GSMONITORING.NET GSMonitoring


gsmonitoring.net website information.

gsmonitoring.net domain name is registered by .NET top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .NET domain zone.

Following name servers are specified for gsmonitoring.net domain:

  • ns2.site4now.net
  • ns3.site4now.net
  • ns1.site4now.net

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website gsmonitoring.net position was 249548 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 994688. Current position of gsmonitoring.net in Alexa rank database is below 1 million.

Website gsmonitoring.net Desktop speed measurement score (59/100) is better than the results of 34.36% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

gsmonitoring.net Mobile usability score (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed measurement score of gsmonitoring.net (50/100) is better than the results of 33.92% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
Nov-17-2024 N/AN/A
Nov-16-2024 N/AN/A
Nov-15-2024 N/AN/A
Nov-14-2024 N/AN/A
Nov-13-2024 N/AN/A
Nov-12-2024 N/AN/A
Nov-11-2024 N/AN/A

Advertisement

gsmonitoring.net Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.



gsmonitoring.net whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.


Domain Name: GSMONITORING.NET
Registry Domain ID: 1832985544_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com
Registrar URL: http://www.tucows.com
Updated Date: 2022-08-04T15:13:39Z
Creation Date: 2013-10-29T15:35:17Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2023-10-29T15:35:17Z
Registrar: Tucows Domains Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 69
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: domainabuse@tucows.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4165350123
Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok
Name Server: NS1.SITE4NOW.NET
Name Server: NS2.SITE4NOW.NET
Name Server: NS3.SITE4NOW.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2022-09-14T01:09:07Z

gsmonitoring.net server information

Servers Location

IP Address
45.58.143.12
Region
Noord-Holland
City
Amsterdam

gsmonitoring.net desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2019-02-11


Desktop Speed Bad
59/100

gsmonitoring.net Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 64 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 627.4KiB (44% reduction).

Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…er-volvo-fmx-volvo.jpg could save 305.3KiB (48% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…ashina-krysha-avto.jpg could save 218KiB (52% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/re…in_slider/slider_1.jpg could save 70.2KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v3/yX/r/Kvo5FesWVKX.png could save 6.8KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…ingservice-300x188.jpg could save 4.6KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/gslogofooter.png could save 4.1KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/gslogo-4.png could save 2.7KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…ingservice-300x188.jpg could save 2.7KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/teletonika.jpg could save 2.4KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/wialon.jpg could save 1.7KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/hostingdemo.png could save 1.7KiB (56% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/bce.png could save 1.5KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/avtosputnik.jpg could save 1.3KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/appstore.png could save 964B (29% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/googleplay.png could save 645B (25% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…_Citycons_location.png could save 497B (29% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent-mia3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-1/p50x…f3409299bd&oe=5CDD0D55 could save 458B (35% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…/1479089954_safari.png could save 404B (24% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…_internet-explorer.png could save 363B (27% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…9612_Google_Chrome.png could save 289B (20% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…0/1479089976_opera.png could save 232B (23% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/plugins/si…l-cms/res/flags/en.png could save 192B (32% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…928_5349_-_Firefox.png could save 162B (12% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/plugins/re…images/transparent.png could save 112B (58% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/plugins/si…l-cms/res/flags/ru.png could save 107B (45% reduction).

priority - 5 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.73 seconds.

There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 2 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/plugins/co…css/styles.css?ver=4.6

priority - 2 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js (20 minutes)
https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/js?v=3.31&key…pUs6-_xB6Zz7p4rlTN5NIM (30 minutes)
http://code.jivosite.com/script/widget/zIfTEmRaCE (2 hours)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 1 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 7.7KiB (25% reduction).

Minifying http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/themes/tra…go/style.css?ver=1.3.1 could save 5.4KiB (25% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/plugins/re…ttings.css?ver=5.2.4.1 could save 2.1KiB (28% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/themes/tra…carousel.css?ver=1.3.1 could save 177B (21% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 3.5KiB (40% reduction).

Minifying http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/themes/tra…othScroll.js?ver=1.3.1 could save 2.5KiB (42% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js could save 667B (39% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/themes/tra…ry.appear.js?ver=1.3.1 could save 287B (30% reduction) after compression.

gsmonitoring.net Desktop Resources

Total Resources148
Number of Hosts13
Static Resources126
JavaScript Resources56
CSS Resources20

gsmonitoring.net Desktop Resource Breakdown

gsmonitoring.net mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2019-02-11


Mobile Speed Bad
50/100

gsmonitoring.net Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 66 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 645.4KiB (42% reduction).

Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…er-volvo-fmx-volvo.jpg could save 305.3KiB (48% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…ashina-krysha-avto.jpg could save 218KiB (52% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/re…in_slider/slider_1.jpg could save 70.2KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…ingservice-768x480.jpg could save 19.2KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…ingservice-768x480.jpg could save 9.4KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v3/yX/r/Kvo5FesWVKX.png could save 6.8KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/gslogo-4.png could save 2.7KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/teletonika.jpg could save 2.4KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/wialon.jpg could save 1.7KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/hostingdemo.png could save 1.7KiB (56% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/bce.png could save 1.5KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/avtosputnik.jpg could save 1.3KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/appstore.png could save 964B (29% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/gslogofooter.png could save 801B (11% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/googleplay.png could save 645B (25% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…_Citycons_location.png could save 497B (29% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent-mia3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-1/p50x…f3409299bd&oe=5CDD0D55 could save 458B (35% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…/1479089954_safari.png could save 404B (24% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…_internet-explorer.png could save 363B (27% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…9612_Google_Chrome.png could save 289B (20% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…0/1479089976_opera.png could save 232B (23% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/plugins/si…l-cms/res/flags/en.png could save 192B (32% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/20…928_5349_-_Firefox.png could save 162B (12% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/plugins/re…images/transparent.png could save 112B (58% reduction).
Compressing http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/plugins/si…l-cms/res/flags/ru.png could save 107B (45% reduction).

priority - 32 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 4 blocking script resources and 12 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-includes/js/jquery…grate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/plugins/re…ols.min.js?ver=5.2.4.1
http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/plugins/re…ion.min.js?ver=5.2.4.1

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/plugins/co…css/styles.css?ver=4.6
http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/plugins/re…ttings.css?ver=5.2.4.1
http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/themes/tra…trap.min.css?ver=1.3.1
http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/uploads/st…/stm/stm.css?ver=1.3.1
http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/themes/tra…go/style.css?ver=1.3.1
http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/themes/tra…some.min.css?ver=1.3.1
http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/themes/tra…ect2.min.css?ver=1.3.1
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans%…%2Clatin-ext&ver=1.3.1
http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/plugins/si…/css/app.css?ver=2.6.0
http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/plugins/js…ser.min.css?ver=4.11.2
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Raleway%3Ar…%2C800%2C900&ver=1.3.1
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto%3A500

priority - 8 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.72 seconds.

There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 3 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js (20 minutes)
https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/js?v=3.31&key…pUs6-_xB6Zz7p4rlTN5NIM (30 minutes)
http://code.jivosite.com/script/widget/zIfTEmRaCE (2 hours)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 1 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 7.7KiB (25% reduction).

Minifying http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/themes/tra…go/style.css?ver=1.3.1 could save 5.4KiB (25% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/plugins/re…ttings.css?ver=5.2.4.1 could save 2.1KiB (28% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/themes/tra…carousel.css?ver=1.3.1 could save 177B (21% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 3.2KiB (41% reduction).

Minifying http://www.gs-monitoring.com/wp-content/themes/tra…othScroll.js?ver=1.3.1 could save 2.5KiB (42% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js could save 667B (39% reduction) after compression.

gsmonitoring.net Mobile Resources

Total Resources141
Number of Hosts13
Static Resources120
JavaScript Resources54
CSS Resources20

gsmonitoring.net Mobile Resource Breakdown

gsmonitoring.net mobile page usability

Last tested: 2019-02-11


Mobile Usability Good
99/100

gsmonitoring.net Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 0 Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <div id="owl-nav-5c61da9c5b7a5" class="owl-dots"></div> is close to 2 other tap targets.

