icer-review.org website information.
icer-review.org domain name is registered by .ORG top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .ORG domain zone.
No name server records were found.
and probably website icer-review.org is hosted by AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website icer-review.org position was 44613 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 999014. Now website icer-review.org ranked in Alexa database as number 196942 (in the world).
Website icer-review.org Desktop speed measurement score (55/100) is better than the results of 29.37% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
icer-review.org Mobile usability score (100/100) is better than the results of 100% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of icer-review.org (73/100) is better than the results of 81.47% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Jan-15-2025 | 196,942 | -2,729 |
| Jan-14-2025 | 194,213 | 2,605 |
| Jan-13-2025 | 196,818 | -6,344 |
| Jan-12-2025 | 190,474 | -41 |
| Jan-11-2025 | 190,433 | -8,150 |
| Jan-10-2025 | 182,283 | 7,038 |
| Jan-09-2025 | 189,321 | -7,705 |
Advertisement
icer-review.org Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
icer-review.org whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
Domain Name: icer-review.org
Registry Domain ID: 67d7403a106f41beb738cedadd8a33d3-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.gandi.net
Registrar URL: http://www.gandi.net
Updated Date: 2022-06-03T15:13:46Z
Creation Date: 2007-12-17T21:06:18Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2024-12-17T21:06:18Z
Registrar: Gandi SAS
Registrar IANA ID: 81
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@support.gandi.net
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +33.170377661
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Organization: Institute for Clinical and Economic Review
Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant State/Province: MA
Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Registry Admin ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Registry Tech ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Name Server: ns-230-b.gandi.net
Name Server: ns-235-a.gandi.net
Name Server: ns-53-c.gandi.net
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2022-08-17T06:39:40Z
icer-review.org server information
Servers Location
| IP Address |
|---|
| Country |
|---|
icer-review.org desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-02-09
icer-review.org Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 79 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 769.3KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09…sessment-framework.png could save 253.6KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/scroll-top.png could save 3KiB (20% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/img/icer_header_logo.png could save 1.7KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/img/footer-pattern.jpg could save 911B (74% reduction).
Compressing https://yt3.ggpht.com/-YHzpA0V1-4g/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAA…rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg could save 857B (37% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/img/facebook.png could save 759B (34% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/img/twitter.png could save 737B (26% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/img/linkedin.png could save 649B (25% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/img/play-button-white.png could save 647B (13% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/img/newnews.png could save 446B (22% reduction).
priority - 8 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 8 blocking script resources and 10 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
Approximately 66% of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://icer-review.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/jque…grate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/gf-char…sjs/2.6.0/Chart.min.js
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/js/jquery.fitvids.js?ver=1.0
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/js/gadownloads.js?ver=1.0
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/js/…ncybox.pack.js?ver=1.0
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/js/…/swiper.min.js?ver=1.0
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/js/site.js?ver=1.0
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://icer-review.org/wp-includes/css/dist/block…tyle.min.css?ver=5.0.3
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/captcha…nd_style.css?ver=4.4.5
https://icer-review.org/wp-includes/css/dashicons.min.css?ver=5.0.3
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/captcha…op_style.css?ver=4.4.5
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/gf-char…s-tables.css?ver=5.0.3
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/gf-char…sreports.css?ver=5.0.3
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-simp…s/styles.css?ver=1.0.0
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/style.css?ver=5.0.3
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/css/screen.css?ver=1.0
priority - 1 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 1 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 8.3KiB (35% reduction).
Minifying https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/style.css?ver=5.0.3 could save 794B (87% reduction).
Minifying https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-simp…s/styles.css?ver=1.0.0 could save 357B (91% reduction).
Minifying https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/gf-char…s-tables.css?ver=5.0.3 could save 286B (40% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/captcha…nd_style.css?ver=4.4.5 could save 163B (23% reduction) after compression.
priority - 0 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.6KiB (31% reduction).
Minifying https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/gf-char…functions.js?ver=5.0.3 could save 350B (33% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/js/…gation.js?ver=20120206 could save 342B (40% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/js/…us-fix.js?ver=20130115 could save 319B (36% reduction).
Minifying https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/js/site.js?ver=1.0 could save 220B (19% reduction) after compression.
priority - 0 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 1.5KiB (46% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/style.css?ver=5.0.3 could save 385B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/css/print.css?ver=1.0 could save 292B (50% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/img/white-arrow.svg could save 239B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-simp…s/styles.css?ver=1.0.0 could save 185B (48% reduction).
priority - 0 Minify HTML
Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.4KiB (14% reduction).
icer-review.org Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 68 |
| Number of Hosts | 12 |
| Static Resources | 53 |
| JavaScript Resources | 25 |
| CSS Resources | 16 |
icer-review.org Desktop Resource Breakdown
icer-review.org mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-02-09
icer-review.org Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 32 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 8 blocking script resources and 10 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
Approximately 58% of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://icer-review.org/wp-includes/js/jquery/jque…grate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/gf-char…sjs/2.6.0/Chart.min.js
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/js/jquery.fitvids.js?ver=1.0
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/js/gadownloads.js?ver=1.0
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/js/…ncybox.pack.js?ver=1.0
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/js/…/swiper.min.js?ver=1.0
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/js/site.js?ver=1.0
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://icer-review.org/wp-includes/css/dist/block…tyle.min.css?ver=5.0.3
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/captcha…nd_style.css?ver=4.4.5
https://icer-review.org/wp-includes/css/dashicons.min.css?ver=5.0.3
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/captcha…le_style.css?ver=4.4.5
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/gf-char…s-tables.css?ver=5.0.3
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/gf-char…sreports.css?ver=5.0.3
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-simp…s/styles.css?ver=1.0.0
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/style.css?ver=5.0.3
https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/css/screen.css?ver=1.0
priority - 1 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 1 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 9.6KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/img/icer_header_logo.png could save 1.7KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/img/footer-pattern.jpg could save 911B (74% reduction).
