wearecult.rocks website information.
wearecult.rocks domain name is registered by .ROCKS top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .ROCKS domain zone.
No name server records were found.
and probably website wearecult.rocks is hosted by TFN-TW Taiwan Fixed Network, Telco and Network Service Provider., TW web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by TFN-TW Taiwan Fixed Network, Telco and Network Service Provider., TW hosting company.
According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website wearecult.rocks position was 57620 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 997930. Now website wearecult.rocks ranked in Alexa database as number 605312 (in the world).
Website wearecult.rocks Desktop speed measurement score (43/100) is better than the results of 17.28% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.
wearecult.rocks Mobile usability score (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.
Mobile speed measurement score of wearecult.rocks (38/100) is better than the results of 16.76% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.
Weekly Rank Report
| Date | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|
| May-06-2024 | N/A | N/A |
| May-05-2024 | 605,312 | 5,230 |
| May-04-2024 | 610,542 | 8,908 |
| May-03-2024 | 619,450 | -3,441 |
| May-02-2024 | 616,009 | 1,344 |
| May-01-2024 | 617,353 | 5,610 |
| Apr-30-2024 | 622,963 | 4,120 |
Advertisement
wearecult.rocks Rank History
Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.
wearecult.rocks whois
WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.
wearecult.rocks server information
Servers Location
| IP Address |
|---|
| Country |
|---|
wearecult.rocks desktop page speed rank
Last tested: 2018-01-09
wearecult.rocks Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 133 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 1.3MiB (78% reduction).
Compressing http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/feat-img-full-circle.jpg could save 272.3KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/feat-img-bowie-hunger.jpg could save 226.2KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/feat-image-beguiled.jpg could save 204.1KiB (86% reduction).
Compressing http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/…mg-yuletide-terror.jpg could save 116.3KiB (59% reduction).
Compressing http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/CULTBANNER200DPI.jpg could save 66.3KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/…e-MBW-2017-678x438.jpg could save 36KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/…ide-terror-678x438.jpg could save 35.7KiB (65% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/…podcastjpg-678x438.jpg could save 34.7KiB (69% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/…mage-praed-678x438.jpg could save 17.6KiB (66% reduction).
Compressing http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2caa776742ed1a029dd92…45ed3?s=24&d=retro&r=g could save 423B (43% reduction).
priority - 8 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 1 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
priority - 6 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.81 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 1 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/ef6393a4f086233003e56…4d996?s=24&d=retro&r=g (5 minutes)
priority - 0 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.5KiB (15% reduction).
Minifying http://s.gravatar.com/css/hovercard.css?ver=2018Janaa could save 234B (13% reduction) after compression.
priority - 0 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 225B (33% reduction).
wearecult.rocks Desktop Resources
| Total Resources | 63 |
| Number of Hosts | 8 |
| Static Resources | 56 |
| JavaScript Resources | 11 |
| CSS Resources | 8 |
wearecult.rocks Desktop Resource Breakdown
wearecult.rocks mobile page speed rank
Last tested: 2018-01-09
wearecult.rocks Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary
priority - 120 Optimize images
Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.
Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 1.1MiB (79% reduction).
Compressing http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/feat-img-full-circle.jpg could save 272.3KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/feat-img-bowie-hunger.jpg could save 226.2KiB (84% reduction).
Compressing http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/feat-image-beguiled.jpg could save 204.1KiB (86% reduction).
Compressing http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/…mg-yuletide-terror.jpg could save 116.3KiB (59% reduction).
Compressing http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/CULTBANNER200DPI.jpg could save 66.3KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/2caa776742ed1a029dd92…45ed3?s=48&d=retro&r=g could save 495B (31% reduction).
priority - 40 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content
Your page has 9 blocking script resources and 6 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.
None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.
Remove render-blocking JavaScript:
http://wearecult.rocks/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquer…grate.min.js?ver=1.4.1
http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/themes/mh-magazi…s/scripts.js?ver=4.8.4
http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/plugins/wp-spamshield/js/jscripts.php
http://s0.wp.com/wp-content/js/devicepx-jetpack.js?ver=201802
http://s.gravatar.com/js/gprofiles.js?ver=2018Janaa
http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/…s/wpgroho.js?ver=4.8.4
http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/plugins/wp-spams…js/jscripts-ftr-min.js
http://wearecult.rocks/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.8.4
Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:
http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/themes/mh-magazi…te/style.css?ver=2.5.0
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Noto+Serif…00i,700,700i|Righteous
http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/themes/mh-magazi…s/font-awesome.min.css
http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/css/jetpack.css?ver=4.5
http://wearecult.rocks/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/…genericons.css?ver=3.1
priority - 8 Prioritize visible content
Your page requires additional network round trips to render the above-the-fold content. For best performance, reduce the amount of HTML needed to render above-the-fold content.
