jpnn.com website information.
jpnn.com domain name is registered by .COM top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .COM domain zone.
No name server records were found.
and probably website jpnn.com is hosted by FASTLY - Fastly, US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by FASTLY - Fastly, US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website jpnn.com position was 44227 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 109889. Now website jpnn.com ranked in Alexa database as number 49026 (in the world).
Website jpnn.com Desktop speed measurement score (62/100) is better than the results of 38.44% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
jpnn.com Mobile usability score (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of jpnn.com (54/100) is better than the results of 41.82% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Oct-06-2024 | 49,026 | -23 |
| Oct-05-2024 | 49,003 | 121 |
| Oct-04-2024 | 49,124 | 11 |
| Oct-03-2024 | 49,135 | 338 |
| Oct-02-2024 | 49,473 | 383 |
| Oct-01-2024 | 49,856 | -221 |
| Sep-30-2024 | 49,635 | -41 |
Advertisement
jpnn.com Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
jpnn.com whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
Domain Name: JPNN.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1633888_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.rumahweb.com
Registrar URL: http://www.rumahweb.com
Updated Date: 2022-07-15T12:28:14Z
Creation Date: 1998-07-23T04:00:00Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2026-07-22T04:00:00Z
Registrar: CV. Rumahweb Indonesia
Registrar IANA ID: 1675
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@rumahweb.co.id
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +62.274882257
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: DONALD.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
Name Server: ROSE.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2024-09-09T11:39:47Z
jpnn.com server information
Servers Location
| IP Address |
|---|
| Country |
|---|
jpnn.com desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-05-05
Desktop Speed
Bad
62/100
jpnn.com Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 53 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 513.6KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.jpg&w=360&h=202&zc=1 could save 23.7KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://secure-assets.rubiconproject.com/static/psa/casala_clk/9.png could save 21KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=https://i…=true&w=515&h=250&zc=1 could save 17.6KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e.jpg&w=360&h=202&zc=1 could save 15.7KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…d.jpg&w=460&h=280&zc=1 could save 14.8KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=360&h=202&zc=1 could save 13.1KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.jpg&w=380&h=180&zc=1 could save 11.6KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.jpg&w=380&h=180&zc=1 could save 11.1KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f.jpg&w=360&h=202&zc=1 could save 11KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e.jpg&w=380&h=180&zc=1 could save 10KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6.jpg&w=360&h=202&zc=1 could save 9.4KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.JPG&w=255&h=150&zc=1 could save 6.8KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…d.jpg&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 6.1KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b.jpg&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 5.4KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0.JPG&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 5.2KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 5.2KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f.jpg&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 4.6KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 4.6KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=380&h=180&zc=1 could save 4.5KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 4.5KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c.jpg&w=300&h=170&zc=1 could save 4.4KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 4.3KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 4.2KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 4.2KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 4KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 4KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…7.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.9KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…d.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.9KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…9.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.8KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…7.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.8KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.JPG&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.8KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3.jpg&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 3.8KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0.JPG&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.7KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.7KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.7KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://www.jpnn.com/assets/img/logo-jpnn.png could save 3.6KiB (47% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.6KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1.jpg&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 3.5KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.4KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…64.jpg&w=110&h=76&zc=1 could save 3.4KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.3KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…7.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.3KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.3KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 3.3KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.2KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.2KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.2KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.2KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.2KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.1KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.1KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://www.jpnn.com/assets/img/donwori.png could save 3.1KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c.jpg&w=210&h=158&zc=1 could save 3KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.9KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.9KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2.9KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…fe.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 2.8KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.8KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=210&h=158&zc=1 could save 2.8KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…9d.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 2.7KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…7.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.7KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…7.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.7KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c.jpg&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 2.7KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…af.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 2.7KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.7KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.6KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.JPG&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.6KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.JPG&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.6KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.6KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.6KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…89.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 2.6KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.5KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…00.JPG&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 2.5KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2.5KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…32.JPG&w=120&h=70&zc=1 could save 2.5KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.4KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.4KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…ce.JPG&w=120&h=70&zc=1 could save 2.4KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…ba.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 2.4KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2.4KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.4KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.3KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.3KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.3KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.3KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.3KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…ee.jpg&w=110&h=76&zc=1 could save 2.2KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2.2KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.2KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…ab.JPG&w=120&h=70&zc=1 could save 2.2KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2.2KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0d.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 2.1KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.1KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0d.jpg&w=110&h=76&zc=1 could save 2.1KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2.1KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2.1KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.1KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph….jpeg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…d.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b3.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.9KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…66e.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.9KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…18.JPG&w=110&h=76&zc=1 could save 1.9KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c6.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.9KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=https://i…0&h=70&w=130&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.9KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…77.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…7.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3bd.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…da.jpg&w=110&h=76&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…67.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…9a.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…67.jpg&w=110&h=76&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…af8.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…239.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…9e.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…12.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…cc.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…cc.jpg&w=110&h=76&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1c.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…05.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…05.jpg&w=110&h=76&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1aa.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0af.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…14.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=https://i…0&h=70&w=130&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=https://i…0&h=70&w=130&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpeg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e9e.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3b3.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b0d.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…fc6.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6f1.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.1KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…ad4.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.1KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…08b.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…08b.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c1c.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1,011B (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…973.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 890B (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3d1.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 866B (34% reduction).
