TRACTORREVIEW.RU Трактор-РЕВЮ | Интернет-журнал о сельскохозяйственной спецтехнике


tractorreview.ru website information.

tractorreview.ru domain name is registered by .RU top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .RU domain zone.

No name server records were found.

and probably website tractorreview.ru is hosted by AUTOMATTIC - Automattic, Inc, US web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by AUTOMATTIC - Automattic, Inc, US hosting company.

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website tractorreview.ru position was 46589 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 982327. Now website tractorreview.ru ranked in Alexa database as number 340489 (in the world).

Website tractorreview.ru Desktop speed measurement score (80/100) is better than the results of 69.89% of other sites and shows that the page is performing great on desktop computers.

tractorreview.ru Mobile usability score (100/100) is better than the results of 100% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed measurement score of tractorreview.ru (51/100) is better than the results of 35.73% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
Nov-28-2024 340,4891,958
Nov-27-2024 342,4475,971
Nov-26-2024 348,418-2,695
Nov-25-2024 345,723-11,505
Nov-24-2024 334,2184,306
Nov-23-2024 338,524-6,955
Nov-22-2024 331,56910,140

Advertisement

tractorreview.ru Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.



tractorreview.ru whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.


% TCI Whois Service. Terms of use:
% https://tcinet.ru/documents/whois_ru_rf.pdf (in Russian)
% https://tcinet.ru/documents/whois_su.pdf (in Russian)

domain: TRACTORREVIEW.RU
nserver: ns1.beget.com.
nserver: ns1.beget.pro.
nserver: ns2.beget.com.
nserver: ns2.beget.pro.
state: REGISTERED, DELEGATED, VERIFIED
person: Private Person
registrar: R01-RU
admin-contact: https://partner.r01.ru/contact_admin.khtml
created: 2015-12-15T03:28:34Z
paid-till: 2023-12-15T03:28:34Z
free-date: 2024-01-15
source: TCI

Last updated on 2023-08-14T19:51:30Z

tractorreview.ru server information

Servers Location

IP Address
Country
Region
City

tractorreview.ru desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2019-03-01


Desktop Speed Medium
80/100

tractorreview.ru Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 7 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 70.1KiB (67% reduction).

Compressing https://yastatic.net/q/set/s/rsya-tag-users/bundle.js could save 68.4KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing https://connect.ok.ru/connect.js could save 1.7KiB (57% reduction).

priority - 6 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://connect.ok.ru/connect.js (expiration not specified)
https://sjsmartcontent.org/wns/top2 (expiration not specified)
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js (5 minutes)
https://www.googletagservices.com/activeview/js/cu…osd.js?cb=%2Fr20100101 (50 minutes)
https://an.yandex.ru/system/context.js (60 minutes)
https://mc.yandex.ru/metrika/advert.gif (60 minutes)
https://mc.yandex.ru/metrika/watch.js (60 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (60 minutes)
https://st.top100.ru/top100/top100.js (60 minutes)
https://www.googleadservices.com/pagead/conversion_async.js (60 minutes)
https://yastatic.net/pcode/media/loader.js (60 minutes)
https://sjsmartcontent.org/static/plugin-site/css/…min.css?version=2.13.2 (65 minutes)
https://sjsmartcontent.org/static/plugin-site/js/sjplugin.js (65 minutes)

priority - 6 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 58.1KiB (52% reduction).

