WSQN.PL Wydawnictwo SQN | Sine Qua Non


wsqn.pl website information.

wsqn.pl domain name is registered by .PL top-level domain registry. See the other sites registred in .PL domain zone.

Following name servers are specified for wsqn.pl domain:

  • ns2.dhosting.pl
  • ns1.dhosting.pl

and probably website wsqn.pl is hosted by OOO "Network of data-centers "Selectel" web hosting company. Check the complete list of other most popular websites hosted by OOO "Network of data-centers "Selectel" hosting company.

According to Alexa traffic rank the highest website wsqn.pl position was 32151 (in the world). The lowest Alexa rank position was 998085. Now website wsqn.pl ranked in Alexa database as number 678569 (in the world).

Website wsqn.pl Desktop speed measurement score (46/100) is better than the results of 19.93% of other sites shows that the page desktop performance can be improved.

wsqn.pl Mobile usability score (99/100) is better than the results of 79.46% of other sites and means that the page is mobile-friendly.

Mobile speed measurement score of wsqn.pl (54/100) is better than the results of 41.82% of other sites and shows that the landing page performance on mobile devices is poor and can be improved.

Weekly Rank Report

DateRankChange
Nov-27-2024 678,56921,523
Nov-26-2024 700,09218,831
Nov-25-2024 718,923-14,869
Nov-24-2024 704,054-34,776
Nov-23-2024 669,2785,548
Nov-22-2024 674,82619,820
Nov-21-2024 694,6463,609

Advertisement

wsqn.pl Rank History

Alexa can identify the popularity of a website as well as its competitors. It is important for website owners and bloggers to know their Alexa ranking because it shows how many visitors have viewed their web page. It gives them a clear idea of how popular their website is on the internet and the ranking of their competitors.



wsqn.pl whois

WHOIS is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system, but is also used for a wider range of other information.


request limit exceeded

wsqn.pl server information

Servers Location

IP Address
109.95.156.5
Country
Poland
Region
Mazowieckie
City
Warsaw

wsqn.pl desktop page speed rank

Last tested: 2018-02-13


Desktop Speed Bad
46/100

wsqn.pl Desktop Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 114 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 1.1MiB (81% reduction).

Compressing and resizing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/okla…ont_1000px-465x663.jpg could save 137.1KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/kost…ont_1000px-465x663.jpg could save 130KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/jado…ont_1000px-465x663.jpg could save 113.3KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/jasn…ont_1000px-465x663.jpg could save 106.5KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/barca-465x663.jpg could save 101.1KiB (82% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/roge…ont_1000px-465x663.jpg could save 90.3KiB (83% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/gola…dka_DRUK-3-465x663.jpg could save 82KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/tkac…ont_1000px-465x663.jpg could save 78.2KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/tyson-cd-mockup-465x663.jpg could save 74.9KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/rzec…ont_1000px-465x663.jpg could save 72KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/rdza-cd-mockup-465x663.jpg could save 65.1KiB (80% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/jordan-cd-mockup-465x663.jpg could save 51.1KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/tlo1.jpg could save 8.2KiB (56% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/social-matryca-yt.png could save 2.7KiB (55% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/social-matryca-twitter1.png could save 1.3KiB (50% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/image…yout/icon-linkedin.png could save 947B (55% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/images/layout/icon-gplus.png could save 928B (51% reduction).
Compressing and resizing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/social-matryca-facebook.png could save 624B (40% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/ajaxy-search…t/images/sf_search.png could save 116B (35% reduction).

priority - 6 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 6 blocking script resources and 15 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.2.1
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/js/me…nd-player.min.js?ver=1
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/js/avia.js?ver=2
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-includes/js/comment-reply.min.js?ver=3.7.14
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/google-langu…or/flags.js?ver=3.7.14
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/ajaxy-search-form/js/sf.js

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/style.css
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/grid.css
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/base.css
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/layout.css?v=1
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/slideshow.css?v=1
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/shortcodes.css
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/js/pr…to/css/prettyPhoto.css
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/js/me…mediaelementplayer.css
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/google-langu…s/style.css?ver=3.7.14
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/google-maps-…t/css/gmw.css?ver=1.30
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/ajaxy-search-form/themes/common.css
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/ajaxy-search…emes/default/style.css
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/related-post…al-m.css?version=1.9.1
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Arimo
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/custom.css

priority - 3 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.48 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 2 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbds.js (20 minutes)
https://translate.googleapis.com/translate_static/css/translateelement.css (60 minutes)
https://translate.googleapis.com/translate_static/js/element/main.js (60 minutes)
http://stats.g.doubleclick.net/dc.js (2 hours)

priority - 1 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 10.3KiB (29% reduction).

Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/js/avia.js?ver=2 could save 5.4KiB (28% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/js/aviapoly.js?ver=1.1.0 could save 3.5KiB (32% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbds.js could save 690B (33% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/ajaxy-search-form/js/sf.js could save 487B (20% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/google-langu…or/flags.js?ver=3.7.14 could save 185B (23% reduction) after compression.

priority - 1 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 5.9KiB (23% reduction).

Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/layout.css?v=1 could save 2KiB (19% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/base.css could save 827B (24% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/style.css could save 740B (97% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/grid.css could save 735B (41% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/js/me…mediaelementplayer.css could save 521B (17% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/shortcodes.css could save 345B (14% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/slideshow.css?v=1 could save 284B (16% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/google-maps-…t/css/gmw.css?ver=1.30 could save 278B (20% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/custom.css could save 142B (100% reduction).
Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/google-langu…s/style.css?ver=3.7.14 could save 139B (18% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.1KiB (11% reduction).

Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/ could save 1.1KiB (11% reduction) after compression.

wsqn.pl Desktop Resources

Total Resources74
Number of Hosts12
Static Resources67
JavaScript Resources17
CSS Resources16

wsqn.pl Desktop Resource Breakdown

wsqn.pl mobile page speed rank

Last tested: 2017-05-12


Mobile Speed Bad
54/100

wsqn.pl Mobile Speed Test Quick Summary


priority - 50 Optimize images

Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data.

Optimize the following images to reduce their size by 492.9KiB (34% reduction).

Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/okla…ont_1000px-465x663.jpg could save 59.1KiB (44% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/wiat…ont_1000px-465x663.jpg could save 49.9KiB (35% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/okla…ont_1000px-465x663.jpg could save 49.4KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/okla…ont_1000px-465x663.jpg could save 43.1KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/arsenal-465x663.jpg could save 42.6KiB (38% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Kobe…an_okladka-465x663.jpg could save 35.2KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/gret…ont_1000px-465x663.jpg could save 35KiB (37% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/klamca-2-5-465x663.jpg could save 32.2KiB (34% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/pyl-…ont_1000px-465x663.jpg could save 32.1KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/giro…ont_1000px-465x663.jpg could save 24KiB (39% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Grim…ie_okladka-465x663.jpg could save 23.9KiB (24% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/sciana-burz-465x663.jpg could save 22.4KiB (31% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/kat-pop2016.jpg could save 13KiB (25% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/kat-fan2016.jpg could save 10.9KiB (21% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/kat-sport2016.jpg could save 10.1KiB (22% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/tlo1.jpg could save 8.2KiB (56% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/image…yout/icon-linkedin.png could save 947B (55% reduction).
Compressing http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/images/layout/icon-gplus.png could save 928B (51% reduction).

priority - 32 Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content

Your page has 7 blocking script resources and 15 blocking CSS resources. This causes a delay in rendering your page.

None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.

Remove render-blocking JavaScript:

http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.10.2/jquery.min.js
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=1.2.1
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/js/me…nd-player.min.js?ver=1
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/js/avia.js?ver=2
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-includes/js/comment-reply.min.js?ver=3.7.14
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/google-langu…or/flags.js?ver=3.7.14
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/ajaxy-search-form/js/sf.js

Optimize CSS Delivery of the following:

http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/style.css
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/grid.css
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/base.css
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/layout.css?v=1
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/slideshow.css?v=1
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/shortcodes.css
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/js/pr…to/css/prettyPhoto.css
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/js/me…mediaelementplayer.css
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/google-langu…s/style.css?ver=3.7.14
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/google-maps-…t/css/gmw.css?ver=1.30
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/ajaxy-search-form/themes/common.css
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/ajaxy-search…emes/default/style.css
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/plugins/related-post…al-m.css?version=1.9.1
http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Arimo
http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/custom.css

priority - 5 Reduce server response time

In our test, your server responded in 0.54 seconds. There are many factors that can slow down your server response time. Please read our recommendations to learn how you can monitor and measure where your server is spending the most time.

priority - 3 Leverage browser caching

Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network.

