fotomagazin.de website information.
fotomagazin.de domain name is registered by .DE top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .DE domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for fotomagazin.de domain:
- b.ns14.net
- a.ns14.net
- d.ns14.net
- c.ns14.net
and probably website fotomagazin.de is hosted by AMAZON-AES - Amazon.com, Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by AMAZON-AES - Amazon.com, Inc., US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website fotomagazin.de position was 12944 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 988661. Now website fotomagazin.de ranked in Alexa database as number 267401 (in the world).
Website fotomagazin.de Desktop speed measurement score (57/100) is better than the results of 31.79% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
fotomagazin.de Mobile usability score (97/100) is better than the results of 49.9% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of fotomagazin.de (62/100) is better than the results of 59.44% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
Date | Rank | Change |
---|---|---|
Nov-27-2024 | 267,401 | -3,562 |
Nov-26-2024 | 263,839 | 8,241 |
Nov-25-2024 | 272,080 | -3,000 |
Nov-24-2024 | 269,080 | -3,078 |
Nov-23-2024 | 266,002 | -204 |
Nov-22-2024 | 265,798 | -3,992 |
Nov-21-2024 | 261,806 | -2,839 |
Advertisement
fotomagazin.de Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
fotomagazin.de whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
Domain: fotomagazin.de
Status: connect
fotomagazin.de server information
fotomagazin.de desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2018-11-16
fotomagazin.de Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 68 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 668.5KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…S×tamp=1539335005 could save 40.9KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…itel.jpg?itok=KtPhbybG could save 40.4KiB (94% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…itel.jpg?itok=vYnxjlxo could save 39KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…t×tamp=1539334980 could save 37.3KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…0×tamp=1539335047 could save 35.8KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…itel.jpg?itok=ZheVl4Vx could save 33.6KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…over.jpg?itok=RiH3m6eg could save 28.7KiB (86% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…C×tamp=1539334868 could save 26.9KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…d×tamp=1539334958 could save 24.5KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…6×tamp=1539335027 could save 21.5KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…9×tamp=1539334914 could save 21.4KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…i×tamp=1542144960 could save 21.2KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…I×tamp=1542283753 could save 18.7KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…E×tamp=1542319525 could save 16.1KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…1×tamp=1539334890 could save 16KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…4×tamp=1541968548 could save 15.5KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…Y×tamp=1539334861 could save 15.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…d_02.jpg?itok=d-VtDjW- could save 12.3KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…O×tamp=1542211244 could save 9.2KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…crop.jpg?itok=_MTueefb could save 8.8KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…S×tamp=1542273905 could save 8.6KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…G×tamp=1542026869 could save 7.4KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…z×tamp=1542101917 could save 7KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…g×tamp=1537189499 could save 7KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…b×tamp=1542288422 could save 5.9KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…z×tamp=1537433446 could save 5.1KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…z×tamp=1539872253 could save 5KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…ding.jpg?itok=tOpkKS96 could save 4.2KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…X×tamp=1541522831 could save 3.9KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…4/datenbank_teaser.jpg could save 3.8KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…T×tamp=1541669886 could save 3.6KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…ig_star.png?1534932828 could save 3.5KiB (66% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…U×tamp=1541523786 could save 3.5KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…Y×tamp=1541520505 could save 3.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…logo_md.png?1534932828 could save 3KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…Y×tamp=1542197037 could save 2.8KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…v×tamp=1540539982 could save 2.5KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…Y×tamp=1536827738 could save 2.4KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…U×tamp=1541784152 could save 2.3KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…r×tamp=1454676949 could save 2.2KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…8×tamp=1539334937 could save 2.2KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…g×tamp=1540827202 could save 2.