Compressing https://yt3.ggpht.com/-YHzpA0V1-4g/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAA…rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg could save 857B (37% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/img/facebook.png could save 759B (34% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/img/twitter.png could save 737B (26% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/img/linkedin.png could save 649B (25% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/img/play-button-white.png could save 647B (13% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/img/newnews.png could save 446B (22% reduction).
priority - 1 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 8.3KiB (35% reduction).
Minifying https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/style.css?ver=5.0.3 could save 794B (87% reduction).
Minifying https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-simp…s/styles.css?ver=1.0.0 could save 357B (91% reduction).
Minifying https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/gf-char…s-tables.css?ver=5.0.3 could save 286B (40% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/captcha…nd_style.css?ver=4.4.5 could save 163B (23% reduction) after compression.
priority - 0 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 1.7KiB (47% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/style.css?ver=5.0.3 could save 385B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/css/print.css?ver=1.0 could save 292B (50% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/img/menu-bars.svg could save 266B (49% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/img/white-arrow.svg could save 239B (43% reduction).
Compressing https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-simp…s/styles.css?ver=1.0.0 could save 185B (48% reduction).
priority - 0 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.6KiB (31% reduction).
Minifying https://icer-review.org/wp-content/plugins/gf-char…functions.js?ver=5.0.3 could save 350B (33% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/js/…gation.js?ver=20120206 could save 342B (40% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/js/…us-fix.js?ver=20130115 could save 319B (36% reduction).
Minifying https://icer-review.org/wp-content/themes/ICER/js/site.js?ver=1.0 could save 220B (19% reduction) after compression.
priority - 0 Minify HTML
Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.4KiB (14% reduction).
icer-review.org Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 73 |
| Number of Hosts | 13 |
| Static Resources | 56 |
| JavaScript Resources | 27 |
| CSS Resources | 16 |
icer-review.org Mobile Resource Breakdown
icer-review.org mobile page usability
Last tested: 2019-02-09
icer-review.org similar domains
www.icer-review.net
www.icer-review.org
www.icer-review.info
www.icer-review.biz
www.icer-review.us
www.icer-review.mobi
www.cer-review.org
www.icer-review.org
www.ucer-review.org
www.iucer-review.org
www.uicer-review.org
www.jcer-review.org
www.ijcer-review.org
www.jicer-review.org
www.kcer-review.org
www.ikcer-review.org
www.kicer-review.org
www.ocer-review.org
www.iocer-review.org
www.oicer-review.org
www.ier-review.org
www.ixer-review.org
www.icxer-review.org
www.ixcer-review.org
www.ider-review.org
www.icder-review.org
www.idcer-review.org
www.ifer-review.org
www.icfer-review.org
www.ifcer-review.org
www.iver-review.org
www.icver-review.org
www.ivcer-review.org
www.icr-review.org
www.icwr-review.org
www.icewr-review.org
www.icwer-review.org
www.icsr-review.org
www.icesr-review.org
www.icser-review.org
www.icdr-review.org
www.icedr-review.org
www.icrr-review.org
www.icerr-review.org
www.icrer-review.org
www.ice-review.org
www.icee-review.org
www.icere-review.org
www.iceer-review.org
www.iced-review.org
www.icerd-review.org
www.icef-review.org
www.icerf-review.org
www.icefr-review.org
www.icet-review.org
www.icert-review.org
www.icetr-review.org
www.icerreview.org
www.icer-eview.org
www.icer-eeview.org
www.icer-reeview.org
www.icer-ereview.org
www.icer-deview.org
www.icer-rdeview.org
www.icer-dreview.org
www.icer-feview.org
www.icer-rfeview.org
www.icer-freview.org
www.icer-teview.org
www.icer-rteview.org
www.icer-treview.org
www.icer-rview.org
www.icer-rwview.org
www.icer-rewview.org
www.icer-rweview.org
www.icer-rsview.org
www.icer-resview.org
www.icer-rseview.org
www.icer-rdview.org
www.icer-redview.org
www.icer-rrview.org
www.icer-rerview.org
www.icer-rreview.org
www.icer-reiew.org
www.icer-reciew.org
www.icer-revciew.org
www.icer-recview.org
www.icer-refiew.org
www.icer-revfiew.org
www.icer-refview.org
www.icer-regiew.org
www.icer-revgiew.org
www.icer-regview.org
www.icer-rebiew.org
www.icer-revbiew.org
www.icer-rebview.org
www.icer-revew.org
www.icer-revuew.org
www.icer-reviuew.org
www.icer-revuiew.org
www.icer-revjew.org
www.icer-revijew.org
www.icer-revjiew.org
www.icer-revkew.org
www.icer-revikew.org
www.icer-revkiew.org
www.icer-revoew.org
www.icer-revioew.org
www.icer-revoiew.org
www.icer-reviw.org
www.icer-reviww.org
www.icer-revieww.org
www.icer-reviwew.org
www.icer-revisw.org
www.icer-reviesw.org
www.icer-revisew.org
www.icer-revidw.org
www.icer-reviedw.org
www.icer-revidew.org
www.icer-revirw.org
www.icer-revierw.org
www.icer-revirew.org
www.icer-revie.org
www.icer-revieq.org
www.icer-reviewq.org
www.icer-revieqw.org
www.icer-reviea.org
www.icer-reviewa.org
www.icer-revieaw.org
www.icer-revies.org
www.icer-reviews.org
www.icer-reviee.org
www.icer-reviewe.org
www.icer-revieew.org
icer-review.org Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
icer-review.org TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.