hosting.com website information.
hosting.com domain name is registered by .COM top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .COM domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for hosting.com domain:
- ns2.eftydns.com
- ns1.eftydns.com
and probably website hosting.com is hosted by SKB-AS SK Broadband Co Ltd, KR web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by SKB-AS SK Broadband Co Ltd, KR hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website hosting.com position was 49327 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 994621. Now website hosting.com ranked in Alexa database as number 259861 (in the world).
Website hosting.com Desktop speed measurement score (73/100) is better than the results of 56.16% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
hosting.com Mobile usability score (98/100) is better than the results of 55.61% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of hosting.com (61/100) is better than the results of 57.04% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Nov-17-2024 | 259,861 | 4,645 |
| Nov-16-2024 | 264,506 | -2,549 |
| Nov-15-2024 | 261,957 | -2,339 |
| Nov-14-2024 | 259,618 | -2,225 |
| Nov-13-2024 | 257,393 | 0 |
| Nov-12-2024 | 257,393 | 0 |
| Nov-11-2024 | 257,393 | 0 |
Advertisement
hosting.com Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
hosting.com whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
Domain Name: HOSTING.COM
Registry Domain ID: 4807915_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com
Registrar URL: http://www.tucows.com
Updated Date: 2023-04-06T20:04:15Z
Creation Date: 1996-02-08T05:00:00Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2028-02-09T05:00:00Z
Registrar: Tucows Domains Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 69
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: domainabuse@tucows.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4165350123
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS1.EFTYDNS.COM
Name Server: NS2.EFTYDNS.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2024-04-05T20:50:34Z
hosting.com server information
hosting.com desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2016-11-22
hosting.com Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 22 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 214.1KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/31e444a.jpg could save 46.4KiB (98% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/3d4049a.jpg could save 42KiB (98% reduction).
Compressing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/…map-new-ON-894x454.png could save 39KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/footer-sprite.png could save 13.3KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/…l-Signature_MEDIUM.png could save 5.7KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/social-icons.png could save 3.6KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/plugins/revslide…ssets/images/dummy.png could save 3.1KiB (96% reduction).
Compressing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/HOSTING-Logo-H-200x65.png could save 3KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Travis_Wright_40x40.gif could save 1.3KiB (52% reduction).
priority - 8 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 8 blocking script resources and 3 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/cache/minify/f0cfb.js?x86746
http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/cache/minify/497d9.js?x86746
http://munchkin.marketo.net/munchkin.js?x86746
http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/cache/minify/9d251.js?x86746
http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/cache/minify/96f3a.js?x86746
http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/cache/minify/4f6f8.js?x86746
http://platform.twitter.com/oct.js?x86746
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/4.5.0…some.min.css?ver=4.5.0
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans&subset=latin%2Clatin-ext
priority - 3 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://use.typekit.net/nyn7whe.js (10 minutes)
http://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-739H (15 minutes)
http://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-TMZC8J (15 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
https://snap.licdn.com/li.lms-analytics/insight.min.js (6.7 hours)
priority - 2 Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.
priority - 1 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 12.3KiB (14% reduction).
hosting.com Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 89 |
| Number of Hosts | 33 |
| Static Resources | 56 |
| JavaScript Resources | 34 |
| CSS Resources | 7 |
hosting.com Desktop Resource Breakdown
hosting.com mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2016-11-22
hosting.com Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 32 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 8 blocking script resources and 3 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/cache/minify/f0cfb.js?x86746
http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/cache/minify/497d9.js?x86746
http://munchkin.marketo.net/munchkin.js?x86746
http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/cache/minify/9d251.js?x86746
http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/cache/minify/96f3a.js?x86746
http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/cache/minify/4f6f8.js?x86746
http://platform.twitter.com/oct.js?x86746
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/4.5.0…some.min.css?ver=4.5.0
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans&subset=latin%2Clatin-ext
priority - 23 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 219.8KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/31e444a.jpg could save 46.4KiB (98% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/3d4049a.jpg could save 42KiB (98% reduction).