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…u×tamp=1541522831 could save 2.2KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…L×tamp=1537189499 could save 2KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…h×tamp=1542058287 could save 2KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…3×tamp=1539334868 could save 2KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…V×tamp=1539334980 could save 2KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…U×tamp=1539335005 could save 1.8KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…7×tamp=1539872253 could save 1.7KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…S×tamp=1542371166 could save 1.7KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…3×tamp=1534514585 could save 1.7KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…J×tamp=1539334914 could save 1.6KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…n×tamp=1539335047 could save 1.5KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…s×tamp=1539334958 could save 1.4KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…M×tamp=1490695904 could save 1.4KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…j×tamp=1540539982 could save 1.2KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…ow_left.png?1534932828 could save 1.2KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…L×tamp=1539334861 could save 1.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…w_right.png?1534932828 could save 1.2KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…9×tamp=1539335027 could save 1.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…gallery.png?1534932828 could save 1.2KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…g_graph.png?1534932828 could save 1.1KiB (55% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…small_2.png?1534932828 could save 1.1KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…small_1.png?1534932828 could save 1.1KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…acebook.png?1534932828 could save 1.1KiB (60% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…small_3.png?1534932828 could save 1.1KiB (63% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…um_star.png?1534932828 could save 1,011B (45% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…C×tamp=1539334890 could save 959B (19% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/vp/0a8dcebdb66eb…5710999917068136_n.jpg could save 923B (15% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/vp/3dd13337d931b…7794998759854715_n.jpg could save 901B (15% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/vp/a0e4c83b17ddf…3594330231681921_n.jpg could save 899B (13% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/vp/3de1689523147…3192001665582713_n.jpg could save 867B (11% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/vp/5f0c0418e8d9e…3542861657485572_n.jpg could save 865B (13% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/vp/94b88a8b04d78…1655383034886810_n.jpg could save 838B (12% reduction).
Compressing https://tps618.doubleverify.com/bsevent.gif?impid=…cbust=1542376367565342 could save 739B (91% reduction).
Compressing https://tps618.doubleverify.com/bsevent.gif?impid=…cbust=1542376367568590 could save 739B (91% reduction).
Compressing https://tps618.doubleverify.com/bsevent.gif?impid=…cbust=1542376367566949 could save 739B (91% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…oter.png?itok=HErLydkF could save 160B (16% reduction).
priority - 4 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 42.5KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing https://adserver.sigma-foto.de/www/delivery/ajs.ph…x%253D1%2526adurl%253D could save 529B (37% reduction).
priority - 4 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://jtsvstats.q-one-hosting.com/piwik.js (expiration not specified)
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-M2JVVRQ (15 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/osd.js (60 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
https://cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/impl.332-482-RELEASE.es5.js (4 hours)
https://cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/jahrtopspecialverlag-fotomagazin/loader.js (4 hours)
https://cdn.doubleverify.com/dv-match6.js (7.9 hours)
priority - 3 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 30.5KiB (49% reduction).
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/all/modules/contr…t/js/inspect.js?phroff could save 4.8KiB (53% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/misc/ajax.js?v=7.60 could save 4.8KiB (62% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/misc/drupal.js?phroff could save 4.4KiB (64% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/all/modules/contr…ormat_output.js?phroff could save 2.6KiB (44% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…ripts/script.js?phroff could save 1.5KiB (45% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/modules/co…nopoly-magic.js?phroff could save 1.3KiB (49% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/all/modules/contr…gleanalytics.js?phroff could save 998B (53% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/modules/co…v=67fb34f6a866c40d0570 could save 935B (69% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/misc/jquery.once.js?v=1.2 could save 816B (76% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/misc/progress.js?v=7.60 could save 588B (49% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/rad…dix-progress.js?phroff could save 582B (44% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/modules/ma…gnific_popup.js?phroff could save 419B (32% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/all/modules/contr…upal.inspect.js?phroff could save 405B (52% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/all/modules/contr…d_ajax_forms.js?phroff could save 323B (44% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/modules/ma…eme/mag_user.js?phroff could save 280B (41% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/modules/fm…xslider.load.js?phroff could save 265B (23% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/modules/co…er/js/slider.js?phroff could save 233B (40% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/modules/co…eal_comments.js?phroff could save 232B (30% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/all/modules/contr…s/closeblock.js?phroff could save 159B (31% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/rad…radix-script.js?phroff could save 142B (27% reduction) after compression.
