TIFF.NET Toronto International Film Festival


tiff.net website information.

tiff.net domain name is registered by .NET top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .NET domain zone.

Following name servers are specified for tiff.net domain:

  • ns-1372.awsdns-43.org
  • ns-1761.awsdns-28.co.uk
  • ns-258.awsdns-32.com
  • ns-718.awsdns-25.net

and probably website tiff.net is hosted by WIKIMEDIA - Wikimedia Foundation Inc., US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by WIKIMEDIA - Wikimedia Foundation Inc., US hosting company.

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website tiff.net position was 9105 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 10012. Now website tiff.net ranked in Alexa database as number 9299 (in the world).

Website tiff.net Desktop speed measurement score (69/100) is better than the results of 49.24% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

tiff.net Mobile usability score (97/100) is better than the results of 49.9% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed measurement score of tiff.net (51/100) is better than the results of 35.73% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
Nov-24-2024 9,29931
Nov-23-2024 9,330-62
Nov-22-2024 9,26844
Nov-21-2024 9,312-29
Nov-20-2024 9,283-36
Nov-19-2024 9,247-36
Nov-18-2024 9,21130

Advertisement

tiff.net Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.



tiff.net whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.


Domain Name: TIFF.NET
Registry Domain ID: 25971972_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com
Registrar URL: http://www.tucows.com
Updated Date: 2021-08-07T18:05:02Z
Creation Date: 2000-04-30T10:17:04Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2022-04-30T10:17:04Z
Registrar: Tucows Domains Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 69
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: domainabuse@tucows.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4165350123
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS-1372.AWSDNS-43.ORG
Name Server: NS-1761.AWSDNS-28.CO.UK
Name Server: NS-258.AWSDNS-32.COM
Name Server: NS-718.AWSDNS-25.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2021-12-30T07:06:10Z

tiff.net server information

Servers Location

IP Address
18.245.253.100
18.245.253.41
18.245.253.109
18.245.253.97
Region
Massachusetts
Massachusetts
Massachusetts
Massachusetts
City
Cambridge
Cambridge
Cambridge
Cambridge

tiff.net desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2017-04-30


Desktop Speed Medium
69/100

tiff.net Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 27 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 259.9KiB (37% reduction).

Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/2BWggWTi…Header_Image.jpg?h=470 could save 61.3KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/1i0f7fSE…cketFund_web.jpg?h=470 could save 52.9KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/99SrjFT…7037e0c/logobar-02.png could save 25.8KiB (97% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/3VjrebcE…15b229f637da.jpg?h=470 could save 25.2KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/2xjWvzT…ff1d7a9/logobar-03.png could save 22KiB (97% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/5SCx8WVW…-submissions.jpg?h=470 could save 18.9KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/5tAWoctG…orthecity_01.jpg?h=470 could save 18.1KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/5tAWoctG…orthecity_01.jpg?h=300 could save 9.3KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/5z8gIqQv…otator_Image.jpg?h=470 could save 9.2KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/68JF33j…754781d/logobar-01.png could save 6.6KiB (87% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/66xI2fSZ…etfund-small.jpg?w=400 could save 5.7KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/4wPMZZjC…/cos-option2.jpg?w=400 could save 2.6KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/3z7N0rW5…ssionsbucket.jpg?w=400 could save 2.2KiB (20% reduction).

priority - 10 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 10 blocking script resources and 4 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://www.tiff.net/js/jquery.js
http://www.tiff.net/js/jquery-ui.js
http://www.tiff.net/js/react.js?
http://www.tiff.net/js/react-dom.js
http://www.tiff.net/js/slick.min.js
http://www.tiff.net/js/app-settings.js?v=1493587464000
http://www.tiff.net/js/header.js?v=1493587464000
http://www.tiff.net/js/carousel.min.js?v=1493587464000
http://www.tiff.net/js/calendar-tool.min.js?v=1493587464000
http://www.tiff.net/js/require.js

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://fonts.googleapis.com/icon?family=Material+Icons
http://www.tiff.net/css/styles.css?v=1493587464000
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto:400…alic,300,100italic,100
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto

priority - 4 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-KH5PJB (15 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
http://dnn506yrbagrg.cloudfront.net/pages/scripts/0050/5235.js?414885 (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
http://www.tiff.net/css/styles.css?v=1493587464000 (2 days)
http://www.tiff.net/js/app-settings.js?v=1493587464000 (2 days)
http://www.tiff.net/js/calendar-tool.min.js?v=1493587464000 (2 days)
http://www.tiff.net/js/carousel.min.js?v=1493587464000 (2 days)
http://www.tiff.net/js/header.js?v=1493587464000 (2 days)
http://www.tiff.net/js/main.js?v=1493587464000 (2 days)

priority - 2 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 19.6KiB (41% reduction).

