EDZIECKO.PL eDziecko.pl - Serwis dla Rodziców. Ciąża, Poród, Zdrowie i Wychowanie Dzieci


edziecko.pl website information.

edziecko.pl domain name is registered by .PL top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .PL domain zone.

Following name servers are specified for edziecko.pl domain:

  • zeus.gazeta.pl
  • hera.gazeta.pl

and probably website edziecko.pl is hosted by GOOGLE - Google LLC, US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by GOOGLE - Google LLC, US hosting company.

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website edziecko.pl position was 262621 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 269099. Now website edziecko.pl ranked in Alexa database as number 263260 (in the world).

Website edziecko.pl Desktop speed measurement score (65/100) is better than the results of 42.84% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

edziecko.pl Mobile usability score (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed measurement score of edziecko.pl (49/100) is better than the results of 31.99% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
May-02-2024 263,2601,989
May-01-2024 265,249-285
Apr-30-2024 264,964-2,343
Apr-29-2024 262,621607
Apr-28-2024 263,2281,680
Apr-27-2024 264,9081,536
Apr-26-2024 266,444-641

Advertisement

edziecko.pl Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.



edziecko.pl whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.


edziecko.pl server information

Servers Location

IP Address
80.252.0.135
Country
Poland
Region
Mazowieckie
City
Warsaw

edziecko.pl desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2019-12-09


Desktop Speed Medium
65/100

edziecko.pl Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 24 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 234.8KiB (30% reduction).

Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/pagead/imgad?id=…-ACRABGAEyCCuo8-i8xkZd could save 84.8KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing https://adv.adview.pl/ads/codest/images/2019/11/27/40648/wallpaper.jpg could save 35.3KiB (13% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/pagead/imgad?id=…vQEQARgBMgiWxqzFZ4sUxg could save 26.5KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/8/24617/m24617248.jpg could save 22.1KiB (88% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/pagead/imgad?id=…3FKhABGAEyCDY_9WdJQtml could save 21.7KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/68/79/fd/z16611688IC.jpg could save 13KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/a1/b2/13/z20652449IC.jpg could save 10.2KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/9/24573/m24573579.png could save 2.3KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/8/24573/m24573578.png could save 2.3KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/1/24497/m24497711.jpg could save 2.1KiB (47% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/0/24497/m24497710.jpg could save 2.1KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/6/24573/m24573576.png could save 2.1KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/4/24497/m24497714.jpg could save 1.9KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/8/24497/m24497708.jpg could save 1.9KiB (44% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/9/24497/m24497709.jpg could save 1.9KiB (46% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/2/24497/m24497712.jpg could save 1.7KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/3/24497/m24497713.jpg could save 1.4KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/7/24573/m24573577.png could save 1.1KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.pushpushgo.com/scripts/5dc55c47c0d4ca3…babec/assets/icons.png could save 428B (37% reduction).

priority - 16 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 5 blocking script resources and 3 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

https://rodo.agora.pl/agreement/check?gid=1&params=
https://static.im-g.pl/static/adview/front/master/…ew/prebid-cmp-1.js?v=6
http://www.edziecko.pl/aliasy/adp/px.js?ch=1
http://www.edziecko.pl/aliasy/adp/px.js?ch=2
https://www.gstatic.com/firebasejs/3.3.0/firebase.js

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://static.im-g.pl/static/epo/style/deploy/mas…4/style-desk-min.cssgz
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto:400,500,700
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto:400,500,700

priority - 7 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://b61.s372.meetrics.net/bb-mx/error (expiration not specified)
https://cdn.mookie1.com/containr.js?tagid=V2_50110…c.placementID=29313626 (60 seconds)
https://cdn.mookie1.com/containr.js?tagid=V2_50110…c.placementID=29313626 (60 seconds)
https://cdn.pushpushgo.com/js/5a65d4b9fe2e540001782530.js (2 minutes)
http://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-WZGWLQ (15 minutes)
http://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/154305…6687?v=2.9.14&r=stable (20 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/activeview/js/cu…osd.js?cb=%2Fr20100101 (50 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/activeview/js/cu…ner.js?cache=r20110914 (50 minutes)
https://cdn.snippet.abtshield.com/static/prod/abtshield-snippet.js (60 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/plugins/ua/linkid.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
https://s372.mxcdn.net/bb-mx/serve/mtrcs_618288.js (8.9 hours)

priority - 4 Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 4% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.
Click to see the screenshot with only the HTML response:

priority - 3 Avoid landing page redirects

Your page has 2 redirects. Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded.