Compressing http://www.jpnn.com/assets/img/bg-donwori.png could save 860B (90% reduction).
Compressing http://www.jpnn.com/assets/img/ausplus.jpg could save 715B (21% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6dc.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 686B (36% reduction).
Compressing http://www.jpnn.com/assets/img/shadow.png could save 658B (65% reduction).
Compressing https://secure-assets.rubiconproject.com/static/psa/casala_clk/9.png could save 21KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=https://i…=true&w=515&h=250&zc=1 could save 17.6KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e.jpg&w=360&h=202&zc=1 could save 15.7KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…d.jpg&w=460&h=280&zc=1 could save 14.8KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=360&h=202&zc=1 could save 13.1KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.jpg&w=380&h=180&zc=1 could save 11.6KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.jpg&w=380&h=180&zc=1 could save 11.1KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f.jpg&w=360&h=202&zc=1 could save 11KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e.jpg&w=380&h=180&zc=1 could save 10KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6.jpg&w=360&h=202&zc=1 could save 9.4KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.JPG&w=255&h=150&zc=1 could save 6.8KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…d.jpg&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 6.1KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b.jpg&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 5.4KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0.JPG&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 5.2KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 5.2KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f.jpg&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 4.6KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 4.6KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=380&h=180&zc=1 could save 4.5KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 4.5KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c.jpg&w=300&h=170&zc=1 could save 4.4KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 4.3KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 4.2KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 4.2KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 4KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 4KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…7.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.9KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…d.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.9KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…9.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.8KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…7.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.8KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.JPG&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.8KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3.jpg&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 3.8KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0.JPG&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.7KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.7KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.7KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://www.jpnn.com/assets/img/logo-jpnn.png could save 3.6KiB (47% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.6KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1.jpg&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 3.5KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.4KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…64.jpg&w=110&h=76&zc=1 could save 3.4KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.3KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…7.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.3KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.3KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 3.3KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.2KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.2KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.2KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.2KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.2KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.1KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3.1KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://www.jpnn.com/assets/img/donwori.png could save 3.1KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c.jpg&w=210&h=158&zc=1 could save 3KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 3KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.9KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.9KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2.9KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…fe.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 2.8KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.8KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=210&h=158&zc=1 could save 2.8KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…9d.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 2.7KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…7.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.7KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…7.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.7KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c.jpg&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 2.7KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…af.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 2.7KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.7KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.6KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.JPG&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.6KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.JPG&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.6KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.6KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.6KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…89.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 2.6KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.5KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…00.JPG&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 2.5KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2.5KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…32.JPG&w=120&h=70&zc=1 could save 2.5KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.4KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.4KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…ce.JPG&w=120&h=70&zc=1 could save 2.4KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…ba.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 2.4KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2.4KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.4KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.3KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.3KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.3KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.3KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.3KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…ee.jpg&w=110&h=76&zc=1 could save 2.2KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2.2KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.2KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…ab.JPG&w=120&h=70&zc=1 could save 2.2KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2.2KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0d.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 2.1KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.1KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0d.jpg&w=110&h=76&zc=1 could save 2.1KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2.1KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2.1KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2.1KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph….jpeg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 2KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…d.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 2KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b3.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.9KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…66e.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.9KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…18.JPG&w=110&h=76&zc=1 could save 1.9KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c6.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.9KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=https://i…0&h=70&w=130&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.9KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…77.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…7.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3bd.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…da.jpg&w=110&h=76&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…67.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…9a.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=220&h=130&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…67.jpg&w=110&h=76&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…af8.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…239.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…9e.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…12.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…cc.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=166&h=100&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…cc.jpg&w=110&h=76&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1c.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…05.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…05.jpg&w=110&h=76&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1aa.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0af.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…14.jpg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=https://i…0&h=70&w=130&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=https://i…0&h=70&w=130&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpeg&w=115&h=75&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e9e.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3b3.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b0d.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=145&h=110&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…fc6.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6f1.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.1KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…ad4.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1.1KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…08b.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…08b.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c1c.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 1,011B (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…973.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 890B (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3d1.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 866B (34% reduction).