priority - 2 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
fotomagazin.de Desktop Resources
Total Resources | 170 |
Number of Hosts | 20 |
Static Resources | 146 |
JavaScript Resources | 56 |
CSS Resources | 9 |
fotomagazin.de Desktop Resource Breakdown
fotomagazin.de mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2018-11-16
fotomagazin.de Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 45 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 436.4KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…S×tamp=1539335005 could save 40.9KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…t×tamp=1539334980 could save 37.3KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…0×tamp=1539335047 could save 35.8KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…C×tamp=1539334868 could save 26.9KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…d×tamp=1539334958 could save 24.5KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…6×tamp=1539335027 could save 21.5KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…9×tamp=1539334914 could save 21.4KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…1×tamp=1539334890 could save 16KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…Y×tamp=1539334861 could save 15.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…itel.jpg?itok=vYnxjlxo could save 9.7KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…itel.jpg?itok=KtPhbybG could save 9.1KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…itel.jpg?itok=ZheVl4Vx could save 9.1KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…8×tamp=1537189499 could save 7KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…over.jpg?itok=RiH3m6eg could save 6KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…z×tamp=1537433446 could save 5.1KiB (26% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…2×tamp=1539872253 could save 5KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…d_02.jpg?itok=d-VtDjW- could save 4.8KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…u×tamp=1490695904 could save 4.7KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…ding.jpg?itok=tOpkKS96 could save 4.2KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…t×tamp=1541522831 could save 3.9KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…4/datenbank_teaser.jpg could save 3.8KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…Y×tamp=1541669886 could save 3.6KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…ig_star.png?1534932828 could save 3.5KiB (66% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…c×tamp=1541523786 could save 3.5KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…-grey_2.png?1534932828 could save 3.2KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…-grey_3.png?1534932828 could save 3.2KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…n×tamp=1541520505 could save 3.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…-grey_1.png?1534932828 could save 3.2KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…l×tamp=1542283753 could save 3.1KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…o_xs@2x.png?1534932828 could save 3KiB (63% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…B×tamp=1541968548 could save 2.6KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…s×tamp=1542144960 could save 2.6KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…q×tamp=1540539982 could save 2.5KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…o×tamp=1542211244 could save 2.4KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…M×tamp=1542319525 could save 2.4KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…8×tamp=1539334937 could save 2.2KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…3×tamp=1539334868 could save 2KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…V×tamp=1539334980 could save 2KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…U×tamp=1539335005 could save 1.8KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…J×tamp=1539334914 could save 1.6KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…P×tamp=1542058287 could save 1.6KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…n×tamp=1539335047 could save 1.5KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…s×tamp=1539334958 could save 1.4KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…x×tamp=1542101917 could save 1.3KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…ow_left.png?1534932828 could save 1.2KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…F×tamp=1542371166 could save 1.2KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…e×tamp=1542273905 could save 1.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…L×tamp=1539334861 could save 1.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…w_right.png?1534932828 could save 1.2KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…9×tamp=1539335027 could save 1.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…gallery.png?1534932828 could save 1.2KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…d×tamp=1542026869 could save 1.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…g_graph.png?1534932828 could save 1.1KiB (55% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…S×tamp=1542288422 could save 1KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…C×tamp=1539334890 could save 959B (19% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/vp/0a8dcebdb66eb…5710999917068136_n.jpg could save 923B (15% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/vp/3dd13337d931b…7794998759854715_n.jpg could save 901B (15% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/vp/a0e4c83b17ddf…3594330231681921_n.jpg could save 899B (13% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/vp/3de1689523147…3192001665582713_n.jpg could save 867B (11% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/vp/5f0c0418e8d9e…3542861657485572_n.jpg could save 865B (13% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/vp/94b88a8b04d78…1655383034886810_n.jpg could save 838B (12% reduction).
Compressing https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/www.fotomagazin.d…oter.png?itok=HErLydkF could save 160B (16% reduction).
priority - 8 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
priority - 4 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 42KiB (65% reduction).
priority - 4 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-M2JVVRQ (15 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
https://cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/impl.332-482-RELEASE.es5.js (4 hours)
https://cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/jahrtopspecialverlag-fotomagazin/loader.js (4 hours)
priority - 3 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 30.5KiB (49% reduction).
