LIFECLIP.ORG Lifeclip - 川原裕也のブログ


lifeclip.org website information.

lifeclip.org domain name is registered by .ORG top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .ORG domain zone.

Following name servers are specified for lifeclip.org domain:

  • dns1.name-services.com
  • dns2.name-services.com
  • dns4.name-services.com
  • dns3.name-services.com
  • dns5.name-services.com

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website lifeclip.org position was 48977 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 999778. Current position of lifeclip.org in Alexa rank database is below 1 million.

Website lifeclip.org Desktop speed measurement score (16/100) is better than the results of 2.91% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

lifeclip.org Mobile usability score (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed measurement score of lifeclip.org (49/100) is better than the results of 31.99% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
Mar-29-2024 N/AN/A
Mar-28-2024 N/AN/A
Mar-27-2024 N/AN/A
Mar-26-2024 N/AN/A
Mar-25-2024 N/AN/A
Mar-24-2024 N/AN/A
Mar-23-2024 N/AN/A

Advertisement

lifeclip.org Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.



lifeclip.org whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.


Domain Name: LIFECLIP.ORG
Registry Domain ID: D161608870-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.enom.com
Registrar URL: http://www.enom.com
Updated Date: 2021-01-25T22:57:16Z
Creation Date: 2011-02-25T06:32:29Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2022-02-25T06:32:29Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: eNom, Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 48
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@enom.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4252982646
Reseller:
Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok
Registrant Organization: Data Protected
Registrant State/Province: WA
Registrant Country: US
Name Server: DNS1.NAME-SERVICES.COM
Name Server: DNS2.NAME-SERVICES.COM
Name Server: DNS3.NAME-SERVICES.COM
Name Server: DNS4.NAME-SERVICES.COM
Name Server: DNS5.NAME-SERVICES.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form https://www.icann.org/wicf/)
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2021-06-02T22:21:20Z

lifeclip.org server information

Servers Location

IP Address
183.90.255.2
Country
Japan
Region
Osaka
City
Osaka

lifeclip.org desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2015-09-23


Desktop Speed Bad
16/100

lifeclip.org Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 393 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 3.7MiB (84% reduction).

Compressing and resizing http://lifeclip.org/img/20150629.png could save 500.3KiB (88% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://lifeclip.org/img/20150331.png could save 495.6KiB (86% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://lifeclip.org/img/20150518090319.png could save 418KiB (78% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://lifeclip.org/img/20150330.png could save 412.1KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://lifeclip.org/img/20141212.png could save 380.3KiB (86% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://lifeclip.org/img/20150323.png could save 343.2KiB (87% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://lifeclip.org/img/20141229.png could save 303.1KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://lifeclip.org/img/20141209.png could save 294.3KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://lifeclip.org/img/20150401.png could save 229.4KiB (88% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://lifeclip.org/img/20141211.png could save 201.4KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://cdn-ak.f.st-hatena.com/images/fotolife/q/qo…602/20150602084921.png could save 165.4KiB (74% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://lifeclip.org/img/20150727.png could save 66.3KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://lifeclip.org/img/qooton-banner.png could save 11.3KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://s3.feedly.com/img/follows/feedly-follow-rectangle-volume-big_2x.png could save 9KiB (66% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://lifeclip.org/img/testlogo.png could save 4.4KiB (65% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://icon.nimg.jp/community/co2130136.jpg?1377015609 could save 1.6KiB (20% reduction).
Losslessly compressing http://s1.qtn.jp/default/forward-25.png could save 797B (77% reduction).

priority - 13 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://b92.yahoo.co.jp/js/s_retargeting.js (expiration not specified)
http://lifeclip.org/img/20141209.png (expiration not specified)
http://lifeclip.org/img/20141211.png (expiration not specified)
http://lifeclip.org/img/20141212.png (expiration not specified)
http://lifeclip.org/img/20141229.png (expiration not specified)
http://lifeclip.org/img/20150323.png (expiration not specified)
http://lifeclip.org/img/20150330.png (expiration not specified)
http://lifeclip.org/img/20150331.png (expiration not specified)
http://lifeclip.org/img/20150401.png (expiration not specified)
http://lifeclip.org/img/20150518090319.png (expiration not specified)
http://lifeclip.org/img/20150629.png (expiration not specified)
http://lifeclip.org/img/20150727.png (expiration not specified)
http://lifeclip.org/img/face3.png (expiration not specified)
http://lifeclip.org/img/qooton-banner.png (expiration not specified)
http://lifeclip.org/img/testlogo.png (expiration not specified)
http://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/original-2cl-1/normalize.css (expiration not specified)
http://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/original-2cl-1/style.css (expiration not specified)
http://connect.facebook.net/ja_JP/all.js (20 minutes)
http://res.nimg.jp/css/thumb/chcm/common.css (20 minutes)
http://res.nimg.jp/img/thumb/chcm/bg.gif (20 minutes)
http://res.nimg.jp/img/thumb/chcm/logo_community.gif (20 minutes)
http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/api.js (30 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js (30 minutes)
https://oauth.googleusercontent.com/gadgets/js/cor…om:shindig.sha1.js?c=2 (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
http://cdn-ak.f.st-hatena.com/images/fotolife/q/qo…602/20150602084921.png (12 hours)

priority - 4 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 3 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/original-2cl-1/normalize.css
http://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/original-2cl-1/style.css
http://lifeclip.org/wp-content/plugins/yet-another…e/widget.css?ver=4.2.5

priority - 2 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.43 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 1 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 11.5KiB (67% reduction).

