MTV.COM.LB MTV Lebanon - Homepage


mtv.com.lb website information.

mtv.com.lb domain name is registered by .LB top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .LB domain zone.

No name server records were found.

and probably website mtv.com.lb is hosted by FASTLY - Fastly, US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by FASTLY - Fastly, US hosting company.

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website mtv.com.lb position was 3766 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 283210. Now website mtv.com.lb ranked in Alexa database as number 78824 (in the world).

Website mtv.com.lb Desktop speed measurement score (48/100) is better than the results of 21.82% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

mtv.com.lb Mobile usability score (96/100) is better than the results of 46.59% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed measurement score of mtv.com.lb (50/100) is better than the results of 33.92% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
May-24-2022 78,824-26,495
May-23-2022 52,329-21,395
May-22-2022 30,9344,533
May-21-2022 35,4674,211
May-20-2022 39,678-21,652
May-19-2022 18,026-1,521
May-18-2022 16,505-6,854

Advertisement

mtv.com.lb Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.



mtv.com.lb whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.


mtv.com.lb domain is not supported

mtv.com.lb server information

Servers Location

IP Address
Country
Region
City

mtv.com.lb desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2019-12-02


Desktop Speed Bad
48/100

mtv.com.lb Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 59 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 577.3KiB (42% reduction).

Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/C…g&width=473&height=267 could save 26.2KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=400&height=224 could save 23.4KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://vodapi.mtv.com.lb/content/uploads/homePage…48086_marcelghanem.jpg could save 21.5KiB (63% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=400&height=224 could save 19.3KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=533&height=305 could save 16.5KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/daca_images/simgad/8024120028307295924 could save 15KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=400&height=224 could save 15KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=400&height=224 could save 13.9KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=400&height=224 could save 13.4KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 12.4KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=473&height=267 could save 12.1KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=400&height=224 could save 12KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=400&height=224 could save 12KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=473&height=267 could save 11.9KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=400&height=224 could save 11.5KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=400&height=224 could save 11.4KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=400&height=224 could save 11.2KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=400&height=224 could save 10.7KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=400&height=224 could save 10.4KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 10KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 10KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 8.5KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 8.2KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 7.8KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 7.8KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=400&height=224 could save 7.7KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=473&height=267 could save 7.5KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=473&height=267 could save 7.4KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=400&height=224 could save 7.3KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 7.2KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 7KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 7KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 6.9KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 6.8KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 6.5KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=200&height=112 could save 6.5KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 6.2KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 6.2KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 6.2KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 6.1KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=400&height=224 could save 6.1KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 6KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 5.8KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 5.5KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 5.5KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 5.4KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 5.2KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 5.2KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 5.1KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=Np…g&width=400&height=224 could save 4.6KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 4.6KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 4.6KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 4.6KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 4.5KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 4.3KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 4.3KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 4.3KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 4.1KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/C…g&width=158&height=122 could save 4.1KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/C…g&width=158&height=122 could save 4KiB (43% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 4KiB (44% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=200&height=112 could save 3.9KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=200&height=112 could save 3.8KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/C…g&width=158&height=122 could save 3.5KiB (40% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…pg&width=169&height=97 could save 3.3KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 3.2KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=256&height=198 could save 3.1KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…g&width=200&height=112 could save 3.1KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/C…g&width=158&height=122 could save 3.1KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…pg&width=169&height=97 could save 3KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/C…g&width=158&height=122 could save 2.9KiB (42% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/images/logo-header.jpg could save 2.9KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/C…g&width=158&height=122 could save 2.8KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=//…pg&width=169&height=97 could save 2.2KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v3/y5/r/OqOE21UvWe3.png could save 201B (50% reduction).

priority - 30 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 23 blocking script resources and 7 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

https://securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/gpt/pubads_…2019111801.js?21065177
https://adservice.google.com/adsid/integrator.sync.js?domain=www.mtv.com.lb
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/jquery-1.12.4.min.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/owl.carousel….0/owl.carousel.min.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/dropdown/core.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/dropdown/touch.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/dropdown/dropdown.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/malihu-custo…crollbar.concat.min.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/jquery-ui-1.…ustom/jquery-ui.min.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/magnific-pop….magnific-popup.min.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/coverflow-master/jquery.coverflow.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/coverflow-ma…ery.interpolate.min.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/coverflow-ma…uery.touchSwipe.min.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/isotope.pkgd.min.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/jquery.sticky-kit.min.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/detectmobilebrowser.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/jquery-smart…/jquery.smartbanner.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Scripts/angular.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Scripts/angular-sanitize.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Scripts/controllers.js?v=1
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Scripts/functions.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Scripts/jquery.signalR-2.0.0.min.js
https://www.mtv.com.lb/signalr/hubs

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Cairo:400,700
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/jquery-smart…jquery.smartbanner.css
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/Vendor/VendorStyles…WUnI3xRMn7v1hw-Z3VBG41
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/Css/WeatherStyles?v…Pn-P753HsUi4MkwGi39zM1
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/css/style.css?v=47
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/css/style-rtl.css?v=47
https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/css/large-screen.css?v=47

priority - 14 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 138.9KiB (64% reduction).

