MSXFAQ.DE MSXFAQ - Exchange, Outlook, Lync, Skype, ...


msxfaq.de website information.

msxfaq.de domain name is registered by .DE top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .DE domain zone.

No name server records were found.

and probably website msxfaq.de is hosted by NAMECHEAP-NET - Namecheap, Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by NAMECHEAP-NET - Namecheap, Inc., US hosting company.

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website msxfaq.de position was 13611 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 975700. Now website msxfaq.de ranked in Alexa database as number 353939 (in the world).

Website msxfaq.de Desktop speed measurement score (81/100) is better than the results of 71.91% of other sites and shows that the page is performing great on desktop computers.

msxfaq.de Mobile usability score (98/100) is better than the results of 55.61% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed measurement score of msxfaq.de (78/100) is better than the results of 86.92% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
Nov-25-2024 353,9391,597
Nov-24-2024 355,536-1,792
Nov-23-2024 353,7448,690
Nov-22-2024 362,434-3,992
Nov-21-2024 358,442-640
Nov-20-2024 357,8022,805
Nov-19-2024 360,607-7,040

Advertisement

msxfaq.de Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.



msxfaq.de whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.


Domain: msxfaq.de
Status: connect

msxfaq.de server information

Servers Location

IP Address
Country
Region
City

msxfaq.de desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2017-06-08


Desktop Speed Medium
81/100

msxfaq.de Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 10 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 2 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://www.msxfaq.de/msxfaq2016.css
https://www.msxfaq.de/images/font-awesome/css/font-awesome.css

priority - 7 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 69.5KiB (84% reduction).

Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/msxfaq2016.css could save 40.9KiB (87% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/font-awesome/css/font-awesome.css could save 27.4KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/banner/aktion.css could save 1.2KiB (69% reduction).

priority - 2 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 16.8KiB (21% reduction).

Minifying https://www.msxfaq.de/msxfaq2016.css could save 12.1KiB (26% reduction).
Minifying https://www.msxfaq.de/images/font-awesome/css/font-awesome.css could save 4.7KiB (14% reduction).

priority - 1 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js (30 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/rpc:shindig_random.js?onload=init (30 minutes)
https://ssl.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)

priority - 1 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 9.4KiB (52% reduction).

Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/msxfaqlogo2016b.jpg could save 4.7KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/boxicons/boxjob.jpg could save 1.5KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/submenuplus.gif could save 754B (89% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/lang-de.gif could save 719B (73% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/lang-fr.gif could save 689B (66% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/lang-en.gif could save 603B (54% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/menulogo/menulogo-lync48x48.png could save 552B (30% reduction).

priority - 0 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 1,020B (16% reduction).

Minifying https://www.msxfaq.de/ could save 1,020B (16% reduction) after compression.

msxfaq.de Desktop Resources

Total Resources55
Number of Hosts8
Static Resources46
JavaScript Resources10
CSS Resources3

msxfaq.de Desktop Resource Breakdown

msxfaq.de mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2019-06-14


Mobile Speed Medium
78/100

msxfaq.de Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 24 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 2 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://www.msxfaq.de/msxfaq2016.css
https://www.msxfaq.de/images/font-awesome/css/font-awesome.css

priority - 1 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js (30 minutes)
https://ssl.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)

priority - 1 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 13KiB (39% reduction).

Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/msxfaqlogo2016b.jpg could save 4.7KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/boxicons/boxjob.jpg could save 1.5KiB (27% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/submenuplus.gif could save 754B (89% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/lang-de.gif could save 719B (73% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/lang-fr.gif could save 689B (66% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/lang-en.gif could save 603B (54% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/menulogo/menulogo-lync48x48.png could save 552B (30% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/menulogo/menulogo-sonst48x48.png could save 446B (30% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/rss.jpg could save 441B (44% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/menulogo/menulogo-tools48x48.png could save 415B (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/menulogo/menulogo-antispam48x48.png could save 404B (22% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/menulogo/menulogo-encrypt48x48.png could save 355B (28% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/menulogo/menulogo-windows48x48.png could save 351B (33% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/menulogo/menulogo-cloud48x48.png could save 342B (22% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/menulogo/menulogo-exchange48x48.png could save 320B (22% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/naw2016.gif could save 286B (13% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/social/c-rss.png could save 197B (15% reduction).
Compressing https://www.msxfaq.de/images/social/c-twitter.png could save 110B (27% reduction).

priority - 0 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.3KiB (21% reduction).

Minifying https://www.msxfaq.de/ could save 1.3KiB (21% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 927B (16% reduction).

Minifying https://www.msxfaq.de/msxfaq2016.css could save 927B (16% reduction) after compression.

msxfaq.de Mobile Resources

Total Resources49
Number of Hosts6
Static Resources40
JavaScript Resources5
CSS Resources3

msxfaq.de Mobile Resource Breakdown

msxfaq.de mobile page usability

Last tested: 2019-06-14


Mobile Usability Good
98/100

msxfaq.de Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 2 Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <a href="sonst/hilfe.htm">Hilfe</a> and 2 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="sonst/datenschutz.htm">Datenschutzerklärung/DSGVO</a> and 2 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="http://twitter…%2C+%2E%2E%2E+"></a> and 4 others are close to other tap targets.

msxfaq.de similar domains

Similar domains:
www.msxfaq.com
www.msxfaq.net
www.msxfaq.org
www.msxfaq.info
www.msxfaq.biz
www.msxfaq.us
www.msxfaq.mobi
www.sxfaq.de
www.msxfaq.de
www.nsxfaq.de
www.mnsxfaq.de
www.nmsxfaq.de
www.jsxfaq.de
www.mjsxfaq.de
www.jmsxfaq.de
www.ksxfaq.de
www.mksxfaq.de
www.kmsxfaq.de
www.mxfaq.de
www.mwxfaq.de
www.mswxfaq.de
www.mwsxfaq.de
www.mexfaq.de
www.mesxfaq.de
www.mdxfaq.de
www.msdxfaq.de
www.mdsxfaq.de
www.mzxfaq.de
www.mszxfaq.de
www.mzsxfaq.de
www.mxxfaq.de
www.msxxfaq.de
www.mxsxfaq.de
www.maxfaq.de
www.msaxfaq.de
www.masxfaq.de
www.msfaq.de
www.mszfaq.de
www.msxzfaq.de
www.mssfaq.de
www.msxsfaq.de
www.mssxfaq.de
www.msdfaq.de
www.msxdfaq.de
www.mscfaq.de
www.msxcfaq.de
www.mscxfaq.de
www.msxaq.de
www.msxcaq.de
www.msxfcaq.de
www.msxdaq.de
www.msxfdaq.de
www.msxraq.de
www.msxfraq.de
www.msxrfaq.de
www.msxtaq.de
www.msxftaq.de
www.msxtfaq.de
www.msxgaq.de
www.msxfgaq.de
www.msxgfaq.de
www.msxvaq.de
www.msxfvaq.de
www.msxvfaq.de
www.msxfq.de
www.msxfqq.de
www.msxfaqq.de
www.msxfqaq.de
www.msxfwq.de
www.msxfawq.de
www.msxfwaq.de
www.msxfsq.de
www.msxfasq.de
www.msxfsaq.de
www.msxfzq.de
www.msxfazq.de
www.msxfzaq.de
www.msxfa.de
www.msxfaa.de
www.msxfaqa.de
www.msxfaaq.de
www.msxfaw.de
www.msxfaqw.de

msxfaq.de Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.


msxfaq.de TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.