Compressing http://www.jpnn.com/assets/img/bg-donwori.png could save 860B (90% reduction).
Compressing http://www.jpnn.com/assets/img/ausplus.jpg could save 715B (21% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6dc.jpg&w=80&h=50&zc=1 could save 686B (36% reduction).
Compressing http://www.jpnn.com/assets/img/shadow.png could save 658B (65% reduction).
priority - 6 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 3 blocking script resources and 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://www.jpnn.com/carabiner/14925854432a2e62baddd49c38f9603c24e62c714d.js
http://www.jpnn.com/clickheat/js/clickheat.js
http://js.genieessp.com/t/135/115/a1135115.js
http://www.jpnn.com/clickheat/js/clickheat.js
http://js.genieessp.com/t/135/115/a1135115.js
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://www.jpnn.com/carabiner/1493287703c115c7f97a…0aa88ef6ae34e78092.css
priority - 5 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://js.genieessp.com/t/135/115/a1135115.js (expiration not specified)
https://secure-assets.rubiconproject.com/static/psa/casala_clk/9.png (expiration not specified)
http://widget.crowdynews.com/Jpnn_homepage-horizontal.js (10 minutes)
http://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js (20 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js?publisherid=105440276395813137928 (30 minutes)
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (60 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/osd.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
http://ads.rubiconproject.com/ad/10724.js (2.4 hours)
https://secure-assets.rubiconproject.com/static/psa/casala_clk/9.png (expiration not specified)
http://widget.crowdynews.com/Jpnn_homepage-horizontal.js (10 minutes)
http://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js (20 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js?publisherid=105440276395813137928 (30 minutes)
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (60 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/osd.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
http://ads.rubiconproject.com/ad/10724.js (2.4 hours)
priority - 0 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 2.2KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing https://d31qbv1cthcecs.cloudfront.net/atrk.js could save 2.2KiB (61% reduction).
jpnn.com Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 239 |
| Number of Hosts | 35 |
| Static Resources | 189 |
| JavaScript Resources | 25 |
| CSS Resources | 3 |
jpnn.com Desktop Resource Breakdown
jpnn.com mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-05-20
Mobile Speed
Bad
54/100
jpnn.com Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 41 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 397.2KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c.jpg&w=570&h=320&zc=1 could save 30.2KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/daca_images/simgad/6887938779283208231 could save 23KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/daca_images/simgad/14636679997124927789 could save 19.8KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 18.2KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f.JPG&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 14.4KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.JPG&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 10.9KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 10.9KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://banner-mtb.dspcdn.com/mtbimg/35e/35e0e8503f…5b27520fa33ab39464dd0a could save 10.3KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 10.2KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 9.7KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0.JPG&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 9KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 9KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 8.5KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 8.3KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 8.2KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 8KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 8KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 7.4KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…9.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 7.2KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 7KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 6.5KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 6.4KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 6.4KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 5.9KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 5.7KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 5.5KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…d.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 5.3KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6.JPG&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 5.2KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 5.1KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 4.7KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 4.4KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 4KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…9b0.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 2.7KiB (46% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b1c.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 2.1KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…215.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 2KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c79.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 2KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a8f.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1ed.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…49c.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…593.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8b7.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…9d7.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…59a.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…de4.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…912.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c26.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…529.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c63.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f80.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…66b.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f91.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…bdc.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…acd.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2d5.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5ed.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…16e.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…fcf.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…65d.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.5KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…df9.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.5KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b82.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.5KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…77c.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.5KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0bc.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.5KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…19f.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.5KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…Pos.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4b4.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…87e.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://m.jpnn.com/assets/img/apps_jpnn.png could save 1.4KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…377.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…138.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6b7.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…526.JPG&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…16d.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1f8.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5d1.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…36d.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c16.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a76.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…59b.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f6f.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f0d.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…ba5.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1f1.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…ce6.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c90.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.1KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…7ce.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.1KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4ad.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.1KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f4c.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.1KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b0f.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.1KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…98c.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.1KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c87.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2bd.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 974B (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1fc.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 968B (34% reduction).
Compressing http://m.jpnn.com/assets/img/newhope.png could save 923B (17% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…74d.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 885B (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3c0.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 836B (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…73c.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 776B (27% reduction).
