infogram.com website information.
infogram.com domain name is registered by .COM top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .COM domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for infogram.com domain:
- ns-1095.awsdns-08.org
- ns-156.awsdns-19.com
- ns-1891.awsdns-44.co.uk
- ns-717.awsdns-25.net
and probably website infogram.com is hosted by WIKIMEDIA - Wikimedia Foundation Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by WIKIMEDIA - Wikimedia Foundation Inc., US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website infogram.com position was 1074 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 821198. Now website infogram.com ranked in Alexa database as number 1204 (in the world).
Website infogram.com Desktop speed measurement score (84/100) is better than the results of 78.07% of other sites and shows that the page is performing great on desktop computers.
infogram.com Mobile usability score (97/100) is better than the results of 49.9% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of infogram.com (80/100) is better than the results of 88.23% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is excellent.
Weekly Rank Report
Date | Rank | Change |
---|---|---|
Nov-24-2024 | N/A | N/A |
Nov-23-2024 | 1,204 | 0 |
Nov-22-2024 | 1,204 | 6 |
Nov-21-2024 | 1,210 | 0 |
Nov-20-2024 | 1,210 | 8 |
Nov-19-2024 | 1,218 | 89 |
Nov-18-2024 | 1,307 | -1 |
Advertisement
infogram.com Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
infogram.com whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
Domain Name: INFOGRAM.COM
Registry Domain ID: 2970898_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.registrar.amazon.com
Registrar URL: http://registrar.amazon.com
Updated Date: 2023-02-18T21:44:56Z
Creation Date: 1996-02-25T05:00:00Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2024-03-25T11:59:59Z
Registrar: Amazon Registrar, Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 468
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@amazonaws.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.2067406200
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS-1095.AWSDNS-08.ORG
Name Server: NS-156.AWSDNS-19.COM
Name Server: NS-1891.AWSDNS-44.CO.UK
Name Server: NS-717.AWSDNS-25.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2023-11-08T05:26:28Z
infogram.com server information
infogram.com desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2018-06-22
infogram.com Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 9 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 91.7KiB (55% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.jifo.co/i/frontpage/steps_maps.png?v=1 could save 4KiB (51% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.jifo.co/i/frontpage/steps_social_media_visuals.png?v=1 could save 2.7KiB (46% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.jifo.co/i/frontpage/steps_charts.png?v=1 could save 2.4KiB (51% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.jifo.co/i/frontpage/steps_dashboards.png?v=1 could save 1.8KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.jifo.co/i/frontpage/steps_reports.png?v=1 could save 1.1KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://cdn.jifo.co/i/frontpage/steps_infographics.png?v=1 could save 418B (20% reduction).
priority - 4 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://assets.zendesk.com/embeddable_framework/main.js (60 seconds)
https://duckbase.com/widget.js (60 seconds)
https://infogram.zendesk.com/embeddable/config (10 minutes)
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-KK3X9J (15 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/133648…0053?v=2.8.18&r=stable (20 minutes)
https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js (24 hours)
priority - 2 Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
53.9KiB of the HTML response was required to render the above-the-fold content. This requires 3 network round-trips. Prioritize the above-the-fold content so that it can be rendered with only the first 2 round-trips' worth of HTML.
priority - 1 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 12.7KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing https://us10.zopim.com/s/W/xdds/VN2KeKSEW4D+c3YQ/p/1529680816678 could save 5.1KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing https://us10.zopim.com/s/W/xdds/VN2KeKSEW4D+c3YQ/p/1529680817928 could save 972B (62% reduction).
Compressing https://us10.zopim.com/s/W/xdds/VN2KeKSEW4D+c3YQ/p/1529680816706 could save 970B (62% reduction).