Compressing and resizing https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/1…falsifikat-300x188.jpg could save 13.4KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/1…chie-shiny-300x188.jpg could save 10.9KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing https://avatars.mds.yandex.net/get-direct-picture/…0lbCVLrPsBncbHoiQ/orig could save 10.5KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/1…salon-2018-300x188.jpg could save 7.4KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/1…agrosalone-300x188.jpg could save 7.2KiB (76% reduction).
Compressing and resizing https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Voith-300x188.jpg could save 5.3KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing https://tractorreview.ru/logo-tractor6.jpg could save 2KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://tractorreview.ru/Ok-tr.png could save 624B (16% reduction).
Compressing https://informer.yandex.ru/informer/34545215/3_0_B…F_999999FF_0_pageviews could save 430B (29% reduction).
Compressing https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/wp-pos…/stars/rating_over.gif could save 117B (23% reduction).
Compressing https://counter.yadro.ru/hit?q;t12.5;r;s1366*768*2….ru/;0.415887045674026 could save 113B (19% reduction).

priority - 2 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.43 seconds.

There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 2 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://tractorreview.ru/wp-includes/css/dist/bloc…/style.min.css?ver=5.1

priority - 0 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 3.1KiB (26% reduction).

Minifying https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/dynamic…ld/style.css?ver=0.1.0 could save 2.3KiB (24% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/dynamic…flexslider.css?ver=5.1 could save 500B (31% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/wp-pos…ngs-css.css?ver=1.86.2 could save 228B (55% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/captch…nd_style.css?ver=4.4.5 could save 163B (23% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.7KiB (26% reduction).

Minifying https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/contac…s/scripts.js?ver=5.0.5 could save 659B (17% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/dynamic…idebar.js?ver=20160421 could save 500B (49% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/dynamic…gation.js?ver=20160719 could save 414B (37% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/dynamic…js/slider.js?ver=2.6.0 could save 124B (39% reduction) after compression.

tractorreview.ru Desktop Resources

Total Resources179
Number of Hosts37
Static Resources109
JavaScript Resources39
CSS Resources14

tractorreview.ru Desktop Resource Breakdown

tractorreview.ru mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2019-03-01


Mobile Speed Bad
51/100

tractorreview.ru Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 48 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 11 blocking script resources and 14 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

https://tractorreview.ru/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.12.4
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-includes/js/jquery/jqu…grate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/dynamic…lider-min.js?ver=2.6.0
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/dynamic…js/slider.js?ver=2.6.0
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/dynamic…gation.js?ver=20160719
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/dynamic…idebar.js?ver=20160421
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/contac…s/scripts.js?ver=5.0.5
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/wp-pos…tings-js.js?ver=1.86.2
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/wpfron…l-top.min.js?ver=2.0.1
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/q2w3-f…idget.min.js?ver=5.1.4
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=5.1

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

https://tractorreview.ru/wp-includes/css/dist/bloc…/style.min.css?ver=5.1
https://sjsmartcontent.org/static/plugin-site/css/…min.css?version=2.13.2
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/captch…nd_style.css?ver=4.4.5
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-includes/css/dashicons.min.css?ver=5.1
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/captch…le_style.css?ver=4.4.5
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/contac…s/styles.css?ver=5.0.5
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/wp-pos…ngs-css.css?ver=1.86.2
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/wpfron…-top.min.css?ver=2.0.1
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/dynamic…ld/style.css?ver=0.1.0
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/Dynamic%20News%20Lite/style.css
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/dynamic…nericons.css?ver=3.4.1
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/dynamic…flexslider.css?ver=5.1
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Droid+Sans…bset=latin%2Clatin-ext
https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/relate…ss/front.css?ver=1.6.2

priority - 29 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 1.2 seconds.

There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 8 Prioritize visible content

Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.

The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.

Only about 68% of the final above-the-fold content could be rendered with the full HTML response.
Click to see the screenshot with only the HTML response:

priority - 8 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

https://connect.ok.ru/connect.js (expiration not specified)
https://sjsmartcontent.org/wns/top2 (expiration not specified)
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js (5 minutes)
https://an.yandex.ru/system/context.js (60 minutes)
https://mc.yandex.ru/metrika/advert.gif (60 minutes)
https://mc.yandex.ru/metrika/watch.js (60 minutes)
https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (60 minutes)
https://st.top100.ru/top100/top100.js (60 minutes)
https://www.googleadservices.com/pagead/conversion_async.js (60 minutes)
https://sjsmartcontent.org/static/plugin-site/css/…min.css?version=2.13.2 (65 minutes)
https://sjsmartcontent.org/static/plugin-site/js/sjplugin.js (65 minutes)

priority - 7 Enable compression

Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.

Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 70.3KiB (67% reduction).

Compressing https://yastatic.net/q/set/s/rsya-tag-users/bundle.js could save 68.4KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing https://connect.ok.ru/connect.js could save 1.7KiB (57% reduction).
Compressing https://yandex.ru/set/s/rsya-tag-users/data?_rnd=1…%2Ftractorreview.ru%2F could save 226B (32% reduction).

priority - 5 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 46.4KiB (42% reduction).

Compressing https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/0…-harakteristiki-01.jpg could save 43.1KiB (44% reduction).
Compressing https://tractorreview.ru/logo-tractor6.jpg could save 2KiB (41% reduction).
Compressing https://tractorreview.ru/Ok-tr.png could save 624B (16% reduction).
Compressing https://informer.yandex.ru/informer/34545215/3_0_B…F_999999FF_0_pageviews could save 430B (29% reduction).
Compressing https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/wp-pos…/stars/rating_over.gif could save 117B (23% reduction).
Compressing https://counter.yadro.ru/hit?q;t12.5;r;s412*732*24….ru/;0.415887045674026 could save 113B (19% reduction).

priority - 0 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 3.1KiB (26% reduction).

Minifying https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/dynamic…ld/style.css?ver=0.1.0 could save 2.3KiB (24% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/dynamic…flexslider.css?ver=5.1 could save 500B (31% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/wp-pos…ngs-css.css?ver=1.86.2 could save 228B (55% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/captch…nd_style.css?ver=4.4.5 could save 163B (23% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.7KiB (26% reduction).

Minifying https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/plugins/contac…s/scripts.js?ver=5.0.5 could save 659B (17% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/dynamic…idebar.js?ver=20160421 could save 500B (49% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/dynamic…gation.js?ver=20160719 could save 414B (37% reduction) after compression.
Minifying https://tractorreview.ru/wp-content/themes/dynamic…js/slider.js?ver=2.6.0 could save 124B (39% reduction) after compression.

tractorreview.ru Mobile Resources

Total Resources166
Number of Hosts35
Static Resources102
JavaScript Resources34
CSS Resources14

