skintour.com website information.
skintour.com domain name is registered by .COM top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .COM domain zone.
No name server records were found.
and probably website skintour.com is hosted by AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website skintour.com position was 67737 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 991480. Now website skintour.com ranked in Alexa database as number 419671 (in the world).
Website skintour.com Desktop speed measurement score (79/100) is better than the results of 67.91% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
skintour.com Mobile usability score (89/100) is better than the results of 31.01% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of skintour.com (53/100) is better than the results of 39.51% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Nov-27-2024 | 419,671 | 2,149 |
| Nov-26-2024 | 421,820 | 578 |
| Nov-25-2024 | 422,398 | -3,273 |
| Nov-24-2024 | 419,125 | 1,441 |
| Nov-23-2024 | 420,566 | -5,514 |
| Nov-22-2024 | 415,052 | -1,436 |
| Nov-21-2024 | 413,616 | -1,030 |
Advertisement
skintour.com Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
skintour.com whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
Domain Name: SKINTOUR.COM
Registry Domain ID: 444491745_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.networksolutions.com
Registrar URL: http://networksolutions.com
Updated Date: 2021-03-11T07:34:24Z
Creation Date: 2006-05-10T22:47:12Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2026-05-10T22:47:12Z
Registrar: Network Solutions, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 2
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: domain.operations@web.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.8777228662
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: NS.LIQUIDWEB.COM
Name Server: NS1.LIQUIDWEB.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2024-10-21T05:01:48Z
skintour.com server information
Servers Location
| IP Address |
|---|
| Country |
|---|
skintour.com desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2018-02-09
skintour.com Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 10 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 6 blocking script resources and 4 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/cache/wpfc-min…480/1517356001index.js
https://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.12.4.min.js
https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/themes/skintour/js/html5.js
https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/cache/wpfc-min…e39/1516818289index.js
https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/cache/wpfc-min…e54/1516818289index.js
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:…subset=latin,latin-ext
https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/cache/wpfc-min…d7/1516818289index.css
https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/cache/wpfc-min…8e/1516818289index.css
priority - 8 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 76.1KiB (52% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/1…andith_086_cropped.jpg could save 7.7KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/0…201608172118242233.jpg could save 6.2KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/footer-logo-4.jpg could save 5.8KiB (51% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/footer-logo-1.jpg could save 5.7KiB (56% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/featured-pigment-2.png could save 3.5KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/footer-logo-2.jpg could save 3.4KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/footer-logo-3.jpg could save 2.8KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/0…5_pump_front_large.jpg could save 2.8KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/0…n-1-e1496772672356.png could save 1.4KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/social-youtube.png could save 742B (49% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/social-twitter.png could save 707B (55% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/social-pinterest.png could save 675B (45% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/0…ront_large-150x150.jpg could save 574B (28% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/0…2118242233-150x150.jpg could save 541B (21% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/social-facebook.png could save 268B (50% reduction).
priority - 3 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.54 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 3 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js (5 minutes)
https://s7.addthis.com/js/300/addthis_widget.js (10 minutes)
https://use.typekit.net/ejj1ibq.js (10 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js (20 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/plugins/ua/linkid.js (60 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 0 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 941B (30% reduction).
skintour.com Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 76 |
| Number of Hosts | 21 |
| Static Resources | 14 |
| JavaScript Resources | 16 |
| CSS Resources | 4 |
skintour.com Desktop Resource Breakdown
skintour.com mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2018-06-06
skintour.com Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 43 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 422.9KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/0…e-for-2018-550x630.jpg could save 38.6KiB (91% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/themes/skintou…ages/ask-banner-bg.jpg could save 33.4KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/1…andith_086_cropped.jpg could save 7.7KiB (61% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/footer-logo-4.jpg could save 5.8KiB (51% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/footer-logo-1.jpg could save 5.7KiB (56% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/footer-logo-2.jpg could save 3.4KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/footer-logo-3.jpg could save 2.8KiB (45% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/0…5_pump_front_large.jpg could save 2.8KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/0…201608172118242233.jpg could save 1.7KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/0…2118242233-230x230.jpg could save 777B (19% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/0…n-1-e1496772672356.png could save 508B (28% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/themes/skintou…cial-share-twitter.png could save 500B (20% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/social-twitter.png could save 277B (22% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/social-pinterest.png could save 245B (17% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/social-youtube.png could save 241B (16% reduction).
