RADIOCUT.FM Conoce RadioCut | RadioCut


radiocut.fm website information.

radiocut.fm domain name is registered by .FM top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .FM domain zone.

No name server records were found.

and probably website radiocut.fm is hosted by FASTLY - Fastly, US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by FASTLY - Fastly, US hosting company.

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website radiocut.fm position was 8485 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 17737. Now website radiocut.fm ranked in Alexa database as number 10004 (in the world).

Website radiocut.fm Desktop speed measurement score (79/100) is better than the results of 67.91% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

radiocut.fm Mobile usability score (93/100) is better than the results of 34.93% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed measurement score of radiocut.fm (58/100) is better than the results of 50.23% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
Nov-17-2024 10,004112
Nov-16-2024 10,11643
Nov-15-2024 10,15974
Nov-14-2024 10,2331,182
Nov-13-2024 11,4150
Nov-12-2024 11,4150
Nov-11-2024 11,4150

Advertisement

radiocut.fm Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.



radiocut.fm whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.


radiocut.fm server information

Servers Location

IP Address
Country
Region
City

radiocut.fm desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2016-10-14


Desktop Speed Medium
79/100

radiocut.fm Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 8 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 2 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://static.radiocut.com.ar/css/app.52f0ddb28cf9…e9b65f40482f862bf2.css
http://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/4.3.0/css/font-awesome.min.css

priority - 7 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.93 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 5 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 47.6KiB (80% reduction).

Compressing http://q.addthis.com/feeds/1.0/views2.json?pubid=r…d4c59e13883views2json0 could save 45.3KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing https://d31qbv1cthcecs.cloudfront.net/atrk.js could save 2.2KiB (61% reduction).

priority - 4 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://s7.addthis.com/l10n/client.es.min.json (expiration not specified)
http://m.addthisedge.com/live/boost?pub=ra-4f7e1d4…_ate.track.config_resp (60 seconds)
http://s7.addthis.com/js/300/addthis_widget.js (10 minutes)
http://js-agent.newrelic.com/nr-974.min.js (60 minutes)
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (60 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/osd.js (60 minutes)
http://widget.uservoice.com/EburFHDl5X4yEZqv0DCjEg.js (2 hours)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 1 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 10.4KiB (31% reduction).

Compressing http://static.radiocut.com.ar/images/radio_cut_64.png could save 2.9KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://static.radiocut.com.ar/images/timeline_share.png could save 2.7KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing http://static.radiocut.com.ar/images/timeline_form.png could save 2.5KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing http://static.radiocut.com.ar/images/timeline_change3.png could save 1.2KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing http://static.radiocut.com.ar/images/header-bg-right.png could save 1.1KiB (31% reduction).

radiocut.fm Desktop Resources

Total Resources75
Number of Hosts25
Static Resources51
JavaScript Resources22
CSS Resources3

radiocut.fm Desktop Resource Breakdown

radiocut.fm mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2016-10-14


Mobile Speed Bad
58/100

radiocut.fm Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 56 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 1 blocking script resources and 2 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://static.radiocut.com.ar/js/app.16ddee9a29018…40b94515e1754d7f22d.js

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://static.radiocut.com.ar/css/app.52f0ddb28cf9…e9b65f40482f862bf2.css
http://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/4.3.0/css/font-awesome.min.css

priority - 8 Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 27% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.

priority - 6 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://s7.addthis.com/js/300/addthis_widget.js (expiration not specified)
http://s7.addthis.com/l10n/client.es.min.json (expiration not specified)
http://m.addthisedge.com/live/boost?pub=ra-4f7e1d4…_ate.track.config_resp (60 seconds)
http://js-agent.newrelic.com/nr-974.min.js (60 minutes)
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (60 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/osd.js (60 minutes)
http://widget.uservoice.com/EburFHDl5X4yEZqv0DCjEg.js (2 hours)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)

priority - 5 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 47.6KiB (80% reduction).

Compressing http://q.addthis.com/feeds/1.0/views2.json?pubid=r…d4c59e13883views2json0 could save 45.3KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing https://d31qbv1cthcecs.cloudfront.net/atrk.js could save 2.2KiB (61% reduction).

priority - 1 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 9.3KiB (31% reduction).

