jot.fm website information.
jot.fm domain name is registered by .FM top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .FM domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for jot.fm domain:
- ns3.idnz.net
- ns1.idnz.net
- ns2.idnz.net
and probably website jot.fm is hosted by AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website jot.fm position was 58461 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 999251. Now website jot.fm ranked in Alexa database as number 229737 (in the world).
Website jot.fm Desktop speed measurement score (94/100) is better than the results of 92.73% of other sites and shows that the page is performing great on desktop computers.
jot.fm Mobile usability score (70/100) is better than the results of 21.03% of other sites and shows that the page mobile usability is poor and can be improved.
Mobile speed measurement score of jot.fm (87/100) is better than the results of 91.36% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is excellent.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Nov-18-2024 | 229,737 | -5,929 |
| Nov-17-2024 | 223,808 | 3,179 |
| Nov-16-2024 | 226,987 | 1,443 |
| Nov-15-2024 | 228,430 | 1,871 |
| Nov-14-2024 | 230,301 | -8,587 |
| Nov-13-2024 | 221,714 | 0 |
| Nov-12-2024 | 221,714 | 0 |
Advertisement
jot.fm Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
jot.fm whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
jot.fm server information
Servers Location
| IP Address |
|---|
| Country |
|---|
jot.fm desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-04-26
jot.fm Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 2 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://www.jot.fm/jotstyle.css (expiration not specified)
https://cdn.syndication.twimg.com/widgets/timeline…e_codes=true&t=1659101 (5 minutes)
http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
priority - 2 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
priority - 1 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 5.6KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/841258027227439104/1Esu06el_normal.jpg could save 955B (46% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/781662510965338112/XkLQ3wqQ_normal.jpg could save 890B (41% reduction).
priority - 0 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 563B (27% reduction).
jot.fm Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 17 |
| Number of Hosts | 7 |
| Static Resources | 12 |
| JavaScript Resources | 4 |
| CSS Resources | 2 |
jot.fm Desktop Resource Breakdown
jot.fm mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-06-09
jot.fm Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 8 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
priority - 4 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://www.jot.fm/jotstyle.css (expiration not specified)
https://cdn.syndication.twimg.com/widgets/timeline…e_codes=true&t=1663354 (5 minutes)
http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
priority - 1 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 12KiB (53% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/841258027227439104/1Esu06el_bigger.jpg could save 906B (29% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/781662510965338112/XkLQ3wqQ_bigger.jpg could save 847B (25% reduction).
priority - 0 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 563B (27% reduction).
jot.fm Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 17 |
| Number of Hosts | 7 |
| Static Resources | 12 |
| JavaScript Resources | 4 |
| CSS Resources | 2 |
jot.fm Mobile Resource Breakdown
jot.fm mobile page usability
Last tested: 2017-06-09
jot.fm Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 23 Use legible font sizes
The following text on your page renders in a way that may be difficult for some of your visitors to read. Use legible font sizes to provide a better user experience.
The following text fragments have a small font size. Increase the font size to make them more legible.
Home renders only 6 pixels tall (16 CSS pixels).Contents and 4 others render only 6 pixels tall (16 CSS pixels)., or subscribe to the and 3 others render only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).Newsletter and 2 others render only 4 pixels tall (11 CSS pixels).Twitter Updates renders only 5 pixels tall (13 CSS pixels).by renders only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).jot.fm/contents/issue and 8 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).J Object Technology and 1 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).@jotfm and 1 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).And in one go:…, with work by and 1 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).06 Jun renders only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).View on Twitter and 1 others render only 5 pixels tall (12 CSS pixels).Editorial and 3 others render only 7 pixels tall (19 CSS pixels).The Journal of…ct technology. renders only 6 pixels tall (15 CSS pixels).Volume 16, no. 2 (April 2017) renders only 7 pixels tall (19 CSS pixels).James Noble, A…Timothy Jones, and 15 others render only 6 pixels tall (15 CSS pixels).Introduction t…rkshop in 2015 and 7 others render only 6 pixels tall (15 CSS pixels).PDF and 3 others render only 6 pixels tall (15 CSS pixels).priority - 10 Configure the viewport
Your page does not have a viewport specified. This causes mobile devices to render your page as it would appear on a desktop browser, scaling it down to fit on a mobile screen. Configure a viewport to allow your page to render properly on all devices.
Configure a viewport for this page.
priority - 9 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<a href="http://blog.jot.fm">Blog</a> is close to 2 other tap targets.<a href="http://twitter.com/jotfm">Twitter</a> and 2 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="https://twitter.com/jameskjx" class="PrettyLink pro…misable h-card">@jameskjx</a> and 7 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="https://t.co/rmWUDhRr0n" class="link customisable">http://www.jot…2017_02.html …</a> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="https://twitte…13327265918977" class="TweetAction Tw…art web-intent"></a> is close to 2 other tap targets.<a href="#" class="TweetAction Tw…-showShareMenu"></a> is close to 4 other tap targets.<a href="https://twitter.com/jotfm" class="TweetAuthor-li…ty u-linkBlend">J Object Techn…@jotfm</a> is close to 2 other tap targets.<a href="https://twitte…r_id=125298251" class="u-floatLeft">Embed</a> is close to 2 other tap targets.<input type="submit"> is close to 1 other tap targets.<a href="http://www.jot…/editorial.pdf" class="pdf">PDF</a> and 3 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="http://dx.doi.…t.2017.16.2.e1" class="doi">DOI</a> and 4 others are close to other tap targets.jot.fm similar domains
www.jot.net
www.jot.org
www.jot.info
www.jot.biz
www.jot.us
www.jot.mobi
www.ot.fm
www.jot.fm
www.not.fm
www.jnot.fm
www.njot.fm
www.hot.fm
www.jhot.fm
www.hjot.fm
www.uot.fm
www.juot.fm
www.ujot.fm
www.iot.fm
www.jiot.fm
www.ijot.fm
www.kot.fm
www.jkot.fm
www.kjot.fm
www.mot.fm
www.jmot.fm
www.mjot.fm
www.jt.fm
www.jit.fm
www.joit.fm
www.jkt.fm
www.jokt.fm
www.jlt.fm
www.jolt.fm
www.jlot.fm
www.jpt.fm
www.jopt.fm
www.jpot.fm
www.jo.fm
www.jor.fm
www.jotr.fm
www.jort.fm
www.jof.fm
www.jotf.fm
www.joft.fm
www.jog.fm
www.jotg.fm
www.jogt.fm
www.joy.fm
www.joty.fm
www.joyt.fm
jot.fm Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
jot.fm TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.