tractorreview.ru Mobile Resource Breakdown

tractorreview.ru mobile page usability

Last tested: 2019-03-01


Mobile Usability Good
100/100

tractorreview.ru similar domains

Similar domains:
www.tractorreview.com
www.tractorreview.net
www.tractorreview.org
www.tractorreview.info
www.tractorreview.biz
www.tractorreview.us
www.tractorreview.mobi
www.ractorreview.ru
www.tractorreview.ru
www.rractorreview.ru
www.trractorreview.ru
www.rtractorreview.ru
www.fractorreview.ru
www.tfractorreview.ru
www.ftractorreview.ru
www.gractorreview.ru
www.tgractorreview.ru
www.gtractorreview.ru
www.yractorreview.ru
www.tyractorreview.ru
www.ytractorreview.ru
www.tactorreview.ru
www.teactorreview.ru
www.treactorreview.ru
www.teractorreview.ru
www.tdactorreview.ru
www.trdactorreview.ru
www.tdractorreview.ru
www.tfactorreview.ru
www.trfactorreview.ru
www.ttactorreview.ru
www.trtactorreview.ru
www.ttractorreview.ru
www.trctorreview.ru
www.trqctorreview.ru
www.traqctorreview.ru
www.trqactorreview.ru
www.trwctorreview.ru
www.trawctorreview.ru
www.trwactorreview.ru
www.trsctorreview.ru
www.trasctorreview.ru
www.trsactorreview.ru
www.trzctorreview.ru
www.trazctorreview.ru
www.trzactorreview.ru
www.tratorreview.ru
www.traxtorreview.ru
www.tracxtorreview.ru
www.traxctorreview.ru
www.tradtorreview.ru
www.tracdtorreview.ru
www.tradctorreview.ru
www.traftorreview.ru
www.tracftorreview.ru
www.trafctorreview.ru
www.travtorreview.ru
www.tracvtorreview.ru
www.travctorreview.ru
www.tracorreview.ru
www.tracrorreview.ru
www.tractrorreview.ru
www.tracrtorreview.ru
www.tracforreview.ru
www.tractforreview.ru
www.tracgorreview.ru
www.tractgorreview.ru
www.tracgtorreview.ru
www.tracyorreview.ru
www.tractyorreview.ru
www.tracytorreview.ru
www.tractrreview.ru
www.tractirreview.ru
www.tractoirreview.ru
www.tractiorreview.ru
www.tractkrreview.ru
www.tractokrreview.ru
www.tractkorreview.ru
www.tractlrreview.ru
www.tractolrreview.ru
www.tractlorreview.ru
www.tractprreview.ru
www.tractoprreview.ru
www.tractporreview.ru
www.tractoreview.ru
www.tractoereview.ru
www.tractorereview.ru
www.tractoerreview.ru
www.tractodreview.ru
www.tractordreview.ru
www.tractodrreview.ru
www.tractofreview.ru
www.tractorfreview.ru
www.tractofrreview.ru
www.tractotreview.ru
www.tractortreview.ru
www.tractotrreview.ru
www.tractoreeview.ru
www.tractorreeview.ru
www.tractordeview.ru
www.tractorrdeview.ru
www.tractorfeview.ru
www.tractorrfeview.ru
www.tractorteview.ru
www.tractorrteview.ru
www.tractorrview.ru
www.tractorrwview.ru
www.tractorrewview.ru
www.tractorrweview.ru
www.tractorrsview.ru
www.tractorresview.ru
www.tractorrseview.ru
www.tractorrdview.ru
www.tractorredview.ru
www.tractorrrview.ru
www.tractorrerview.ru
www.tractorrreview.ru
www.tractorreiew.ru
www.tractorreciew.ru
www.tractorrevciew.ru
www.tractorrecview.ru
www.tractorrefiew.ru
www.tractorrevfiew.ru
www.tractorrefview.ru
www.tractorregiew.ru
www.tractorrevgiew.ru
www.tractorregview.ru
www.tractorrebiew.ru
www.tractorrevbiew.ru
www.tractorrebview.ru
www.tractorrevew.ru
www.tractorrevuew.ru
www.tractorreviuew.ru
www.tractorrevuiew.ru
www.tractorrevjew.ru
www.tractorrevijew.ru
www.tractorrevjiew.ru
www.tractorrevkew.ru
www.tractorrevikew.ru
www.tractorrevkiew.ru
www.tractorrevoew.ru
www.tractorrevioew.ru
www.tractorrevoiew.ru
www.tractorreviw.ru
www.tractorreviww.ru
www.tractorrevieww.ru
www.tractorreviwew.ru
www.tractorrevisw.ru
www.tractorreviesw.ru
www.tractorrevisew.ru
www.tractorrevidw.ru
www.tractorreviedw.ru
www.tractorrevidew.ru
www.tractorrevirw.ru
www.tractorrevierw.ru
www.tractorrevirew.ru
www.tractorrevie.ru
www.tractorrevieq.ru
www.tractorreviewq.ru
www.tractorrevieqw.ru
www.tractorreviea.ru
www.tractorreviewa.ru
www.tractorrevieaw.ru
www.tractorrevies.ru
www.tractorreviews.ru
www.tractorreviee.ru
www.tractorreviewe.ru
www.tractorrevieew.ru

tractorreview.ru Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.


tractorreview.ru TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.