notebookreview.com website information.
notebookreview.com domain name is registered by .COM top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .COM domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for notebookreview.com domain:
- ns10.techtarget.com
- ns11.techtarget.com
- ns12.techtarget.com
- ns13.techtarget.com
- ns14.techtarget.com
- ns15.techtarget.com
and probably website notebookreview.com is hosted by AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website notebookreview.com position was 18872 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 20883. Now website notebookreview.com ranked in Alexa database as number 20836 (in the world).
Website notebookreview.com Desktop speed measurement score (73/100) is better than the results of 56.16% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
notebookreview.com Mobile usability score (96/100) is better than the results of 46.59% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of notebookreview.com (52/100) is better than the results of 37.6% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
Date | Rank | Change |
---|---|---|
Nov-24-2024 | 20,836 | -196 |
Nov-23-2024 | 20,640 | 232 |
Nov-22-2024 | 20,872 | -164 |
Nov-21-2024 | 20,708 | 175 |
Nov-20-2024 | 20,883 | -87 |
Nov-19-2024 | 20,796 | -52 |
Nov-18-2024 | 20,744 | -143 |
Advertisement
notebookreview.com Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
notebookreview.com whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
Domain Name: NOTEBOOKREVIEW.COM
Registry Domain ID: 3512609_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.directnic.com
Registrar URL: http://www.directnic.com
Updated Date: 2023-12-26T07:09:55Z
Creation Date: 1999-02-09T05:00:00Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2025-02-09T05:00:00Z
Registrar: DNC Holdings, Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 291
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS10.TECHTARGET.COM
Name Server: NS11.TECHTARGET.COM
Name Server: NS12.TECHTARGET.COM
Name Server: NS13.TECHTARGET.COM
Name Server: NS14.TECHTARGET.COM
Name Server: NS15.TECHTARGET.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2024-09-09T12:42:06Z
notebookreview.com server information
notebookreview.com desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-12-02
notebookreview.com Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 12 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 21 blocking script resources and 7 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/cmp/sourcepoint/sp-config.min.js
https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.8.2/jquery.min.js?ver=4.9.8
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/g…ntend.min.js?ver=7.1.0
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/s…cript.min.js?ver=4.9.8
https://cdn.rawgit.com/vaakash/jquery-easy-ticker/…icker.min.js?ver=4.9.8
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com//rms/ux/javascript/gpt-1.0.min.js
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/t…onsiveAds.js?ver=4.9.8
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/t…e-tracker.js?ver=1.9.2
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/js/css3-me…eries.min.js?ver=4.9.8
https://a.dpmsrv.com/dpmpxl/index.php?q=xSegList&cl=68
http://a.postrelease.com/serve/load.js?async=true
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/js/jquery-1.8.2.min.js
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/js/jquery.raty.min.js
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/js/technologyguide.js
http://s.skimresources.com/js/525X1521902.skimlinks.js
http://notebookreview.us.intellitxt.com/intellitxt/front.asp?ipid=88252
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-includes/js/jquer…in.js?ver=1.1-20110113
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/c…s/scripts.js?ver=5.0.3
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/js/zuperSlider.js?ver=4.9.8
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.8
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/c…s/styles.css?ver=5.0.3
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/s…tyle.min.css?ver=4.9.8
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/w…enavi-css.css?ver=2.70
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/css/jquery.raty.min.css
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/css/styles.min.css