Compressing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/…map-new-ON-894x454.png could save 39KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/footer-sprite.png could save 13.3KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/…l-Signature_MEDIUM.png could save 5.7KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/…ING-Logo-H-400x129.png could save 5.7KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/social-icons.png could save 3.6KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/plugins/revslide…ssets/images/dummy.png could save 3.1KiB (96% reduction).
Compressing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/HOSTING-Logo-H-200x65.png could save 3KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing http://www.hosting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Travis_Wright_40x40.gif could save 1.3KiB (52% reduction).
priority - 8 Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.
priority - 5 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://use.typekit.net/nyn7whe.js (10 minutes)
http://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-739H (15 minutes)
http://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-TMZC8J (15 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
https://snap.licdn.com/li.lms-analytics/insight.min.js (6.7 hours)
priority - 1 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 12.3KiB (14% reduction).
hosting.com Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 91 |
| Number of Hosts | 34 |
| Static Resources | 57 |
| JavaScript Resources | 34 |
| CSS Resources | 7 |
hosting.com Mobile Resource Breakdown
hosting.com mobile page usability
Last tested: 2016-11-22
hosting.com Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 1 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<a href="tel:8888944678">888-894-4678</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.<a id="g1-secondary-nav-switch" href="#"> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<div class="g1-nav-direction__prev"> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="http://www.hos…ting/about-us/">About HOSTING</a> and 7 others are close to other tap targets.hosting.com similar domains
www.hosting.net
www.hosting.org
www.hosting.info
www.hosting.biz
www.hosting.us
www.hosting.mobi
www.osting.com
www.hosting.com
www.bosting.com
www.hbosting.com
www.bhosting.com
www.gosting.com
www.hgosting.com
www.ghosting.com
www.yosting.com
www.hyosting.com
www.yhosting.com
www.uosting.com
www.huosting.com
www.uhosting.com
www.josting.com
www.hjosting.com
www.jhosting.com
www.nosting.com
www.hnosting.com
www.nhosting.com
www.hsting.com
www.histing.com
www.hoisting.com
www.hiosting.com
www.hksting.com
www.hoksting.com
www.hkosting.com
www.hlsting.com
www.holsting.com
www.hlosting.com
www.hpsting.com
www.hopsting.com
www.hposting.com
www.hoting.com
www.howting.com
www.hoswting.com
www.howsting.com
www.hoeting.com
www.hoseting.com
www.hoesting.com
www.hodting.com
www.hosdting.com
www.hodsting.com
www.hozting.com
www.hoszting.com
www.hozsting.com
www.hoxting.com
www.hosxting.com
www.hoxsting.com
www.hoating.com
www.hosating.com
www.hoasting.com
www.hosing.com
www.hosring.com
www.hostring.com
www.hosrting.com
www.hosfing.com
www.hostfing.com
www.hosfting.com
www.hosging.com
www.hostging.com
www.hosgting.com
www.hosying.com
www.hostying.com
www.hosyting.com
www.hostng.com
www.hostung.com
www.hostiung.com
www.hostuing.com
www.hostjng.com
www.hostijng.com
www.hostjing.com
www.hostkng.com
www.hostikng.com
www.hostking.com
www.hostong.com
www.hostiong.com
www.hostoing.com
www.hostig.com
www.hostibg.com
www.hostinbg.com
www.hostibng.com
www.hostihg.com
www.hostinhg.com
www.hostihng.com
www.hostijg.com
www.hostinjg.com
www.hostimg.com
www.hostinmg.com
www.hostimng.com
www.hostin.com
www.hostinf.com
www.hostingf.com
www.hostinfg.com
www.hostinv.com
www.hostingv.com
www.hostinvg.com
www.hostint.com
www.hostingt.com
www.hostintg.com
www.hostinb.com
www.hostingb.com
www.hostiny.com
www.hostingy.com
www.hostinyg.com
www.hostinh.com
www.hostingh.com
www.hosting.con
hosting.com Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
hosting.com TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.