Compressing http://lifeclip.org/wp-includes/js/wp-emoji-release.min.js?ver=4.2.5 could save 10.1KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing http://ext.nicovideo.jp/thumb_community/co2130136 could save 838B (52% reduction).
Compressing http://res.nimg.jp/css/thumb/chcm/common.css could save 649B (50% reduction).

priority - 1 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 3.6KiB (2% reduction).

Minifying https://fbstatic-a.akamaihd.net/rsrc.php/v2/y8/r/KjwEUVB5ode.js could save 1KiB (3% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://fbstatic-a.akamaihd.net/rsrc.php/v2/yY/r/eJHCgJIBBWG.js could save 1KiB (3% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://apis.google.com/_/scs/apps-static/_/js/k=o…xLn1dR_PvPsDVhnfV-z5_Q could save 889B (1% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://oauth.googleusercontent.com/gadgets/js/cor…om:shindig.sha1.js?c=2 could save 661B (3% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 2.2KiB (44% reduction).

Minifying http://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/original-2cl-1/normalize.css could save 1.6KiB (63% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/original-2cl-1/style.css could save 638B (25% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 587B (9% reduction).

Minifying http://lifeclip.org/ could save 587B (9% reduction) after compression.

lifeclip.org Desktop Resources

Total Resources88
Number of Hosts25
Static Resources69
JavaScript Resources26
CSS Resources7

lifeclip.org Desktop Resource Breakdown

lifeclip.org mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2019-07-01


Mobile Speed Bad
49/100

lifeclip.org Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 73 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 716KiB (72% reduction).

Compressing https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/uploads/aoitori.jpg could save 230.2KiB (88% reduction).
Compressing https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/uploads/20161002.jpg could save 146.4KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/uploads/dice.jpg could save 120.6KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/uploads/20161129.jpg could save 115.1KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/uploads/kachi.jpg could save 71.7KiB (53% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t45.1600-4/…975e84f543&oe=5D7D5EB2 could save 6.3KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t45.1600-4/…2bd471a414&oe=5D839C90 could save 4.7KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1143361199829946369…ormat=jpg&name=600x314 could save 3.1KiB (13% reduction).
Compressing https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v3/y2/r/onuUJj0tCqE.png could save 2.8KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v3/y3/r/n-uOOobFC9i.png could save 2.7KiB (86% reduction).
Compressing https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v3/yC/r/faq_tyJQplI.png could save 2.1KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_th…ges/footer_logo_pc.png could save 1KiB (52% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/752525813904322561/nQ8XeFp1_bigger.jpg could save 1KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_th…ges/footer_logo_sp.png could save 993B (30% reduction).
Compressing https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1144180622933389312…mat=png&name=144x144_2 could save 989B (17% reduction).
Compressing https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_th…ges/pagetop_ico_sp.png could save 938B (50% reduction).
Compressing https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_th…ages/search_btn_pc.png could save 912B (67% reduction).
Compressing https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_th…images/foot_fb_ico.png could save 879B (76% reduction).
Compressing https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_th…images/foot_tw_ico.png could save 864B (64% reduction).
Compressing https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_th…ges/header_logo_pc.png could save 824B (48% reduction).
Compressing https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_th…ages/search_btn_sp.png could save 803B (35% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-1/p50x…544af9af25&oe=5DC0C673 could save 410B (32% reduction).
Compressing https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-1/p50x…5f7c62a4d4&oe=5DC0C673 could save 410B (32% reduction).
Compressing https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v3/yG/r/wrCiWd_JmQD.png could save 296B (30% reduction).

priority - 17 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_theme/css/style.css (expiration not specified)
https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_th…images/foot_fb_ico.png (expiration not specified)
https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_th…images/foot_tw_ico.png (expiration not specified)
https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_th…ges/footer_logo_pc.png (expiration not specified)
https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_th…ges/footer_logo_sp.png (expiration not specified)
https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_th…ges/header_logo_pc.png (expiration not specified)
https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_th…ges/header_logo_sp.png (expiration not specified)
https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_th…ges/pagetop_ico_sp.png (expiration not specified)
https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_th…ages/search_btn_pc.png (expiration not specified)
https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_th…ages/search_btn_sp.png (expiration not specified)
https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_theme/js/script.js (expiration not specified)
https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_theme/style.css (expiration not specified)
https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/uploads/20161002.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/uploads/20161129.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/uploads/20170424.png (expiration not specified)
https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/uploads/aoitori.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/uploads/dice.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/uploads/kachi.jpg (expiration not specified)
https://cdn.syndication.twimg.com/timeline/profile…700&with_replies=false (5 minutes)
https://syndication.twitter.com/settings (10 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/ja_JP/sdk.js (20 minutes)
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 15 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 148.7KiB (71% reduction).