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/css/notebookreview.min.css
priority - 11 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://images.intellitxt.com/k/kormorant-1.31.5.min.js (expiration not specified)
https://s.dpmsrv.com/dpm_b7eb6c689c037217079766fdb77c3bac3e51cb4c.min.js (expiration not specified)
https://sp-js-releases.s3.amazonaws.com/0/2.0.1083/auto_opt_in-v2.0.1083.js (expiration not specified)
https://cdn.printfriendly.com/printfriendly.js (5 minutes)
https://q-stg.quintesse.io/api/is?st=971572f5-966a-443b-abff-83c3086e2387 (5 minutes)
https://dptr.distiltag.com/dptr?dpn=lotame&dpi=771…44ae-92c3-2040a0b6b32e (10 minutes)
http://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-WRN4PK (15 minutes)
http://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js (30 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/activeview/js/cu…osd.js?cb=%2Fr20100101 (50 minutes)
http://a.postrelease.com/serve/load.js?async=true (60 minutes)
http://s.skimresources.com/js/525X1521902.skimlinks.js (60 minutes)
https://acdn.adnxs.com/prebid/c/8156/pb.js (60 minutes)
https://ds-4047.kxcdn.com/api/v3/domain_settings/a…&client_version=client (60 minutes)
http://p.skimresources.com/?provider_id=91fcfcd52b…6dcf&skim_mapping=true (2 hours)
http://p.skimresources.com/px.gif?ch=1&rn=0.6989898986648768 (2 hours)
http://p.skimresources.com/px.gif?ch=2&rn=0.6989898986648768 (2 hours)
http://static.chartbeat.com/js/chartbeat.js (2 hours)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
https://js-agent.newrelic.com/nr-1153.min.js (2 hours)
https://p.skimresources.com/?provider_id=7719cdb31…0682&skim_mapping=true (2 hours)
http://consent.notebookreview.com/mms/get_loaders?….com%2F&account_id=370 (3 hours)
https://q-stg.quintesse.io/js/q.js (6 hours)
priority - 4 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 36.8KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/images/notebookreview_sprites.png could save 1.7KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/pagead/imgad?id=…DAfBABGAEyCOgqAsspsvMN could save 738B (91% reduction).
priority - 3 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 31.6KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing http://pixel.mathtag.com/event/js?mt_id=1171175&mt…4300-b494-1843431d08a2 could save 767B (56% reduction).
Compressing https://sourcepoint.mgr.consensu.org/consent/v2/11…ctedAny&consentedToAll could save 647B (52% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/js/zuperSlider.js?ver=4.9.8 could save 421B (46% reduction).
Compressing http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/s…cript.min.js?ver=4.9.8 could save 398B (50% reduction).
Compressing http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/t…tyle/wpp.css?ver=4.9.8 could save 247B (46% reduction).
Compressing http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/w…enavi-css.css?ver=2.70 could save 135B (37% reduction).
Compressing http://privacy.crwdcntrl.net/consent/set?c=12412&c…cds=1&cta=1&ccd=1&ct=y could save 129B (36% reduction).
Compressing http://fastlane.rubiconproject.com/a/api/fastlane.…and=0.8383512159343809 could save 111B (37% reduction).
Compressing http://fastlane.rubiconproject.com/a/api/fastlane.…and=0.7986031137406826 could save 109B (37% reduction).
priority - 3 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 29.2KiB (42% reduction).
Minifying https://q-stg.quintesse.io/js/q.js could save 6.4KiB (53% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/c…s/scripts.js?ver=5.0.3 could save 672B (17% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://pixel.mathtag.com/event/js?mt_id=1171175&mt…4300-b494-1843431d08a2 could save 324B (24% reduction).
Minifying http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/t…onsiveAds.js?ver=4.9.8 could save 288B (40% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://notebookreview.us.intellitxt.com/intellitxt/front.asp?ipid=88252 could save 171B (21% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/s…cript.min.js?ver=4.9.8 could save 154B (20% reduction).
priority - 2 Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.
priority - 0 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.23 seconds.
There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 0 Minify HTML
Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 2.1KiB (12% reduction).
priority - 0 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 479B (51% reduction).