Leverage browser caching for the following cacheable resources:

http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbds.js (20 minutes)
https://translate.googleapis.com/translate_static/css/translateelement.css (60 minutes)
https://translate.googleapis.com/translate_static/js/element/main.js (60 minutes)
http://stats.g.doubleclick.net/dc.js (2 hours)

priority - 1 Minify JavaScript

Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and execution time.

Minify JavaScript for the following resources to reduce their size by 9.6KiB (29% reduction).

Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/js/avia.js?ver=2 could save 5.4KiB (28% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/js/aviapoly.js?ver=1.1.0 could save 3.5KiB (32% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbds.js could save 695B (33% reduction) after compression.

priority - 1 Minify CSS

Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify CSS for the following resources to reduce their size by 4.8KiB (24% reduction).

Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/layout.css?v=1 could save 2KiB (19% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/base.css could save 827B (24% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/style.css could save 740B (97% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/css/grid.css could save 735B (41% reduction) after compression.
Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/wp-content/themes/angular/js/me…mediaelementplayer.css could save 521B (17% reduction) after compression.

priority - 0 Minify HTML

Compacting HTML code, including any inline JavaScript and CSS contained in it, can save many bytes of data and speed up download and parse times.

Minify HTML for the following resources to reduce their size by 1.1KiB (11% reduction).

Minifying http://www.wsqn.pl/ could save 1.1KiB (11% reduction) after compression.

wsqn.pl Mobile Resources

Total Resources76
Number of Hosts12
Static Resources70
JavaScript Resources17
CSS Resources16

wsqn.pl Mobile Resource Breakdown

wsqn.pl mobile page usability

Last tested: 2017-05-12


Mobile Usability Good
99/100

wsqn.pl Mobile Usability Test Quick Summary


priority - 0 Size tap targets appropriately

Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. Consider making these tap targets larger to provide a better user experience.

The following tap targets are close to other nearby tap targets and may need additional spacing around them.

The tap target <a href="http://www.wsqn.pl/kontakt/">Send us Mail</a> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.

The tap target <a href="#close" class="close_info_text rounded">close</a> is close to 2 other tap targets.

The tap target <button type="submit" class="sf_button searchsubmit">Szukaj</button> and 1 others are close to other tap targets.

wsqn.pl similar domains

Similar domains:
www.wsqn.com
www.wsqn.net
www.wsqn.org
www.wsqn.info
www.wsqn.biz
www.wsqn.us
www.wsqn.mobi
www.sqn.pl
www.wsqn.pl
www.qsqn.pl
www.wqsqn.pl
www.qwsqn.pl
www.asqn.pl
www.wasqn.pl
www.awsqn.pl
www.ssqn.pl
www.wssqn.pl
www.swsqn.pl
www.esqn.pl
www.wesqn.pl
www.ewsqn.pl
www.wqn.pl
www.wwqn.pl
www.wswqn.pl
www.wwsqn.pl
www.weqn.pl
www.wseqn.pl
www.wdqn.pl
www.wsdqn.pl
www.wdsqn.pl
www.wzqn.pl
www.wszqn.pl
www.wzsqn.pl
www.wxqn.pl
www.wsxqn.pl
www.wxsqn.pl
www.waqn.pl
www.wsaqn.pl
www.wsn.pl
www.wsan.pl
www.wsqan.pl
www.wswn.pl
www.wsqwn.pl
www.wsq.pl
www.wsqb.pl
www.wsqnb.pl
www.wsqbn.pl
www.wsqh.pl
www.wsqnh.pl
www.wsqhn.pl
www.wsqj.pl
www.wsqnj.pl
www.wsqjn.pl
www.wsqm.pl
www.wsqnm.pl
www.wsqmn.pl

wsqn.pl Ping

Ping is a networking utility tool to test if a particular host is reachable. It is a diagnostic that checks reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network. In a computer network, a ping test is a way of sending messages from one host to another. Aside from checking if the host is connected to a network, ping also gives indicators of the reliability and general speed of the connection.


wsqn.pl TRACEROUTE

Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to track the pathway taken by a packet on an IP network from source to destination. Traceroute also records the time taken for each hop the packet makes during its route to the destination. Traceroute uses ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol) echo packets with variable time to live values. The response time of each hop is calculated. To guarantee accuracy, each hop is queried multiple times (usually three times) to better measure the response of that particular hop.