seleck.cc website information.
seleck.cc domain name is registered by .CC top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .CC domain zone.
Following name servers are specified for seleck.cc domain:
- ns-1472.awsdns-56.org
- ns-2016.awsdns-60.co.uk
- ns-300.awsdns-37.com
- ns-797.awsdns-35.net
and probably website seleck.cc is hosted by WIKIMEDIA - Wikimedia Foundation Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by WIKIMEDIA - Wikimedia Foundation Inc., US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website seleck.cc position was 9574 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 997276. Now website seleck.cc ranked in Alexa database as number 355567 (in the world).
Website seleck.cc Desktop speed measurement score (15/100) is better than the results of 2.65% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
seleck.cc Mobile usability score (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of seleck.cc (32/100) is better than the results of 11.35% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Nov-26-2024 | 355,567 | 7,240 |
| Nov-25-2024 | 362,807 | 4,877 |
| Nov-24-2024 | 367,684 | 1,680 |
| Nov-23-2024 | 369,364 | -295 |
| Nov-22-2024 | 369,069 | -539 |
| Nov-21-2024 | 368,530 | 1,584 |
| Nov-20-2024 | 370,114 | -5,062 |
Advertisement
seleck.cc Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
seleck.cc whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
Domain Name: SELECK.CC
Registry Domain ID: 110403571_DOMAIN_CC-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.discount-domain.com
Registrar URL: http://gmo.jp
Updated Date: 2020-09-28T01:40:03Z
Creation Date: 2014-10-26T06:05:08Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2022-10-26T06:05:08Z
Registrar: GMO Internet, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.com
Registrar IANA ID: 49
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@gmo.jp
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +81.337709199
Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok
Name Server: NS-1472.AWSDNS-56.ORG
Name Server: NS-2016.AWSDNS-60.CO.UK
Name Server: NS-300.AWSDNS-37.COM
Name Server: NS-797.AWSDNS-35.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2022-01-01T23:10:50Z
seleck.cc desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2019-09-03
seleck.cc Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 403 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 3.8MiB (87% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…520b45b05-1024x512.png could save 464.7KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…09/03113627/pic-16.jpg could save 464.4KiB (94% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…0fd49887c-1024x512.png could save 427.6KiB (92% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…d8c8bea7e-1024x512.png could save 418.2KiB (91% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…8/19103034/pic-15.jpeg could save 357.1KiB (97% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…9094834/management.png could save 284.4KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…8/21094522/pic-152.jpg could save 91.4KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…24/pic-25-1024x512.jpg could save 89.8KiB (91% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…2/pic-141-1024x512.jpg could save 75.3KiB (91% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…02/pic-15-1024x512.jpg could save 74.9KiB (92% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…888900fb-1024x512.jpeg could save 72.5KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…408ccc4c-1024x512.jpeg could save 70.7KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…873a76a3-1024x512.jpeg could save 61KiB (92% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…2b5af4fa-1024x512.jpeg could save 59.3KiB (91% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…dd4a5292-1024x512.jpeg could save 51.6KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…HRBP.001-1024x512.jpeg could save 48.1KiB (88% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…17/pic-13-1024x512.jpg could save 46.3KiB (88% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…5/pic-171-1024x512.jpg could save 42.1KiB (89% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…itor.001-1024x512.jpeg could save 40.7KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…6/pic-192-1024x512.jpg could save 36.4KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…dc5304d7-1024x512.jpeg could save 33KiB (89% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…20b45b05-1024x512.jpeg could save 30.7KiB (89% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…8/pic-193-1024x512.jpg could save 29.2KiB (90% reduction).
Compressing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…27/pic-16-1024x512.jpg could save 22.6KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…9/pic-153-1024x512.jpg could save 21.3KiB (30% reduction).
Compressing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…2/pic-152-1024x512.jpg could save 11.5KiB (18% reduction).
Compressing https://dpd29bjwmgbr8.cloudfront.net/wp-content/up…4/pic-15-1024x512.jpeg could save 5.9KiB (25% reduction).
priority - 6 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
priority - 6 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://js.hs-analytics.net/analytics/1567501500000/6080033.js (5 minutes)
http://satori.segs.jp/s.js?c=0d1e7c48 (5 minutes)
https://js.hsadspixel.net/fb.js (10 minutes)
https://js.hsleadflows.net/leadflows.js (10 minutes)
http://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-5BGQN4 (15 minutes)
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=AW-726723986 (15 minutes)
http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/942787…92495?v=2.9.4&r=stable (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/plugins/inferredEvents.js?v=2.9.4 (20 minutes)
https://www.googleadservices.com/pagead/conversion_async.js (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 1 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 13.7KiB (78% reduction).
priority - 1 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 10.5KiB (48% reduction).
Minifying https://seleck.cc/wp-content/plugins/contact-form-…s/scripts.js?ver=5.1.1 could save 653B (17% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://connect.facebook.net/signals/plugins/inferredEvents.js?v=2.9.4 could save 646B (85% reduction) after compression.
priority - 0 Minify HTML
Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.7KiB (12% reduction).
Minifying http://satori.segs.jp/s_inner.html could save 152B (21% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://satori.segs.jp/s?cu=http%3A%2F%2Fseleck.cc%…0d1e7c48&stid=&optout= could save 143B (19% reduction) after compression.
priority - 0 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 291B (20% reduction).