Minifying http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/w…enavi-css.css?ver=2.70 could save 127B (34% reduction).
notebookreview.com Desktop Resources
Total Resources | 170 |
Number of Hosts | 63 |
Static Resources | 84 |
JavaScript Resources | 68 |
CSS Resources | 8 |
notebookreview.com Desktop Resource Breakdown
notebookreview.com mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-12-03
notebookreview.com Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 48 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 21 blocking script resources and 7 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/cmp/sourcepoint/sp-config.min.js
https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.8.2/jquery.min.js?ver=4.9.8
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/g…ntend.min.js?ver=7.1.0
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/s…cript.min.js?ver=4.9.8
https://cdn.rawgit.com/vaakash/jquery-easy-ticker/…icker.min.js?ver=4.9.8
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com//rms/ux/javascript/gpt-1.0.min.js
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/t…onsiveAds.js?ver=4.9.8
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/t…e-tracker.js?ver=1.9.2
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/js/css3-me…eries.min.js?ver=4.9.8
https://a.dpmsrv.com/dpmpxl/index.php?q=xSegList&cl=68
http://a.postrelease.com/serve/load.js?async=true
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/js/jquery-1.8.2.min.js
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/js/jquery.raty.min.js
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/js/technologyguide.js
http://s.skimresources.com/js/525X1521902.skimlinks.js
http://notebookreview.us.intellitxt.com/intellitxt/front.asp?ipid=88252
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-includes/js/jquer…in.js?ver=1.1-20110113
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/c…s/scripts.js?ver=5.0.3
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/js/zuperSlider.js?ver=4.9.8
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.8
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/c…s/styles.css?ver=5.0.3
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/s…tyle.min.css?ver=4.9.8
http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/w…enavi-css.css?ver=2.70
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/css/jquery.raty.min.css
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/css/styles.min.css
https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/css/notebookreview.min.css
priority - 22 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 215.3KiB (86% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/uploads/s…dioBookOne-752x473.jpg could save 51.4KiB (95% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/ThinkPadT460.jpg could save 41.7KiB (95% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/simgad/9265575717258341470 could save 31.2KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/uploads/s…ogleStadia-752x450.jpg could save 17.7KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/simgad/2170037941467982882 could save 13.9KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/images/notebookreview_sprites.png could save 1.7KiB (23% reduction).
priority - 16 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://images.intellitxt.com/k/kormorant-1.31.5.min.js (expiration not specified)
https://q-stg.quintesse.io/api/info (expiration not specified)
https://s.dpmsrv.com/dpm_b7eb6c689c037217079766fdb77c3bac3e51cb4c.min.js (expiration not specified)
https://sp-js-releases.s3.amazonaws.com/0/2.0.1083/auto_opt_in-v2.0.1083.js (expiration not specified)
https://cdn.printfriendly.com/printfriendly.js (5 minutes)
https://q-stg.quintesse.io/api/is?st=971572f5-966a-443b-abff-83c3086e2387 (5 minutes)
http://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-WRN4PK (15 minutes)
http://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js (30 minutes)
http://a.postrelease.com/serve/load.js?async=true (60 minutes)
http://s.skimresources.com/js/525X1521902.skimlinks.js (60 minutes)
https://acdn.adnxs.com/prebid/c/8156/pb.js (60 minutes)
https://ds-4047.kxcdn.com/api/v3/domain_settings/a…&client_version=client (60 minutes)
http://p.skimresources.com/?provider_id=2d265ceb32…e698&skim_mapping=true (2 hours)
http://p.skimresources.com/px.gif?ch=1&rn=9.011386689264327 (2 hours)
http://p.skimresources.com/px.gif?ch=2&rn=9.011386689264327 (2 hours)
http://static.chartbeat.com/js/chartbeat.js (2 hours)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
https://js-agent.newrelic.com/nr-1153.min.js (2 hours)
https://p.skimresources.com/?provider_id=608ea2912…3464&skim_mapping=true (2 hours)
http://consent.notebookreview.com/mms/get_loaders?….com%2F&account_id=370 (3 hours)
https://q-stg.quintesse.io/js/q.js (6 hours)
priority - 8 Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.
priority - 3 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 31.5KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing http://pixel.mathtag.com/event/js?mt_id=1171175&mt…4700-b8f4-ae371b2f100d could save 768B (56% reduction).