Compressing http://m.jpnn.com/assets/img/shadow.png could save 660B (65% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…563.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 622B (34% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/daca_images/simgad/6887938779283208231 could save 23KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/daca_images/simgad/14636679997124927789 could save 19.8KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 18.2KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f.JPG&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 14.4KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.JPG&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 10.9KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 10.9KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://banner-mtb.dspcdn.com/mtbimg/35e/35e0e8503f…5b27520fa33ab39464dd0a could save 10.3KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 10.2KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 9.7KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0.JPG&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 9KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 9KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 8.5KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 8.3KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 8.2KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 8KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 8KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 7.4KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…9.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 7.2KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 7KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 6.5KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 6.4KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 6.4KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 5.9KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…e.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 5.7KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 5.5KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…d.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 5.3KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6.JPG&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 5.2KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 5.1KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2.jpg&w=280&h=170&zc=1 could save 4.7KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 4.4KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6.jpg&w=277&h=156&zc=1 could save 4KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…9b0.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 2.7KiB (46% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b1c.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 2.1KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…215.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 2KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c79.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 2KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a8f.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1ed.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…49c.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…593.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…8b7.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…9d7.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.8KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…59a.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…de4.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…912.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c26.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…529.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c63.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f80.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.7KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…66b.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f91.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…bdc.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…acd.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2d5.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5ed.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…16e.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…fcf.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.6KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…65d.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.5KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…df9.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.5KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b82.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.5KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…77c.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.5KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…0bc.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.5KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…19f.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.5KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…Pos.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4b4.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…87e.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://m.jpnn.com/assets/img/apps_jpnn.png could save 1.4KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…377.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…138.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…6b7.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…526.JPG&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.4KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…16d.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1f8.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…5d1.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…36d.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c16.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…a76.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.3KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…59b.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f6f.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f0d.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…ba5.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1f1.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…ce6.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.2KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c90.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.1KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…7ce.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.1KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…4ad.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.1KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…f4c.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.1KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…b0f.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.1KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…98c.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1.1KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…c87.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 1KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…2bd.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 974B (30% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…1fc.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 968B (34% reduction).
Compressing http://m.jpnn.com/assets/img/newhope.png could save 923B (17% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…74d.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 885B (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…3c0.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 836B (34% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…73c.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 776B (27% reduction).
Compressing http://m.jpnn.com/assets/img/shadow.png could save 660B (65% reduction).
Compressing http://photo.jpgm.co.id/timthumb.php?src=http://ph…563.jpg&w=80&h=70&zc=1 could save 622B (34% reduction).
priority - 26 Avoid landing page redirects
Your page has 2 redirects. Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded.
Avoid landing page redirects for the following chain of redirected URLs.
http://jpnn.com/
http://www.jpnn.com/
http://m.jpnn.com/
http://www.jpnn.com/
http://m.jpnn.com/
priority - 20 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://banner-mtb.dspcdn.com/mtbimg/0bb/0bbe061d9f…9776c29e31dd20e004dd73 (expiration not specified)
http://banner-mtb.dspcdn.com/mtbimg/35e/35e0e8503f…5b27520fa33ab39464dd0a (expiration not specified)
http://banner-mtb.dspcdn.com/mtbimg/be7/be73852aaf…065d0091f19998bb48d92f (expiration not specified)
http://q.crowdynews.com/v1/content/Jpnn?q=terpopul…0&sort=kudos&callback= (2 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0ijo2o8tOM4/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1OAQwddhhJA/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/2bFmmeGvni4/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/6j7jMUEwVos/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/89fGwMkgXTc/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/BZbJrBupY2c/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/MQeXg93j4kY/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ir4zzVDC7lk/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/q9HN7wcgXIE/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/sstm3UrztmA/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uiUebJWsjcg/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
http://widget.crowdynews.com/Jpnn_mobile.js (9.7 minutes)
http://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
https://js.mtburn.com/advs-instream.js (19.4 minutes)
http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbadnw55.js (20 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js?publisherid=105440276395813137928 (30 minutes)
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (60 minutes)
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js (60 minutes)
http://rules.quantcount.com/rules-p-hkYNkh0PX-Jwa.js (60 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/osd.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
http://banner-mtb.dspcdn.com/mtbimg/35e/35e0e8503f…5b27520fa33ab39464dd0a (expiration not specified)
http://banner-mtb.dspcdn.com/mtbimg/be7/be73852aaf…065d0091f19998bb48d92f (expiration not specified)
http://q.crowdynews.com/v1/content/Jpnn?q=terpopul…0&sort=kudos&callback= (2 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0ijo2o8tOM4/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1OAQwddhhJA/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/2bFmmeGvni4/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/6j7jMUEwVos/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/89fGwMkgXTc/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/BZbJrBupY2c/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/MQeXg93j4kY/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ir4zzVDC7lk/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/q9HN7wcgXIE/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/sstm3UrztmA/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uiUebJWsjcg/mqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=280&h=170 (5 minutes)
http://widget.crowdynews.com/Jpnn_mobile.js (9.7 minutes)
http://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
https://js.mtburn.com/advs-instream.js (19.4 minutes)
http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbadnw55.js (20 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js?publisherid=105440276395813137928 (30 minutes)
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (60 minutes)
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js (60 minutes)
http://rules.quantcount.com/rules-p-hkYNkh0PX-Jwa.js (60 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/osd.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 8 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://m.jpnn.com/carabiner/149009470595740582adfc4bd04d0845c135c34e2c.css
priority - 0 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 2.2KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing https://d31qbv1cthcecs.cloudfront.net/atrk.js could save 2.2KiB (61% reduction).