The entire HTML response was not sufficient to render the above-the-fold content. This usually indicates that additional resources, loaded after HTML parsing, were required to render above-the-fold content. Prioritize visible content that is needed for rendering above-the-fold by including it directly in the HTML response.
priority - 7 Reduce server response time
In our test, your server responded in 0.64 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.
priority - 1 Leverage browser caching
Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.
Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:
http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/ef6393a4f086233003e56…4d996?s=48&d=retro&r=g (5 minutes)
priority - 0 Minify CSS
Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.
Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.5KiB (15% reduction).
Minifying http://s.gravatar.com/css/hovercard.css?ver=2018Janaa could save 234B (13% reduction) after compression.
priority - 0 Enable compression
Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network.
Enable compression for the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 227B (33% reduction).
wearecult.rocks Mobile Resources
| Total Resources | 63 |
| Number of Hosts | 8 |
| Static Resources | 56 |
| JavaScript Resources | 11 |
| CSS Resources | 8 |
wearecult.rocks Mobile Resource Breakdown
wearecult.rocks mobile page usability
Last tested: 2018-01-09
wearecult.rocks Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary
priority - 0 Size tap targets appropriately
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.
The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.
<a href="http://wearecu…category/audio">Audio</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="http://wearecu…s/wp-login.php">Log in</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="http://wearecu…-bowie-on-film" class="bump-view">Hooked To The…Bowie On Film</a> and 3 others are close to other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="http://wearecu…cks/contact-us">Contact us</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.The tap target
<a href="http://wearecu…he-small-print">The small print</a> is close to 1 other tap targets.wearecult.rocks similar domains
www.wearecult.net
www.wearecult.org
www.wearecult.info
www.wearecult.biz
www.wearecult.us
www.wearecult.mobi
www.earecult.rocks
www.wearecult.rocks
www.qearecult.rocks
www.wqearecult.rocks
www.qwearecult.rocks
www.aearecult.rocks
www.waearecult.rocks
www.awearecult.rocks
www.searecult.rocks
www.wsearecult.rocks
www.swearecult.rocks
www.eearecult.rocks
www.weearecult.rocks
www.ewearecult.rocks
www.warecult.rocks
www.wwarecult.rocks
www.wewarecult.rocks
www.wwearecult.rocks
www.wsarecult.rocks
www.wesarecult.rocks
www.wdarecult.rocks
www.wedarecult.rocks
www.wdearecult.rocks
www.wrarecult.rocks
www.werarecult.rocks
www.wrearecult.rocks
www.werecult.rocks
www.weqrecult.rocks
www.weaqrecult.rocks
www.weqarecult.rocks
www.wewrecult.rocks
www.weawrecult.rocks
www.wesrecult.rocks
www.weasrecult.rocks
www.wezrecult.rocks
www.weazrecult.rocks
www.wezarecult.rocks
www.weaecult.rocks
www.weaeecult.rocks
www.weareecult.rocks
www.weaerecult.rocks
www.weadecult.rocks
www.weardecult.rocks
www.weadrecult.rocks
www.weafecult.rocks
www.wearfecult.rocks
www.weafrecult.rocks
www.weatecult.rocks
www.weartecult.rocks
www.weatrecult.rocks
www.wearcult.rocks
www.wearwcult.rocks
www.wearewcult.rocks
www.wearwecult.rocks
www.wearscult.rocks
www.wearescult.rocks
www.wearsecult.rocks
www.weardcult.rocks
www.wearedcult.rocks
www.wearrcult.rocks
www.wearercult.rocks
www.wearrecult.rocks
www.weareult.rocks
www.wearexult.rocks
www.wearecxult.rocks
www.wearexcult.rocks
www.wearedult.rocks
www.wearecdult.rocks
www.wearefult.rocks
www.wearecfult.rocks
www.wearefcult.rocks
www.wearevult.rocks
www.wearecvult.rocks
www.wearevcult.rocks
www.weareclt.rocks
www.wearecylt.rocks
www.wearecuylt.rocks
www.wearecyult.rocks
www.wearechlt.rocks
www.wearecuhlt.rocks
www.wearechult.rocks
www.wearecjlt.rocks
www.wearecujlt.rocks
www.wearecjult.rocks
www.wearecilt.rocks
www.wearecuilt.rocks
www.weareciult.rocks
www.wearecut.rocks
www.wearecupt.rocks
www.weareculpt.rocks
www.wearecuplt.rocks
www.wearecuot.rocks
www.weareculot.rocks
www.wearecuolt.rocks
www.wearecukt.rocks
www.weareculkt.rocks
www.wearecuklt.rocks
www.wearecul.rocks
www.weareculr.rocks
www.wearecultr.rocks
www.weareculrt.rocks
www.weareculf.rocks
www.wearecultf.rocks
www.weareculft.rocks
www.weareculg.rocks
www.wearecultg.rocks
www.weareculgt.rocks
www.weareculy.rocks
www.weareculty.rocks
www.weareculyt.rocks
wearecult.rocks Ping
Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.
wearecult.rocks TRACEROUTE
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.