Compressing https://sourcepoint.mgr.consensu.org/consent/v2/11…ctedAny&consentedToAll could save 648B (52% reduction).
Compressing https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/techguide/v12/js/zuperSlider.js?ver=4.9.8 could save 421B (46% reduction).
Compressing http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/s…cript.min.js?ver=4.9.8 could save 398B (50% reduction).
Compressing http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/t…tyle/wpp.css?ver=4.9.8 could save 247B (46% reduction).
Compressing http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/w…enavi-css.css?ver=2.70 could save 135B (37% reduction).
Compressing http://privacy.crwdcntrl.net/consent/set?c=12412&c…cds=1&cta=1&ccd=1&ct=y could save 128B (36% reduction).
Compressing http://fastlane.rubiconproject.com/a/api/fastlane.…and=0.5931913442909718 could save 112B (38% reduction).
priority - 3 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 29.2KiB (42% reduction).
Minifying https://q-stg.quintesse.io/js/q.js could save 6.4KiB (53% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/c…s/scripts.js?ver=5.0.3 could save 672B (17% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://pixel.mathtag.com/event/js?mt_id=1171175&mt…4700-b8f4-ae371b2f100d could save 324B (24% reduction).
Minifying http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/t…onsiveAds.js?ver=4.9.8 could save 288B (40% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://notebookreview.us.intellitxt.com/intellitxt/front.asp?ipid=88252 could save 171B (21% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/s…cript.min.js?ver=4.9.8 could save 154B (20% reduction).
priority - 0 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.23 seconds.
There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 0 Minify HTML
Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 2.1KiB (12% reduction).
priority - 0 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 479B (51% reduction).
Minifying http://www.notebookreview.com/wp-content/plugins/w…enavi-css.css?ver=2.70 could save 127B (34% reduction).
notebookreview.com Mobile Resources
Total Resources | 167 |
Number of Hosts | 65 |
Static Resources | 87 |
JavaScript Resources | 67 |
CSS Resources | 8 |
notebookreview.com Mobile Resource Breakdown
notebookreview.com mobile page usability
Last tested: 2019-12-03
notebookreview.com Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 3 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<li class="active">1</li>
is close to 2 other tap targets.<li>2</li>
and 2 others are close to other tap targets.<a href="http://www.not…view.com/news/" class="contentType">News</a>
and 2 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="http://www.not…view.com/news/" class="contentType">News</a>
and 9 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="http://www.not…ting-802-11ax/">Forum Spotligh…sting 802.11ax</a>
and 1 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="//www.tabletpcreview.com">TabletPCReview</a>
and 11 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="/about/">About Us</a>
and 3 others are close to other tap targets.notebookreview.com similar domains
www.notebookreview.net
www.notebookreview.org
www.notebookreview.info
www.notebookreview.biz
www.notebookreview.us
www.notebookreview.mobi
www.otebookreview.com
www.notebookreview.com
www.botebookreview.com
www.nbotebookreview.com
www.bnotebookreview.com
www.hotebookreview.com
www.nhotebookreview.com
www.hnotebookreview.com
www.jotebookreview.com
www.njotebookreview.com
www.jnotebookreview.com
www.motebookreview.com
www.nmotebookreview.com
www.mnotebookreview.com
www.ntebookreview.com
www.nitebookreview.com
www.noitebookreview.com
www.niotebookreview.com
www.nktebookreview.com
www.noktebookreview.com
www.nkotebookreview.com