Compressing https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/social-facebook.png could save 107B (21% reduction).
priority - 40 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 6 blocking script resources and 5 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/cache/wpfc-min…878/1526341364index.js
https://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.12.4.min.js
https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/themes/skintour/js/html5.js
https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/cache/wpfc-min…e39/1523039457index.js
https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/cache/wpfc-min…e54/1523039457index.js
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:…subset=latin,latin-ext
https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/cache/wpfc-min…d7/1523039457index.css
https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/cache/wpfc-min…21/1523039457index.css
https://www.skintour.com/wp-content/cache/wpfc-min…00/1523039457index.css
priority - 8 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.72 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 5 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js (5 minutes)
https://s7.addthis.com/js/300/addthis_widget.js (10 minutes)
https://use.typekit.net/ejj1ibq.js (10 minutes)
https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js (20 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/plugins/ua/linkid.js (60 minutes)
https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
priority - 0 Minify JavaScript
Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.
Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 941B (30% reduction).
skintour.com Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 79 |
| Number of Hosts | 20 |
| Static Resources | 16 |
| JavaScript Resources | 20 |
| CSS Resources | 6 |
skintour.com Mobile Resource Breakdown
skintour.com mobile page usability
Last tested: 2018-06-06
skintour.com Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 11 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<a href="https://www.sk…ag/anti-aging/">anti-aging</a> and 36 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="https://www.sk….com/tag/2018/">2018</a> and 25 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="http://store.s…loretin-cf-gel">Phloretin CF G…o exception...</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<div class="bx-pager bx-default-pager">12345</div> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="" class="bx-pager-link active">1</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="" class="bx-pager-link">2</a> and 3 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="" class="bx-next">Next</a> is close to 2 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="https://www.sk…bout-dr-irwin/">About</a> and 8 others are close to other tap targets.skintour.com similar domains
www.skintour.net
www.skintour.org
www.skintour.info
www.skintour.biz
www.skintour.us
www.skintour.mobi
www.kintour.com
www.skintour.com
www.wkintour.com
www.swkintour.com
www.wskintour.com
www.ekintour.com
www.sekintour.com
www.eskintour.com
www.dkintour.com
www.sdkintour.com
www.dskintour.com
www.zkintour.com
www.szkintour.com
www.zskintour.com
www.xkintour.com
www.sxkintour.com
www.xskintour.com
www.akintour.com
www.sakintour.com
www.askintour.com
www.sintour.com
www.sjintour.com
www.skjintour.com
www.sjkintour.com
www.siintour.com
www.skiintour.com
www.sikintour.com
www.smintour.com
www.skmintour.com
www.smkintour.com
www.slintour.com
www.sklintour.com
www.slkintour.com
www.sointour.com
www.skointour.com
www.sokintour.com
www.skntour.com
www.skuntour.com
www.skiuntour.com
www.skuintour.com
www.skjntour.com
www.skijntour.com
www.skkntour.com
www.skikntour.com
www.skkintour.com
www.skontour.com
www.skiontour.com
www.skitour.com
www.skibtour.com
www.skinbtour.com
www.skibntour.com
www.skihtour.com
www.skinhtour.com
www.skihntour.com
www.skijtour.com
www.skinjtour.com
www.skimtour.com
www.skinmtour.com
www.skimntour.com
www.skinour.com
www.skinrour.com
www.skintrour.com
www.skinrtour.com
www.skinfour.com
www.skintfour.com
www.skinftour.com
www.skingour.com
www.skintgour.com
www.skingtour.com
www.skinyour.com
www.skintyour.com
www.skinytour.com
www.skintur.com
www.skintiur.com
www.skintoiur.com
www.skintiour.com
www.skintkur.com
www.skintokur.com
www.skintkour.com
www.skintlur.com
www.skintolur.com
www.skintlour.com
www.skintpur.com
www.skintopur.com
www.skintpour.com
www.skintor.com
www.skintoyr.com
www.skintouyr.com
www.skintoyur.com
www.skintohr.com
www.skintouhr.com
www.skintohur.com
www.skintojr.com
www.skintoujr.com
www.skintojur.com
www.skintoir.com
www.skintouir.com
www.skintou.com
www.skintoue.com
www.skintoure.com
www.skintouer.com
www.skintoud.com
www.skintourd.com
www.skintoudr.com
www.skintouf.com
www.skintourf.com
www.skintoufr.com
www.skintout.com
www.skintourt.com
www.skintoutr.com
www.skintour.con
skintour.com Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
skintour.com TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.