gsmonitoring.net similar domains

Similar domains:
www.gsmonitoring.com
www.gsmonitoring.net
www.gsmonitoring.org
www.gsmonitoring.info
www.gsmonitoring.biz
www.gsmonitoring.us
www.gsmonitoring.mobi
www.smonitoring.net
www.gsmonitoring.net
www.fsmonitoring.net
www.gfsmonitoring.net
www.fgsmonitoring.net
www.vsmonitoring.net
www.gvsmonitoring.net
www.vgsmonitoring.net
www.tsmonitoring.net
www.gtsmonitoring.net
www.tgsmonitoring.net
www.bsmonitoring.net
www.gbsmonitoring.net
www.bgsmonitoring.net
www.ysmonitoring.net
www.gysmonitoring.net
www.ygsmonitoring.net
www.hsmonitoring.net
www.ghsmonitoring.net
www.hgsmonitoring.net
www.gmonitoring.net
www.gwmonitoring.net
www.gswmonitoring.net
www.gwsmonitoring.net
www.gemonitoring.net
www.gsemonitoring.net
www.gesmonitoring.net
www.gdmonitoring.net
www.gsdmonitoring.net
www.gdsmonitoring.net
www.gzmonitoring.net
www.gszmonitoring.net
www.gzsmonitoring.net
www.gxmonitoring.net
www.gsxmonitoring.net
www.gxsmonitoring.net
www.gamonitoring.net
www.gsamonitoring.net
www.gasmonitoring.net
www.gsonitoring.net
www.gsnonitoring.net
www.gsmnonitoring.net
www.gsnmonitoring.net
www.gsjonitoring.net
www.gsmjonitoring.net
www.gsjmonitoring.net
www.gskonitoring.net
www.gsmkonitoring.net
www.gskmonitoring.net
www.gsmnitoring.net
www.gsminitoring.net
www.gsmoinitoring.net
www.gsmionitoring.net
www.gsmknitoring.net
www.gsmoknitoring.net
www.gsmlnitoring.net
www.gsmolnitoring.net
www.gsmlonitoring.net
www.gsmpnitoring.net
www.gsmopnitoring.net
www.gsmponitoring.net
www.gsmoitoring.net
www.gsmobitoring.net
www.gsmonbitoring.net
www.gsmobnitoring.net
www.gsmohitoring.net
www.gsmonhitoring.net
www.gsmohnitoring.net
www.gsmojitoring.net
www.gsmonjitoring.net
www.gsmojnitoring.net
www.gsmomitoring.net
www.gsmonmitoring.net
www.gsmomnitoring.net
www.gsmontoring.net
www.gsmonutoring.net
www.gsmoniutoring.net
www.gsmonuitoring.net
www.gsmonjtoring.net
www.gsmonijtoring.net
www.gsmonktoring.net
www.gsmoniktoring.net
www.gsmonkitoring.net
www.gsmonotoring.net
www.gsmoniotoring.net
www.gsmonoitoring.net
www.gsmonioring.net
www.gsmoniroring.net
www.gsmonitroring.net
www.gsmonirtoring.net
www.gsmoniforing.net
www.gsmonitforing.net
www.gsmoniftoring.net
www.gsmonigoring.net
www.gsmonitgoring.net
www.gsmonigtoring.net
www.gsmoniyoring.net
www.gsmonityoring.net
www.gsmoniytoring.net
www.gsmonitring.net
www.gsmonitiring.net
www.gsmonitoiring.net
www.gsmonitioring.net
www.gsmonitkring.net
www.gsmonitokring.net
www.gsmonitkoring.net
www.gsmonitlring.net
www.gsmonitolring.net
www.gsmonitloring.net
www.gsmonitpring.net
www.gsmonitopring.net
www.gsmonitporing.net
www.gsmonitoing.net
www.gsmonitoeing.net
www.gsmonitoreing.net
www.gsmonitoering.net
www.gsmonitoding.net
www.gsmonitording.net
www.gsmonitodring.net
www.gsmonitofing.net
www.gsmonitorfing.net
www.gsmonitofring.net
www.gsmonitoting.net
www.gsmonitorting.net
www.gsmonitotring.net
www.gsmonitorng.net
www.gsmonitorung.net
www.gsmonitoriung.net
www.gsmonitoruing.net
www.gsmonitorjng.net
www.gsmonitorijng.net
www.gsmonitorjing.net
www.gsmonitorkng.net
www.gsmonitorikng.net
www.gsmonitorking.net
www.gsmonitorong.net
www.gsmonitoriong.net
www.gsmonitoroing.net
www.gsmonitorig.net
www.gsmonitoribg.net
www.gsmonitorinbg.net
www.gsmonitoribng.net
www.gsmonitorihg.net
www.gsmonitorinhg.net
www.gsmonitorihng.net
www.gsmonitorijg.net
www.gsmonitorinjg.net
www.gsmonitorimg.net
www.gsmonitorinmg.net
www.gsmonitorimng.net
www.gsmonitorin.net
www.gsmonitorinf.net
www.gsmonitoringf.net
www.gsmonitorinfg.net
www.gsmonitorinv.net
www.gsmonitoringv.net
www.gsmonitorinvg.net
www.gsmonitorint.net
www.gsmonitoringt.net
www.gsmonitorintg.net
www.gsmonitorinb.net
www.gsmonitoringb.net
www.gsmonitoriny.net
www.gsmonitoringy.net
www.gsmonitorinyg.net
www.gsmonitorinh.net
www.gsmonitoringh.net

gsmonitoring.net Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.


gsmonitoring.net TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.