1.2KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing http://contextual.media.net/cksync.php?cs=3&type=m…4d00-8db3-94f37e36dbdc could save 744B (91% reduction).
Compressing http://st1.bgr.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/lg-g6-qualcomm-260x120.jpg could save 631B (11% reduction).
Compressing http://live.sekindo.com/content/video/splayer/assets/preloaderImg.png could save 574B (24% reduction).
priority - 0 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 1.8KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing http://bcp.crwdcntrl.net/5/c=5620/rand=225551639/p…india%20website/rt=ifr could save 876B (53% reduction).
bgr.in Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 242 |
| Number of Hosts | 92 |
| Static Resources | 76 |
| JavaScript Resources | 49 |
| CSS Resources | 4 |
bgr.in Mobile Resource Breakdown
bgr.in mobile page usability
Last tested: 2017-04-24
bgr.in Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 0 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<a href="https://twitter.com/BillGates">@BillGates</a> and 3 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="https://twitter.com/BGRIndia"></a> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="https://twitter.com/BGRIndia" class="cntopten-author">BGR India</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<div class="cnbutton-skip"></div> is close to 2 other tap targets.bgr.in similar domains
www.bgr.net
www.bgr.org
www.bgr.info
www.bgr.biz
www.bgr.us
www.bgr.mobi
www.gr.in
www.bgr.in
www.vgr.in
www.bvgr.in
www.vbgr.in
www.ggr.in
www.bggr.in
www.gbgr.in
www.hgr.in
www.bhgr.in
www.hbgr.in
www.ngr.in
www.bngr.in
www.nbgr.in
www.br.in
www.bfr.in
www.bgfr.in
www.bfgr.in
www.bvr.in
www.bgvr.in
www.btr.in
www.bgtr.in
www.btgr.in
www.bbr.in
www.bgbr.in
www.bbgr.in
www.byr.in
www.bgyr.in
www.bygr.in
www.bhr.in
www.bghr.in
www.bg.in
www.bge.in
www.bgre.in
www.bger.in
www.bgd.in
www.bgrd.in
www.bgdr.in
www.bgf.in
www.bgrf.in
www.bgt.in
www.bgrt.in
bgr.in Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
bgr.in TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.