Minifying https://seleck.cc/wp-content/plugins/search-by-alg…omplete.css?ver=2.11.2 could save 123B (14% reduction) after compression.
seleck.cc Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 83 |
| Number of Hosts | 25 |
| Static Resources | 66 |
| JavaScript Resources | 29 |
| CSS Resources | 7 |
seleck.cc Desktop Resource Breakdown
seleck.cc mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2017-05-21
seleck.cc Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 172 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 1.6MiB (70% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/4c05f759-bfed…-a872-346d542a1d1b.png could save 182.5KiB (98% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/5c279c7a-3e7d…8303-abfedd25ddc6.jpeg could save 182.4KiB (85% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/37d0fb8c-1956…-a880-ed2e830b6322.png could save 142.7KiB (97% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/47830ebe-aa3e…-ba7d-e35fa3efa489.jpg could save 107.5KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/113966fa-2c66…9daa-534b8b85d830.jpeg could save 72.6KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/de3b344c-c2ab…-853d-ad1fa05ae93b.jpg could save 50.4KiB (47% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/34fd003b-2d48…-9319-047d24b93ffb.jpg could save 50.1KiB (52% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/8e0b2b0b-7124…-8e9e-176c572332bb.jpg could save 46.5KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/e327f1fa-8e74…-af70-ff00e3fee437.jpg could save 43.3KiB (47% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/3dcc5cc3-e482…-b5ab-97beb7a973e3.jpg could save 42.6KiB (55% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/fc61292e-3f9e…-9ecb-17708f05ca99.jpg could save 38.3KiB (54% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/1e5dd1a7-7517…-8476-ffa44b9059bf.jpg could save 33.5KiB (47% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/2bdbb499-9c49…a140-6b94dc090837.jpeg could save 31.7KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/662b1982-46b8…-af1a-05a7137bf3a8.jpg could save 31.4KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/f6e71f2a-bc5a…-b700-3ad1a440469e.jpg could save 29.5KiB (48% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/6e381482-3cf8…-a636-cf37ddd89ba6.png could save 26.2KiB (16% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/d8544ea4-a592…-b332-b3ca09dea0ef.jpg could save 25.2KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/96e8189c-f24e…-962b-d6dca54509c9.jpg could save 24.4KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/96fa0300-5843…-b2cc-f5f956cd41d1.jpg could save 23.7KiB (49% reduction).
Compressing https://dvljqgv78zqdf.cloudfront.net/c228fc3a-d8ac…-9fa0-14bc0fc15f89.jpg could save 13.5KiB (48% reduction).
priority - 32 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
priority - 9 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 84.8KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing https://satori.segs.jp/s.js?c=0d1e7c48 could save 11.9KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing https://delivery.satr.jp/js/creative_set.js could save 1.6KiB (61% reduction).
priority - 7 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 69.7KiB (66% reduction).
Minifying https://satori.segs.jp/s.js?c=0d1e7c48 could save 8.4KiB (53% reduction).
Minifying https://delivery.satr.jp/js/creative_set.js could save 891B (34% reduction).
Minifying https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/942787395792495?v=2.7.10 could save 630B (79% reduction) after compression.
priority - 6 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://js.hs-scripts.com/2079854.js (15 seconds)
https://satori.segs.jp/s.js?c=0d1e7c48 (5 minutes)
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-5BGQN4 (15 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js (20 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/signals/config/942787395792495?v=2.7.10 (20 minutes)
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js (30 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
seleck.cc Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 51 |
| Number of Hosts | 13 |
| Static Resources | 41 |
| JavaScript Resources | 11 |
| CSS Resources | 2 |
seleck.cc Mobile Resource Breakdown
seleck.cc mobile page usability
Last tested: 2017-05-21
seleck.cc Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 0 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<a href="/997" class="jumbotron-slider__link">Work Hard and…ルなし」の生産的な働き方とは</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.seleck.cc similar domains
www.seleck.net
www.seleck.org
www.seleck.info
www.seleck.biz
www.seleck.us
www.seleck.mobi
www.eleck.cc
www.seleck.cc
www.weleck.cc
www.sweleck.cc
www.wseleck.cc
www.eeleck.cc
www.seeleck.cc
www.eseleck.cc
www.deleck.cc
www.sdeleck.cc
www.dseleck.cc
www.zeleck.cc
www.szeleck.cc
www.zseleck.cc
www.xeleck.cc
www.sxeleck.cc
www.xseleck.cc
www.aeleck.cc
www.saeleck.cc
www.aseleck.cc
www.sleck.cc
www.swleck.cc
www.sewleck.cc
www.ssleck.cc
www.sesleck.cc
www.sseleck.cc
www.sdleck.cc
www.sedleck.cc
www.srleck.cc
www.serleck.cc
www.sreleck.cc
www.seeck.cc
www.sepeck.cc
www.selpeck.cc
www.sepleck.cc
www.seoeck.cc
www.seloeck.cc
www.seoleck.cc
www.sekeck.cc
www.selkeck.cc
www.sekleck.cc
www.selck.cc
www.selwck.cc
www.selewck.cc
www.selweck.cc
www.selsck.cc
www.selesck.cc
www.selseck.cc
www.seldck.cc
www.seledck.cc
www.seldeck.cc
www.selrck.cc
www.selerck.cc
www.selreck.cc
www.selek.cc
www.selexk.cc
www.selecxk.cc
www.selexck.cc
www.seledk.cc
www.selecdk.cc
www.selefk.cc
www.selecfk.cc
www.selefck.cc
www.selevk.cc
www.selecvk.cc
www.selevck.cc
www.selec.cc
www.selecj.cc
www.seleckj.cc
www.selecjk.cc
www.seleci.cc
www.selecki.cc
www.selecik.cc
www.selecm.cc
www.seleckm.cc
www.selecmk.cc
www.selecl.cc
www.seleckl.cc
www.seleclk.cc
www.seleco.cc
www.selecko.cc
www.selecok.cc
seleck.cc Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
seleck.cc TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.