www.nltebookreview.com
www.noltebookreview.com
www.nlotebookreview.com
www.nptebookreview.com
www.noptebookreview.com
www.npotebookreview.com
www.noebookreview.com
www.norebookreview.com
www.notrebookreview.com
www.nortebookreview.com
www.nofebookreview.com
www.notfebookreview.com
www.noftebookreview.com
www.nogebookreview.com
www.notgebookreview.com
www.nogtebookreview.com
www.noyebookreview.com
www.notyebookreview.com
www.noytebookreview.com
www.notbookreview.com
www.notwbookreview.com
www.notewbookreview.com
www.notwebookreview.com
www.notsbookreview.com
www.notesbookreview.com
www.notsebookreview.com
www.notdbookreview.com
www.notedbookreview.com
www.notdebookreview.com
www.notrbookreview.com
www.noterbookreview.com
www.noteookreview.com
www.notevookreview.com
www.notebvookreview.com
www.notevbookreview.com
www.notegookreview.com
www.notebgookreview.com
www.notegbookreview.com
www.notehookreview.com
www.notebhookreview.com
www.notehbookreview.com
www.notenookreview.com
www.notebnookreview.com
www.notenbookreview.com
www.notebokreview.com
www.notebiokreview.com
www.noteboiokreview.com
www.notebiookreview.com
www.notebkokreview.com
www.notebokokreview.com
www.notebkookreview.com
www.noteblokreview.com
www.notebolokreview.com
www.noteblookreview.com
www.notebpokreview.com
www.notebopokreview.com
www.notebpookreview.com
www.noteboikreview.com
www.notebooikreview.com
www.notebokkreview.com
www.notebookkreview.com
www.notebolkreview.com
www.noteboolkreview.com
www.notebopkreview.com
www.noteboopkreview.com
www.notebooreview.com
www.noteboojreview.com
www.notebookjreview.com
www.noteboojkreview.com
www.notebooireview.com
www.notebookireview.com
www.noteboomreview.com
www.notebookmreview.com
www.noteboomkreview.com
www.noteboolreview.com
www.notebooklreview.com
www.noteboooreview.com
www.notebookoreview.com
www.noteboookreview.com
www.notebookeview.com
www.notebookeeview.com
www.notebookreeview.com
www.notebookereview.com
www.notebookdeview.com
www.notebookrdeview.com
www.notebookdreview.com
www.notebookfeview.com
www.notebookrfeview.com
www.notebookfreview.com
www.notebookteview.com
www.notebookrteview.com
www.notebooktreview.com
www.notebookrview.com
www.notebookrwview.com
www.notebookrewview.com
www.notebookrweview.com
www.notebookrsview.com
www.notebookresview.com
www.notebookrseview.com
www.notebookrdview.com
www.notebookredview.com
www.notebookrrview.com
www.notebookrerview.com
www.notebookrreview.com
www.notebookreiew.com
www.notebookreciew.com
www.notebookrevciew.com
www.notebookrecview.com
www.notebookrefiew.com
www.notebookrevfiew.com
www.notebookrefview.com
www.notebookregiew.com
www.notebookrevgiew.com
www.notebookregview.com
www.notebookrebiew.com
www.notebookrevbiew.com
www.notebookrebview.com
www.notebookrevew.com
www.notebookrevuew.com
www.notebookreviuew.com
www.notebookrevuiew.com
www.notebookrevjew.com
www.notebookrevijew.com
www.notebookrevjiew.com
www.notebookrevkew.com
www.notebookrevikew.com
www.notebookrevkiew.com
www.notebookrevoew.com
www.notebookrevioew.com
www.notebookrevoiew.com
www.notebookreviw.com
www.notebookreviww.com
www.notebookrevieww.com
www.notebookreviwew.com
www.notebookrevisw.com
www.notebookreviesw.com
www.notebookrevisew.com
www.notebookrevidw.com
www.notebookreviedw.com
www.notebookrevidew.com
www.notebookrevirw.com
www.notebookrevierw.com
www.notebookrevirew.com
www.notebookrevie.com
www.notebookrevieq.com
www.notebookreviewq.com
www.notebookrevieqw.com
www.notebookreviea.com
www.notebookreviewa.com
www.notebookrevieaw.com
www.notebookrevies.com
www.notebookreviews.com
www.notebookreviee.com
www.notebookreviewe.com
www.notebookrevieew.com
www.notebookreview.con
notebookreview.com Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
notebookreview.com TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.