Avoid landing page redirects for the following chain of redirected URLs.

http://edziecko.pl/
http://www.edziecko.pl/
http://www.edziecko.pl/edziecko/0,0.html

priority - 1 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 8.4KiB (60% reduction).

Compressing https://cdn.snippet.abtshield.com/static/prod/abtshield-snippet.js could save 8KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing http://gazeta.hit.gemius.pl/_1575881695478/redot.j…zq9aoz.M7&vis=1&lsadd= could save 203B (46% reduction).
Compressing http://gazeta.hit.gemius.pl/_1575881695492/rexdot.…7&vis=1&lsadd=KlGVsGoa could save 202B (45% reduction).

priority - 1 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 8.2KiB (14% reduction).

Minifying http://www.edziecko.pl/edziecko/0,0.html could save 8.2KiB (14% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 3.2KiB (18% reduction).

Minifying https://cdn.mookie1.com/containr.js?tagid=V2_50110…c.placementID=29313626 could save 855B (37% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://cdn.mookie1.com/containr.js?tagid=V2_50110…c.placementID=29313626 could save 855B (37% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://gazeta.hit.gemius.pl/xgemius.js could save 809B (12% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://gazeta.hit.gemius.pl/gemius.js could save 792B (11% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.23 seconds.

There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

edziecko.pl Desktop Resources

Total Resources170
Number of Hosts40
Static Resources99
JavaScript Resources55
CSS Resources2

edziecko.pl Desktop Resource Breakdown

edziecko.pl mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2019-12-10


Mobile Speed Bad
49/100

edziecko.pl Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 72 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 3 blocking script resources and 3 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

https://rodo.agora.pl/agreement/check?gid=1&params=
https://static.im-g.pl/static/adview/front/master/…ew/prebid-cmp-0.js?v=6
https://www.gstatic.com/firebasejs/3.3.0/firebase.js

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://static.im-g.pl/static/epo/style/deploy/mas…e-mobile-min.css.cssgz
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto:400,500,700
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto:400,500,700

priority - 16 Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 36% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.
Click to see the screenshot with only the HTML response:

priority - 10 Avoid landing page redirects

Your page has 2 redirects. Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded.

Avoid landing page redirects for the following chain of redirected URLs.

http://edziecko.pl/
http://www.edziecko.pl/
http://www.edziecko.pl/edziecko/0,0.html

priority - 8 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://cdn.pushpushgo.com/js/5a65d4b9fe2e540001782530.js (2 minutes)
http://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-WZGWLQ (15 minutes)
http://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/154305…6687?v=2.9.14&r=stable (20 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/activeview/js/cu…osd.js?cb=%2Fr20100101 (50 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/activeview/js/cu…ner.js?cache=r20110914 (50 minutes)
https://cdn.snippet.abtshield.com/static/prod/abtshield-snippet.js (60 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/plugins/ua/linkid.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 7 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 65.1KiB (38% reduction).

Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/8/24617/m24617248.jpg could save 22.1KiB (88% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/daca_images/simgad/1095724206746626666 could save 21.9KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/9/24573/m24573579.png could save 2.3KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/8/24573/m24573578.png could save 2.3KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/1/24497/m24497711.jpg could save 2.1KiB (47% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/0/24497/m24497710.jpg could save 2.1KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/6/24573/m24573576.png could save 2.1KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/4/24497/m24497714.jpg could save 1.9KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/8/24497/m24497708.jpg could save 1.9KiB (44% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/9/24497/m24497709.jpg could save 1.9KiB (46% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/2/24497/m24497712.jpg could save 1.7KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/3/24497/m24497713.jpg could save 1.4KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing https://bi.im-g.pl/im/7/24573/m24573577.png could save 1.1KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.pushpushgo.com/scripts/5dc55c47c0d4ca3…babec/assets/icons.png could save 428B (37% reduction).

priority - 1 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 8.4KiB (60% reduction).

Compressing https://cdn.snippet.abtshield.com/static/prod/abtshield-snippet.js could save 8KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing http://gazeta.hit.gemius.pl/_1575965984285/redot.j…HmSzcH.07&vis=1&lsadd= could save 203B (46% reduction).
Compressing http://gazeta.hit.gemius.pl/_1575965984323/rexdot.…7&vis=1&lsadd=KlGVsGoa could save 203B (45% reduction).

priority - 1 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 5.6KiB (13% reduction).

Minifying http://www.edziecko.pl/edziecko/0,0.html could save 5.6KiB (13% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.23 seconds.