Compressing https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js could save 65.6KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing https://platform.twitter.com/css/timeline.70d17849…00695473.light.ltr.css could save 41.4KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing https://platform.twitter.com/js/moment~timeline~tw…4b1c047f200045ffa1e.js could save 16.5KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing https://platform.twitter.com/js/timeline.49693ebcd…8708ebca7502c7c343d.js could save 15.6KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe…s%3A%2F%2Flifeclip.org could save 9.2KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/plugins/yet-anothe…e/widget.css?ver=5.2.2 could save 387B (50% reduction).

priority - 8 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_theme/css/style.css

priority - 0 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 2.6KiB (28% reduction).

Minifying https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_theme/css/style.css could save 2.3KiB (28% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/plugins/yet-anothe…e/widget.css?ver=5.2.2 could save 151B (20% reduction).
Minifying https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_theme/style.css could save 138B (67% reduction).

priority - 0 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.2KiB (35% reduction).

Minifying https://connect.facebook.net/ja_JP/sdk.js could save 673B (39% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/plugins/pbd-ajax-l…/load-posts.js?ver=1.0 could save 320B (40% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://lifeclip.org/wp-content/themes/lifeclip_theme/js/script.js could save 221B (24% reduction) after compression.

lifeclip.org Mobile Resources

Total Resources92
Number of Hosts17
Static Resources68
JavaScript Resources29
CSS Resources11

lifeclip.org Mobile Resource Breakdown

lifeclip.org mobile page usability

Last tested: 2019-07-01


Mobile Usability Good
99/100

lifeclip.org Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 0 Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <a id="pagetop" href="#"></a> is close to 1 other tap targets.

lifeclip.org similar domains

Similar domains:
www.lifeclip.com
www.lifeclip.net
www.lifeclip.org
www.lifeclip.info
www.lifeclip.biz
www.lifeclip.us
www.lifeclip.mobi
www.ifeclip.org
www.lifeclip.org
www.pifeclip.org
www.lpifeclip.org
www.plifeclip.org
www.oifeclip.org
www.loifeclip.org
www.olifeclip.org
www.kifeclip.org
www.lkifeclip.org
www.klifeclip.org
www.lfeclip.org
www.lufeclip.org
www.liufeclip.org
www.luifeclip.org
www.ljfeclip.org
www.lijfeclip.org
www.ljifeclip.org
www.lkfeclip.org
www.likfeclip.org
www.lofeclip.org
www.liofeclip.org
www.lieclip.org
www.liceclip.org
www.lifceclip.org
www.licfeclip.org
www.lideclip.org
www.lifdeclip.org
www.lidfeclip.org
www.lireclip.org
www.lifreclip.org
www.lirfeclip.org
www.liteclip.org
www.lifteclip.org
www.litfeclip.org
www.ligeclip.org
www.lifgeclip.org
www.ligfeclip.org
www.liveclip.org
www.lifveclip.org
www.livfeclip.org
www.lifclip.org
www.lifwclip.org
www.lifewclip.org
www.lifweclip.org
www.lifsclip.org
www.lifesclip.org
www.lifseclip.org
www.lifdclip.org
www.lifedclip.org
www.lifrclip.org
www.liferclip.org
www.lifelip.org
www.lifexlip.org
www.lifecxlip.org
www.lifexclip.org
www.lifedlip.org
www.lifecdlip.org
www.lifeflip.org
www.lifecflip.org
www.lifefclip.org
www.lifevlip.org
www.lifecvlip.org
www.lifevclip.org
www.lifecip.org
www.lifecpip.org
www.lifeclpip.org
www.lifecplip.org
www.lifecoip.org
www.lifecloip.org
www.lifecolip.org
www.lifeckip.org
www.lifeclkip.org
www.lifecklip.org
www.lifeclp.org
www.lifeclup.org
www.lifecliup.org
www.lifecluip.org
www.lifecljp.org
www.lifeclijp.org
www.lifecljip.org
www.lifeclkp.org
www.lifeclikp.org
www.lifeclop.org
www.lifecliop.org
www.lifecli.org
www.lifeclio.org
www.lifeclipo.org
www.lifeclil.org
www.lifeclipl.org
www.lifeclilp.org

lifeclip.org Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.


lifeclip.org TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.