Compressing https://infogram.com/img/arrow-down-gray.svg could save 459B (45% reduction).
priority - 0 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 160B (14% reduction).
infogram.com Desktop Resources
Total Resources | 150 |
Number of Hosts | 22 |
Static Resources | 55 |
JavaScript Resources | 34 |
CSS Resources | 3 |
infogram.com Desktop Resource Breakdown
infogram.com mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2018-08-05
infogram.com Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 9 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 87KiB (88% reduction).
priority - 8 Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
55.5KiB of the HTML response was required to render the above-the-fold content. This requires 3 network round-trips. Prioritize the above-the-fold content so that it can be rendered with only the first 2 round-trips' worth of HTML.
priority - 6 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://assets.zendesk.com/embeddable_framework/main.js (60 seconds)
https://duckbase.com/widget.js (60 seconds)
https://infogram.zendesk.com/embeddable/config (10 minutes)
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-KK3X9J (15 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/133648…0053?v=2.8.24&r=stable (20 minutes)
https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js (24 hours)
priority - 1 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 11.1KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing https://infogram.com/i/frontpage/header.svg?v=1 could save 3.2KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing https://us20.zopim.com/s/W/xdds/2KeKSEW4D+c3YQv3/p/1533448185466 could save 2.5KiB (66% reduction).
Compressing https://infogram.com/i/logo/white.svg could save 974B (52% reduction).
Compressing https://infogram.com/i/frontpage/ico-testimonial-twitter.svg could save 838B (50% reduction).
priority - 0 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 160B (14% reduction).
infogram.com Mobile Resources
Total Resources | 86 |
Number of Hosts | 18 |
Static Resources | 54 |
JavaScript Resources | 26 |
CSS Resources | 3 |
infogram.com Mobile Resource Breakdown
infogram.com mobile page usability
Last tested: 2018-08-05
infogram.com Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 2 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<path>
and 30 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="https://infogram.com/blog">Blog</a>
and 4 others are close to other tap targets.infogram.com similar domains
www.infogram.net
www.infogram.org
www.infogram.info
www.infogram.biz
www.infogram.us
www.infogram.mobi
www.nfogram.com
www.infogram.com
www.unfogram.com
www.iunfogram.com
www.uinfogram.com
www.jnfogram.com
www.ijnfogram.com
www.jinfogram.com
www.knfogram.com
www.iknfogram.com
www.kinfogram.com
www.onfogram.com
www.ionfogram.com
www.oinfogram.com
www.ifogram.com
www.ibfogram.com
www.inbfogram.com
www.ibnfogram.com
www.ihfogram.com
www.inhfogram.com
www.ihnfogram.com
www.ijfogram.com
www.injfogram.com
www.imfogram.com
www.inmfogram.com
www.imnfogram.com
www.inogram.com
www.incogram.com
www.infcogram.com
www.incfogram.com
www.indogram.com
www.infdogram.com
www.indfogram.com
www.inrogram.com
www.infrogram.com
www.inrfogram.com
www.intogram.com
www.inftogram.com
www.intfogram.com
www.ingogram.com
www.infgogram.com
www.ingfogram.com
www.invogram.com
www.infvogram.com
www.invfogram.com
www.infgram.com
www.infigram.com
www.infoigram.com
www.infiogram.com
www.infkgram.com
www.infokgram.com
www.infkogram.com
www.inflgram.com
www.infolgram.com
www.inflogram.com
www.infpgram.com
www.infopgram.com
www.infpogram.com
www.inforam.com
www.infofram.com
www.infogfram.com
www.infofgram.com
www.infovram.com
www.infogvram.com
www.infovgram.com
www.infotram.com
www.infogtram.com
www.infotgram.com
www.infobram.com
www.infogbram.com
www.infobgram.com
www.infoyram.com
www.infogyram.com
www.infoygram.com
www.infohram.com
www.infoghram.com
www.infohgram.com
www.infogam.com
www.infogeam.com
www.infogream.com
www.infogeram.com
www.infogdam.com
www.infogrdam.com
www.infogdram.com
www.infogfam.com
www.infogrfam.com
www.infogtam.com
www.infogrtam.com
www.infogrm.com
www.infogrqm.com
www.infograqm.com
www.infogrqam.com
www.infogrwm.com
www.infograwm.com
www.infogrwam.com
www.infogrsm.com
www.infograsm.com
www.infogrsam.com
www.infogrzm.com
www.infograzm.com
www.infogrzam.com
www.infogra.com
www.infogran.com
www.infogramn.com
www.infogranm.com
www.infograj.com
www.infogramj.com
www.infograjm.com
www.infograk.com
www.infogramk.com
www.infograkm.com
www.infogram.con
infogram.com Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
infogram.com TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.