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/all/modules/contr…t/js/inspect.js?phroff could save 4.8KiB (53% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/misc/ajax.js?v=7.60 could save 4.8KiB (62% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/misc/drupal.js?phroff could save 4.4KiB (64% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/all/modules/contr…ormat_output.js?phroff could save 2.6KiB (44% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/fm_…ripts/script.js?phroff could save 1.5KiB (45% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/modules/co…nopoly-magic.js?phroff could save 1.3KiB (49% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/all/modules/contr…gleanalytics.js?phroff could save 998B (53% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/modules/co…v=67fb34f6a866c40d0570 could save 935B (69% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/misc/jquery.once.js?v=1.2 could save 816B (76% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/misc/progress.js?v=7.60 could save 588B (49% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/rad…dix-progress.js?phroff could save 582B (44% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/modules/ma…gnific_popup.js?phroff could save 419B (32% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/all/modules/contr…upal.inspect.js?phroff could save 405B (52% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/all/modules/contr…d_ajax_forms.js?phroff could save 323B (44% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/modules/ma…eme/mag_user.js?phroff could save 280B (41% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/modules/fm…xslider.load.js?phroff could save 265B (23% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/modules/co…er/js/slider.js?phroff could save 233B (40% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/modules/co…eal_comments.js?phroff could save 232B (30% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/sites/all/modules/contr…s/closeblock.js?phroff could save 159B (31% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.fotomagazin.de/profiles/mag/themes/rad…radix-script.js?phroff could save 142B (27% reduction) after compression.
fotomagazin.de Mobile Resources
Total Resources | 139 |
Number of Hosts | 14 |
Static Resources | 128 |
JavaScript Resources | 47 |
CSS Resources | 9 |
fotomagazin.de Mobile Resource Breakdown
fotomagazin.de mobile page usability
Last tested: 2018-11-16
fotomagazin.de Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 2 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<a href="#main-content" class="element-invisi…ment-focusable">Direkt zum Inhalt</a>
is close to 1 other tap targets.<a href="/technik/news/…aus-frankreich">Pixii A1112: M…aus Frankreich</a>
and 1 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<ol class="flex-control-n…control-paging">12345678910</ol>
is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="/bild/sonnenuntergang-2">Sonnenuntergang</a>
and 8 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="http://www.aer…ernational.de/">AERO INTERNATIONAL</a>
and 24 others are close to other tap targets.<span class="closeblock-button">close</span>
is close to 1 other tap targets.<a href="http://stores.…ductId=2536790">Jetzt Angebot…DGET ab 13,60€</a>
is close to 1 other tap targets.<a href="http://stores.…ductId=2536790">Jetzt Angebot…DGET ab 13,60€</a>
is close to 1 other tap targets.<a href="http://stores.…ductId=2536790">Jetzt Angebot…DGET ab 13,60€</a>
is close to 1 other tap targets.<a href="http://stores.…ductId=2536790">Jetzt Angebot…DGET ab 13,60€</a>