Minifying https://www.mtv.com.lb/Scripts/angular.js could save 124.4KiB (71% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.mtv.com.lb/Scripts/functions.js could save 5.1KiB (31% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.mtv.com.lb/Scripts/angular-sanitize.js could save 3.5KiB (56% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.mtv.com.lb/Scripts/controllers.js?v=1 could save 1.9KiB (23% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/jquery-smart…/jquery.smartbanner.js could save 1.6KiB (36% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/vendor/coverflow-master/jquery.coverflow.js could save 1.2KiB (35% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js could save 672B (39% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://www.mtv.com.lb/signalr/hubs could save 528B (44% reduction) after compression.

priority - 7 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.32 seconds.

There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 5 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://syndication.twitter.com/settings (10 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js (20 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js (30 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/rpc:shindig_random.js?onload=init (30 minutes)
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/activeview/js/cu…osd.js?cb=%2Fr20100101 (50 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/activeview/js/cu…ner.js?cache=r20110914 (50 minutes)
https://mts0.google.com/vt/data=9vivhB-S_haTFAt82W…Zu1-xefctbRiBMD2XmpgIg (60 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 2 Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 50% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.
Click to see the screenshot with only the HTML response:

priority - 2 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 14.7KiB (22% reduction).

Minifying https://www.mtv.com.lb/Content/css/style.css?v=47 could save 14.7KiB (22% reduction) after compression.

mtv.com.lb Desktop Resources

Total Resources203
Number of Hosts31
Static Resources87
JavaScript Resources61
CSS Resources10

mtv.com.lb Desktop Resource Breakdown

mtv.com.lb mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2017-11-01


Mobile Speed Bad
50/100

mtv.com.lb Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 48 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://mtv.com.lb/Content/css/jquery.smartbanner.css

priority - 40 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 389.2KiB (27% reduction).

Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb//Chrome/Kpanel/Pictures/Pro…33958746~594-x-383.jpg could save 101.5KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb//Chrome/Kpanel/Pictures/Programs/170123085359133.jpg could save 76.3KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 14.7KiB (86% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 11.3KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=///…&width=600&height=9999 could save 10.4KiB (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 5.4KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=///…&width=600&height=9999 could save 4.5KiB (12% reduction).
Compressing http://mtv.com.lb/Content/images/mtv.jpg could save 4.3KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 3.1KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 3.1KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 3.1KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 3KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=280&height=9999 could save 2.9KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=280&height=9999 could save 2.7KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 2.7KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 2.7KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 2.5KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 2.4KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 2.4KiB (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 2.4KiB (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 2.1KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 1.9KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 1.9KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://mtv.com.lb/Content/images/newsPlayer_213.jpg could save 1.7KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 1.7KiB (13% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1.6KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=280&height=9999 could save 1.5KiB (13% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.4KiB (19% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=///…&width=163&height=9999 could save 1.3KiB (13% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1.3KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=280&height=9999 could save 1.3KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.3KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.3KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1.3KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1.2KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.2KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1.2KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=1000&height=214 could save 1.2KiB (12% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=///…&width=163&height=9999 could save 1.2KiB (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=///…&width=163&height=9999 could save 1.2KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1.2KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.2KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1.2KiB (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.2KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.1KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.1KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.1KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.1KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1.1KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=///…&width=163&height=9999 could save 1.1KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.1KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1.1KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.1KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.1KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.1KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.1KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.1KiB (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1.1KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.1KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=///…&width=163&height=9999 could save 1.1KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1.1KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1.1KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1KiB (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1KiB (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=///…&width=163&height=9999 could save 1KiB (13% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=///…&width=163&height=9999 could save 1KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1KiB (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1KiB (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1,022B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1,021B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1,018B (17% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1,018B (17% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1,017B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1,015B (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 1,007B (17% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1,006B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 1,001B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 996B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 992B (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 983B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 977B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 976B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 974B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 973B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 968B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 965B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 964B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 956B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 945B (17% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 943B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 942B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 940B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=///…&width=163&height=9999 could save 935B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 919B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 919B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 913B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 906B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=///…&width=163&height=9999 could save 905B (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 902B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 901B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 894B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 884B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=///…&width=163&height=9999 could save 881B (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 872B (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 868B (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 868B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 868B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 862B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 837B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 837B (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 831B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 830B (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=///…&width=163&height=9999 could save 824B (13% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 823B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 819B (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 815B (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 814B (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 807B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=///…&width=163&height=9999 could save 805B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=///…&width=163&height=9999 could save 802B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 797B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 797B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=///…&width=163&height=9999 could save 791B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 787B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 771B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 770B (18% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 767B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 766B (21% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 751B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 746B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 744B (18% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=///…&width=163&height=9999 could save 742B (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 735B (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 730B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 709B (18% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 705B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 695B (14% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 693B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 642B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 635B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…g&width=9999&height=95 could save 628B (16% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 593B (15% reduction).
Compressing http://plus.mtv.com.lb/getImage.aspx?imageName=/Ch…&width=160&height=9999 could save 577B (16% reduction).

priority - 15 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 149.5KiB (59% reduction).