There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 0 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.6KiB (12% reduction).

Minifying https://gazeta.hit.gemius.pl/xgemius.js could save 809B (12% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://gazeta.hit.gemius.pl/gemius.js could save 792B (11% reduction) after compression.

edziecko.pl Mobile Resources

Total Resources127
Number of Hosts35
Static Resources77
JavaScript Resources41
CSS Resources2

edziecko.pl Mobile Resource Breakdown

edziecko.pl mobile page usability

Last tested: 2019-12-10


Mobile Usability Good
99/100

edziecko.pl Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 0 Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <div class="swiper-paginat…nation-bullets"></div> is close to 1 other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="http://www.edz…d/0,79533.html" class="item noSwiper">Oblicz termin porodu</a> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="http://www.edz…do-samego.html">Mama ze Szwajc…y na porodówkę</a> is close to 2 other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="http://kontent…/0,135721.html">Licencje/Kontent</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.
The tap target <button>AKCEPTUJĘ I PR…DZĘ DO SERWISU</button> is close to 1 other tap targets.

The tap target <a>pre-selected companies</a> is close to 3 other tap targets.
The tap target <a class="banner_detailExpand--2vF7k">Information that may be used</a> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a class="banner_detailExpand--2vF7k">Information that may be used</a> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a class="banner_learnMore--3KMk_">Manage Your Choices</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.
The tap target <a class="banner_continue--2NyXA">Continue to site</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.

edziecko.pl similar domains

Similar domains:
www.edziecko.com
www.edziecko.net
www.edziecko.org
www.edziecko.info
www.edziecko.biz
www.edziecko.us
www.edziecko.mobi
www.dziecko.pl
www.edziecko.pl
www.wdziecko.pl
www.ewdziecko.pl
www.wedziecko.pl
www.sdziecko.pl
www.esdziecko.pl
www.sedziecko.pl
www.ddziecko.pl
www.eddziecko.pl
www.dedziecko.pl
www.rdziecko.pl
www.erdziecko.pl
www.redziecko.pl
www.eziecko.pl
www.exziecko.pl
www.edxziecko.pl
www.exdziecko.pl
www.esziecko.pl
www.edsziecko.pl
www.eeziecko.pl
www.edeziecko.pl
www.eedziecko.pl
www.erziecko.pl
www.edrziecko.pl
www.efziecko.pl
www.edfziecko.pl
www.efdziecko.pl
www.ecziecko.pl
www.edcziecko.pl
www.ecdziecko.pl
www.ediecko.pl
www.edxiecko.pl
www.edzxiecko.pl
www.edsiecko.pl
www.edzsiecko.pl
www.edaiecko.pl
www.edzaiecko.pl
www.edaziecko.pl
www.edzecko.pl
www.edzuecko.pl
www.edziuecko.pl
www.edzuiecko.pl
www.edzjecko.pl
www.edzijecko.pl
www.edzjiecko.pl
www.edzkecko.pl
www.edzikecko.pl
www.edzkiecko.pl
www.edzoecko.pl
www.edzioecko.pl
www.edzoiecko.pl
www.edzicko.pl
www.edziwcko.pl
www.edziewcko.pl
www.edziwecko.pl
www.edziscko.pl
www.edziescko.pl
www.edzisecko.pl
www.edzidcko.pl
www.edziedcko.pl
www.edzidecko.pl
www.edzircko.pl
www.edziercko.pl
www.edzirecko.pl
www.edzieko.pl
www.edziexko.pl
www.edziecxko.pl
www.edziexcko.pl
www.edziedko.pl
www.edziecdko.pl
www.edziefko.pl
www.edziecfko.pl
www.edziefcko.pl
www.edzievko.pl
www.edziecvko.pl
www.edzievcko.pl
www.edzieco.pl
www.edziecjo.pl
www.edzieckjo.pl
www.edziecjko.pl
www.edziecio.pl
www.edzieckio.pl
www.edzieciko.pl
www.edziecmo.pl
www.edzieckmo.pl
www.edziecmko.pl
www.edzieclo.pl
www.edziecklo.pl
www.edzieclko.pl
www.edziecoo.pl
www.edzieckoo.pl
www.edziecoko.pl
www.edzieck.pl
www.edziecki.pl
www.edzieckoi.pl
www.edzieckk.pl
www.edzieckok.pl
www.edzieckko.pl
www.edzieckl.pl
www.edzieckol.pl
www.edzieckp.pl
www.edzieckop.pl
www.edzieckpo.pl

edziecko.pl Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.


edziecko.pl TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.