is close to 1 other tap targets.<a href="http://stores.…ductId=2536790">Jetzt Angebot…DGET ab 13,60€</a>
is close to 1 other tap targets.<a href="http://stores.…ductId=2536790">Jetzt Angebot…DGET ab 13,60€</a>
and 1 others are close to other tap targets.<button id="jtsv-marketing-bar--abo-cta" class="btn btn-danger">Jetzt Angebot sichern!</button>
is close to 1 other tap targets.fotomagazin.de similar domains
www.fotomagazin.net
www.fotomagazin.org
www.fotomagazin.info
www.fotomagazin.biz
www.fotomagazin.us
www.fotomagazin.mobi
www.otomagazin.de
www.fotomagazin.de
www.cotomagazin.de
www.fcotomagazin.de
www.cfotomagazin.de
www.dotomagazin.de
www.fdotomagazin.de
www.dfotomagazin.de
www.rotomagazin.de
www.frotomagazin.de
www.rfotomagazin.de
www.totomagazin.de
www.ftotomagazin.de
www.tfotomagazin.de
www.gotomagazin.de
www.fgotomagazin.de
www.gfotomagazin.de
www.votomagazin.de
www.fvotomagazin.de
www.vfotomagazin.de
www.ftomagazin.de
www.fitomagazin.de
www.foitomagazin.de
www.fiotomagazin.de
www.fktomagazin.de
www.foktomagazin.de
www.fkotomagazin.de
www.fltomagazin.de
www.foltomagazin.de
www.flotomagazin.de
www.fptomagazin.de
www.foptomagazin.de
www.fpotomagazin.de
www.foomagazin.de
www.foromagazin.de
www.fotromagazin.de
www.fortomagazin.de
www.fofomagazin.de
www.fotfomagazin.de
www.foftomagazin.de
www.fogomagazin.de
www.fotgomagazin.de
www.fogtomagazin.de
www.foyomagazin.de
www.fotyomagazin.de
www.foytomagazin.de
www.fotmagazin.de
www.fotimagazin.de
www.fotoimagazin.de
www.fotiomagazin.de
www.fotkmagazin.de
www.fotokmagazin.de
www.fotkomagazin.de
www.fotlmagazin.de
www.fotolmagazin.de
www.fotlomagazin.de
www.fotpmagazin.de
www.fotopmagazin.de
www.fotpomagazin.de
www.fotoagazin.de
www.fotonagazin.de
www.fotomnagazin.de
www.fotonmagazin.de
www.fotojagazin.de
www.fotomjagazin.de
www.fotojmagazin.de
www.fotokagazin.de
www.fotomkagazin.de
www.fotomgazin.de
www.fotomqgazin.de
www.fotomaqgazin.de
www.fotomqagazin.de
www.fotomwgazin.de
www.fotomawgazin.de
www.fotomwagazin.de
www.fotomsgazin.de
www.fotomasgazin.de
www.fotomsagazin.de
www.fotomzgazin.de
www.fotomazgazin.de
www.fotomzagazin.de
www.fotomaazin.de
www.fotomafazin.de
www.fotomagfazin.de
www.fotomafgazin.de
www.fotomavazin.de
www.fotomagvazin.de
www.fotomavgazin.de
www.fotomatazin.de
www.fotomagtazin.de
www.fotomatgazin.de
www.fotomabazin.de
www.fotomagbazin.de
www.fotomabgazin.de
www.fotomayazin.de
www.fotomagyazin.de
www.fotomaygazin.de
www.fotomahazin.de
www.fotomaghazin.de
www.fotomahgazin.de
www.fotomagzin.de
www.fotomagqzin.de
www.fotomagaqzin.de
www.fotomagqazin.de
www.fotomagwzin.de
www.fotomagawzin.de
www.fotomagwazin.de
www.fotomagszin.de
www.fotomagaszin.de
www.fotomagsazin.de
www.fotomagzzin.de
www.fotomagazzin.de
www.fotomagzazin.de
www.fotomagain.de
www.fotomagaxin.de
www.fotomagazxin.de
www.fotomagaxzin.de
www.fotomagasin.de
www.fotomagazsin.de
www.fotomagaain.de
www.fotomagazain.de
www.fotomagaazin.de
www.fotomagazn.de
www.fotomagazun.de
www.fotomagaziun.de
www.fotomagazuin.de
www.fotomagazjn.de
www.fotomagazijn.de
www.fotomagazjin.de
www.fotomagazkn.de
www.fotomagazikn.de
www.fotomagazkin.de
www.fotomagazon.de
www.fotomagazion.de
www.fotomagazoin.de
www.fotomagazi.de
www.fotomagazib.de
www.fotomagazinb.de
www.fotomagazibn.de
www.fotomagazih.de
www.fotomagazinh.de
www.fotomagazihn.de
www.fotomagazij.de
www.fotomagazinj.de
www.fotomagazim.de
www.fotomagazinm.de
www.fotomagazimn.de
fotomagazin.de Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
fotomagazin.de TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.