Minifying http://mtv.com.lb/Scripts/angular.js could save 124.5KiB (71% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://mtv.com.lb/scripts/idangerous.swiper.js could save 5.4KiB (30% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://mtv.com.lb/Scripts/frontuploader/swfupload.js could save 5KiB (44% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://mtv.com.lb/scripts/angular-sanitize.js could save 3.5KiB (56% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://mtv.com.lb/Scripts/jquery.validate.js could save 3.1KiB (32% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://mtv.com.lb/Scripts/controllers.js could save 3KiB (30% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://mtv.com.lb/Scripts/jquery.smartbanner.js could save 1.6KiB (36% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://mtv.com.lb/scripts/mtv.js could save 1.1KiB (17% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://mtv.com.lb/Scripts/frontuploader/fileprogress.js could save 926B (33% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://mtv.com.lb/Scripts/frontuploader/handler.js could save 890B (33% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://mtv.com.lb/signalr/hubs could save 529B (45% reduction) after compression.

priority - 4 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://via.batch.com/v1/bootstrap.min.js (expiration not specified)
http://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
https://securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/static/glade.js (30 minutes)
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (60 minutes)
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/osd.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 0 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 4.2KiB (17% reduction).

Minifying http://mtv.com.lb/ could save 4.2KiB (17% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 2.2KiB (61% reduction).

Compressing https://d31qbv1cthcecs.cloudfront.net/atrk.js could save 2.2KiB (61% reduction).

priority - 0 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 582B (16% reduction).

Minifying http://mtv.com.lb/scripts/Jquery-ui/css/blitzer/jq…-1.10.3.custom.min.css could save 582B (16% reduction) after compression.

mtv.com.lb Mobile Resources

Total Resources236
Number of Hosts22
Static Resources46
JavaScript Resources49
CSS Resources7

mtv.com.lb Mobile Resource Breakdown

mtv.com.lb mobile page usability

Last tested: 2017-11-01


Mobile Usability Good
96/100

mtv.com.lb Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 3 Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <a href="https://google…ms%253D9032152" class="rhimage rhimage_C0_RH00_"></a> is close to 1 other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="https://google…ms%253D9032152" class="rhtitle rhdefaultcolored">STARZ</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.

The tap target <span class="rhpromotext rhdefaultcolored">Original series &amp; movies.</span> is close to 1 other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="https://google…ms%253D9032152" class="rhstoreicon rh…icon_clickable"></a> is close to 1 other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="https://google…ms%253D9032152" class="rhprice rhdefaultcolored">مجانًا</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.

The tap target <div id="abgc" class="abgc">Googleإعلانات</div> is close to 1 other tap targets.

The tap target <div class="swiper-wrapper">01:29…قدر التوقّعات</div> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <div class="swiper-wrapper">المقدمة…الأجوال الجوية</div> is close to 1 other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="/Programs/Prim…_2017_/المقدمة" class="slide">المقدمة</a> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="/About" class="link">ABOUT MTV</a> and 9 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="/Production" class="link">PRODUCTION</a> and 3 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="/Contact" class="link last">CONTACT</a> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <a id="footer_facebook" href="http://www.fac…com/mtvlebanon">Facebook</a> is close to 3 other tap targets.
The tap target <a id="footer_mobile" href="/Mobile">Mobile Apps</a> is close to 3 other tap targets.
The tap target <input id="result" type="text"> is close to 1 other tap targets.

mtv.com.lb similar domains

Similar domains:
www.mtv.com
www.mtv.net
www.mtv.org
www.mtv.info
www.mtv.biz
www.mtv.us
www.mtv.mobi
www.tv.com.lb
www.mtv.com.lb
www.ntv.com.lb
www.mntv.com.lb
www.nmtv.com.lb
www.jtv.com.lb
www.mjtv.com.lb
www.jmtv.com.lb
www.ktv.com.lb
www.mktv.com.lb
www.kmtv.com.lb
www.mv.com.lb
www.mrv.com.lb
www.mtrv.com.lb
www.mrtv.com.lb
www.mfv.com.lb
www.mtfv.com.lb
www.mftv.com.lb
www.mgv.com.lb
www.mtgv.com.lb
www.mgtv.com.lb
www.myv.com.lb
www.mtyv.com.lb
www.mytv.com.lb
www.mt.com.lb
www.mtc.com.lb
www.mtvc.com.lb
www.mtcv.com.lb
www.mtf.com.lb
www.mtvf.com.lb
www.mtg.com.lb
www.mtvg.com.lb
www.mtb.com.lb
www.mtvb.com.lb
www.mtbv.com.lb

mtv.com.lb Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.


mtv.com.lb TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.