Compressing http://static.radiocut.com.ar/images/radio_cut_64.png could save 2.9KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing http://static.radiocut.com.ar/images/timeline_share.png could save 2.7KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing http://static.radiocut.com.ar/images/timeline_form.png could save 2.5KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing http://static.radiocut.com.ar/images/timeline_change3.png could save 1.2KiB (22% reduction).

radiocut.fm Mobile Resources

Total Resources69
Number of Hosts25
Static Resources46
JavaScript Resources22
CSS Resources3

radiocut.fm Mobile Resource Breakdown

radiocut.fm mobile page usability

Last tested: 2016-10-14


Mobile Usability Good
93/100

radiocut.fm Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 6 Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <div class="rhstoreicon"></div> is close to 1 other tap targets.
The tap target <a href="#" class="set-lang pt">Português</a> and 10 others are close to other tap targets.

radiocut.fm similar domains

Similar domains:
www.radiocut.com
www.radiocut.net
www.radiocut.org
www.radiocut.info
www.radiocut.biz
www.radiocut.us
www.radiocut.mobi
www.adiocut.fm
www.radiocut.fm
www.eadiocut.fm
www.readiocut.fm
www.eradiocut.fm
www.dadiocut.fm
www.rdadiocut.fm
www.dradiocut.fm
www.fadiocut.fm
www.rfadiocut.fm
www.fradiocut.fm
www.tadiocut.fm
www.rtadiocut.fm
www.tradiocut.fm
www.rdiocut.fm
www.rqdiocut.fm
www.raqdiocut.fm
www.rqadiocut.fm
www.rwdiocut.fm
www.rawdiocut.fm
www.rwadiocut.fm
www.rsdiocut.fm
www.rasdiocut.fm
www.rsadiocut.fm
www.rzdiocut.fm
www.razdiocut.fm
www.rzadiocut.fm
www.raiocut.fm
www.raxiocut.fm
www.radxiocut.fm
www.raxdiocut.fm
www.rasiocut.fm
www.radsiocut.fm
www.raeiocut.fm
www.radeiocut.fm
www.raediocut.fm
www.rariocut.fm
www.radriocut.fm
www.rardiocut.fm
www.rafiocut.fm
www.radfiocut.fm
www.rafdiocut.fm
www.raciocut.fm
www.radciocut.fm
www.racdiocut.fm
www.radocut.fm
www.raduocut.fm
www.radiuocut.fm
www.raduiocut.fm
www.radjocut.fm
www.radijocut.fm
www.radjiocut.fm
www.radkocut.fm
www.radikocut.fm
www.radkiocut.fm
www.radoocut.fm
www.radioocut.fm
www.radoiocut.fm
www.radicut.fm
www.radiicut.fm
www.radioicut.fm
www.radiiocut.fm
www.radikcut.fm
www.radiokcut.fm
www.radilcut.fm
www.radiolcut.fm
www.radilocut.fm
www.radipcut.fm
www.radiopcut.fm
www.radipocut.fm
www.radiout.fm
www.radioxut.fm
www.radiocxut.fm
www.radioxcut.fm
www.radiodut.fm
www.radiocdut.fm
www.radiodcut.fm
www.radiofut.fm
www.radiocfut.fm
www.radiofcut.fm
www.radiovut.fm
www.radiocvut.fm
www.radiovcut.fm
www.radioct.fm
www.radiocyt.fm
www.radiocuyt.fm
www.radiocyut.fm
www.radiocht.fm
www.radiocuht.fm
www.radiochut.fm
www.radiocjt.fm
www.radiocujt.fm
www.radiocjut.fm
www.radiocit.fm
www.radiocuit.fm
www.radiociut.fm
www.radiocu.fm
www.radiocur.fm
www.radiocutr.fm
www.radiocurt.fm
www.radiocuf.fm
www.radiocutf.fm
www.radiocuft.fm
www.radiocug.fm
www.radiocutg.fm
www.radiocugt.fm
www.radiocuy.fm
www.radiocuty.fm

radiocut.fm Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.


radiocut.fm TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.