Minifying http://www.tiff.net/js/moment.js could save 9.3KiB (32% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.tiff.net/js/json2csv.js could save 9.1KiB (58% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.tiff.net/js/app-settings.js?v=1493587464000 could save 1.3KiB (29% reduction) after compression.

priority - 2 Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 5% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.

tiff.net Desktop Resources

Total Resources59
Number of Hosts16
Static Resources43
JavaScript Resources25
CSS Resources4

tiff.net Desktop Resource Breakdown

tiff.net mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2017-05-17


Mobile Speed Bad
51/100

tiff.net Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 40 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 10 blocking script resources and 4 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://www.tiff.net/js/jquery.js
http://www.tiff.net/js/jquery-ui.js
http://www.tiff.net/js/react.js?
http://www.tiff.net/js/react-dom.js
http://www.tiff.net/js/slick.min.js
http://www.tiff.net/js/app-settings.js?v=1495045674000
http://www.tiff.net/js/header.js?v=1495045674000
http://www.tiff.net/js/carousel.min.js?v=1495045674000
http://www.tiff.net/js/calendar-tool.min.js?v=1495045674000
http://www.tiff.net/js/require.js

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://fonts.googleapis.com/icon?family=Material+Icons
http://www.tiff.net/css/styles.css?v=1495045674000
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto:400…alic,300,100italic,100
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto

priority - 31 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 299.8KiB (33% reduction).

Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/2BWggWTi…Header_Image.jpg?h=470 could save 61.3KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/1i0f7fSE…cketFund_web.jpg?h=470 could save 52.9KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/5t8NK2J5…k-man-woman1.jpg?h=470 could save 51.5KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/3VjrebcE…15b229f637da.jpg?h=470 could save 25.2KiB (33% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/5SCx8WVW…-submissions.jpg?h=470 could save 18.9KiB (29% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/1yU9Klzu…Risk_Image_4.jpg?h=300 could save 18.4KiB (32% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/5tAWoctG…orthecity_01.jpg?h=470 could save 18.1KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/7T8CABWJ…171484251067.jpg?h=300 could save 17.5KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/5xPR9Rwl…-FORWEBCOMMS.jpg?h=300 could save 16.1KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/5tAWoctG…orthecity_01.jpg?h=300 could save 9.3KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/66xI2fSZ…etfund-small.jpg?w=400 could save 5.7KiB (28% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/4wPMZZjC…/cos-option2.jpg?w=400 could save 2.6KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing http://images.contentful.com/22n7d68fswlw/3z7N0rW5…ssionsbucket.jpg?w=400 could save 2.2KiB (20% reduction).

priority - 24 Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 2% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.

priority - 6 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-KH5PJB (15 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js (15 minutes)
http://dnn506yrbagrg.cloudfront.net/pages/scripts/0050/5235.js?415290 (60 minutes)
http://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js (2 hours)
http://www.tiff.net/css/styles.css?v=1495045674000 (2 days)
http://www.tiff.net/js/app-settings.js?v=1495045674000 (2 days)
http://www.tiff.net/js/calendar-tool.min.js?v=1495045674000 (2 days)
http://www.tiff.net/js/carousel.min.js?v=1495045674000 (2 days)
http://www.tiff.net/js/header.js?v=1495045674000 (2 days)
http://www.tiff.net/js/main.js?v=1495045674000 (2 days)

priority - 2 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 19.6KiB (41% reduction).

Minifying http://www.tiff.net/js/moment.js could save 9.3KiB (32% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.tiff.net/js/json2csv.js could save 9.1KiB (58% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.tiff.net/js/app-settings.js?v=1495045674000 could save 1.3KiB (29% reduction) after compression.

tiff.net Mobile Resources

Total Resources62
Number of Hosts16
Static Resources46
JavaScript Resources24
CSS Resources4

tiff.net Mobile Resource Breakdown

tiff.net mobile page usability

Last tested: 2017-05-17


Mobile Usability Good
97/100

tiff.net Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 2 Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <span class="number">1</span> and 4 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <span class="number active">2</span> is close to 2 other tap targets.

The tap target <div class="calendar-film-title">Buster&#39;s Mal Heart</div> and 2 others are close to other tap targets.
The tap target <div class="calendar-film-director">Sarah Adina Smith</div> and 3 others are close to other tap targets.

tiff.net similar domains

Similar domains:
www.tiff.com
www.tiff.net
www.tiff.org
www.tiff.info
www.tiff.biz
www.tiff.us
www.tiff.mobi
www.iff.net
www.tiff.net
www.riff.net
www.triff.net
www.rtiff.net
www.fiff.net
www.tfiff.net
www.ftiff.net
www.giff.net
www.tgiff.net
www.gtiff.net
www.yiff.net
www.tyiff.net
www.ytiff.net
www.tff.net
www.tuff.net
www.tiuff.net
www.tuiff.net
www.tjff.net
www.tijff.net
www.tjiff.net
www.tkff.net
www.tikff.net
www.tkiff.net
www.toff.net
www.tioff.net
www.toiff.net
www.tif.net
www.ticf.net
www.tifcf.net
www.ticff.net
www.tidf.net
www.tifdf.net
www.tidff.net
www.tirf.net
www.tifrf.net
www.tirff.net
www.titf.net
www.tiftf.net
www.titff.net
www.tigf.net
www.tifgf.net
www.tigff.net
www.tivf.net
www.tifvf.net
www.tivff.net
www.tifc.net
www.tiffc.net
www.tifd.net
www.tiffd.net
www.tifr.net
www.tiffr.net
www.tift.net
www.tifft.net
www.tifg.net
www.tiffg.net
www.tifv.net
www.tiffv.net

tiff.net Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.


tiff.net TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.