jpnn.com Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 238 |
| Number of Hosts | 45 |
| Static Resources | 179 |
| JavaScript Resources | 34 |
| CSS Resources | 5 |
jpnn.com Mobile Resource Breakdown
jpnn.com mobile page usability
Last tested: 2017-05-20
Mobile Usability
Good
99/100
jpnn.com Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 0 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
The tap target
The tap target
The tap target
The tap target
The tap target
The tap target
The tap target
The tap target
The tap target
<span class="rhprice rhdefaultcolored">GRATIS</span> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<div class="rhstoreicon"></div> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<span class="rhprice rhdefaultcolored">GRATIS</span> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<div class="rhstoreicon"></div> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<span class="rhbody rhdefaultcolored">Download From…Day Free Trial</span> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="https://google…ms%253D9032152" class="rhtitle rhdefaultcolored">Detour</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<span class="rhprice rhdefaultcolored">GRATIS</span> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<div class="cnbutton-skip"></div> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<div class="cnfooter-controls"></div> is close to 2 other tap targets.The tap target
<div class="drag-target"> is close to 1 other tap targets.jpnn.com similar domains
Similar domains:
www.jpnn.com
www.jpnn.net
www.jpnn.org
www.jpnn.info
www.jpnn.biz
www.jpnn.us
www.jpnn.mobi
www.pnn.com
www.jpnn.com
www.npnn.com
www.jnpnn.com
www.njpnn.com
www.hpnn.com
www.jhpnn.com
www.hjpnn.com
www.upnn.com
www.jupnn.com
www.ujpnn.com
www.ipnn.com
www.jipnn.com
www.ijpnn.com
www.kpnn.com
www.jkpnn.com
www.kjpnn.com
www.mpnn.com
www.jmpnn.com
www.mjpnn.com
www.jnn.com
www.jonn.com
www.jponn.com
www.jopnn.com
www.jlnn.com
www.jplnn.com
www.jlpnn.com
www.jpn.com
www.jpbn.com
www.jpnbn.com
www.jpbnn.com
www.jphn.com
www.jpnhn.com
www.jphnn.com
www.jpjn.com
www.jpnjn.com
www.jpjnn.com
www.jpmn.com
www.jpnmn.com
www.jpmnn.com
www.jpnb.com
www.jpnnb.com
www.jpnh.com
www.jpnnh.com
www.jpnj.com
www.jpnnj.com
www.jpnm.com
www.jpnnm.com
www.jpnn.con
www.jpnn.net
www.jpnn.org
www.jpnn.info
www.jpnn.biz
www.jpnn.us
www.jpnn.mobi
www.pnn.com
www.jpnn.com
www.npnn.com
www.jnpnn.com
www.njpnn.com
www.hpnn.com
www.jhpnn.com
www.hjpnn.com
www.upnn.com
www.jupnn.com
www.ujpnn.com
www.ipnn.com
www.jipnn.com
www.ijpnn.com
www.kpnn.com
www.jkpnn.com
www.kjpnn.com
www.mpnn.com
www.jmpnn.com
www.mjpnn.com
www.jnn.com
www.jonn.com
www.jponn.com
www.jopnn.com
www.jlnn.com
www.jplnn.com
www.jlpnn.com
www.jpn.com
www.jpbn.com
www.jpnbn.com
www.jpbnn.com
www.jphn.com
www.jpnhn.com
www.jphnn.com
www.jpjn.com
www.jpnjn.com
www.jpjnn.com
www.jpmn.com
www.jpnmn.com
www.jpmnn.com
www.jpnb.com
www.jpnnb.com
www.jpnh.com
www.jpnnh.com
www.jpnj.com
www.jpnnj.com
www.jpnm.com
www.jpnnm.com
www.jpnn.con
jpnn.com Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
jpnn.com TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.